Margaret Brennan Blames CDC Critics For Shooting (And Other Face The Nation Questions)

Here are all the questions Margaret Brennan asked her Republican and Democrat guests on Sunday’s 'Face The Nation.'

Pushing back against the big Medicaid lie



Democrats were virtually salivating as they unanimously voted against Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act ahead of the Independence Day holiday, which certainly should give pause to Republicans as they prepare for the midterms and the 2028 elections beyond.

What gives the Democrats hope that they can campaign effectively against Trump’s mega-bill? Is it the fact that Republicans were able to make permanent the 2017 tax cuts? Are they planning to campaign against the “no tax on tips” provision that even Kamala Harris supported? Will they claim that funding border security and mass deportation of illegal aliens is somehow bad for the country?

Remember, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is the codification of the agenda that President Trump ran on in 2024. It’s not tricky. It’s not nefarious.

No, no, and no. Democrats are not idiots. They know that they have the short straw on all of those 80-20 issues. So they are going back to the same issue they have demagogued since 2008 — health care. By tugging on the heartstrings of the American public, they know they can use fear to win votes.

Demagoguing Medicaid ... again

During debate in both the House and Senate, Democrats relied on questionable forward-looking interpretations of the impact of the mega-bill on Medicaid to claim that nearly 12 million low-income people would lose health coverage if the bill passed, as it ultimately did.

The left-leaning Congressional Budget Office supplied some of that data, and by the time the vote was finalized on July 3, various other groups were adding fuel to the fire. KFF, formerly the Kaiser Family Foundation, added the 12 million people who would allegedly lose Medicaid to the five million who KFF claimed would lose coverage in the Affordable Care Act marketplace, concluding that at least 17 million would be at risk. Then, there was the claim that Trump’s budget would deny food stamps to hungry children and pregnant women.

But not so fast. Despite the bleak picture painted by Democrats and weak-kneed RINOs that Trump wanted poor people to just die and be done with it, there were reasonable explanations for all the budget changes that had nothing to do with genocide.

Reductions in Obamacare premium subsidies are just an acknowledgment that the COVID crisis is over, and those boosted premiums are no longer necessary. Likewise, food stamps are still going to be provided to the disabled, families with young children, and the impoverished elderly, even if Democrats want to pretend otherwise.

And pretend they will, so if Republicans want to prevail in future elections, they had better fully understand the truth about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, because otherwise, they will be painted as heartless elitists who want their fellow Americans to die by the millions.

Telling the truth

Fortunately, the road map is already clear on how to respond to the demagoguery of the Democrats, and it was modeled by two members of the Trump administration on the Sunday morning talk shows over the long holiday weekend.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, faced down their hostile questioners on CNN’s “State of the Union” and CBS’ “Face the Nation” respectively.

Bessent, who by all accounts is the most competent member of Trump’s Cabinet, immediately pushed back on Dana Bash’s supposition that the bill would cut benefit programs like Medicaid:

Only in D.C. is a 20% hike over 10 years a cut. Medicaid funding will go up 20% over the next 10 years. The people who Medicaid was designed for — the pregnant women, the disabled, and families with children under 14 — will be refocused. The able-bodied Americans are not vulnerable Americans, so a work requirement or a community service requirement, that’s very popular with the public.

Bessent then struck a blow against the argument that millions of Americans will lose their Medicaid coverage because they didn’t remember to reapply for benefits under the new rules.

“It is a group of Democrats who unfortunately seem to think that poor people are stupid,” he said. “I don’t think poor people are stupid. I think they have agency, and I think to have them register twice a year for these benefits is not a burden. But these people who want to infantilize the poor and those who need these Medicaid benefits are alarmist.”

RELATED: The budget hoax that nearly sank Trump’s biggest win (so far)

Photo by Tom Brenner For the Washington Post via Getty Images

Over on “Face the Nation,” Hassett was interviewed by Weijia Jiang, senior White House correspondent for CBS. She dutifully recited the claim that 12 million people would lose their Medicaid coverage, but Hassett struck back hard:

Let’s unbundle that a little bit. What we are actually doing is asking for a work requirement, but the work requirement is that you need to be looking for work or even doing volunteer work, and you don’t need to do it until your kids are 14 or older, so the idea that that’s going to cause a massive hemorrhaging in availability of insurance doesn’t make a lot of sense. And if you look at the CBO numbers, if you look at the numbers they say are going to lose insurance, about five million of those are people who have other insurance. ... If they lose one, they’re still insured.

