It's been a rough week for Fauci's inner circle — and things may get a lot worse



It has been a rough week for scientists who were in Anthony Fauci's inner circle at the outset of the pandemic — particularly for Peter Daszak, head of the scandal-plagued EcoHealth Alliance, and for David M. Morens, senior scientific adviser to the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Where Daszak is concerned, all his years of protest and lab-leak denial were apparently for nought, given that he has finally been cut off from all federal funding.

The Department of Health and Human Services told the British zoologist in a letter Tuesday that it holds him personally responsible for EHA's egregious shortcomings, oversight failures, and opacity as it pertains to the dangerous coronavirus experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Morens, who served as adviser to previous NIAID director Fauci, was accused Wednesday by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic of undermining the operations of the U.S. government; unlawfully deleting federal COVID-19 records; using a personal email to avoid the Freedom of Information Act; "acting unbecoming of a federal employee"; and "likely lying to Congress on multiple occasions."

Daszak makes a cameo in many of the emails that Morens may now be regretting.

The duo, who had a hand in helping Fauci downplay the likely lab origin of COVID-19, may soon face greater consequences than strongly worded letters and suspended funding.

"Dr. Daszak's impending debarment does not shield him from accountability to the American people," Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), chairman of the coronavirus subcommittee, said in a statement Wednesday. "It appears that Dr. Daszak may have lied under oath about his relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and his compliance with NIH grant procedures."

As for Morens, the subcommittee indicated that it now has "overwhelming evidence from Dr. Morens's own email that he engaged in serious misconduct and potentially illegal actions while serving as a Senior Advisor to Dr. Fauci during the COVID-19 pandemic."

Defunding the unaccountable

The Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General blasted EHA in a January 2023 report for dropping the ball on oversight regarding the use of grant money on coronavirus research in China and for failing to comply with federal requirements.

On May 1, the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic released its own report recommending that EHA be permanently cut off from taxpayer funding and that Daszak similarly be cut off as well as criminally investigated.

"Dr. Daszak and his organization conducted dangerous gain-of-function research at the WIV, willfully violated the terms of a multimillion-dollar National Institutes of Health grant, and placed U.S. national security at risk. This blatant contempt for the American people is reprehensible," Wenstrup said in a statement.

On May 15, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services suspended EHA from participating in federal procurement and nonprocurement programs and proposed its debarment "to protect the public interest."

Whereas a suspension is a temporary action, a debarment serves as a more definitive denial of grant money that can last for several years and is used primarily for serious violations, according to Nature.

In the memo detailing the decision, HHS suspension and debarment official Henrietta Brisbon reiterated the grievances raised in both the subcommittee's report and in HHS' OIG report, altogether making clear that EHA was irresponsible and untrustworthy.

This week, HHS went a step farther, commencing formal debarment proceedings against Daszak.

HHS' Tuesday letter to the British zoologist states, "The alleged conduct of EHA is imputed to you, because during all or part of the time relevant, you participated in, knew of, or had reason to know of EHA's improper conduct, through your role as President of EHA, and also as the [program director/principal investigator]" for the relevant grant.

In addition to blackballing Daszak, the letter indicated he is prohibited from doing business with the federal government and receiving a subcontract from a government contractor valued at $35,000 or more and could face a debarment of over three years.

Wenstrup said of Daszak's fate, "EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak's personal debarment will ensure he never again receives a single cent from U.S. taxpayers nor has the opportunity to start a new, untrustworthy organization."

"This step comes just two weeks after the Select Subcommittee released substantial evidence of Dr. Daszak's contempt for the American people, his flagrant disregard for the risks associated with gain-of-function research, and his willful violation of the terms of his NIH grant," added Wenstrup.

