Joy Reid said the quiet part out loud — and it’s ugly



Joy Reid has done the parents of America an unexpected kindness.

If you’ve ever wondered what really lies behind the diversity, equity, and inclusion philosophy and the “decolonizing” curriculum so prominent in our universities, Reid has made it plain by saying the quiet part out loud.

Appearing with Wajahat Ali on “The Left Hook,” she claimed that “mediocre white men” are simply coasting along on stolen achievements from others. As amusing as it can be to watch Reid melt down and flail in any medium, there is, alas, a serious side to her remarks.

In the space of a few breaths, Reid not only insulted the intelligence of all white people, but also cast herself, unwittingly, as the schoolyard bully.

As one of the few — and I mean very few — conservative professors at Arizona State University, I can testify firsthand that faculty meetings and mandatory “trainings” often turn into open-mic nights for contemptuous remarks about white men. And if you raise the issue, cue the gaslighting chorus: “We can’t be racist. Only white men can be racist.”

So yes, laugh at the absurdity if you like. But parents should know that Joy Reid’s public bile is not an isolated eccentricity. It’s the distilled essence of a worldview taught in classrooms across the country.

Riding on privilege

Consider her credentials: a degree in film studies from Harvard and a lucrative perch in television. Yes, you read that right — film studies. Yet her rant against “whiteness” was no theatrical performance. It was a window into the sort of ignorance and hatred our universities have been happily exporting into the culture for decades.

Her interlocutor, Ali, was even more candid.

These people [white men] cannot create culture on their own. Without black people, brown people, the DEIs, there’s no culture in America. We make the food better. We make the economy better. We make the music better. Right? MAGA can’t create culture. They got Cracker Barrel and Kid Rock.

If you are still operating under the “classical liberalism and respectful pluralism” lens, you need to wake up. The left abandoned that approach decades ago. That might not be what leftists say at “meet the professor night” to get your money, but it’s what you find in their curriculum — and then said out loud by people like Joy Reid.

For those who are still under the illusion that we are committed to pluralism, you might have expected Reid to have exhibited a modicum of moderation: “Hold on, we can’t make sweeping denunciations of an entire people group. Everyone has contributed.” But no. For the academic left, classical liberalism and its old-fashioned respect for difference and fair treatment went out of fashion around the same time as dial-up internet.

Instead, Reid didn’t hide her disdain for those with lighter skin tones. “They don’t have the intellectual rigor to actually argue or debate with us,” she told Ali. “What they do is tattle and tell. They run and tell teacher that ‘the black lady or the brown man was mean to me.’”

Hiding in plain sight

The spectacle is almost too delicious. In the space of a few breaths, she not only insulted the intelligence of all white people, but also cast herself, unwittingly, as the schoolyard bully whose chief grievance is that the other children tell the teacher when she breaks the rules.

The irony, as Kid Rock might have noted with a raised brow, is as dense as a Cracker Barrel biscuit.

When Reid and Ali deign to speak of “culture,” they only mean food and pop music. They spent time sneering at Elvis, as if dismissing him were the final act of liberation. Meanwhile, Reid — a multimillionaire alumna of one of the finest (supposedly) universities in the world — complains of American awfulness and insists that our entire history must be reduced to the story of slavery, with no mention of those white men who fought and died to abolish it.

RELATED: Students are trapped in mandatory DEI disguised as coursework

Photo by Deagreez via iStock/Getty Images

As a professor, I can assure you that this is standard-issue humanities pedagogy in many American universities. Students are not trained to grapple with Mozart, Shakespeare, Adam Smith, or William Lloyd Garrison. They are taught a cartoon version of history in which every problem is “the fault of whiteness” and every solution is a demand for reparations. If those great names of history do appear, they are merely depicted as foils in a morality play about systemic oppression.

Remain vigilant

Parents, take note: Feel free to chuckle at Reid’s self-own, but then remember that people with her views stand in the front of your child’s classroom, smiling benignly during the parent campus tour while privately stewing in the same resentment. Moreover, they expect you to pay them tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege of being indoctrinated into their hatred.