Hassett also explained that the best way to get insurance is to get a job, and so if the Trump economy stimulates growth, it will help people to happily leave Medicaid after they gain employment.

On another question, about whether the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is harmful because it grows the national debt by between $3 trillion and $5 trillion over the next 10 years, Hassett responded by reminding the reporter that the Congressional Budget Office is underestimating growth in the economy compared to what happened in the first Trump term pre-COVID. Based on that historical record, Hassett expects the debt to actually shrink by $1.5 trillion in the next decade.

What Hassett didn’t say, but which should be on the lips of every Republican defending their votes for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, is that over the 10 years from 2014 to 2024, the federal debt increased by more than $17.5 trillion. Admittedly, Trump’s first term played a role in that thanks to COVID, but only Trump and Republicans are making any effort today to shrink the debt. If left up to Democrats, every social program in the budget would see increased funding, deficit be damned.

Fight fear with facts

To summarize, here are the talking points that every Republican candidate for Congress must master if they hope to beat back Democrat distortions:

  1. Republicans voted to increase Medicaid spending over the next 10 years by 20%.
  2. Republicans voted to preserve Medicaid for the needy by making sure that everyone using the program’s valuable resources is truly needy — and eligible.
  3. Republicans voted to create an economy where more people can get jobs that provide high-quality health insurance. Emphasize this: Jobs are good.
  4. Republicans treat Medicaid recipients with dignity, asking them to follow simple rules to qualify for the benefit, rather than treating them as helpless wards of the state.
  5. Republicans are bending the curve downward on the national debt. Even if the CBO is right that the debt will increase by $3.5 trillion over the next 10 years, that increase is only 20% of what it was over the previous 10 years. And the Trump tax cuts are expected to stimulate the economy, so the national debt should actually decrease.

Those will do for a start. Remember, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is the codification of the agenda that President Trump ran on in 2024. It’s not tricky. It’s not nefarious. And if it is unpopular, that’s only because Democrats have been lying about it.

Now, it’s up to Republicans to fight back against the big Medicaid lie, or else pay the price for their silence.

Editor’s note: This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

Margaret Brennan Resumes Resistance Tweeting After Disastrous Rubio Interview

CBS News host Margaret Brennan has not publicly addressed her controversial exchange with Secretary of State Marco Rubio over the weekend, in which the anchor claimed that the Holocaust occurred because Nazis "weaponized" free speech. But Brennan has found time to weigh in on other anti-Trump news events.

The post Margaret Brennan Resumes Resistance Tweeting After Disastrous Rubio Interview appeared first on .

Unshakable J.D. Vance Destroys Margaret Brennan On ‘Face The Nation’

'At what point will these leftwing media hacks figure out that they're no match for JD?' Donald Trump Jr. posted on X.

'I don't really care, Margaret': Vance carpet-bombs Margaret Brennan interview with inconvenient facts and common sense



CBS News' Margaret Brennan took a decidedly adversarial approach to her interview with Vice President JD Vance that aired on Sunday, trying on multiple occasions and across various topics to corner the 40-year-old Republican or to extract concessions.

Not only did Brennan discover that she was outmatched, but she helped demonstrate both the toothlessness of the liberal presumptions of yesteryear and Vance's commitment to the prioritization of Americans over all other concerns.

The "Face the Nation" host appeared especially keen to needle Vance over the Trump administration's immigration policy, intimating that the removal of illegal aliens and President Donald Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship are at odds with the spirit of the nation and its Constitution, stating, "This is a country founded by immigrants."

'America should actually look out for the interests of our citizens first.'

Vance rejected the premise, saying, "This is a very unique country, and it was founded by some immigrants and some settlers. But just because we were founded by immigrants doesn't mean that 240 years later, we have to have the dumbest immigration policy in the world."

The vice president emphasized further that "no country says that temporary visitors [and] their children will be given complete access to the benefits and blessings of American citizenship. America should actually look out for the interests of our citizens first."

