Democratic strategist gets torched online for claiming threat of crime on NYC subway is an 'imaginary' monster​



A tweet from a Democratic strategist went viral after she claimed that she had "safely ridden" the subway in New York City for 23 years and that critics were complaining about "imaginary monsters."

Elizabeth Spiers was responding to a criticism from Dan MacLaughlin of National Review in the wake of the death of a black man after he threatened passengers and was put into a chokehold by a former U.S. Marine.

"Hi - New Yorker here. I’ve safely ridden the subway for 23 years and my child has never been menaced by a half naked lunatic, but these imaginary monsters in your head are addressable with therapy," tweeted Spiers in response.

\u201cHi - New Yorker here. I\u2019ve safely ridden the subway for 23 years and my child has never been menaced by a half naked lunatic, but these imaginary monsters in your head are addressable with therapy.\u201d
— Elizabeth Spiers (@Elizabeth Spiers) 1683548531

Her tweet received 1.3k likes of support and 1.7 views, but others derided her for downplaying the threat that many face on the New York City subway system.

"I worked in Manhattan from 1996-2020. While the city was safer for many of those years than it is today, if you've never encountered an alarming lunatic on the subway or its platforms, I question what city you've been traveling in," MacLaughlin responded.

Others mocked her for making an argument for subway safety based on anecdotal evidence.

"I know someone from Chicago who’s never been shot. It follows that gun violence in that city is imaginary," replied Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee.

"This is not true. It used to be. If I thought my 13 year old son could safely and routinely take the subway I’d still live in NYC. It’s almost that simple," responded columnist David Marcus.

"Your subway privilege is showing! I have been SPAT on, FOLLOWED, and witnessed full blown ASSAULTS. I have filed MULTIPLE police reports for crimes I’ve witnessed and I only lived in NYC for 7 years. Just because it doesn’t happen to you, doesn’t mean it’s imaginary," replied Hayley Caronia, an OutKick producer.

"My daughter used to be a New Yorker too but her experience was different. She felt unsafe when she rode the subway. So much so that she moved to a different city when her job went remote. Thanks for invalidating her experience because apparently only yours matters," read another popular response.

Many on the left have claimed Jordan Neely was killed because he was a black man, but others defend the actions of the 24-year-old former Marine by pointing out that Neely had 42 prior arrests and had been threatening passengers.

Spiers was the founder of Gawker before it went under and also worked as the editor of the New York Observer when Jared Kushner owned the publication.

Here's more about the death of Jordan Neely:

Jordan Neely video shows U.S. cities are ‘BECOMING GOTHAM’www.youtube.com

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Mike Lee issues challenge to Elizabeth Warren after she claims 'right-wing extremists' have 'hijacked' Supreme Court



Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) challenged Democratic colleague Sen. Elizabeth Warren to a debate this week over her renewed demands to pack the Supreme Court.

What did Warren say?

Amid new allegations of ethical impropriety against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Warren claimed on Monday that "right-wing extremists" have "hijacked" the Supreme Court.

The only antidote for such a disease, according to Warren, is to pack the court with justices who would issue rulings that she agrees with. She couched her demands using language about "rebalance" and protecting "our democracy."

"I'll just be blunt: right-wing extremists have hijacked the Supreme Court of the United States. From shredding abortion rights to rigging the rules against workers and consumers, an out-of-touch majority is substituting their own views for the rule of law," Warren said.

"For the sake of our freedoms and the sake of our democracy, we must expand the Supreme Court to rebalance it, and we need to institute a binding code of ethics for the justices," she added.

\u201cFor the sake of our freedoms and the sake of our democracy, we must expand the Supreme Court to rebalance it, and we need to institute a binding code of ethics for the justices.\u201d
— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1682345129

How did Lee respond?

The Utah Republican offered to debate Warren about the merits of her demands.

"I'd love to debate you on this topic at a mutually agreeable time and venue," he told her on Tuesday.