It’s time to call this nonsense what it is — racism dressed up in academic jargon — and consign it to the ash heap of falsehood. They are free to hold their opinions, and we are free to ignore them and move on.

Biden’s bureaucrats scramble to protect their taxpayer slush fund



Democrats love to preach about “fiscal responsibility” — but only when it involves raising taxes. The moment someone suggests cutting waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government, they panic like a cornered animal. That’s exactly what’s happening now with the Department of Government Efficiency.

This new initiative aims to do something any rational person should support: eliminate wasteful spending and root out fraud in Washington. Yet, Democrats treat it like a personal attack. Why? Because waste isn’t a flaw in their system — it’s the foundation of their political machine.

Now that the DOGE is daring to ask, 'Should we maybe stop setting money on fire?' Democrats are in full meltdown mode.

For decades, the left has built its empire on a bloated, unaccountable government that burns through taxpayer dollars with no regard for efficiency, effectiveness, or common sense. Every redundant program, every duplicate agency, and every absurd study — like researching shrimp on treadmills or “equitable tree planting” — isn’t just a mistake. It’s a jobs program for the Democrats' allies and a slush fund for their agenda. They don’t want a lean, effective government. They want an ever-expanding bureaucracy that secures their power.

The numbers don’t lie. Every year, Washington wastes hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars on blatant fraud and inefficiency. This isn’t about minor accounting errors — it’s about reckless spending. Examples include $2.1 million for a climate change video game, $6 million to boost Egyptian tourism, and $28 million for forest camouflage uniforms for Afghan soldiers — in a country that is 99% desert.

These aren’t isolated incidents. This is standard operating procedure in Washington. Now that the DOGE is daring to ask, “Should we maybe stop setting money on fire?” Democrats are in full meltdown mode.

Protect the bloat, launder money

This is the part where Democrats insist that cutting waste means slashing “essential programs” for the poor. It’s the same lie they use every time someone suggests fiscal responsibility. They’ve played this game for years — protect the bloat, fund their allies, then cry poverty when called out.

The truth is, government waste isn’t helping struggling Americans. It’s lining the pockets of left-wing nonprofits, corrupt contractors, and activist organizations that exist solely to keep Democrats in power.

Look at the grift. Teachers’ unions, “climate justice” groups, and woke diversity consultants rake in massive taxpayer-funded grants and contracts. Then, miraculously, they donate millions right back into Democrat campaign coffers. This isn’t governance — it’s money laundering. The system is designed to take your money, hand it to Democratic donors, and have those donors funnel a cut back to the politicians who keep the racket alive.

That’s why the same politicians who claim to fight for the working class will prioritize a taxpayer-funded gender studies program in Pakistan over helping American workers. These programs don’t exist to help people. They exist to expand the federal government, create more Democrat voters, and funnel more money to the ruling class. The moment you try to stop it, you become their enemy.

That’s exactly what’s happening with the DOGE. The moment the Department of Government Efficiency started investigating wasteful spending, bureaucrats and Democratic politicians began working behind the scenes to undermine it.

A program designed to stop fraud and waste should have bipartisan support. Instead, Democrats are sabotaging it at every turn.

Democrats accuse DOGE of being “politically motivated,” which is laughable coming from the same people who weaponized the FBI, Justice Department, and nearly every federal agency against their political enemies. They claim it will “harm essential programs” — a tacit admission that these so-called essential programs are riddled with fraud and waste. They whine that the DOGE is a “power grab,” when in reality, it’s the first serious effort in decades to cut off the ruling class from its unlimited taxpayer-funded piggy bank.

Bureaucracy on defense

It’s not just politicians who are panicking. The unelected bureaucrats who run Washington like their personal kingdom are scrambling to stop the DOGE from doing its job. The permanent D.C. establishment isn’t just packed with Democrats — it’s a revolving door of career operatives cycling between government jobs, left-wing nonprofits, academia, and the media. These people depend on government bloat to maintain their influence. Cut the waste, and you cut their power. That’s why they’re mobilizing to block the DOGE from delivering the accountability Americans expect.

