Was Something Strapped To Biden’s Face? Questions Fly Over Bizarre Marks
NYC mayor blames Republicans for struggles handling migrant influx in sanctuary city he helms
New York City Mayor Eric Adams blamed Republicans Sunday for issues the Big Apple is facing as the sanctuary city's officials struggle to house, feed, and care for thousands of migrants.
"If this is properly handled at the border level, this issue can be resolved while we finally get Congress, particularly the Republican Party, to deal with comprehensive immigration policy," Adams told CBS News's "Face the Nation" moderator Margaret Brennan.
Adams told Brennan the $30 million the White House has pledged to help NYC deal with the migrant crisis is insufficient. According to Adams, the city has spent close to $4.3 billion and counting.
"When you look at the price tag, $30 million comes nowhere near what the city is paying for a national problem," he said.
When Brennan challenged him on the "migrant magnet" powered by New York City's sanctuary city status, Adams deflected, again focusing on Republicans.
"The problem is that Republicans for far too many years have failed to deal with real immigration reform. This is a national issue."
He suggested allowing migrants and asylum seekers to have work status as a partial solution.
Some migrant moms who recently illegally migrated from Ecuador have taken to the unlicensed selling of fruit and drinks along dangerous highways and busy intersections, as the New York Post reported Sunday.
The mothers, with babies strapped to their backs, sell the locally purchased food to motorists who have stopped for red lights. Councilman Robert Holden, a Democrat, called the scary situation potentially "catastrophic."
Holden was referring to the possibility the women or their children could be killed or maimed while weaving among vehicles selling their wares. Holden's appeal to the NYPD to address the situation with more vigor has met with little success.
Mayor Adams says a "decompression strategy" is required to take some of the pressure off the city, which still has 42,000 migrants "in our care." He characterized the bussing of migrants to cities like New York an "unfair" burden.
Part of that decompression strategy, bussing migrants to nearby counties, met with instant backlash and legal challenges.
Sunday morning, Suffolk County announced plans to draft a resolution to assure its residents do not bear the financial burden if NYC busses migrants there, News 12 Long Island reported.
New York City made a "conscious decision to be a sanctuary city, Suffolk County did not," Suffolk Legislature's Presiding Officer Kevin McCaffrey said in a press conference covered by News 12. McCaffrey added that the county's top priorities are "public safety and fiscal responsibility."
Orange County and Rockland County have already taken action to stem the tide of migrants being bussed in from New York City.
Watch a portion of NYC Mayor Eric Adams' interview with "Face the Nation" moderator Margaret Brennan below.
\u201c.@NYCMayor Eric Adams tells @MargBrennan the federal government should be directing migrant movement throughout the U.S. \u201cWe have 108,000 cities, villages, towns. If everyone takes a small portion, it\u2019s not a burden on one city.\u201d\u201d— Face The Nation (@Face The Nation) 1684680955
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Trump for speaker of House? Democrat claims Republicans are 'repeatedly' pushing Trump for top post
Democrats are floating the possibility that Donald Trump could become speaker of the House if Republicans manage to retake control of the House.
Wait — Trump?
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) claimed on CBS News' "Face the Nation" Sunday that Republican lawmakers are considering installing Trump as House speaker.
In fact, Raskin claimed that Republicans have "repeatedly" discussed the possibility.
"It's a real problem for Kevin McCarthy now because there are certain pro-Trumpists within his House caucus who refuse to accept that he's really with Trump, and they want to get rid of McCarthy," Raskin claimed.
"We know that the hard-right Freedom Caucus people are in search of another candidate. And one potential candidate whose name has been floated is Donald Trump himself because the speaker of the House does not have to be a member of the House," he alleged. "And they are talking about putting Trump right there."
\u201cAt least 155 GOP "election deniers" will serve in the new House, @CBSNews projects.\n \nRep. Jamie Raskin: "That's a statement about the political contamination of the GOP by Donald Trump."\u201d— Face The Nation (@Face The Nation) 1668366201
The Maryland Democrat cited Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) as one lawmaker who could support Trump for the post.
But Biggs has not indicated that he will support Trump. Instead, Biggs himself is going to campaign for speaker, the Wall Street Journal reported.
What is the bigger picture?