Lee also directed Warren to his book, "Saving Nine," which makes a comprehensive argument against expanding the Supreme Court. Some of the most compelling evidence in Lee's book focuses on the words of Democrats and liberal-leaning justices who warned against packing the court.

\u201c.@ewarren, I\u2019d love to debate you on this topic at a mutually agreeable time and venue. In the meantime, please take a look at Saving Nine, which I wrote to defend the position previously held by @POTUS\u2014that packing the Supreme Court would harm all of us. https://t.co/6ImeXEpRuV\u201d
— Mike Lee (@Mike Lee) 1682395368

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for instance, was a prominent critic of Democrats'' ideas of "court reform."

"I have heard that there are some people on the Democratic side who would like to increase the number of judges. I think that was a bad idea when President Franklin Delano Roosevelt tried to pack the court," Ginsburg told NPR in 2019.

"[I]f anything would make the court appear partisan then it would be that, one side saying, 'When we're in power we're going to enlarge the number of judges so we'll have more people who will vote the way we want them to,'" she added.

Warren did not respond to Lee's debate challenge.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Elizabeth Warren schooled with prompt constitutional lesson after making demand that contradicts founding document



Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) received a swift lesson in constitutional law on Monday after declaring that Washington, D.C., should become a state.

Without context, Warren simply tweeted, "D.C. should be a state."

\u201cD.C. should be a state.\u201d
— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1675094661

Despite being just five words, the pithy tweet generated a forceful response and had more than 9 million views by Tuesday morning. The reason? People were quick to highlight why the nation's capital is not a state — because the Constitution, in its current form, prohibits D.C. statehood.

  • "Senators should read the Constitution," Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) responded.
  • "I recommend you read the Constitution first before tweeting again about this again," Tim Kennedy suggested.
  • "You should read the constitution," Graham Allen advised.
  • "It makes no sense to make a single city its own state. So, if it weren’t unconstitutional, DC should be absorbed by Maryland. But Liz wouldn’t want that because it’s not really about that. It’s about rigging the system to get two more Democrat senators," one person said.
  • "Do you use the Constitution as a coaster?" another person responded.

Indeed, Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution establishes the district as an independent entity, and thus not as a state, for an important reason.

Politico explains:

The federal district was established in 1790 in accordance with the constitutional imperative that the seat of the federal government be under the control of the Congress, rather than any other entity. (It’s right there in Article I, Section 8.) The reason, as James Madison explained in Federalist 43, was that the federal government had to be independent of any one state’s supervision.

The district—to be no more than 10 square miles—was situated on its spot on the Potomac River as a compromise between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, with George Washington himself surveying the territory.

The only way, therefore, that D.C. could ever become a state is through the ratification of a constitutional amendment granting it statehood.

For years, Democrats have argued that D.C. and Puerto Rico should be granted statehood. While D.C. license plates, for example, bemoan "taxation without representation," Democrats want statehood because it would likely increase their ability to maintain control of Congress.

With two more likely Democratic senators representing each territory and a host of Democratic House members, Republicans would be poorly positioned to ever control Congress short of an electoral landslide.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Elon Musk tweets that America has 'been harmed by having' this Democrat 'as a senator'



Billionaire business magnate Elon Musk has suggested that America has "been harmed by having" Elizabeth Warren serve as a U.S. senator.

Musk, the CEO of Tesla, made the comment in response to news that the Democratic lawmaker from Massachusetts sent a letter to Tesla board chair Dr. Robyn Denholm, pressing her about how Musk's acquisition of Twitter and work running the social media platform is impacting the electric car maker.

"Mr. Musk's acquisition of Twitter and his simultaneous management of both Twitter and Tesla raise significant legal questions about conflicts of interest, compliance with labor laws, and misappropriation of corporate resources. As you know, it is the legal obligation of Tesla’s Board to ensure that its CEO is meeting all his legal responsibilities and serving as an effective leader. I am writing you so that I can better understand how you are dealing with these challenging circumstances so that I can evaluate current laws and current law enforcement in this area," Warren wrote in the letter.

