House Oversight Committee Investigates Biden-Harris 'Scientific Integrity' Guidelines Meant To Thwart Trump's Agenda

The House Oversight and Reform Committee is launching a broad investigation into so-called scientific integrity rules crafted by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Health and Human Services, the Washington Free Beacon has learned.

The post House Oversight Committee Investigates Biden-Harris 'Scientific Integrity' Guidelines Meant To Thwart Trump's Agenda appeared first on .

Delusion, Hypocrisy, and the Threat to Democracy

"Ungoverning" is a term invented by Russell Muirhead and Nancy Rosenblum, political scientists respectively at Dartmouth and Harvard, to describe the project of "deconstructing the administrative state [conducted] by a reactionary movement." This would include elected Republican officials and Supreme Court justices, aimed at depriving government of ability to govern. The individual they hold most responsible for this is Donald Trump, who brought decades of preexisting "hostility toward government to a crescendo."

The post Delusion, Hypocrisy, and the Threat to Democracy appeared first on .

Former Trump Appointee Explains Why Trump Needs Elon Musk To Fire Thousands Of Bureaucrats

Mark Moyar's story shows why Trump has to prove to the people he needs for an effective presidency that he will not leave them twisting in the wind.

How Many Laws Did You Break Today?

When the Washington Free Beacon asked me to review Over Ruled, I was honored, intrigued, and amused. Honored because this was Justice Neil Gorsuch’s latest work that’s not printed in U.S. Reports, the official publisher of Supreme Court opinions. Intrigued because he, along with his sometime coauthor and former clerk Janie Nitze (an accomplished lawyer in her own right) were arguing that our rule of law was suffering because we had not just too many laws—that ground has been well-trod, not least by my former colleague Walter Olson, who founded and for over 20 years ran the first-ever legal blog, Overlawyered—but too much law. And amused because I myself have a book coming out called Lawless, which chronicles the illiberal takeover of legal education, with the danger that foretells for the future gatekeepers of our legal and political institutions.

The post How Many Laws Did You Break Today? appeared first on .

Supreme Court Overturns Chevron, Dealing Major Blow to Federal Agency Power

The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a major blow to federal regulatory power on Friday by overturning a 1984 precedent that had given deference to government agencies in interpreting laws they administer, handing a defeat to President Joe Biden's administration.

The post Supreme Court Overturns Chevron, Dealing Major Blow to Federal Agency Power appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

Republicans Introduce Bill To Ban DEI in Government, Federal Contracting

Congressional Republicans introduced a bill on Wednesday that would eliminate all diversity, equity, and inclusion positions in the federal government and bar federal contractors from requiring DEI statements and training sessions. The Dismantle DEI Act, introduced by Sen. J.D. Vance (R., Ohio) and Rep. Michael Cloud (R., Texas), would also bar federal grants from going […]

The post Republicans Introduce Bill To Ban DEI in Government, Federal Contracting appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

New Biden Rule Aims To Entrench The Deep State Forever

The Biden administration’s rule seems designed to ensure the deep state will remain unaccountable to the president — and the American people.

Federal Reserve Staff Underwent DEI Training Amid Rising Inflation, Documents Show

The Federal Reserve conducted diversity, equity, and inclusion trainings in which staff members learned that "correct pronoun usage is a civil right" and were told to acknowledge their "white privilege," documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show.

The post Federal Reserve Staff Underwent DEI Training Amid Rising Inflation, Documents Show appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

How The Biden Administration Put Race at the Center of Government Spending

The residents of Gillette, Wyoming, once enjoyed economic gains almost unheard of in rural communities thanks to a single commodity: coal.

The post How The Biden Administration Put Race at the Center of Government Spending appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

Biden quietly makes it harder for future Republican presidents to slash size of the federal bureaucracy



The Biden administration wants to make it difficult for future Republican presidents to decrease the size of the federal bureaucracy.

What is the background?

Most career federal civil servants are competitive service employees hired under a merit-based system typical of the nongovernment marketplace. They receive tremendous employee rights against demotion or termination.

Excepted service employees, on the other hand, work jobs requiring specialized qualifications or skills, such as in law enforcement, intelligence, science, and the law. However, excepted employees do not receive the same job protections as their competitive service counterparts unless they meet strict criteria.

In 2020, then-President Donald Trump issued an executive order creating a new job category for federal employees: Schedule F. The new category would have applied to excepted employees whose job exerted any influence over policy. The directive would have essentially made these employee's "at will," and thus would have stripped them of their civil service protections. In theory, it would have made such employees easy to fire.

President Joe Biden rescinded the executive order after taking office.

What is the Biden admin proposing?

The Office of Personnel Management issued a rule proposal on Friday to give federal employees more protections and to rebuff future attempts at slashing the size of the federal workforce.

The new rule stipulates that any federal employee shifted from the competitive service to the excepted service will keep "the status and civil service protections they had already accrued." The rule also clarifies the definition of which employees have influence over policy to mean "noncareer, political appointments."

In a press release, OPM directly cited the Trump administration as motivation for now taking action to protect federal bureaucrats.

"The previous Administration issued an executive order to alter the long-standing system that ensures that decisions to hire and fire career civil servants are based on merit and not loyalty to the President," the agency claimed.

The rule proposal comes as Republican presidential candidates promise to reduce the size of the federal bureaucracy — comprising more than 2.2 million employees, according to OPM — if they win the White House.

Vivek Ramaswamy, for example, promises to slash more than 1 million jobs and ultimately 75% of the federal workforce over four years, while Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis says he will begin cutting jobs on day one of his presidency.

Anything else?

According to FedSmith, the "OPM proposal is obviously about politics and political power." Indeed, poorly performing civil employees are notoriously difficult to demote or terminate. Moreover, civil service employees are supposed to be nonpartisan, but there is a strong perception that a significant number are not.

Should it be difficult to remove overly partisan career employees? That's a question that remains open for debate. But make no doubt about it: the Biden administration is working hard to ensure that partisan and poorly performing employees remain difficult to remove.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!