While some Republicans in the past have floated Trump as a House speaker candidate, Raskin provided no evidence to back his claim that Republicans are internally pushing for Trump now.
Since Election Day, not a single Republicans has publicly backed Trump for the position.
Raskin's rhetorical sleight-of-hand, however, is clear. Democrats understand the red wave never materialized because of Trump's influence in the 2022 midterm elections — hence why moderate Republicans often won reelection in landslides, while Trump-endorsed candidates either lost or won narrowly — so they will continue tying Republicans to Trump.
Still, Republicans are expected to win control of the House, albeit by a small majority. McCarthy is the favorite to become speaker, but his path will not be easy.
"All I’ll say at the moment is McCarthy doesn’t have 218, and there will be an alternative challenger," a spokesman for Biggs told WSJ.
Arizona Democrat Katie Hobbs opposes week-based abortion restrictions, denies that late-term elective abortions happen
Arizona Democratic gubernatorial candidate Katie Hobbs said that politicians should not be involved in a woman's decision to obtain an abortion, articulating a de facto no-restrictions position that her Republican opponent Kari Lake has called "extremist."
Hobbs, who is currently Arizona's secretary of state, gave an interview to CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday, during which host Major Garrett her asked her whether she supports a 15-week ban on abortion.
The Democratic candidate said she opposes the 15-week ban and accused Lake of misrepresenting her position on abortion.
"I don't support the 15-week ban. But let me just say that Kari Lake is entirely misconstruing my position on this issue. You and I both know that late-term abortion is extremely rare, and if it's being talked about, it's because something has gone incredibly wrong in a pregnancy," Hobbs said.
She then denied that late-term elective abortions happen. According to the most recent data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were 992 surgical abortions and 159 medical abortions after 13 weeks of pregnancy in Arizona in 2019. Fewer than 1% of abortions are performed after 21 weeks' gestation, the CDC says.
"A doctor is not going to perform an abortion late in a pregnancy just because somebody decided they want one. That is ridiculous, and she's saying this to distract from her incredibly extreme position," Hobbs claimed.
She also asserted that if Lake wins, Arizona will have "government-mandated forced births."
But when Garrett pressed her on whether there should be any week restrictions on abortion, she would not answer the question.
"Abortion is a very personal decision that belongs between a woman and her doctor. The government and politicians don't belong in that decision. We need to let doctors perform the care that they are trained and take an oath to perform," Hobbs said.
"So, if an Arizona voter were to conclude from your previous answer that you do not favor any specific week limit on abortion, would they be correct?" Garrett asked.
Hobbs replied, "I support leaving the decision between a woman and her doctor and leaving politicians entirely out of it."
\u201cDemocratic Arizona Governor candidate Katie Hobbs says she does not support a 15-week ban on abortion, adding \u201cI support leaving the decision between a woman and her doctor and leaving politicians entirely out of it.\u201d\u201d— Face The Nation (@Face The Nation) 1665334446
Lake appeared on "Face the Nation" before Hobbs and said regarding abortion that as governor she would enforce the law, although what the law says is currently being debated in court.
Arizona originally banned abortion in 1864, but that long-standing law was blocked by the U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. In March, Gov. Doug Ducey (R) signed a new 15-week abortion ban into law. After the court overturned Roe in June, the dueling abortion laws came into conflict, and abortion providers sued to block the 1864 near-total ban from taking effect.
Watch:
Kari Lake, Arizona's Republican gubernatorial candidate, says "we have a crisis on our border" youtu.be
Lake said that Ducey's 15-week abortion law takes precedence and said she would follow that law if elected governor. She has previously called the older law "a great law" and said she would support a fetal heartbeat law that would ban abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
“I am a woman, I’m a mother. I'm all for women's health care — I come from a large family, seven sisters I have — of course I want women's health care. This has moved beyond health care,” Lake told Garrett. “We're not giving women choices. I’m for giving women true choices. And when they walk into an abortion center, they're only given one choice. They're not told that you have the choice to keep your baby and we can help, and here's how. Or, we can help you find a loving family who will adopt your baby.
"I want to give women true choices. I will uphold the law, whatever that law is. And I want to see to it that we save more lives."
American intelligence says that Russia will invade Ukraine as Western allies scramble to find a diplomatic solution
The United States has intelligence that Russian commanders received orders to proceed with an invasion of Ukraine, CBS News reported.