What’s truly infuriating is that Democrats have the audacity to claim cutting waste is “anti-government.” No, what’s anti-government is creating a system so dysfunctional, corrupt, and wasteful that Americans lose faith in it entirely. That’s exactly what the left has done to Washington. Leftists turned the federal government into a money pit that funds everyone except the people it’s supposed to serve. Now that someone is finally trying to fix it, they’re throwing a tantrum.

Meanwhile, they’re funneling hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to Ukraine with no oversight. They’re ignoring billions in welfare fraud while hiring 87,000 new IRS agents to shake down small business owners and working Americans. At the same time, Medicaid fraud alone drains over $100 billion a year from taxpayers. Where is their concern for fiscal responsibility when it comes to their own spending?

Nowhere — because this was never about responsible government. It’s about power, control, and keeping their political machine well-funded.

The same people who demand “fairness” and “transparency” in government never want to discuss where the money goes. They don’t want you asking why Soros-backed nonprofits keep receiving federal grants. They don’t want you questioning why the Clinton Health Access Initiative has received millions from USAID. They don’t want you to notice how taxpayer money is laundered through activist groups and handed out like candy to political allies. Because once you do, their entire narrative collapses.

The American people are fed up with seeing their hard-earned money wasted on corruption, fraud, and leftist activism disguised as government programs. The DOGE is finally doing what no one in Washington has dared to do — demand accountability. That’s why the left is panicking. Once Americans see how much of their money has been stolen, wasted, and funneled into the Democratic machine, the backlash will be relentless.

Democrats aren’t worried that the DOGE will cut “essential programs.” They’re terrified it will expose how much of their political power depends on fraud. They know that once Americans see the truth, they won’t just demand cuts to wasteful spending — they’ll demand the removal of every corrupt politician who enabled it.

And that reckoning is long overdue.

Lawmakers Look To Codify Trump’s Orders Killing DEI

'You live by the executive order, you die by the executive order,” said Dan Lennington, deputy counsel at WILL.

NCAA Keeps Touting ‘Fairness’ While Refusing To Ban Men From Women’s Sports

The NCAA doesn't need to wait for Trump to issue additional guidance and force its hand to protect our female athletes.

Meet The Outspoken Women Leading The Fight Against Men Invading Their Spaces

Jennifer Sey has joined other courageous women in leading the charge when it comes to proclaiming the reality of human nature.

'The dam is bursting': Riley Gaines and other female athletes sue NCAA for allowing transvestites to invade women's sports



All-American swim star Riley Gaines and 15 other all-female athletes are suing the National Collegiate Athletics Association for allowing transvestites to invade women's sports and locker rooms.

Gaines, host of the podcast "Gaines for Girls," noted on X, "The dam is bursting & it's about time."

The athletes who have joined the legal fight include All-American swimmer and Olympian Réka György; 2-time NCAA Champion and 31-time All-American swimmer Kylee Alons; soccer and track star Ainsley Erzen; University of Kentucky tennis player Ellie Eades; and Roanoke College swimming captains Lily Mullens and Kate Pearson along with their teammates Susanna Price, Carter Satterfield, Katie Blankship, and Julianna Morrow.

Background

Independent Council on Women's Sports, the group that ultimately organized the class action, penned a letter in January 2023 putting the NCAA Office of Legal Affairs on notice that their "practice of allowing male athletes on women's teams constitutes illegal discrimination against women on the basis of sex."

Stressing that the "NCAA is not above the law," the women's advocacy group demanded the association oust men from women's sports and locker rooms.

In subsequent months, various state governors around the country cognizant of the well-demonstrated athletic gap between men and women implored the NCAA Board of Governors to revise its transvestite student-athlete policy.

ICONS' letter and the gubernatorial pressure apparently weren't enough to make the NCAA budge. Sixteen female athletes figured a lawsuit might do the trick.

The Free Press reported that the suit could impact eligibility rules at 1,100 colleges and universities represented by the NCAA.