Justin Goodman, senior vice president of the White Coat Waste Project — a watchdog that helped expose Daszak's and Fauci's ties to the gain-of-function experiments at the WIV — told Blaze News in a statement, "The current government-wide suspension, and proposed debarment, of EcoHealth and Daszak will ensure taxpayers aren't forced to fund any more of their wasteful and reckless virus hunting and animal experimentation that can cause pandemics and create bioweapons, especially their scary scheme to build a new bat virus lab on U.S. soil."

Outing the opaque

Blaze News previously reported on Morens' admission in correspondence with Fauci's inner circle that he opted to use a personal email account and delete the exchanges thereon to evade Freedom of Information requests.

"As you know, I try to always communicate on gmail because my NIH email is FOIA'd constantly," Morens reportedly wrote to the top scientists involved determining COVID-19's origins, including Daszak, whose subcontractor Ben Hu conducted deadly gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was reportedly one of the first infected with COVID-19; virologists Robert Garry, Kristian Andersen, and Edward Holmes; and others.

On Wednesday, the coronavirus subcommittee released a memo presenting previously unreleased email correspondence further indicating that Morens helped Fauci avoid transparency when discussing the origins of COVID-19 — an alleged "conspiracy amongst the highest levels" to hide and potentially "destroy official records regarding the origins of COVID-19."

In one email to Daszak, dated April 21, 2021, Morens wrote, "PS, i [sic] forgot to say there is no worry about FOIAs. I can either send stuff to Tony on his private gmail, or hand it to him at work or at his house. He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble."

In a May 13, 2021, email where Daszak is copied, Morens wrote, "I suggested to Arthur try to interview Tony directly and connected him to our 'secret' back channel. He emailed Tony a few hours ago."

— (@)

The subcommittee highlighted other efforts by Morens to "backchannel internal NIH information to EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak" and his discussion of Fauci's intention to protect Daszak.

There also appears to be evidence that Morens received instruction from the NIH FOIA office on "how to make emails disappear" upon being met with a FOIA request.

In a Feb. 25, 2021, email where Daszak is copied, Morens wrote, "I learned the tricks last year from an old friend, Marg Moore, who heads our FOIA office and also hates FOIAs."

Like Fauci, Morens apparently preferred to communicate off the record via his personal account.

"I forgot to clarify in my email yesterday that BOTH my gmail and phone calls are now safe. Test is NOT, as it can be FOIA'd, as can my got email," Morens wrote in a Nov. 19, 2021, letter. "So you and Peter and others sshould be able to email me on gmail only, with the caveat that no other govt. employee is copied at a govt address, as all govt emails are potentially FOIA'able."

Morens' help may have come at a price. The subcommittee highlighted one exchange where Morens appears to press Daszak for a "kickback" for his help editing EHA's grant compliance efforts.

According to the subcommittee, Morens undermined NIH efforts to oversee EHA, provided Daszak "with inside information regarding NIH operations," and likely provided false testimony to Congress when giving testifying before the subcommittee on Dec. 22, 2023, and Jan. 18.

The New York Post indicated that when Morens, currently on administrative leave, appeared before the subcommittee Wednesday to testify about the findings detailed in the memo, he faced a bipartisan longue lashing.

Ranking member Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.) said, "It is not anti-science to hold you accountable for defying the public's trust and misusing official resources."

"What troubles me most about your conduct, Dr. Morens, is the extent to which it so willingly betrays decades of dedication, diligence, and decorum from the thousands of federal scientists and public health workers who came before you, who have served alongside you, and who will serve on into the future," added Ruiz.

Goodman told Blaze News that for allegedly lying to Congress about what happened in Wuhan, Daszak, Fauci, and Morens "can and should face fines and jail time for perjury, as Senator Rand Paul has requested in referrals to the DOJ."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

House COVID-19 committee wants Wuhan lab-linked EcoHealth Alliance boss criminally investigated, barred from receiving grants



The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic released a damning report Wednesday recommending that EcoHealth Alliance be permanently cut off from taxpayer funding and that its lab-leak-theory-denying president, British zoologist Peter Daszak, also be cut off from federal funding and criminally investigated.