CBS News host, Margaret Brennan said, “The president was very clear that he is convinced by U.S. intelligence that this invasion will happen, that President Putin [has] decided to do it. How was he that certain?”
CBS News correspondent David Martin responded by saying, “The intelligence says that Russian troops have actually received orders now, to proceed with the invasion. So, not only are they moving up closer and closer to the border into these attack positions, but the commanders on the ground are making specific plans for how they would maneuver in their sector of the battlefield.”
Martin said that the Russian forces are doing “everything that American commanders would do once they got the order to proceed.”
NEWS: The U.S. has intelligence that Russian troops have received orders to proceed with an invasion of Ukraine. \u201cThe commanders on the ground are making specific plans for how they would maneuver in their sector of the battlefield,\u201d CBS David Martin reports on @FacetheNation.pic.twitter.com/uKsfdWRQjV— Face The Nation (@Face The Nation) 1645371972
On Friday, President Joe Biden told reporters that he was “convinced” Russian leadership had decided to invade Ukraine and that he expected Russian forces to invade Ukraine in the “coming days.”
Previously, Ukrainian leadership said that Russia was working to destabilize Ukraine from within to create circumstances that would justify an invasion.
Oleksiy Danilov, Ukraine’s top national security adviser, said that a military invasion would be too costly for Russia given the size of Ukraine’s military and the Ukrainian people’s will to fight.
Danilov also speculated that West continuing to pressure Russia would cause Russian leadership to shy away from conventional means of warfare and pursue a series of intense cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and economic pressure.
However, as tension in the region continues to escalate, the Russian military announced that it would be conducting military drills involving the country’s strategic nuclear forces.
A spokesman for the Kremlin said that Vladimir Putin would watch the drills from the Defense Ministry’s situation room and supervise the practice missile launches in person.
Moscow continues to deny that it has any plans to invade Ukraine and demands that the United States and NATO allies withdraw their military forces from territories near Russia and make legally binding commitments that Ukraine will not join NATO. Leadership in Washington and Brussels refuse to meet these demands.
The Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, expressed that he was interested in meeting with Putin so that they could come to a diplomatic consensus that would end the ongoing conflict.
On Thursday, Vice President Kamala Harris met with European leaders in Munich, Germany, to discuss the conflict and strategize with Western leaders on how they might deter a Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Several international airlines have stopped providing service to the Ukraine at this time.
Former FDA commissioner admits: 'Cloth masks aren't going to provide a lot of protection'
Former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb admitted that cloth masks do not provide a high level of protection against COVID-19. Gottlieb — who sits on the board of directors of Pfizer — delivered his insight on face masks as well as stating that the omicron is a milder variant during an appearance on "Face the Nation."
"Cloth masks aren't going to provide a lot of protection, that's the bottom line," Gottlieb told host Margaret Brennan on Sunday morning.
"This is an airborne illness," he continued. "We now understand that, and a cloth mask is not going to protect you from a virus that spreads through airborne transmission."
"It could protect better through droplet transmission, something like the flu, but not something like this coronavirus," explained Gottlieb, who was a clinical assistant professor at New York University School of Medicine before becoming the 23rd FDA commissioner in 2017.
At this stage of the pandemic, cloth masks don't provide much protection against COVID-19, according to @ScottGottliebMD.pic.twitter.com/pvX5McVnzX— Face The Nation (@Face The Nation) 1641139038
Last January, Gottlieb shared a CNN opinion piece titled: "America needs better masks to fight Covid-19."
Part of the reason is that new Covid-19 variants are more transmissible – meaning you are possibly more likely to be infected with even less exposure time and from greater distances than before. As Dr. Walensky herself mentions, ongoing studies are evaluating the efficacy of cloth masks in light of new variants. Without definitive answers, the precautionary principle – erring on the side of caution – should be invoked before more people become infected. Secondly, because -- regardless of variant -- the virus is still transmitted by both droplets and aerosols, the latter of which are best trapped by electrostatic charges found in N95 caliber masks.
In November 2020, Gottlieb wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal titled: "Some Masks Will Protect You Better Than Others."
In the article, Gottlieb noted that at the beginning of the pandemic, health agencies advised the public to use cloth masks because "medical masks were in short supply."
