Alaska Airlines employees sue after allegedly being fired for voicing opposition to the LGBT 'Equality Act' on an internal message board they were invited to comment on



A pair of former Alaska Airlines flight attendants have sued their employer, claiming they were fired for voicing opposition to the company's embrace of the LGBT "Equality Act" on an internal message board.

Marli Brown and Lacey Smith argued in a federal lawsuit filed this week that they were the targets of religious discrimination when they were terminated from their jobs in August 2021 solely on the basis of their religious beliefs.

In early 2021, as Congress was debating the passage of the controversial Equality Act, Alaska Airlines announced its support for the measure on an employee message board and asked employees to comment.

The Equality Act, if passed, would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include sexual orientation and gender identity among the prohibited categories of discrimination or segregation — which currently include race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.

According to their law firm, First Liberty Institute, both Brown and Smith felt "compelled by their Christian faith" to weigh in.

Smith asked: "As a company, do you think it’s possible to regulate morality?"

Brown added a lengthier statement seeking further explanation from Alaska Airlines about its support of the measure:

Does Alaska [Airlines] support: endangering the Church, encouraging suppression of religious freedom, obliterating [women’s] rights and parental rights? This act will [force] every American to agree with controversial government-imposed ideology … or be treated as an outlaw.

The Equality Act demolishes existing civil rights and constitutional freedoms, which threatens constitutional freedoms by eliminating conscience protections from the Civil Rights Act.

The Equality Act would affect everything from girls’ and women’s showers and locker rooms to women’s shelters and women’s prisons, endangering safety and diminishing privacy.

Giving people blanket permission to enter private spaces for the opposite sex enables sexual predators to exploit the rules and gain easy access to victims. This is Equality Act …

The remainder of her question was cut off due to character limitations.

Both Brown and Smith's comments were later removed for being "discriminatory," "hateful," and "offensive." The company then launched an investigation into the employees, which eventually resulted in their termination.

According to court documents, Alaska Airlines told the flight attendants: "Defining gender identity or sexual orientation as a moral issue, or questioning the Company’s support for the rights of all people regardless of their gender identity or sexual orientation, is not a philosophical question, but a discriminatory statement. Your posting was offensive, discriminatory, and did not align with Alaska Airline’s values."

Following their termination, the two reported charges to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and have since been granted "right-to-sue" letters by the department.

In the lawsuit, the women also claim that the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) did little to defend them despite its stated duties to help members being discriminated against on the basis of religion.

"Alaska Airlines 'canceled' Lacey and Marli because of their religious beliefs, flagrantly disregarding federal civil rights laws that protect people of faith from discrimination," said Stephanie Taub, Senior Counsel for First Liberty Institute, in a press release.

She added: "It is a blatant violation of state and federal civil rights laws to discriminate against someone in the workplace because of their religious beliefs and expression. 'Woke' corporations like Alaska Airlines think that they do not have to follow the law and can fire employees if they simply don't like their religious beliefs."

TheBlaze reached out to Alaska Airlines for comment regarding the lawsuit, but the company did not respond in time for publication.

Flight attendants sue CDC over mask mandate, ask court to prevent gov't from ever issuing such a mandate again



Nine flight attendants from six different airlines have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health and Human Services over the federal mask mandate on air travel, claiming the measure is unconstitutional, ineffective, and harmful to their health and safety.

In the lawsuit, filed March 24 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, the flight attendants claimed the measure obstructs breathing over many hours and causes a litany of other health problems. Enforcement of the mandate also puts attendants in danger of retaliation from unruly passengers who refuse to comply, they added.

The plaintiffs also called the mandate "an illegal and unconstitutional exercise of executive authority," since it was enacted "without statutory authorization or following the rulemaking process required by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)."

They urged a judge to vacate the Federal Transportation Mask Mandate effective immediately. Then they went even further, calling on the court to issue a permanent injunction prohibiting the CDC and HHS from ever issuing such a mandate again.

The suit comes as the large majority of states across the country have begun lifting mask mandates for most areas of public life. Air travel, however, remains one of the last sectors with an ongoing mask requirement. The FTMM, which was placed in effect on Feb. 1, 2021, has been extended several times, most recently until April 18, 2022.

That latest extension, issued March 10, served as the last straw for several in the aviation industry. Shortly after the extension was announced, 10 major airline company CEOs issued a letter to President Joe Biden demanding that his administration move on from the mandate. Around the same time, a group of pilots filed a lawsuit against the CDC over the requirement.

"Masks impair our health and reduce flight safety," Southwest Airlines attendant Victoria Vasenden of Reno, Nevada, who is one of the plaintiffs, said, according to KTVX-TV.

"We are in planes and airports up to 18 hours a day with zero chance of fresh air. Physicians don’t wear masks that long," she added. "That’s assault on the brain, organs, and tissues of the human body. Yet, we are expected to ensure all aspects of the flight remain safe when masks clearly diminish our capacities."

Another plaintiff, Alaina Trocano of Fort Myers, Florida, who works for American Airlines, added, "We’re supposed to ensure safety yet there are many of us who do not feel safe ourselves."

"Mask or be harassed. That’s not ensuring safety. That’s enabling hostility. Air travel should be the last place for conflict," she lamented in reference to the several on-flight skirmishes over mask policy adherence since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In addition to Southwest and American, the plaintiffs in the complaint work for Allegiant, Delta, Frontier, and United. They come from six different states, as well.

The lawsuit is reportedly the 19th legal challenge filed against the FTMM but the first issued by flight attendants, who have effectively been commandeered by the federal government as enforcers of the mandate.

Neither the HHS nor the CDC have provided substantive comment to multiple local outlets reporting on the lawsuit. The CDC reportedly told KPHO-TV that it does not discuss pending litigation.