"The United States has definitely been harmed by having her as a senator lol," Musk tweeted in response to a post by Farzad Mesbahi.

Mesbahi had tweeted, "Elizabeth Warren is the last person I would ever want anywhere close to Tesla" — he made the comment when retweeting another account which had tweeted, "Elizabeth Warren has written a letter to Tesla’s board asking whether investors have been harmed by the billionaire tech mogul’s time running the social network, per NYT."

\u201c@farzyness The United States has definitely been harmed by having her as a senator lol\u201d
— Farzad Mesbahi (@Farzad Mesbahi) 1671460870

Musk recently posted a poll asking people whether he should step down from the helm of Twitter — he indicated that he would abide by the outcome of the poll, and ultimately, a majority of the votes (57.5%) supported having Musk relinquish the reins at Twitter, while 42.5% of the votes supported having him remain in charge of the platform.

"I will resign as CEO as soon as I find someone foolish enough to take the job! After that, I will just run the software & servers teams," Musk tweeted on Tuesday.

Last year, Musk referred to Warren as "Senator Karen."

\u201c@SenWarren Please don\u2019t call the manager on me, Senator Karen \ud83d\ude4f\u201d
— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1639409443

Musk posted a poll on Tuesday asking people whether Congress should pass the $1.7 trillion omnibus spending bill.

"Not no, but HELL NO. They don’t even read it before voting on it!" the Hodgetwins responded.

"Guaranteed, not one person voting for it has read the whole thing. If we added that basic requirement, legislation would improve dramatically in favor of the people," Musk replied.

\u201c@hodgetwins Guaranteed, not one person voting for it has read the whole thing. If we added that basic requirement, legislation would improve dramatically in favor of the people.\u201d
— Elon Musk (@Elon Musk) 1671580205

Marlon Brando's infamous Academy Awards stand-in Sacheen Littlefeather denounced by her sisters as a 'fraud' and not an Apache



Sacheen Littlefeather rose to notoriety in 1973 as Marlon Brando's Academy Awards stand-in, denouncing the film industry for its representation of Native Americans. The actress, whose real name was Marie Louise Cruz, died Oct. 2.

Despite Cruz's claims throughout her life of being an Apache, her sisters indicated that Cruz was instead of Hispanic and European heritage and a "fraud."

Brando's denunciatory proxy

Her claim to fame was refusing the Oscar for Best Actor on behalf of Brando, who didn't attend the Hollywood ceremony.

"My name is Sacheen Littlefeather. I'm Apache, and I am the president of the National Native American Affirmative Image Committee," Cruz said as she stood at the podium in a buckskin dress and moccasins.

Cruz said Brando refused the award because of "the treatment of American Indians today by the film industry ... and on television in movie re-runs, and also with recent happenings at Wounded Knee."

Her allusion to Wounded Knee was in reference to the 1973 Incident at Wounded Knee, South Dakota, when armed followers of the American Indian Movement occupied the area for 71 days and shot and paralyzed U.S. Marshal Lloyd Grimm and wounded an FBI agent. The incident, in fact, was still going on during the 1973 Oscars ceremony.

Marlon Brando's Best Actor Oscar win for "The Godfather" | Sacheen Littlefeather youtu.be

Some audience members jeered Cruz during her brief speech.

Clint Eastwood quipped when presenting the next award, "I don’t know if I should present this award ... on behalf of all the cowboys shot in all the John Ford westerns over the years."

The New Yorker's Michael Schulman claimed in September that Cruz "was poised and courageous, and the mockery she endured was flagrantly sexist and racist."

Cruz later claimed that after the event she had been "silenced" and struggled to find work.

Earlier this year, the Academy held a "reconciliation" event for Cruz at the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures.

