Georgia man sues Facebook over banning his account and wins, but his fight isn't over



A Georgia man successfully sued Facebook after his account was permanently banned for allegedly violating the social media network’s child exploitation rules.

“I woke up one Sunday morning, I tapped on my Facebook icon, and I was locked out," Jason Crawford told WAGA this week.

Crawford said the only explanation for his Facebook account being terminated was a quick pop-up message that said he had violated the platform's child exploitation standards.

"It just gave me the briefest snapshot of saying that I had violated their standards on child sexual exploitation," he said. "And then it went away."

Crawford admitted that his account had been suspended in the past over posts about politics. However, he said that he had not done anything that would violate the child exploitation rules.

"I had, I don’t even know how you quantify it, pictures, videos, posts that, you know, come up as memories that I like to look at from time to time. You know, all that kind of stuff that I wasn’t willing to let a bunch of bullies take away from me for no reason," he explained.

Crawford wanted to clear his name and get his Facebook page back. He attempted to contact Facebook, but found it impossible.

He said, "It was as if I didn’t exist and Facebook was operated by a bunch of ghosts or something."

"What I learned is the way you submit your appeal, or whatever, is through your own profile, your own account," he told the Atlanta station. "If you don't have an account, you have no way of submitting it, so it’s like a dog chasing its tail."

Crawford, who is a lawyer, launched a lawsuit against Facebook's parent company Meta Platforms in August 2022. In the complaint, Crawford accused the tech giant of being "negligent" for banning him from the social media platform "based on a violation that did not occur."

Crawford said he was also banned from Instagram and WhatsApp – which are both owned by Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms allegedly did not respond to the lawsuit, and the judge ruled in favor of Crawford.

"Defendant was properly served with process in this action in according with Georgia law. … Defendant has failed to respond thereto as required by law; this action has automatically become in default; Defendant has failed to open the default as a matter of right within 15 days of the day of each Defendant’s default; and default judgment is demanded against Defendant," the ruling reads, according to BizPac Review.

“Plaintiff’s injuries and damages, as hereinabove described, were directly and proximately caused by the negligence of Defendant. The Court concludes that Plaintiff has endured great mental pain since Facebook unjustifiably and unreasonably shut down his account and that his pain and suffering will likely continue. The Court further concludes that Plaintiff is entitled to just and adequate compensation for his injuries and for his past and future damages," the ruling states.

The judge ordered Meta Platforms to pay $50,000 to Crawford.

Crawford said that Facebook finally restored his account. "I felt a little bit vindicated, and they activated my account again," he said.

A Facebook attorney allegedly told Crawford that his account had been hacked.

However, Crawford said that Meta Platforms has not paid him a dime yet. "Every step of the way, Facebook is choosing not to do the right thing," Crawford declared.

"It feels like a poke in the eye, and it feels like they're continuing to poke in the eye," he said. "Poke the local court system in the eye. Poke me in the eye. Poke other users in the eye, and it’s time that they at least respect our legal system."

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox 5 Atlanta.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Facebook will pay more than $14 million in settlement with DOJ for discriminating against US workers



Facebook will pay more than $14 million in penalties in a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice after the federal government accused the Big Tech company of discriminating against U.S. workers in favor of foreigners, the agency said Tuesday.

In a separate settlement with the U.S. Department of Labor, the company promised to do more to recruit Americans and agreed to submit to ongoing audits to ensure compliance with federal regulations.

These settlements come after the DOJ filed a lawsuit against Facebook in December 2020 alleging that the company "engaged in intentional and widespread violations of the law, by setting aside positions for temporary visa holders instead of considering interested and qualified U.S. workers." The government said Facebook had failed to properly advertise at least 2,600 open jobs and did not consider applications from U.S. citizens before offering those positions to foreign workers whom the company had sponsored for green cards between 2018 and 2019.

Federal law prohibits employers from discriminating against workers based on their citizenship or immigration status. And under DOL regulations, would-be employers must demonstrate that there are no qualified U.S. workers available before they offer jobs to foreign workers they sponsor for temporary visa applications.

After an investigation found that Facebook's hiring practices violated the law, the company agreed to pay a civil penalty of $4.75 million to the U.S. government and up to $9.5 million to eligible victims of its alleged discrimination. Officials said the civil penalty and back pay fund "represent the largest fine and monetary award that the Division ever has recovered in the 35-year history of the [Immigration and Naturalization Act]'s anti-discrimination provision."

"Facebook is not above the law, and must comply with our nation's federal civil rights laws, which prohibit discriminatory recruitment and hiring practices," Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division said. "Companies cannot set aside certain positions for temporary visa holders because of their citizenship or immigration status. This settlement reflects the Civil Rights Division's commitment to holding employers accountable and eradicating discriminatory employment practices."

Officials said Facebook will also train staff on federal anti-discrimination requirements. Over the next three years, the company's applications for temporary visa holders will be regularly audited by the Labor Department to check for compliance with the federal government's permanent labor certification program.

"This settlement is an important step forward and means that U.S. workers will have a fair chance to learn about and apply for Facebook's job opportunities," added Department of Labor Solicitor Seema Nanda. "No matter an employer's size or reach, the Department of Labor is committed to vigorously enforcing the law."

YouTube screenshot

Steven Crowder’s lawyer files lawsuit against Facebook alleging litany of censorship-related offenses



The lawyer for BlazeTV host Steven Crowder announced Monday that he has filed a lawsuit against Facebook for "unfair competition, fraud, false advertising, and antitrust" violations.

Bill Richmond, who is jokingly referred to on the set as Crowder's "half-Asian lawyer," was unusually straight-faced during Monday's show as he shared details about the lawsuit, which he expects will pull him away from the show for the foreseeable future.

"This time's different," said Crowder about other minor lawsuits often filed against the platform for alleged censorship.

"The reason why it's different is because we're going after Facebook based on its own words and its own premises," Richmond said.

He pointed to a 2016 report published by Gizmodo in which former Facebook employees admitted to "routinely" suppressing conservative news. In the aftermath of that article, Facebook has publicly denied that it censors conservatives any more.

"They told Congress 'we don't do it,' they told the consumers 'we don't do it,' they told us that they don't do it," Richmond claimed on Monday, adding, "but over the course of years, we've realized they actually are doing it."

One of the main complaints focuses on "Louder with Crowder's" massively popular election night livestream, which Crowder said Facebook took down without any explanation.

Richmond added that the lawsuit is "pro-business, anti-fraud," saying, "you can run a business however you want -- if you were a social media platform or any kind of business and you wanted to allow certain types of content or certain types of customers in your store or on your platform, you're allowed to do it -- but what you can't do is lie."

"What you can't do is say, 'We are open to everyone, we don't discriminate based on political ideology or race or religion,' and then turn around and actually do that, both expressly and through the software that you're implementing," he said.

With the lawsuit, Richmond said he is seeking injunctive relief from Facebook, or in other words, a court order requiring the platform stop censoring content from conservative sources.

He noted that he expects pushback from certain federal courts but said "we are ready and prepared to take this all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court."

You can watch the announcement below. This post will be updated as official court documents are made available.

WAR!! WALL STREET vs. MAIN STREET! | Louder with Crowder youtu.be