"A cotton mask offers far less protection than a surgical mask," he wrote, adding, "An N95 or equivalent mask offers the best protection and, if used properly, will filter out at least 95% of infectious particles."
During Sunday's "Face the Nation" interview, Brennan asked Gottlieb if schools should mandate COVID-19 booster shots for 12- to 15-year-olds.
"Well, look, I certainly don't think schools should be mandating boosters," he replied. "I think this should be left up to the discretion of parents and their physicians."
"You know, it's going to depend on the individual circumstance," Gottlieb said. "What is the risk that the child's facing? Are they in a setting where they're more likely to come into contact with the infection? Do they have some underlying health conditions that put them at increased risk of bad outcomes?"
Gottlieb stressed that schools need to remain open.
"I think the imperative needs to be to try to open schools," he stated. "What you're saying by closing schools preemptively, and even colleges, is that you can't possibly control outbreaks in those settings. And I just don't think that that's the case. I think with the tools we have with prudence, with the knowledge we have about how to control this infection in those settings, you can do pretty- a pretty good job of trying to control large outbreaks, certainly within the classroom."
Gottlieb said the Omicron variant "does appear to be a milder strain of coronavirus and we also have a lot of immunity in the population."
"There is a very clear decoupling between cases at this point in hospitalizations and ICU admissions," he said. "There's a very clear, as I said, decoupling between cases and hospitalizations and does appear now based on a lot of experimental evidence that we've gotten just in the last two weeks, that this is a milder form of the coronavirus appears to be a more of an upper airway disease and a lower airway disease that's good for most Americans."
"The one group that- that may be a problem for his very young kids — very young children, toddlers who have trouble with upper airway infections, and you're in fact seeing more croup-like infections and bronchiolitis in New York City among children," he added. "So, that could be a challenge for young kids, and we are seeing rising hospitalizations among that pediatric segment."
Gottlieb believes that the current wave of the Omicron variant will begin to decline in most of the U.S. by the end of February.
"Now this is a big country, this will affect different parts of the country at different points in time," he said. "But if the UK is any guide, London's already peaking. If South Africa is any guide. This is about a two-month epidemic wave from start to finish. And so, parts of the country that were affected earlier, like New York, probably are going to start to peak in the next two weeks, other parts within the next four weeks. So, I think certainly by the end of February, we will be through this if businesses need a guide of when prevalence is going to start to decline in terms of school."
Last month, Gottlieb predicted that 2022 "is going to be a transition year." He said we will likely "go from a pandemic into a more endemic phase."
Gottlieb says Omicron appears to be a "milder form" of COVID-19, but pediatric danger remains www.youtube.com
CBS panel sits in silence as top reporter blasts the 'crushing impact' of COVID policies on children
Members of a CBS News "Face the Nation" panel sat in silence on Sunday when one panelist explained that the most "underreported" story of 2021 is how restrictive COVID policies devastatingly impacted children.
What happened?
While reviewing the year's top stories with foremost CBS News reporters, chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford silenced her colleagues for more than 90 seconds as she explained why the "crushing impact" of COVID policies on children is the most underreported story of 2021.
Crawford cited the low vulnerability of young people to severe COVID infections, the mental health crisis happening among teenagers because of lockdowns, and the fact that the adverse impact of COVID policies has essentially been an "afterthought" to those with power.
"It's the crushing impact that our COVID policies have had on young kids and children," Crawford began. "By far, the least serious risk for serious illness, but — I mean, even teenagers, you know, a healthy teenager has a one in 1,000,000 chance of getting and dying from COVID, which is way lower than dying in a car wreck on a road trip."
"But they have suffered and sacrificed the most, especially kids in underrepresented and at-risk communities. And now we have the surgeon general saying there’s a mental health crisis among our kids," she continued. "The risk of suicide attempts among girls now up 51% this year. Black kids nearly twice as likely as white kids to die by suicide."
\u201cThey will be paying for our generation\u2019s decisions the rest of their lives\u201d: @JanCBS explains why she thinks 2021's biggest underreported story was the devastating impact of COVID policies on childrenpic.twitter.com/AUU1f6AFNi— Face The Nation (@Face The Nation) 1640552417
Highlighting "school closures, lockdowns, [and the] cancellation of sports," Crawford noted that during the height of the pandemic, children in Washington, D.C., could not even use playgrounds "without cops scurrying, shooing the kids off."