The report, released ahead of the subcommittee's hearing with Daszak, reiterated previous findings, confirmed old suspicions, and made abundantly clear that EHA — an organization that critics including Rutgers University biologist Richard Ebright have long suspected kicked off the pandemic — behaved both opaquely and irresponsibly before, during, and after the spread of the COVID-19 virus.

"Dr. Daszak and his organization conducted dangerous gain-of-function research at the WIV, willfully violated the terms of a multi-million-dollar NIH grant, and placed U.S. national security at risk. This blatant contempt for the American people is reprehensible," Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), chairman of the subcommittee, said in a statement.

Background

EHA appears to be an organization central to the COVID-19 pandemic — a world-altering event that claimed the lives of millions of people worldwide.

Blaze News previously reported on the basis of federal documents obtained by the watchdog group White Coat Waste Project that the National Institute of Allergy and Infections Diseases, under the leadership of Anthony Fauci, and the United States Agency for International Development funded an EcoHealth subcontractor's work on coronaviruses to the tune of $41 million.

That subcontractor, named as an investigator on the grants, was Ben Hu.

Hu, the Wuhan Institute of Virology's lead gain-of-function researcher on coronaviruses, happened to be one of the three lab researchers infected with COVID-19 in November 2019 — all three possibly patients zero.

The White Coat Waste Project revealed that Hu had his name name on U.S. taxpayer-funded grants awarded by the then-Fauci-led NIAID and the USAID.

An EcoHealth-administered grant of $3,586,760 from the NIAID was marked "pending" for a project titled "understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence" for work to be undertaken from June 2019 through May 2024. The same project had previously received $3,086,735 in American taxpayer money from NIAID between June 2014 and May 2019.

2. @WhiteCoatWaste got the NIAID grant with Ben Hu's name on it. This is the NIH institute that Tony Fauci ran. Ya' know, the guy who said he didn't fund this research?\n\nDocument shows Ben Hu is a subcontractor to Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance.\n\nHu also reports a USAID grant.
— (@)

After the pandemic hit and people started asking questions, Daszak immediately got defensive. After all, he likely knew that these and other paper trails linked his organization to dangerous experiments that may have been responsible the manufacture and escape of a mass-killing virus.

In 2020, he called NIH requests that U.S. federal officials inspect the WIV "heinous" and derided suggestions that the virus might have leaked from the WIV as "conspiracy theories."

In a Sept. 7, 2021, email to David M. Morens, senior scientific adviser to the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a witness grilled in the new House report, Daszak wrote, "The lab leakers are already stirring up bullshit lines of attack that will bring more negative publicity our way — which is what this is about — a way to line up the [gain-of-function] attack on Fauci, or the 'risky research' attack on all of us."

The final report

Over a year after the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General made clear that EHA had dropped the ball on oversight regarding the use of grant money on coronavirus research in China and failed to comply with various federal requirements, the COVID Select Subcommittee released its report further exposing EHA's dangerous failures as well as the "serious, systemic weaknesses at the National Institutes of Health that enabled EcoHealth to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China."

The subcommittee concluded after reviewing over 1 million pages of documents and interviewing dozens of witnesses that:

  • EHA "violated its grant terms and conditions by failing to report a potentially deadly experiment conducted by the WIV";
  • EHA used American taxpayer funds to "facilitate gain-of-function research on coronaviruses in Wuhan at the WIV, contrary to previous public statements, including those by Dr. Anthony Fauci";
  • While trying to get his grant reinstated, Daszak "omitted the material fact that unanalyzed samples and sequences — that the U.S. paid for -— are in the custody and control of the WIV"; and
  • EHA lied about being unable to submit its Year 5 Report and missed the National Institute of Health's deadline for filing it by two years.

The late submission of the five-year report is particularly interesting, as the report concerned the use of NIH funds on research regarding pandemic prevention. The fifth year in which these funds were received and used "concerningly coincides with the time period immediately preceding the COVID-19 pandemic," according to the committee.

