‘Media Reporting’ Is Now Just More Censorship And Suppression Of Information

At its ideal, media reporting was a reality check on other high-profile journalists, TV people and newsroom editors.

CNN's defense of its 'incorrect' Joe Rogan-ivermectin coverage blasted by WaPo media critic as 'more like ... an advocacy group than a journalism outfit'



Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple blasted CNN in an op-ed Thursday, not only over the cable network's coverage of Joe Rogan's bout with COVID-19, during which the podcaster took medically prescribed ivermectin to treat the infection — but also over CNN's defense of its reporting.

What are the details?

Given that multiple CNN on-air personalities repeatedly declared that Rogan was taking "horse dewormer" rather than the human dose of ivermectin, Wemple said that "the network's coverage was slanted in some cases and straight-up incorrect in others."

Indeed, Wemple cited Scott Phillips of the Washington Poison Center in Seattle, who told the media critic that "if you're prescribed the FDA human version [of ivermectin] then you're not taking a horse pill."

What's more, after Rogan told CNN's chief medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta that CNN "out and out lied" about his ivermectin use, Gupta admitted to Rogan that CNN "shouldn't have said" the podcaster was taking "horse dewormer":

With all those hard facts at his disposal, Wemple asked CNN for an explanation — and here's the statement the media critic said the cable network sent him:

The heart of this debate has been purposely confused and ultimately lost. It's never been about livestock versus human dosage of Ivermectin. The issue is that a powerful voice in the media, who by example and through his platform, sowed doubt in the proven and approved science of vaccines while promoting the use of an unproven treatment for covid-19 — a drug developed to ward off parasites in farm animals. The only thing CNN did wrong here was bruise the ego of a popular podcaster who pushed dangerous conspiracy theories and risked the lives of millions of people in doing so.

'More like the work of an advocacy group'

While Wemple gave CNN points for some aspects of its statement, he ultimately took the the cable network to task for its response, saying it "sounds more like the work of an advocacy group than a journalism outfit."

Wemple added in his final paragraph that "you don't have to endorse Rogan to abhor CNN's coverage of this topic. Here's a network, after all, that prides itself on impeccable factual hygiene, a place where there's no conceptual hair too fine to split, no political statement too sprawling to flyspeck. It's tough living by your own standards."

This wasn't the first time Wemple took CNN or other left-leaning news outlets to task. In March he appeared on the cable network's "Reliable Sources" program and appeared to shock far-left host Brian Stelter by ripping the "love-a-thons" between then-New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and his brother, CNN host Chris Cuomo.

And in late 2019, Wemple blasted MSNBC host Rachel Maddow for "misleading and dishonest" coverage of Russia and the Steele dossier.

What's the background?

After Rogan announced last month that he caught COVID-19, CNN's Anderson Cooper said — above a headline reading, "Joe Rogan announces he has COVID; praises horse dewormer ivermectin" — the drug is "more often used to deworm horses."

CNN's chief media correspondent Brian Stelter joined in: "But when you have a horse deworming medication that's discouraged by the government that actually causes some people in this crazed environment we're in to actually want to try it, that's the upside-down world we're in with figures like Joe Rogan."

At least the physician on the panel, Dr. Leana Wen, admitted that ivermectin can be prescribed for humans — but again, no clarifying words from her that Rogan received the medication properly.

Joe Rogan says he tested positive for Covid-19youtu.be

Wemple noted that CNN anchor Jim Acosta a few days later played video of Rogan's COVID infection disclosure and added, "In case you missed it, Rogan said ivermectin. Yes, that's the deworming medicine made to kill parasites in farm animals and, weirdly, is being promoted by right-wing media figures and even some politicians as a COVID treatment."

Rogan was not happy and floated the idea of a lawsuit, saying CNN is "making s**t up."

And even after Gupta's admission that his own network shouldn't have said Rogan was taking "horse dewormer," Gupta later that day appeared on Don Lemon's CNN show to talk about his interview with Rogan — and they completely glossed over and spun Rogan's issues with CNN's coverage of the podcaster's COVID-19 treatments:

"I will talk to them," @DrSanjayGupta told @JoeRogan after Gupta said on the podcast that it was wrong for CNN to d… https://t.co/41iCUZ4jE7

— Steve Krakauer (@SteveKrak) 1634237432.0

Even CNN contributor Mary Katharine Ham ripped her cable network's coverage of the Joe Rogan-ivermectin controversy, saying CNN engaged in "dishonest" and "bulls**t" reporting.

While appearing on CNN, WaPo media critic rips CNN for Cuomo brothers' 'love-a-thon': 'It's a major black eye for network'



Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple went scorched earth during an appearance on CNN. While appearing on CNN's "Reliable Sources," Wemple bashed the liberal cable TV news network for allowing CNN host Chris Cuomo to have "love-a-thons" with his brother Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D).

Chris Cuomo is the anchor of CNN's "Cuomo Prime Time," which is self-described as a "news program where Cuomo tests power with newsmakers and politicians from both sides of the aisle." However during the coronavirus pandemic, Cuomo welcomed his New York governor brother on the show to deliver an unchallenged and glowing narrative of his leadership.

Many times the interviews were completely unprofessional and chummy. There were jokes that the governor only appeared on the show because their mom made him and then there was a strange segment that involved a gigantic Q-tip. All this positive coverage despite New York having the second-most coronavirus deaths per million and there being bombshell reports that New York's nursing home deaths were far higher than Cuomo's administration admitted.

Cuomo has not appeared on his brother's CNN show since the flurry of sexual harassment allegations against the governor started to storm in.

Flash forward to Sunday, Wemple was a guest on "Reliable Sources" to discuss the media coverage of Andrew Cuomo and his scandals. Wemple did not hold back at pointing out the bias of a news network previously handing out flattering publicity to a political figure by his own brother.

"I would be remiss, Brian, if I didn't mention CNN's own huge media story here with Chris Cuomo, the anchor at the nine o'clock hour, who covered Andrew Cuomo and had all these wonderful love-a-thon interviews with him, more than ten of them," Wemple told CNN host Brian Stelter.

"And they suspended the conflict of interest rule for Chris Cuomo for those interviews, yet all of the sudden they've enforced it again now that Andrew Cuomo is in the midst of a historic scandal in the Albany State House," Wemple continued.

"So, I think that is a major black eye for CNN," Wemple proclaimed. "I will say that you and other people have covered the Cuomo story very aggressively, so I do want to be fair about this, but it is a major black eye for this network."

Stelter looked stone-faced as Wemple ripped his network during an interview on CNN.

WaPo’s Erik Wemple said it is a “major black eye for CNN” that they suspended the conflict of interest rule for Chr… https://t.co/3I8nWfEPro
— Cameron Cawthorne (@Cameron Cawthorne)1615739208.0

To his credit, this isn't the first time that Wemple has called out a left-leaning cable TV news host. In 2019, Wemple bashed MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow for her partisanship and "rooting" for the Steele dossier to be true instead of being more concerned with the truth.

When small bits of news arose in favor of the dossier, the franchise MSNBC host pumped air into them. At least some of her many fans surely came away from her broadcasts thinking the dossier was a serious piece of investigative research, not the flimflam, quick-twitch game of telephone outlined in the Horowitz report. She seemed to be rooting for the document.

And when large bits of news arose against the dossier, Maddow found other topics more compelling.

She was there for the bunkings, absent for the debunkings — a pattern of misleading and dishonest asymmetry.