"Tremendous negative impact on kids, and it’s been an afterthought. It’s hurt their dreams, their future, learning loss, risk of abuse, their mental health," Crawford lamented. "And now, with our knowledge, our vaccines, if our policies don’t reflect a more measured and reasonable approach for our children, they will be paying for our generation’s decisions the rest of their lives."
Any additional context?
Data shows that, as Crawford explained, suicide rates among teenagers have soared during the pandemic. Equally problematic is how education took a back seat to a commonsense approach to the pandemic.
For example, one survey from the Kaiser Family Foundation discovered that about 40% of parents believe their children fell behind during the pandemic because of school lockdowns and remote learning, which does not provide the same educational experience as in-person learning. School lockdowns impacted not only education, but social and emotional development in children and drove an increase of mental health and behavioral problems, the survey found.
In fact, the lack of attention such problems have received may be another reason behind Republican Glenn Youngkin's surprise victory in the Virginia gubernatorial election.
After the election in November, CNN interviewed a panel of suburban moms, all of whom agreed they supported Youngkin in part because he proposed ways to address the problems for young people caused by pandemic-related policies.
"I just feel they're really tone-deaf, they're really dismissive," one mom said of Democrats.
"They weren't looking at the concerns on the ground," another mom explained. "And the concerns on the ground were we were really concerned about our kids' education, and the Democrats were not listening to that."
"Glenn, he listened to us. He met with us. He sent his wife to meet with special education parents," another mom told CNN. "They spent a lot of one-on-one time with parents."
Full video: "Face the Nation" correspondents roundtable www.youtube.com
Piers Morgan says Dr. Fauci should 'put his ego away ... and shut the f*** up'
In a piece criticizing Dr. Anthony Fauci, Piers Morgan, a British television host, did not mince words in declaring that the prominent figure should "shut the f*[**] up."
Morgan mocked Fauci's ubiquitous media appearances during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"I've never heard Dr. Anthony Fauci's cell phone voicemail greeting, but I imagine it says: 'Yes, I'll come on your show,'" Morgan quipped. "For someone whose day job is supposed to be leading America's scientific and medical war against Covid-19, he seems to have an incredible amount of spare time for self-promotional media interviews."
Morgan did offer some words of praise for the public health figure in the piece as well, writing that Fauci is "indisputably an outstanding scientist who has done a lot of great work for his country for many decades."
Fauci is chief medical advisor to President Joe Biden.
The 80-year-old medical figure, who has served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for more than three decades, has proven to be a controversial figure amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
"With his arrogant partisan performances this weekend, Fauci's laid bare the inherent weakness of his obsession with going on TV," Morgan wrote. "The more he talks, the less many Americans either like or believe him," he added. "They just see a narcissistic blow-hard who likes the sound of his own voice and constantly changes his mind."
Morgan said that "the more he contradicts himself on TV, the more he erodes public trust."
"If, as he insists, his only interest is in saving lives, then it's time Anthony Fauci put his ego away, stayed off TV and shut the f*[**] up," Morgan concluded.
In the piece, Morgan pointed to comments Fauci made during an interview on CBS's "Face the Nation".
Margaret Brennan said to Fauci that U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) "told the attorney general you should be prosecuted."
In replying to Brennan, Fauci laughed, "I should be prosecuted? What happened on January 6 senator?"
"Do you think that this is about making you a scapegoat to deflect from President Trump?" Brennan inquired.
"Of course," Fauci said.
During the interview Fauci also said that "they're really criticizing science, because I represent science."
Earlier this year Cruz asked Attorney General Merrick Garland, "Is the Department of Justice investigating Dr. Fauci for lying to Congress?" The lawmaker also asked if the attorney general would appoint a special prosecutor.
Lawmakers like Sens. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz have called for Dr. Fauci to step down and be prosecuted over the course of COVID-19. Fauci scoffs at such threats, calling it "noise." \n\n"They're really criticizing science because I represent science. That's dangerous."pic.twitter.com/zLzceD2DHe— Face The Nation (@Face The Nation) 1638119027