The report was released ahead of the committee's hearing with Daszak.

Anthony Bellotti, president and founder of the White Coat Waste Project, said in a statement to Blaze News, "As the group that first exposed and ended EcoHealth's batty boondoggle with the Wuhan animal lab and uncovered damning documents detailing how EcoHealth's reckless gain-of-function experiments probably infected Patient Zero and prompted the pandemic, we're glad that Peter Daszak is finally being hauled before Congress to answer for lying, wasting taxpayers' money, breaking the law, abusing animals, and threatening public health."

"It's high time EcoHealth and Daszak were held accountable because our investigations have documented how they've gotten off scot-free so far and raked in $60 million of new taxpayers’ cash just since the pandemic began," added Bellotti.

"Peter Daszak is the closest this committee will ever get to questioning a Chinese spy," Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas) told the Daily Mail. "His direct role in providing funding for the Wuhan lab and his lies and personal involvement in the COVID cover-up that followed were directly responsible for the public health and economic disaster that followed."

"As the saying goes, 'follow the money,' and the money was flowing directly from Dr. Fauci and the NIH to Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance and his gain-of-function research," continued Jackson. "This IS where COVID originated, and this IS who funded it!"

In his opening remarks, Rep. Wenstrup stressed that "EcoHealth’s actions themselves are a threat to national security."

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Breaking: House spending bill bars EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan lab from receiving USAID funds



Lawmakers on the House Appropriations Committee have introduced legislation that would bar EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology from receiving funds from the U.S. Agency for International Development as well as from other financial streams leading back to the Department of State.

This move, preceded by similar efforts in recent months to block funding to EHA and labs run by America's foes, comes just days after the White Coat Waste Project provided receipts — obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit — that indicated EHA and the Wuhan Institute of Virology had their fingerprints on research that may have ultimately resulted in the deaths of over 1.1 million Americans and well over 6.9 million people worldwide.

Federal documents revealed that EHA, run by British zoologist Peter Daszak, administered at least $38 million in USAID funds to a project on which one of the Wuhan Institute of Virology's "patients zero" was listed as "investigator."

TheBlaze previously detailed the WCW's findings, which showed that this EHA subcontractor, Ben Hu, was not only among the first infected with COVID-19 at the Chinese military-co-opted Wuhan lab, but also happened to be the lab's lead gain-of-function researcher who routinely conducted deadly experiments on coronaviruses.

Extra to the funds doled out to EHA prior to the pandemic, the WCW indicated that since March 2020, USAID has handed over $11 million to the outfit. The Department of Defense reportedly provided Daszak's organization with another $26 million in that time, and the National Science Foundation gave it another $263,801. The National Institutes of Health also renewed a grant to EHA in May.

According to USA Spending, the NIH and other government agencies have been funneling taxpayer money into EcoHealth Alliance since 2008.

The 2024 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Bill, reported by Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R), will put EHA in the same limitations camp as countries deemed foreign adversaries by the secretary of state.

The bill states that none of the funds made available by this act "may be made available to support, directly or indirectly":

  • "the Wuhan Institute of Virology located in the City of Wuhan in the People's Republic of China";
  • "the EcoHealth Alliance, Inc.";
  • "any laboratory owned or controlled by the governments of the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Cuba, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela under the regime of Nicolas Maduro Moros, or any other country determined by the Secretary of State to be a foreign adversary"; or
  • "gain-of-function research."

Chairman Diaz-Balart will speak generally to the bill's contents outside the Capitol Friday morning.

WCW reportedly worked with Appropriations Committee members Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pa.), Rep. Chris Stewart (R-Utah), and Rep. Dave Joyce (R-Ohio) on these measures in recent months.