The class-action lawsuit

The stated aim of the lawsuit, filed this week in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, is to "secure for future generations of women the promise of Title IX that is being denied them and other college women by the National Collegiate Athletic Association working in concert with its member colleges and universities including those that are part of the University System of Georgia."

The suit accuses the NCAA of aligning with "the most radical elements of the so-called diversity, equity, and inclusion agenda on college campus" in the interest of "retaining control of the monetization of college sport," a multi-billion-dollar business.

To ensure this profitable ideological alignment, the suit claims the NCAA has also coordinated with member institutions such as Georgia Tech to suppress the free speech of student athletes who resist or speak out about the corruption of women's sports.

Part of this suppression strategy allegedly involves the imposition of "what the NCAA calls 'LGBTQ-Inclusive Codes of Conduct' which 'outlin[e] consequences for engaging in homophobic and transphobic behaviors.'"

The plaintiffs have requested the court declare that the NCAA violated Title IX and the 14th Amendment.

The suit specifically claims that the NCAA's eligibility policies pertaining to transvestites are discriminatory and violate Title IX because they:

  • permit men to compete against women in competitions and for prizes designated for females;
  • "deprive women of equal access to separate showers, locker rooms, and associated restroom facilities";
  • "diminish equal opportunities and resources for women";
  • "divert opportunities and resources to males";
  • "subject women to a loss of privacy and emotional harm"; and
  • "disproportionately impact and suppress the free speech rights of women advocating for their rights, safe spaces, and a reasonable and correct application of Title IX and equal protection principles."

The plaintiffs seek declarations that the University System of Georgia and Georgia Tech have similarly run afoul of federal law.

Beyond demanding declarations and damages, the female athletes want the NCAA and the other defendants to be barred from continuing to allow men into women's sports and from altogether enforcing its transvestite policies.

The plaintiffs have also asked that male athletes — such as the swimmer formerly known as William Thomas — have any awards, prizes, titles, or trophies won while competing against real women invalidated and reassigned.

"We're not just fighting for ourselves, we're fighting for every young girl who dreams of competing in sports," Gaines said in a statement.

ICONS cofounder Marshi Smith, herself a collegiate All-American and NCAA national champion swimmer, stated, "This lawsuit against the NCAA isn't just about competition; it's a fight for the very essence of women's sports."

"We're standing up for justice and the rights of female athletes to compete on a level playing field," continued Smith. "It's about preserving the legacy of Title IX and ensuring that the future of women's sports is as bright as its past."

The NCAA said in a statement obtained by The Hill, "College sports are the premier stage for women's sports in America, and while the NCAA does not comment on pending litigation, the Association and its members will continue to promote Title IX, make unprecedented investments in women's sports and ensure fair competition in all NCAA championships."

CBS News noted that representatives from the Georgia schools named in the suit said they had not yet been served with the lawsuit and would not comment.

It's personal

The lawsuit comes more than a year after Riley Gaines wrote to NCAA president and former Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker (R), speaking to the "anger and frustration" experienced by girls "who had worked so hard and sacrificed so much to get to this moment only to have to compete in a farce."

In her message to Baker, Gaines also highlighted the scientifically documented physical advantages male athletes have over female competitors. The former All-American swimmer witnessed this advantage firsthand in 2022 when she had to compete against Thomas, who dominated the NCAA Swimming Championships.

Blaze News previously reported that Thomas had been a middling performer on the University of Pennsylvania men's swimming team until he started taking cross-sex hormones in 2019 and competing against women.

He subsequently crushed records set by real women in the 500-yard freestyle in the 2022 championships and tied with Gaines for fifth the next month in the women's 200-meter.

Thomas' inclusion impacted various women besides Gaines, a number of whom are plaintiffs in the case.

Réka György, for instance, indicated in 2022 that Thomas' inclusion precluded her from securing a spot in the consolation final.

"That final spot was taken away from me because of the NCAA's decision to let someone who is not a biological female compete," György said in a March 2022 letter to the NCAA. "It hurts me, my team and other women in the pool."

It wasn't just Thomas' physical advantage that was a problem for female NCAA athletes. He also brought his vestigial male appendage into the women's locker room with him.

