Biden slams WNBA 'pay gap' amid Caitlin Clark salary controversy. But is there one?



Caitlin Clark's WNBA salary has sparked widespread attention — including President Joe Biden's.

“Women in sports continue to push new boundaries and inspire us all. But right now we’re seeing that even if you’re the best, women are not paid their fair share. It’s time that we give our daughters the same opportunities as our sons and ensure women are paid what they deserve,” Biden tweeted on X.

Biden’s tweet followed Clark being selected as the number one overall pick by the Indiana Fever in the 2024 WNBA draft. The star is slated to earn only $76,535 in her rookie season and $338,056 over the subsequent four seasons.

While the disparity between the WNBA and the NBA salaries is clear, Sara Gonzales — unlike Joe Biden — knows why the “pay gap” exists.

“It’s not the fact that nobody watches the freaking WNBA,” Gonzales mocks. “It’s definitely sexism because the president said so.”

While feminists are upset that Clark isn’t being paid what they believe her to be worth, Stu Burguiere notes that the sport itself has never made money, and the addition of one star player won’t make a huge difference.

“This is a league that has never made money, and it’s been around for 26 years. It has lost money every single year it’s been in existence, and it has been subsidized by the boy players every single year it’s been in existence,” Burguiere says.

The WNBA is reportedly making 60 million a season with its TV contracts while the NBA is making 2.7 billion annually.

“If Biden’s saying, ‘Get paid what she deserves’ and ‘We want equal pay,’ they might have to cut her pay a little bit,” Dan Andros adds, agreeing with Gonzales and Burguiere.


Want more from Sara Gonzales?

To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred take to news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Iceland's prime minister goes on strike over 'gender equality' and 'wage gap' — listed World Economic Forum meetings as a solution



Icelandic Prime Minister Katrin Jakobsdóttir went on strike to protest gender discrimination and stated the country is still fighting for gender quality.

A nationwide "women's strike" protest was meant to call out pay discrimination, gendered violence, and inequality between the sexes in general. The demonstrations marked the first time the entire country had participated in a day of absence in the workplace since 1975.

"We have not yet reached our goals of full gender equality and we are still tackling the gender-based wage gap, which is unacceptable in 2023," Jakobsdóttir said, according to Fox News.

"I will not work this day, as I expect all the women [in cabinet] will do as well," Jakobsdóttir added.

The widely debunked theory of a gender pay gap supposes that men and women earn the same amount of money for doing the exact same work. Total earnings often show a difference between genders without factoring in work hours, profession, or time lapses in a career.

The gap is quite small in Iceland, at about 10%, compared to the United States, where women earn 83 cents for every dollar a man earns, a figure that has barely moved in two decades.

Iceland consistently ranks at the top of equality indexes, however, including at the World Economic Forum where Jakobsdóttir wrote an article in 2017 boasting the country's gender successes.

Listed a WEF "agenda contributor," the prime minister noted that Iceland still has work to do while lauding the country's parental care and child leave programs. Of course, she also listed the WEF's "Women Leaders Global Forum" as a "part of the solution."

"This unique forum" allows female leaders to "share ideas and solutions that help build better societies and promote gender equality," she said.

Jakobsdóttir's past comments typically side with left-wing feminist talking points, including that she was "gravely disappointed and heartbroken" to see the U.S. Supreme Court overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022.

In 2020, the Icelandic leader said that in regard to "rebuilding and reimagining societies after COVID-19," it was crucial to keep "gender & racial equality, democracy & social justice at the forefront."

In March 2023 she complained of gender bias in algorithms based on the fact that they are mostly designed by men.

"We have a data gap on women and if the algorithms are mainly designed by men, we need to do everything we can to ensure that new technologies make our world more equal," she wrote on her X account.

Algorithms are exactly as flawed as their creators, with the same built in gender biases. We have a data gap on women and if the algorithms are mainly designed by men, we need to do everything we can to ensure that new technologies make our world more equal - not unequal. #CSW67 pic.twitter.com/nlrtlZ6JNw
— Katrín Jakobsdóttir (@katrinjak) March 6, 2023

After former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern stepped down, Jakobsdóttir said that the socialist would be "missed on the world stage" and was a "powerful role model for women & girls worldwide."