Unable to land a rhetorical punch on the issues of birthright citizenship and illegal immigration, Brennan pressed Vance on the administration's moratorium on refugee admissions, insinuating hypocrisy on the part of the vice president.

Brennan referred to her August 2024 interview with Vance, in which she asked him whether America owed anything to the "80,000 or so Afghans who were left behind [during the Biden withdrawal], many of whom worked for the United States," and whether they should be offered asylum.

"I think that we should bring people here who helped us and have been properly vetted," Vance said at the time. "And that's very, very important, because a lot of the people the Biden administration has brought in have not been properly vetted."

Years earlier, Vance was among the Republican lawmakers who warned that a failure to get the vetting process right could end in tragedy, stating on Aug. 23, 2021, that "according to Pew, 40% of the people [in Afghanistan] believe that blowing yourself up, committing a suicide bombing, is an acceptable way to solve a problem. ... Let's ensure that we're properly vetting them so that we don't get a bunch of people who believe that they should blow themselves up at a mall because somebody looked at their wife the wrong way."

After stating that refugees are "heavily vetted," Brennan asked Vance in the Sunday interview whether he stood by his August 2024 statement in the face of Trump's recent executive action canceling Afghan flights and applications.

Again, Vance rejected Brennan's premise, replying, "Margaret, I don't agree that all these immigrants, or all these refugees, have been properly vetted. In fact, we know that there are cases of people who allegedly were properly vetted and then were literally planning terrorist attacks in our country."

'I don't want that person in my country.'

Blaze News previously reported that an Afghan national who entered the U.S. on Sept. 9, 2021, on a special immigrant visa was arrested in October and charged with allegedly plotting an Election Day terror attack for ISIS in Oklahoma. Following his capture, Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi allegedly admitted to purchasing weapons for the purpose of targeting large gatherings of people near voting stations and dying in the process of doing so.

Last week, the Oakland County Sheriff's Office apprehended another Afghan refugee in Michigan after he allegedly stabbed his caseworker multiple times.

Brennan, confronted with the Oklahoma case and caught on the back foot, conceded that not all of the Afghans were properly vetted; however, she desperately clung to her question, asking once more whether Vance stood by his previous statement.

Vance simply hammered home the point: "My primary concern as the vice president, Margaret, is to look after the American people. ... And now that we know that we have vetting problems with a lot of these refugee programs, we absolutely cannot unleash thousands of unvetted people into our country."

Vance stressed that he wouldn't subject other American citizens' children to the threat of improperly vetted foreign nationals, just as he wouldn't tolerate such a risk to his own children.

When Brennan tried splitting hairs, suggesting that one of the imported threats at issue may have been radicalized in the U.S., Vance cut her off, saying, "I don't really care, Margaret. I don't want that person in my country, and I think most Americans agree with me."

Having failed to dunk on Vance when discussing immigration, Brennan hurriedly pivoted to the topic of Trump's pardons for thousands of Jan. 6 defendants, suggesting again that the vice president's support for the president's decision reeked of hypocrisy.

After noting context missing from a quote Brennan shared, Vance proposed an alternative framing to the issue than that provided by the CBS News interviewer.

Brennan, adopting the go-to Democratic talking point, insinuated that by issuing a blanket pardon to supposedly violent and nonviolent Jan. 6 protesters alike, Trump downplayed violence against law enforcement. Vance countered by suggesting that the pardon power, which is "not just for people who are angels or people who are perfect," was properly utilized to rectify a wrong, namely the Biden Department of Justice's subjection of American citizens to an "incredibly unfair process, to denial of constitutional rights, and, frankly, to a double standard that was not applied to many people, including, of course, the Black Lives Matter rioters who killed over two dozen people and never had the weight of a weaponized Department of Justice come against them."

"There's what the people actually did on January the sixth, and we're not saying that everybody did everything perfectly," said Vance. "And then what did Merrick Garland's Department of Justice do in unjustly prosecuting well over a thousand Americans in a way that was politically motivated?"

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

CBS Reporter Regrets Media Misinformation On Biden For All The Wrong Reasons

'It could have changed the scope of the entire election'