Justin Goodman, senior vice president at WCW, told TheBlaze in a statement, “Our blockbuster investigations prove that the disgraced EcoHealth Alliance secretively shipped US taxpayer dollars from USAID to COVID’s likely Patient Zero Ben Hu at the CCP-run Wuhan lab for dangerous gain-of-function experiments on humanized mice that violated federal policy and that the FBI and other experts believe caused COVID. But, despite EHA’s calamitous collaboration with the Wuhan animal lab and its well-documented waste, fraud, and abuse, EHA has raked in over $11 million in new taxpayer funds from USAID just since the pandemic began. Enough is enough."

"Taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to fund the reckless white coats who caused COVID or other dangerous virus experiments on animals at home and abroad," said Goodman. "We’re proud to work with Congress to curtail wasteful government spending on animal experiments that can prompt pandemics. The solution is simple: Stop the money. Stop the madness.”

Goodman, who suggested the White Coat Waste Project's recent revelations have helped bolster the rationale behind these spending prohibitions, is "cautiously optimistic" that the limitations will survive in the legislation that ultimately passes, in part since there is precendent: "Congress blocked 2023 State Department and Pentagon funding for the Wuhan lab, and the facility was recently disqualified from NIH funding, too. Lawmakers also enacted a WCW-backed measure last year to defund EcoHealth projects in China."

The White Coat Waste Project will endeavor to continue its work getting gain-of-function experiments defunded and "permanently cutting off the grifters at EcoHealth, the Wuhan lab, and all other animal labs run by China, Russia and adversarial nations," said Goodman.

Extra to this latest effort to preclude EHA from taking more taxpayer money, Iowa Senator Joni Ernst (R) stated Wednesday that she will offer amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act to:

  • "Ensure no defense dollars ever go to China's Wuhan Institute of Virology";
  • "Cut off further payments from the Pentagon to EcoHealth, which collaborated with the Chinese, but refuses to cooperate with our investigations into what they were doing with our dollars"; and
  • "Conduct an independent investigation to determine if EcoHealth diverted any U.S. Defense dollars into the Wuhan Institute, or any other Chinese lab, or spent it to create enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential."
TheBlaze reached out to EcoHealth Alliance and Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart for comment, but neither had responded by the time of publication.

Markup of Fiscal Year 2024 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Bill youtu.be

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'Absolutely reckless': Biden admin renews grant to EcoHealth Alliance —​ the same outfit that funded dangerous experiments at epicenter of pandemic



The National Institutes of Health has renewed a grant to EcoHealth Alliance — the controversial organization that bankrolled dangerous coronavirus experiments at the likely ground zero of the COVID-19 pandemic, China's state-run Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The move comes despite protest from experts, watchdogs, and lawmakers, as well as a damning report from the HHS Office of Inspector General that cast EHA in a particularly unfavorable light.
EHA, still run by British zoologist Peter Daszak, announced Monday that it would once again be meddling with bat coronaviruses on the American taxpayer's dime.
According to the EHA, the objectives of the new NIH- and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease-funded project are to:
  • "characterize and analyze more than 300 new whole genomes and large genome segments of SARSr-CoVs from our archived samples to determine the processes underlying coronavirus recombination and identify viral strains with a high predicted risk of spillover";
  • "analyze archived samples from community- and clinic-based syndromic surveillance of people to identify evidence of spillover, assess behavioral risk factors, and pinpoint evidence of illness"; and
  • "conduct in vitro viral characterization and in silico analysis of epidemiological data to identify hotspots of further CoV spillover risk."

EHA noted that the NIH grant enabling it to resume toying with coronaviruses "reflects a reversal of the previous termination and suspension of an R01 awarded in 2019, but halted in April 2020 due to concerns about continuing collaborative laboratory research with the Wuhan Institute of Virology."

Former President Donald Trump had the grant suspended after the organization's link to gain-of-function research in Wuhan was exposed.

According to USA Spending, the NIH and other government agencies have been funneling taxpayer money into the EHA since 2008.

