Dan Crenshaw brushes off apparent death threat as 'hyperbole' as ethics complaint looms



A conservative watchdog group filed an ethics complaint Tuesday against Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R) over his apparent suggestion that he would kill Tucker Carlson should the two ever meet in person — something Crenshaw claims was clearly "hyperbole."

The American Accountability Foundation indicated Tuesday that it penned a letter to the U.S. House of Representatives' Office of Congressional Ethics requesting an immediate investigation into Crenshaw's remarks. According to the watchdog group, which is led by a former legislative director of Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Crenshaw may have violated House rules by engaging in conduct unbecoming of a member of Congress.

Blaze News previously reported that GB News' Steven Edginton interviewed Crenshaw at the 2025 Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference in Britain last week, asking the congressman about American global leadership, the "neocon" label often applied to him, and the war in Ukraine.

When Edginton mentioned Tucker Carlson's criticism of American aid to Ukraine, Crenshaw declared, "Tucker doesn't know what he's talking about."

'No, seriously, I would kill him.'

After the interview, Edginton casually asked Crenshaw with the camera still rolling, "Have you ever met Tucker?"

In footage that did not originally air on GB News but went viral Monday on social media, Crenshaw seemingly responded, "We've talked a lot on Twitter. If I ever meet him, I'll f**king kill him."

Edginton, who indicated that the footage was genuine, suggested on X that when he laughed off the remark, Crenshaw doubled down, stating, "No, seriously, I would kill him."

When later asked on X by Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R) whether he threatened to kill Carlson, Crenshaw wrote, "lol, no."

The AAF suggested that a failure to sanction Crenshaw over his apparent threat of a member of the press would "send a message to Members that they are free to threaten reporters they disagree with and more importantly send a message to reporters that they need to worry for their safety when they report on Members of Congress."

'I have absolutely no desire to harm him.'

"There is no reasonable construction of creditable behavior which includes threating [sic] innocent journalists simply for disagreeing with a Member," the AAF noted in its complaint.

"As Representative Crenshaw frequently points out, he is a former Navy SEAL, so one should reasonably assume that his threats to kill someone should be taken seriously, since he has received significant military training in the application of lethal force," added the AAF.

When pressed for comment, a spokesman for Crenshaw directed Blaze News to the congressman's Wednesday KRIV-TV interview, where Crenshaw stated, "I caught that video myself after I saw all the outrage online, and I have got say, that's the lamest 'death threat' that I've ever seen. I think it's pretty clear that is a non-literal turn of phrase."

"I think anyone seriously watching and being honest with themselves knows that was hyperbole, said in private, and no, Tucker has nothing to worry about. I have absolutely no desire to harm him," added Crenshaw.

The congressman told KRIV that he will not accept Carlson's invitation to sit down for an interview, noting, "I don't want to be in the same room with him."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Democrat-Friendly Licensing Boards Target Republican Attorneys General In Election Year

'Every minute I’m spending defending the AG from this is one minute I’m not spending suing the Biden administration or defending laws passed by the legislature.'

George Santos Announces Effort To Expel Jamaal Bowman From Congress

'This is just another meaningless stunt,' said Bowman

Watchdog Group Requests Ethics Investigation Into Ilhan Omar’s TikTok Usage

'In the present case, both Rep. Omar’s use of her TikTok account and the content posted on that account appear to be clear violations'

AOC poses with Libs of TikTok founder — who then shocks Dem lawmaker with notice of ethics complaint



Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stormed off Thursday after being informed by the Libs of TikTok founder that she had filed an ethics complaint against the Democratic lawmaker.

What is the background?

At a House Oversight and Accountability Committee on Feb. 8, Ocasio-Cortez accused Libs of TikTok creator Chaya Raichik of lying when she circulated claims that Boston Children's Hospital is "now offering 'gender affirming hysterectomies' for young girls."

Ocasio-Cortez also claimed that Raichik's lying had "culminated in real life harassment and ultimately a bomb threat to the Boston Children's Hospital."

Fact-checks affirmed claims that Raichik spread false information. But Raichik has defended herself from such accusations, defense which culminated with an ethics complaint against Ocasio-Cortez.

What happened with AOC?

On Thursday, Raichik stopped by Ocasio-Cortez's office in the Cannon House Office Building to deliver the ethics complaint personally. Ocasio-Cortez, unfortunately, was not present at the time, so Raichik delivered it to one of her staff members.

But as luck would have it, Raichik later ran into Ocasio-Cortez as she walked through the Capitol.

Raichik stopped Ocasio-Cortez and posed for a photo. As both women were smiling for the picture, Raichik informed Ocasio-Cortez about the ethics complaint. That's when the Democratic lawmaker insulted Raichik and ran away.

"I just delivered a complaint to your office because you lied about me in a committee hearing," Raichik told Ocasio-Cortez. "I never inspired a bomb threat."

"No. You are actually super transphobic, and I never want to share a space with you! Thank you," Ocasio-Cortez responded as she hurried off.

\u201cBREAKING: I served @AOC with an ethics complaint after she lied about me in a committee hearing. AOC wasn\u2019t in her office but then I bumped into her as I was leaving the Capitol!\n\nWatch what happens:\u201d
— Libs of TikTok (@Libs of TikTok) 1680186341

What does the ethics complaint say?

The ethics complaint, according to Fox News, accuses Ocasio-Cortez of violating House ethics rules by "knowingly and intentionally defaming Chaya Raichik, creator of the viral Libs of TikTok account, falsely accusing her of lying and disseminating disinformation."

The complaint also defends the substance of Raichik's accusation against Boston Children's Hospital. Fox News explained:

The nine-page complaint defends Raichik’s view that Boston Children’s Hospital performs gender-affirming hysterectomies on young girls. Aside from being the "premier pediatric hospital," Heritage noted that the hospital’s website notes that it performs gender-affirmation surgery to "eligible adolescents," and that the Journal of Clinical Medicine has documented that the hospital has "performed 65 double-mastectomies on minors over the course of three years."

Other material collected by Heritage shows that gender-affirmation surgery has been performed on patients as young as 15, and that the hospital "quietly changed its website to reflect that ‘genital surgeries are only performed on patients age 18 and older."

If it is determined that Ocasio-Cortez violated House ethics rules, the complaint urges the Office of Congressional Ethics to reprimand Ocasio-Cortez, make her apologize to Raichik, and strike her accusations from the congressional record.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!