Kylee Alons, a plaintiff in the suit who previously swam for North Carolina State, told the Free Press that to avoid changing with a then-anatomically correct man, she started changing in a "dimly lit storage and utility closet" behind the bleachers.

"I was literally racing U.S. and Olympic gold medalists and I was changing in a storage closet at this elite-level meet," said Alons. "I just felt that my privacy and safety were being violated in the locker room."

Gaines previously alleged that on at least one occasion, Thomas exposed his male genitals in the presence of real female athletes.

Kaitlynn Wheeler told the Free Press that when changing into racing suits, "You're exposed."

"You can't stand there and hold a towel around you while putting the suit on at the same time," said Wheeler. "Never in my 18-year career had I seen a man changing in the locker rooms. I immediately felt the need to cover myself."

Gaines underscored that Thomas was merely taking advantage of the rules on the books: "It is the rules that are the problem. Not Lia Thomas."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

How Lia Thomas And A Small Cabal Of Lawyers Are Waging Lawfare Across Women’s Sports

A small network of people appears to be using activists and mediocre male athletes to wage a war on biology and fairness in women's sports.

From Title IX To Title None, Biden Kills Women’s Sports And Safety

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/2018-10-15_Athletics_Girls_Shot_put_at_the_2018_Summer_Youth_Olympics_–_Stage_2_Martin_Rulsch_40-e1681323392813-1200x675.jpg crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/2018-10-15_Athletics_Girls_Shot_put_at_the_2018_Summer_Youth_Olympics_%5Cu2013_Stage_2_Martin_Rulsch_40-e1681323392813-1200x675.jpg%22%7D" expand=1]XY obliterates XX under Biden's Title IX.

Republican stumps Elizabeth Warren over single question about fairness of student loan cancelation: 'Where do I sign up for reimbursement?'



Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) stole a play from "Dodgeball" on Friday — dodge, duck, dip, dive, and dodge — when a Republican guest co-host on "The View" confronted her about student loan cancelation.

What happened?

Because Warren advocates for mass student loan cancelation, Republican Lindsey Granger asked Warren how she plans to reimburse Americans who paid off their student loans.

The question exposed what critics of student loan forgiveness say is the innate unfairness of canceling student loans.

"What do you say to someone like me who worked two jobs for a decade to pay all their student loans — just finished. Where do I sign up for reimbursement?" Granger asked.

Elizabeth Warren Explains Why She's Calling on Biden to Cancel Student Loan Debt | The View youtu.be

Warren, however, completely deflected from answering the question, and instead presented her talking points for why she believes student loan cancelation is necessary.

"So let's start out with who has student loans today. About 40% of folks with student loans don't have a college diploma," Warren began. "They're folks who tried and life happened ... and now they earn what a high school grad earns, and they're trying to pay off college-level debt, and it is crushing their bones.

"Keep in mind that of those that have student loan debt more than half have negative wealth— they don't have any wealth. You know that right now there are tens of thousands of people who are living on Social Security, who are having their Social Security checks garnished to pay student loans," she continued. "And so this for me is a question of fairness."

Warren then repeated her misleading claim that she only spent $50 per semester going to the University of Houston (The school's newspaper notes that Warren probably paid at least double what she claims).

"There was a time in America when we invested in our public colleges and universities, that's how I could go to a college that cost $50 a semester paid for on two part-time jobs. But today that option is not out there for our young people," Warren said. "So this is about saying: Look, it's tough, we understand that. We want to invest in you. We want to invest in your getting an education."

At no point did Warren answer Granger's question. After her response ended, the panel immediately shifted the topic to the fallout over the potential overturn of Roe v. Wade.

Anything else?

"The View" later went off the rails Friday when liberal co-host Sunny Hostin racially insulted Granger.

"I feel like it's an oxymoron, a black Republican," Hostin said after Granger identified as a Republican.

Virginia Eliminates Accelerated Math Courses Because Equity

The Virginia Department of Education is eliminating accelerated math courses before 11th grade to "[i]mprove equity in mathematics learning opportunities."