‘Goodbye’: If your man does this, it’s time to go



Times have changed, and in terms of relationships — it hasn’t been for the better.

Women everywhere are finding themselves growing older while their long-term partners are failing to get down on one knee and commit, and one recent post on X brought this glaring and painful issue into the spotlight.

“I have a friend who has been in a relationship for five years. She is 32 now, he is 35. He says that he loves her but doesn’t feel ready to move in or commit. Thoughts?” Italian journalist Alessandra Bocchi posted on X.

Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” has some advice.


“I will say that I am not really in the business of telling people that I do not know to break up,” Stuckey begins. “There are a lot of different details and different nuances in people’s relationships. There could be different caveats, different circumstances.”

“But this person asked, in general, what are your thoughts about this situation. And from the information that we have, someone who is 32 and 35, they’ve been dating for five years, she doesn’t give any extenuating circumstances or reasons other than he doesn’t feel ready to move in or commit,” she continues.

“Based on that knowledge, I am saying goodbye. Goodbye. You break up with him, and you move on. No, no, no. He is a man-child at this point. There is a failure to launch. There is something going on here, and there is no innocuous good reason, no justification, no valid excuse for him not to commit,” she adds.

While women, often blinded by the love they feel for someone in a relationship, will psychoanalyze the situation and find reasons for their man’s refusal to commit — the real reason is much simpler.

“It is usually that he simply does not want to. Because the phrase is true,” Stuckey concludes, “If he wanted to, he would.”

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'She said YES': Sen. Tim Scott announces engagement



Republican Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina announced that he is engaged.

"She said YES. Mindy, thank you for making me the luckiest man in the world," Scott tweeted, sharing a photo that captured him down on one knee and another photo of the happy couple smiling together.

Scott said they plan to get married this year, according to the Washington Post, which noted that Scott, 58, has never been married, but was previously engaged over 20 years ago.

"As a guy who is mostly an introvert and on the quiet side, having to have a conversation about the engagement is a little, you know, uncomfortable in a way, but it's the most exciting thing I'll do with my life besides making Jesus my Lord," Scott said, according to the Washington Post. "I've been very patient and prayerful, and I'm really excited and somewhat nervous, and I couldn't be more thankful for having found a soul mate and someone who shares a lot of the same interests, passions and goals that I do," he noted.

"My joke is as soon as I saw her picture, I figured it out. But the truth is about two weeks into it, I knew there was something very different about her and her faith," he said, according to the Post. "In our first conversation that went about an hour and a half or two, we ended up deciding to do a Bible study together."

Scott, who launched a presidential bid but later dropped out last year, endorsed former President Donald Trump last week, even as former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, who appointed Scott to the U.S. Senate more than a decade ago, challenges Trump for the GOP presidential nod.

"Congratulations, Tim and Mindy! Sharon and I are so happy for both of you, and wish you a long, happy life together," GOP Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, who also endorsed Trump earlier this month, tweeted in response to Scott's engagment announcement on X.

— (@)

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Tim Scott Announces Engagement To Girlfriend

‘Mindy, thank you for making me the luckiest man in the world'

Why Elon Musk Nuking X Headlines Is A Good Thing

Musk just saved a whole lot of X users from having to deal with the comments of the solid majority who don’t read articles before posting.

If You’re Dissing Millie Bobby Brown For Getting Engaged At 19, You Might Be The Problem

A committed, mutually sacrificial marriage is far less scary than intentionally going through life alone for fear of narrowing your options.

More Money And Gimmicks Won’t Improve Public Schools, But Competition From Charters Will

Simply spending more money on new interventions won't improve American public education, and it's wrong to dismiss the promise of charter schools.

Biden Announces Stephen Benjamin As Director Of The Office Of Public Engagement

Lance Bottoms will return home to Atlanta

Adventures in dialogue with the other side

While I was on vacation, I saw an interesting tweet from a member of the "liberal media" calling President Trump a racist. That in and of itself isn't interesting, because it happens 10,000 times a day regardless of what the president says or does. But Emily Cahn Singer, senior political reporter with Mic, said the president was engaging in "open bigotry" for the following tweet:

As I read the president's skepticism to importing people from a known terrorist-sponsoring state, I wondered where Emily was seeing bigotry here. So I decided to earnestly engage her with the following:

Clearly, there must be arguments on the Left that don't always devolve into identity politics, race cards, etc. At least I hope there are. And yet ... Emily chose to respond with more of the same.

Right away, you can see we're having two totally difference conversations. She wants to drown in identity politics. I want see if we have sound public policy to protect innocent Americans, regardless of how they identify. Thus, I asked her what her screening process would be. Check out her answer:

She flippantly sent me the form/guidelines for applying for citizenship, which of course didn't answer my question. Not one to be easily deterred, I decided to try again.

More race-baiting identity politics. Surely, two somewhat intelligent members of the media can set the ad hominem aside long enough to have an adult conversation on an open forum with our thousands of followers watching? I decided to give it another go.

Apparently we can't.

Nevertheless, my Savior leaves 99 found sheep behind to go and bring back the one that is lost, like I was. Therefore, I gave Emily one more opportunity to tell me what substantive issues she has with our immigration policies in general and the president's concerns about importing folks from enemy regimes in particular.

I never got a reply back.

Keep reading...Show less