David Rubin, former Academy president, wrote to Cruz as part of the organization's apology: "The abuse you endured because of [the Oscar speech] was unwarranted and unjustified ... The emotional burden you have lived through and the cost to your own career in our industry are irreparable ... We offer both our deepest apologies and our sincere admiration."

The Academy's accompanying statement said that Cruz had been "discriminated against for the last 50 years."

In a statement ahead of the event, Cruz said, "Regarding the Academy's apology to me, we Indians are a very patient people."

The European Apache

But according to her sisters, Cruz was the daughter of a Spanish-American and a woman of European descent.

The Guardian, taking Cruz at her word, reported last year that her father "was Native American, a mix of Apache and Yaqui, and her mother was white."

Cruz's sister, Rozalind Cruz, had entertained the possibility that their father might have been of "Yaqui and Spanish" descent after all, tweeting as much on Oct. 4, and going so far as to try enrolling in the White Mountain Apache Tribe.

However, nearly one month after printing Cruz's obituary calling her an "Apache activist," the New York Times reported that Jacqueline Keeler, a member of the Navajo Nation, produced genealogical research for Rozalind Cruz that placed her application status in doubt.

The research traced the family of Cruz's father back to Mexico in 1850. There was no evidence of him being a Native American or having any Native ancestry.

Orlandi Cruz told the San Francisco Chronicle that her sister Marie's claim of Apache heritage is "a lie ... My father was who he was. His family came from Mexico. And my dad was born in Oxnard."

Rozalind Cruz concurred: "It is a fraud ... It's disgusting to the heritage of the tribal people. And it's just ... insulting to my parents."

Both sisters identify as "Spanish," suggesting their deceased sister alternatively sought to be an "American Indian princess. It was more prestigious to be an American Indian than it was to be Hispanic in her mind."

In her research into whether or not Marie Louise Cruz was a "Pretendian," Keeler found that "all of the family's cousins, great-aunts, uncles and grandparents going back to about 1880 (when their direct ancestors crossed the border from Mexico) identified as white, Caucasian, and Mexican on key legal documents in the United States."

None of the ancestors belonging to the woman who called herself Sacheen Littlefeather married anyone reportedly Native American or American Indian.

"Keeler proves Littlefeather was a troubled woman who made the stories of others her own," Liza Black, associate professor of history and Native American studies at Indiana University, told the Times.

The paper also reported that [N]ila [N]orthsun — a Shoshone poet and friend of Marie Louise Cruz — suggested that Native identity is "what you feel in your heart, and what your belief system is," seemingly downplaying Cruz's apparent Hispanic and European heritage.

Keeler was not impressed by this line of thinking, writing that "a U.S. citizen of distant French descent does not get to claim French citizenship. And it would be absurd for that person to wear a beret on stage at the Oscars and speak on behalf of the nation of France."

Other controversial race claims

Democrat U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) is another high-profile individual whose claims of being part Native American were put to the test in recent years.

TheBlaze reported that Warren identified as Native American on her application for a job at Harvard University and hand-wrote "American Indian" in the field for "race" on her State Bar of Texas registration card.

In 2018, former President Donald Trump, who had long derided Warren as "Pocahontas," challenged the senator to get a DNA test to prove she was Native American. The test results came back showing that she was only 1/1,024th Native American if at all.

Warren touted this result as proof of her membership to the group.

\u201cBy the way, @realDonaldTrump: Remember saying on 7/5 that you\u2019d give $1M to a charity of my choice if my DNA showed Native American ancestry? I remember \u2013 and here's the verdict. Please send the check to the National Indigenous Women\u2019s Resource Center: https://t.co/I6YQ9hf7Tv\u201d
— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1539608627

Over 200 Cherokee and other Native Americans signed an open letter to Warren calling on her to retract claims she had Native American heritage.

