LGBTQ activists are attempting to redefine infertility so that same-sex couples get medical coverage for surrogacy and IVF



They’ve already deconstructed gender, villainized motherhood, and made up some fun new pronouns, so why not go ahead and add “redefine infertility” to the list?

Allie Beth Stuckey and guest Katy Faust, founder and director of Them Before Us, discuss exactly what the Alphabet Mafia is doing to undermine and redefine infertility.

“California and other blue states are trying to redefine infertility to include gay couples that cannot have a child biologically so that insurance companies would then be forced to cover things like surrogacy for two men who want a child,” says Allie.

“The medical definition of infertility is unprotected heterosexual sex for 12 months that doesn't result in a pregnancy or live birth,” Katy explains, “and now what they're saying is … no matter how much unprotected sex the same-sex couple has, they are never going to be able to produce a child” and “what biology cannot accomplish, the law needs to provide.”

The indisputable truth is that same-sex couples “will never medically be able to be diagnosed as infertile because they're not participating in the activity that would lead doctors to conclude that infertility is the problem, and yet they want the same kind of access, and they want the same insurance coverage,” Katy tells Allie.

According to the feelings > logic state of California, “it's discriminatory for heterosexual couples to be able to be designated as infertile and then receive coverage from their insurance companies,” so in the name of DEI, they intend to “redefine what infertility means.”

“So now the California bill and similar other bills across the country are seeking to define infertility as not a medical status but really a relational status,” says Katy, so people can be deemed infertile because of “the relationship [they’re in] or…because [they’re] not in a relationship at all.”

“What are some of the repercussions of green-lighting a bill like this?” asks Allie.

“The California bill specifically said insurance companies can't discontinue services and there is in essence unlimited supply of IVF transfers,” says Katy, “and we already have a situation in this country where we've got one million frozen embryos in storage right now, and oftentimes the only thing that keeps that in check is cost.”

However, with “insurance funded IVF transfers … why limit the number of embryos that you're going to create?”

“It is only going to increase the amount of children who are suffering indefinitely in a freezer or who are going to perish in the gauntlet that children have to undergo between freezer and implantation and then ultimately birth,” says Katy.

Further, “it is going to massively increase the number of children that are screened for sex or for … potential genetic markers that don't seem as desirable to the adults; in essence, it is going to contribute to the increased commodification of children where they are thawed and discarded, donated to research, or spend their life forever in a freezer,” she explains.

To hear their full conversation, watch the video below.


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Surrogacy horror: Gay ‘dads’ demand abortion



Brittney Pearson, a California mother of four, has claimed she was told to terminate a surrogate pregnancy at 24 weeks by the two gay men who hired her.

Pearson had been diagnosed with breast cancer, which doctors said would require aggressive chemotherapy to treat.

While Pearson wanted to attempt to save the baby and induce an early delivery, the gay couple refused — even when Pearson and her family members offered to adopt the child.

The entire situation has been incredibly tragic for Pearson, who says that when she received her diagnosis, the first thing that came into her head was that she needed to be there to buy her daughter a prom dress.

“She’s only 12, so she’s not going to prom yet, but I was like I need to be here for that.”

When the gay couple found out about her diagnosis, she recalls them not being “very nice."

Allie Beth Stuckey, horrified, asks Pearson what “not very nice” means.

“They just started threatening, like, lawsuits,” she recalls.

Doctors told her she could deliver prematurely at 36 weeks, but the couple wouldn’t go earlier than 39 weeks — no matter what.

Pearson claims she felt like a “rented uterus” who was “just being used instead of being a part of something.”

After the cancer had spread to Pearson’s liver, the gay couple refused to discuss any option other than terminating the pregnancy and threatened any doctor who delivered the baby with a lawsuit.

“They wanted no lifesaving measures if the baby was born alive,” she recalls, adding that “they wanted the baby just completely gone.”

Despite the couple’s attempt to force an abortion, Pearson found a hospital that would deliver the baby and had the baby, ironically, on Father’s Day.

“That’s the day their baby was born, if they even still think of it as a baby,” Pearson adds, noting that the couple kept calling the baby a “fetus” at every appointment.

Tragically, the baby did not survive, but was “held and cared for and loved for a short amount of time before they took him.”

While Pearson fought for the ability to deliver the baby, after the baby was born all decisions contractually were shifted to the couple — who did not want to try to save him.

“It’s something that will never not be right at the front of my mind.”


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Chrissy Tiegen Rents a Womb | Guest: Steve Deace | Ep 831

Chrissy Tiegen Rents a Womb | Guest: Steve Deace | Ep 831

Chrissy Teigen rents a womb?



Just months after Chrissy Teigen gave birth to her third child, the star has revealed she “had” another baby via surrogate.

A couple of years earlier, Teigen had miscarried and tragically lost her baby.

“That’s the worst pain really that I can even imagine as a parent,” Allie Beth Stuckey says sympathetically.

Teigen explained that the idea of surrogacy came from that loss, saying that after losing her baby Jack, she was unsure she’d be able to carry any more babies on her own.

Teigen and her husband reached out to a surrogacy agency before they knew she was pregnant again.

Stuckey, while sympathetic to what Tiegen has been through, does not view the surrogacy as a good thing.

“The fact of the matter is that surrogacy is still the exploitation of female bodies. It is still prioritizing the wants of adults over the well-being of children.”

“There is a bond that is created between the child and his mother, or the woman carrying him during gestation,” Stuckey continues. “He feels her heartbeat, knows her smell, knows the sights and sounds of the life that she is creating around her.”

Stuckey believes surrogacy betrays the primal instinct of the child, who wants to attach himself to the woman who carried him.

“I don’t think that we even put any thought into the psychological, mental, emotional, physical well-being of a child who is created in this way and then gestated in this way and then given to people who, as far as the child knows, are strangers.”

While Teigen used her own eggs, Stuckey notes that in many cases, you have to use another woman’s eggs.

“You have to buy the eggs of one woman, rent the womb of another woman, as you do when it’s two men going through the surrogacy process — and then you take that child away not just from the biological mother who sold her eggs, not just from the woman who gestated the child with the womb that was rented, but you also take that child away from the possibility of ever having a mother at all.”


Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.