Medical group sues Pfizer for 'open' discrimination against whites and Asians: Report



A group of medical professionals and other health care associates has sued pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. for supposedly discriminating against "white and Asian-American applicants" for one of its fellowship programs.

Earlier this month, Do No Harm — which describes itself as "a diverse group of physicians, healthcare professionals, medical students, patients, and policymakers" who wish to "[p]rotect healthcare from a radical, divisive, and discriminatory ideology" — filed a lawsuit in federal court in Manhattan to end the supposedly discriminatory aspects of Pfizer's Breakthrough Fellowship Program.

Pfizer claims that it established BFP "to increase minority representation at Pfizer" and "to enhance [its] pipeline of diverse leaders." To achieve that end, BFP recipients are given funding for: several summer internships, a master's degree, and pre- and post-graduate employment at the company. However, Pfizer limits those who may apply for BFP. In addition to being a U.S. citizen or resident; a junior at an accredited college or university; interested in a master's in business, pharmacology, or statistics; and willing to remain in or relocate to New York City, applicants must "[m]eet the program’s goals of increasing the pipeline for Black/African American, Latino/Hispanic and Native Americans."

In other words, Do No Harm alleges, whites and Asian-Americans need not apply. Such a policy, Do No Harm states, is "discriminatory on its face."

"Racial discrimination demeans us," the complaint continues.

Not only does Do No Harm insist that this form of racial discrimination is wrong, the group also alleges that "open exclusion of white and Asian-American applicants is illegal" because it violates municipal, state, and federal civil rights laws as well as laws regulating which companies can receive federal funding.

The lawsuit seeks to end the discriminatory BFP requirements, prevent Pfizer from discriminating against white and Asian-American applicants for the 2023 BFP awards, and collect $1 in compensatory damages.

However, Pfizer seems unfazed by either the lawsuit or the accusations. Though representatives of the COVID vaccine manufacturer claim they had not read the entire lawsuit, they said they have "every confidence" that Pfizer's policies comply with all local, state, and federal employment laws.

"We will continue to strive to create more opportunity," the statement from Pfizer said, "including through specific programs designed to cast a wide net for talent."

As it stands, Pfizer said it hopes to develop 100 fellows within the next three years.

Google has also recently come under fire for supposedly discriminating against whites and Asians in one of its Ph.D. fellowship programs.

"The Google Fellowship program is a blatantly unlawful and immoral quota plan that pits students against one another by skin color and ethnic heritage," said Edward Blum, the founder of Students for Fair Admissions. "Our nation’s enduring civil rights laws were passed to specifically forbid this type of racial discrimination."

Like Pfizer, Google said that it stands by its policy.

Google PhD fellowship discriminates against white and Asian students, but many elite universities still comply



Since at least 2009, Google has offered generous fellowships to up and coming computer science scholars seeking financial support during their final years of study. A new report from the Washington Free Beacon now reveals that Google has long included a racist criterium to prevent colleges and universities from nominating too many qualified white and Asian students for the fellowship.

Google claims that it offers the fellowship "to recognize outstanding graduate students doing exceptional and innovative research in areas relevant to computer science and related fields." And though it likewise purports that fellowships are available to "promising PhD candidates of all backgrounds," the nomination process Google has established directly limits the number of male, white, and Asian students who can be considered.

Under the fellowship FAQ section, Google states that applicants — except those from Africa, India, or southeast Asia — must be nominated by their school. It also states that American and Canadian universities may nominate up to four students total, only two of whom may be able-bodied white or Asian males.

"If a university chooses to nominate more than two students," Google states, "then in order to increase opportunities for students who are underrepresented in the field of computing the third and fourth nominees must self-identify as a woman, Black / African descent, Hispanic / Latino / Latinx, Indigenous, and/or a person with a disability."

It is unclear whether Google means to imply that applicants may "self-identify" as black, Hispanic, indigenous, or disabled.

As the Washington Free Beacon notes, many of the schools which have submitted nominees for the fellowship also have anti-discrimination policies which would prohibit them from selecting nominees based on race and gender. These include elite Ivy League schools like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, as well as notable state schools like the University of North Carolina, the University of Michigan, and the University of California, Berkeley. MIT, NYU, Duke, Johns Hopkins, and others have also submitted nominations.

And by complying with the race and gender parameters for the fellowship, these same schools may also be violating federal law.

"The Google Fellowship program is a blatantly unlawful and immoral quota plan that pits students against one another by skin color and ethnic heritage," said Edward Blum, the founder of Students for Fair Admissions. "Our nation’s enduring civil rights laws were passed to specifically forbid this type of racial discrimination."

Despite the accusations of racial and gender discrimination, Google stands by its policy.

"Like many companies, we actively encourage a broad range of individuals to apply to our PhD Fellowship program in order to attract the widest and most representative pool of applicants possible—this follows all relevant laws and is extremely common to do," a Google spokesperson said.

Google further stated that the selection process to determine the final awardees "is not based on demographics in any way."

It is unclear how many white and Asian males have ever received a Google fellowship.

Dear Dr. Fauci: You’re Invited To Our Christmas This Year

There will be plenty of pecan pie, a Christmas ham, carols, lots of fellowship, and the joy of knowing that our hope is in the promise of eternity.