Rachel Dolezal, former head of the Spokane, Washington, chapter of the NAACP and former adjunct professor at North Idaho college, long claimed to have both black and Native American heritage.

In 2015, after years of claiming to be black and teaching African-American studies, Dolezal's relatives revealed she was, in fact, white. She subsequently admitted that she was "born white" but "I do consider myself to be black."

CNN reported that in 2002, she had sued Howard University for allegedly discriminating against her, suggesting the school had favored black students over her at a student art exhibition.

Sen. Liz Warren hit with merciless mockery after tweeting about Indigenous Peoples' Day



Democrat Sen. Liz Warren of Massachusetts was mocked mercilessly online for her own fake ancestry scandal after she tweeted in support of Indigenous Peoples' Day.

Warren tweeted Monday about the holiday meant to replace Christopher Columbus Day by those who resent how Native Americans were treated by Europeans after they arrived in the New World.

"On #IndigenousPeoplesDay, we celebrate the remarkable contributions, cultures, & resilience of tribal nations & Native communities," Warren tweeted.

\u201cOn #IndigenousPeoplesDay, we celebrate the remarkable contributions, cultures, & resilience of tribal nations & Native communities. And we recognize that the federal government must honor its promises to Native peoples & respect Tribal sovereignty & self-determination.\u201d
— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1665420066

"And we recognize that the federal government must honor its promises to Native peoples & respect Tribal sovereignty & self-determination," she added.

Critics of the left-wing senator pounced on the tweet to remind Warren of the embarrassing scandal over her attempts to justify her identification as a Native American based on dubious evidence. At one point, she took a DNA test to prove her indigenous ancestry, and it showed only 1/1024 could be traced back to Native Americans.

"You honored them by stealing jobs, money and opportunities from them. No American alive today has taken more from Native peoples. For at least this one day, you should hide your pale face in shame," responded podcast host Gerry Callahan.

"Happy steal-all-benefits-meant-for-real-natives day, Senator 1/1024th," responded another detractor.

"This is like John Dillinger praising a bank holiday," joked one critic.

"Maybe sit this one out, Navajo White," read another tweet.

"You know what else is remarkable? That you pretended to be Native America your entire life, got caught, and now have no shame in pretending to care about Native Americans," said another critic.

Warren later apologized to Native Americans for the DNA test political stunt after receiving overwhelming criticism from many indigenous groups.

"I am not a tribal citizen," she said at the time. "Tribes and only tribes determine tribal citizenship."

Here's more about the indigenous Warren scandal:

Cherokee Nation: Elizabeth Warren's DNA test is uselesswww.youtube.com

Elizabeth Warren slams McConnell over cost of college tuition, but quickly trips over her past job



Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) tried to slam Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) for opposing President Joe Biden's student loan debt forgiveness plan.

But she quickly tripped over her own contributions to the student loan debt crisis.

What did McConnell say?

On Wednesday, McConnell released a terse statement condemning Biden's plan.

The statement said, in part:

Washington Democrats have found yet another way to make inflation even worse, reward far-left activists, and achieve nothing for millions of working American families who can barely tread water. President Biden’s student loan socialism is a slap in the face to every family who sacrificed to save for college, every graduate who paid their debt, and every American who chose a certain career path or volunteered to serve in our Armed Forces in order to avoid taking on debt. This policy is astonishingly unfair.

How did Warren respond?

Warren deployed her trite narrative about the exploding cost of college.

"Senator McConnell graduated from a school that cost $330 a year. Today it costs over $12,000," Warren responded, referring to the University of Kentucky.

"McConnell has done nothing to fix it — and is irate that the President is stepping up to help millions of working Americans drowning in debt. He can spare us the lectures on fairness," she added.

\u201cSenator McConnell graduated from a school that cost $330 a year. Today it costs over $12,000. McConnell has done nothing to fix it \u2014 and is irate that the President is stepping up to help millions of working Americans drowning in debt. He can spare us the lectures on fairness.\u201d
— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1661463838

Warren loves to talk about the skyrocketing cost of college tuition to argue for student loan debt forgiveness.