Ardern left office mainly due to backlash over hard COVID-19 restrictions. While in power she often refused to take questions from the media and boasted about the harshness of her rules.

"We are still tackling gender-based violence, which has been a priority for my government to tackle," Jakobsdóttir said during her protest.

Her cabinet has maintained an equal number of men and women.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Democrats Intend To Submit Legislation Taking On Long Debunked ‘Pay Gap’ Talking Point

The Democrats will reportedly submit legislation to call for equal pay between men and women.

US women's soccer — in search of 'equal pay' with men for years — says offer to get same contract proposals as men akin to 'PR stunts'



On the hunt for "equal pay" with men for years, the organization that represents American women soccer players said the U.S. Soccer Federation's offer to make female players' contract proposals identical to male players' contract proposals is akin to "PR stunts."

USSF's PR stunts and bargaining through the media will not bring us any closer to a fair agreement. In contrast, we… https://t.co/i4UpSlGWQ6

— USWNT Players (@USWNTPlayers) 1631721725.0

"USSF's PR stunts and bargaining through the media will not bring us any closer to a fair agreement," the United States Women's National Team Players Association tweeted Wednesday in reaction to the offer. "In contrast, we are committed to bargaining in good faith to achieve equal pay and the safest working conditions possible. The proposal that USSF made recently to us does neither."

While the women's national team has been winning quite a bit more than the American men's team over the last several years, it's argued that female players don't earn as much as male players — and should. However, actual numbers aren't crystal clear, particularly due to how multiple revenue streams are deployed and differences in compensation structures (e.g., the women receive salaries while the men don't).

How did U.S. Soccer respond?

U.S. Soccer fired back at the women's players' association on Twitter: "An offer on paper of identical contracts to the USWNT and USMNT, and to discuss equalizing prize money, is real, authentic, and in good faith. A publicity stunt is a 90-minute one-sided movie."

What did star player Alex Morgan have to say?

U.S. women's forward Alex Morgan said her fellow players were cautiously optimistic, ESPN reported.

"We still need to chat about the statement given by U.S. Soccer. But any commitment to equal pay publicly is good," Morgan said Wednesday, the outlet noted. "However, we need to look line by line at what they're actually providing, because if you have equal but it's not even what we got before, or to the value that we are, then we still consider that to be not good enough."

Morgan added, "We don't want to start the new year without a new CBA in effect, so that's the number one priority of our PA, of our legal team. Looking at the [USSF] statements, it's difficult to say, we want to feel encouraged and we want to be optimistic, but we have seen a lot of statements before. What we really want to do is see what we can do at the negotiation table, see those statements be put into action in those negotiations. So of course we're always hopeful. Under the new proposal put forward by the USSF, it said it also wouldn't agree to a CBA with either team that didn't take the important step of equalizing FIFA World Cup prize money."

ESPN reported in a separate story that FIFA offered $30 million in prize money to the 2019 Women's World Cup teams — while in the men's teams in 2018 got $400 million.

More from the outlet:

The USWNT sued U.S. soccer's governing body in 2019 over allegations of gender discrimination in compensation and nearly every other aspect of its playing conditions.

Months later, the team won a fourth World Cup as fans during the final chanted, "Equal pay."

The lawsuit, which sought $66 million in damages under the Equal Pay Act, was dismissed, but the USWNT has since appealed.

The USWNT's current labor agreement expires at the end of 2021, while the men's team has been operating under the terms of a deal that expired in 2018.

Anything else?

In 2019, Carlos Cordeiro — then-president of U.S Soccer — responded to the equal pay lawsuit by saying USSF paid the women players more over the course of a decade even though the team has lost millions of dollars overall.

In 2020, U.S. Soccer apologized for arguing in court that women players aren't as skilled and athletic as their male counterparts.

The U.S. women's soccer team suffered embarrassing defeats at the Tokyo Olympics earlier this summer and failed to win an expected gold medal. In fact, many Americans rooted against the team over its propensity for anti-American kneeling protests prior to games.

Are the U.S. women's soccer team players paid less? The gender pay gap explained | The Fact Checkeryoutu.be

Why The Gender Wage Gap Is BullSh**

Turns out, the math is completely wrong.