TheBlaze previously detailed how EcoHealth has, in turn, used American grant money to fund dangerous gain-of-function research — executed in part by foreign entities — on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The HHS Office of Inspector General released a report earlier this year revealing that the NIH knew about potential risks associated with the research being performed in China that had been executed using federal grant money funneled to and through EHA. Despite this knowledge, it "did not effectively monitor or take timely action to address EcoHealth's compliance with some requirements."

According to the report, EHA did not ensure subawards in China were compliant with federal requirements; ensure compliance with reporting and subrecipient monitoring requirements; and it did not always use its grant funds according to federal requirements.

When, for instance, the the NIH asked EHA on Nov. 5, 2021, to provide scientific documentation pertaining to experiments performed in Wuhan, there was no indication that EHA ever obtained that information. EHA officials reportedly confirmed the WIV had proven unresponsive to its request for data.

Republican lawmakers have expressed contempt for EHA, recognizing it as an unaccountable actor in a play that might have gotten millions of Americans killed.

Over 30 House and Senate Republicans sent letters to Lawrence A. Tabak, the director of the NIH, as well as to Sethuraman Panchanathan, director of the National Science Foundation, calling for the suspension of federal funding to EHA.

\u201cEcoHealth Alliance has funded dangerous and potentially deadly research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab run by the Chinese Communist Party.\n\nI led bicameral letters to the Biden Administration demanding the NIH and NSF terminate their grant relationships with EcoHealth.\u201d
— Guy Reschenthaler (@Guy Reschenthaler) 1665439530

Republican lawmakers highlighted EcoHealth's "lengthy history of reporting failures and collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)," noting that the WIV "is a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) laboratory and the likely origin of the COVID-19 pandemic."

The letter to the NIH referenced how, in 2020, Daszak, president of EcoHealth, called NIH requests that U.S. federal officials inspect the WIV "heinous" and derided suggestions that the virus might have leaked from the WIV — to which his organization had directed a significant amount of taxpayer funds — as "conspiracy theories."

During the 117th Congress, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) went beyond mere letters, introducing a bill to prohibit federal funding to the organization. It did not pass.

Ernst said that "[g]iving taxpayer money to EcoHealth to study pandemic prevention is like paying a suspected arsonist to conduct fire safety inspections."

Dr. Richard Ebright, a biologist at Rutgers University, appeared to be of the same mind, having accused EHA of "possibly having caused the pandemic and definitely having repeatedly and gravely violated terms of a US-government grant."

Newsweek reported that White Coat Waste Project, the government watchdog outfit that revealed U.S. taxpayer money was used to bankroll dangerous research at the WIV, blasted the NIH's grant renewal for the EHA.

"The batty taxpayer-funded grant that bankrolled EcoHealth Alliance's dangerous animal experiments in Wuhan that probably prompted the pandemic should be de-funded, not re-funded," said Justin Goodman, senior vice president of the watchdog group.

The Daily Mail reported that Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.) denounced the Biden NIH's move to pour more money into EHA.

"It's absolutely reckless that the NIH has renewed a grant for EcoHealth Alliance given their negligence and the breach of their contract with the NIH on the coronavirus research done at the Wuhan Institute of Virology," said Griffith.

Griffith added, "Until they can demonstrate a willingness to work with Congress to resolve outstanding questions and fulfill all of the terms of their federal contracts, paid for with American taxpayer dollars, all funding should remain suspended, and no new contracts should be awarded."

Sen. Ernst told the Daily Mail, "EcoHealth has already betrayed the trust of American taxpayers by funneling funds to China's Wuhan Institute of Virology for risky experiments on bat coronaviruses that may have unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world. Americans deserve accountability, which is why it's past time to defund EcoHealth."

House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) echoed Ernst and Griffith, telling the Daily Mail, "EcoHealth Alliance funneled taxpayer dollars to the Wuhan lab to conduct mad scientist research on bat coronaviruses that may have started the pandemic. EcoHealth shouldn't receive another dime from the U.S. government until we fully investigate what happened at the Wuhan lab."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!