Rarely, however, does Warren address why college tuition has skyrocketed and how the federal student loan system incentivizes college administrators to increase tuition prices.

Thus, in response to Warren's attack, it was widely noted that Warren has negatively contributed to the crisis.

As PolitiFact explained, Warren was paid more than $400,000 for teaching two classes at Harvard Law School in 2010 and 2011. One wonders why Warren accepted such a large salary to teach students who most likely received student loans to attend her class if she believes there is something deeply amiss with the system.

Anything else?

Americans hold $1.6 trillion in outstanding student loan debt. That is a problem worth addressing, but simply forgiving debt without fixing the underlying problems will erase any progress Biden's plan will make toward reducing student loan debt.

As the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found in 2017 study, "The average tuition increase associated with expansion of student loans is as much as 60 cents per dollar. That is, more federal aid to students enables colleges to raise tuition more," the Cato Institute explained.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, in fact, estimates it will take just five years for outstanding student loan debt to return to its current level if Biden's plan is fully implemented.

Democrats lose their minds after Supreme Court curbs EPA's ability to regulate carbon emissions to combat climate change



The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday significantly curtailed the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate emissions from power plants, prompting Democrats to froth at the mouth because the court said Congress must act if lawmakers are concerned about climate change.

In a 6-3 decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, the court said that the EPA lacks broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act.

"Congress did not grant EPA ... the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generations shifting approach the Agency took in the Clean Power Plan," the court said.

The case concerned an Obama-era EPA regulation known as the Clean Power Plan, which created guidelines for states to limit carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, and its Trump-era replacement, known as the Affordable Clean Energy rule. The Trump administration repealed the Clean Power Plan after arguing it was illegal and introduced its own rule, known as the ACE rule, as a replacement. But some states and environmental groups sued, claiming Trump's rule did not go far enough and that the EPA had erred by issuing the ACE rule instead of following through with the Clean Power Plan.

The D.C. Circuit Court agreed with the challengers, vacating the ACE rule and sending the matter back to the EPA. But West Virginia and other states petitioned the Supreme Court to review the D.C. Circuit Court's opinion.

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts held that the Obama-era Clean Power Plan was an "unprecedented" power grab by the EPA that "effected a 'fundamental revision of the statute, changing it from [one sort of] scheme of ... regulation' into an entirely different kind."

Roberts ruled that Congress had not intended to give the EPA the regulatory powers it was claiming and that the agency cannot force power plants to move away from fossil fuels and towards renewable resources without further legislation from Congress.

“A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body,” he wrote.

The three liberal justices dissented. Justice Elena Kagan complained that the court's decision removes the power of the EPA to address "the most pressing environmental challenge of our time."

She criticized Congress for being too ignorant and lacking expertise to write sensible laws regulating the environment.

"Members of Congress often don't know enough — and know that they don't know enough — to regulate sensibly on an issue," Kagan wrote.

"Members of Congress often can't know enough — and again, know they can't — to keep regulatory schemes working across time," she added.

\u201cIn dissent, Justice Kagan is like: Congress sucks, so executive agencies have to be able to do this.\u201d
— Gabriel Malor (@Gabriel Malor) 1656597802

Reacting to the decision, Democratic lawmakers were aghast that the court said they have to pass laws before the EPA can issue climate change regulations.

"Our planet is on fire, and this extremist Supreme Court has destroyed the federal government’s ability to fight back," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) tweeted. "This radical Supreme Court is increasingly facing a legitimacy crisis, and we can't let them have the last word."

\u201cOur planet is on fire, and this extremist Supreme Court has destroyed the federal government\u2019s ability to fight back.\n \nThis radical Supreme Court is increasingly facing a legitimacy crisis, and we can't let them have the last word.\u201d
— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1656599584

House Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), called Thursday's decision "catastrophic" and said the Senate needs to nuke the 60-vote filibuster threshold so Democrats can ram through climate laws.

"A filibuster carveout is not enough. We need to reform or do away with the whole thing, for the sake of the planet," she said.

\u201cCatastrophic. A filibuster carveout is not enough. We need to reform or do away with the whole thing, for the sake of the planet.\u201d
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1656598004

Republicans, on the other hand, praised the court for reasserting that the legislative power resides with Congress, not executive branch agencies operated by unelected bureaucrats.

\u201cThis decision confirms Congress, not the EPA, has the authority to create environmental policy. We\u2019ll continue working to protect the environment while making American energy as clean, reliable and affordable as possible. \nhttps://t.co/dPtYYmD3mm\u201d
— Sen. John Barrasso (@Sen. John Barrasso) 1656599632

"SCOTUS' decision today rightfully reins in unreasonable and unlawful attempts to shut down American power plants and energy production," Sen. John Barasso (R-Wyo.) said. "For years Democrats have used overreaching @EPA regulations to side-step Congress and the American people to enact their extreme climate agenda.

"This decision confirms Congress, not the EPA, has the authority to create environmental policy. We’ll continue working to protect the environment while making American energy as clean, reliable and affordable as possible," he added.

OOPS! Psaki accidentally confirms Biden's new 'disinformation' czar is everything critics claim



White House press secretary Jen Psaki defended Nina Jankowicz, the newly appointed head of President Joe Biden's "Disinformation Governance Board" (aka the "Ministry of Truth") by accidentally confirming everything critics are saying.

After first pointing out that Jankowicz called the Hunter Biden laptop "Russian disinformation," Fox News' Peter Doocy asked Psaki if we should "look forward in the future to her censoring internet traffic about the Hunter Biden laptop?"

Psaki answered by doubling down on her former claim that Jankowicz is "an expert on online disinformation."

Oh yes, Jankowicz is a disinformation "expert" all right. She has an extensive history of posting her own disinformation online, including many a whopper about COVID-19, the infamous Steele dossier, Donald Trump, ISIS, and of course the whole Hunter Biden laptop debacle.

"The woman you noted [Jankowicz] has extensive experience and has done extensive work addressing disinformation," Psaki told Doocy before descending into desperation by rattling off a nonsensical list of Jankowicz's "credentials."

Psaki MELTS When Doocy Confronts Her Over Appointee’s Hunter Biden Laptop Conspiracy


► Subscribe to BlazeTV YouTube! https://bit.ly/2KJHuwu► Join BlazeTV! https://get.blazetv.com/► Sign up for our NEWSLETTER: https://theblaze.com/newslettersC...

The Twitterverse was quick to call BS on Psaki's latest load of waffle.

In America, the biggest source of disinformation is this person.
— Sacred Swastika is not Nazi Hikenkruez (@Sacred Swastika is not Nazi Hikenkruez) 1651531906
By extensive experience you mean the spread of disinformation?
— Nat Helm (@Nat Helm) 1651524553


She does have experience in spreading disinformation, so there\u2019s that!
— Sassy Q (@Sassy Q) 1651540777


pic.twitter.com/Dou275UAGV
— Christopher Pearce (@Christopher Pearce) 1651527719


Out of 4
— William Murray (@William Murray) 1651539897


Holy crap, I was so distracted by how unlikable she was that I almost forgot how crazy it is that she was defending a "disinformation governance board"
— Norkulus (@Norkulus) 1651537938


2+2=5 2+2=5 2+2=5 repeat repeat repeat
— Elizabeth Tarin (@Elizabeth Tarin) 1651523855


https://vm.tiktok.com/TTPdb1qcVe/
— Bill Stacy (@Bill Stacy) 1651523405
By extensive experience you mean an expert in the spread of disinformation?
— The Best Is Coming (@The Best Is Coming) 1651577227