Mike Johnson And Trump Can Cut The Bait-And-Switch ‘Loan For Ukraine’ Talk

Republicans are trying to con voters by calling more Ukraine welfare a 'loan.' It's a lie because Ukraine will never be able to repay it.

Utah Sen. Mike Lee says 'We might have to invoke the War Powers Act' after Biden authorizes deployment of reservists to Europe



President Joe Biden authorized the deployment of thousands of reservists to Europe Thursday, adding to an American troop presence on the continent already totaling over 100,000.

Army Lt. Gen. Douglas Sims, the director of operations for the Joint Staff, told reporters, "This reaffirms the unwavering support and commitment to the defense of NATO's eastern flank in the wake of Russia's illegal and unprovoked war on Ukraine," reported Politico.

Critics have suggested that the move, following the recent shipment of cluster bombs to Ukraine, takes the U.S. closer to a direct shooting war with Russia, with some claiming, "America Last strikes again!"

Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah suggested that Congress consider invoking the War Powers Act and other measures to prevent Biden from "locking us into supporting Ukraine."

The order

Biden issued an executive order Thursday, just after recommitting to NATO at the alliance's summit in Vilnius, Lithuania, stating, "It is necessary to augment the active Armed Forces of the United States for the effective conduct of Operation Atlantic Resolve in and around the United States European Command's area of responsibility."

Accordingly, he authorized the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security, with respect to the Coast Guard, to "order to active duty any units, and any individual members not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit of the Selected Reserve, or any member in the Individual Ready Reserve mobilization category and designated as essential."

The number of troops called up is "not to exceed 3,000 total members at any one time, of whom not more than 450 may be members of the Individual Ready Reserve," which consists of former active-duty or reserve military personnel.

Politico indicated that the president's order is novel in that it designates Operation Atlantic Resolve a contingency operation for the first time, meaning the Pentagon can "call up reserve forces and implement sped-up acquisition authorities to supply those troops with equipment."

With this designation, reservists will also be paid and supported as active-duty troops.

"This new designation benefits troops and families with increases in authorities, entitlements, and access to the reserve component forces and personnel," clarified Sims.

Atlantic Resolve, an operation headquartered in Poznan, Poland, kicked off in 2014 under then-President Barack Obama in response to Russia's annexation of the Crimean Peninsula. Its purpose is to buttress NATO nations' defenses against further Russian aggression.

The Pentagon indicated last summer, "Since February 2022, DoD deployed or extended over 20,000 additional forces to Europe in response to the Ukraine crisis, adding additional air, land, maritime, cyber, and space capabilities, bringing our current total to more than 100,000 service members across Europe."

"This included extending a Carrier Strike Group, deploying additional fighter squadrons and lift/tanker aircraft, and deploying an Amphibious Readiness Group and Marine Expeditionary Force. DoD added a Corps Headquarters, Division Headquarters, Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT), Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT), High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) battalion, and multiple enablers to the existing Corps Forward Command Post, Division Headquarters, and three BCTs already stationed in or deployed to Europe," said the Defense Department.

The response

Richard Grenell, the former acting director of national intelligence under Trump, noted, "Eight of the 31 NATO countries currently pay their obligations. Germany and Canada are two of the wealthier nations NOT paying the agreed upon percentage. Joe Biden failed to press NATO this week - but then called up American reserves to active duty."

In another tweet, Grenell, who was previously ambassador to Germany, noted that there "was no peace plan presented" at the NATO summit, "just more WAR for American men and women."

Joe Kent, a Washington state Republican running for Congress in 2024, tweeted, "Defending America is Biden's last priority."

Sean Davis, CEO of the Federalist, tweeted, "Nothing to see here. Just Biden calling up the reserves in preparation for World War 3 against Russia over a tinpot puppet kleptocrat in Eastern Europe."

William Wolfe, a former senior Trump administration official, wrote, "Biden authorizing the call for reserve troops up to active duty for operations in Europe? Does this mean Ukraine? Not good."

Turning Point USA CEO Charlie Kirk wrote, "Joe Biden is calling up reservists for active duty in Operation Atlantic Resolve, because apparently it can’t fill the ranks of its rainbow flag military as recruitment plummets. This is not to fortify our border, which remains wide open, but to increase our deployments near Ukraine. America Last strikes again!"

Restraining Biden's ambitions

Sen. Lee claimed Thursday that "President Biden is arguably walking the U.S. up to the line of war and daring Russia to shoot first."

"Since conflict with Russia and Ukraine came to blows in 2014, rotational deployments under Atlantic Resolve have been considered a backbone of deterring Russia from crossing NATO's Eastern flank," wrote Lee. "The active-duty activation and deployment of these additional forces is a dangerous provocation, knowing full well NATO's Eastern Flank is adjacent to active hostilities."

Late last year, a Ukrainian missile strayed into Poland, but was misidentified in the press as a Russian missile. Such spillover from the fighting between Ukrainians and the Russian invaders could easily and swiftly bring America directly into the conflict.

"President Biden did the same thing at the beginning of the war in Ukraine in 2022, massively increasing our active-duty force presence when we knew hostilities were imminent. But now it’s even more risky because hostilities are active," continued Lee. "Not only does this run the risk of further locking us into supporting Ukraine, now the military-industrial complex will say the US military presence is THE one thing preventing Russia from crossing NATO’s eastern border & that we have to maintain such presence indefinitely."

According to Lee, this may amount to a "long-term security guarantee. Another endless war but this time by proxy."

The Utah senator said that "this makes me really uneasy," adding that "we might have to invoke the War Powers Act."

The War Powers Act states that, unless Congress has declared war, the U.S. military and members thereof cannot be "introduced in hostilities or in situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances" unless:

  • they are repelling an armed attack on the U.S., its territories and possessions;
  • they are taking "necessary and appropriate retaliatory actions in the event of such an attack";
  • they are forestalling the direct imminent threat of such an attack;
  • they are providing protection for evacuation of American citizens; or
  • they have "specific statutory authorization," such as the 2001 "Authorization for Use of Military Force."

Lee acknowledged that a resolution passed under the War Powers Act could be vetoed by the president. To override such a veto would require a two-thirds vote from both houses of Congress, meaning it would have to be a bipartisan effort.

The Utah senator was part of a bipartisan legislative effort in 2021 to reclaim for Congress "its rightful role as co-equal branch on matters of war and national security."

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said at the time that Congress had "acquiesced to the growing, often unchecked power of the executive to determine the outline of America's footpring in the world."

Should a War Powers resolution such as that proposed by Lee fail, the senator indicated Congress would still have the "option of defunding, but that's tricky too because spending legislation is also subject to presidential veto."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Finland to be admitted to NATO 'within days' following Turkish approval — will double NATO's border with Russia



Turkey's parliament approved a bill Thursday to permit Finland's admission to NATO. With Hungary similarly backing the Nordic country's admission to the military alliance this week, all 30 members are now onside and ready to double NATO's border with the Russian Federation.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said Friday, "All 30 Nato allies have now ratified the accession protocol. ... Finland will formally join our alliance in the coming days."

\u201c\u275dFinland will formally join our Alliance in the coming days.\u00a0Their membership will make Finland safer and NATO stronger. I look forward to also welcoming Sweden as a full member of the NATO family as soon as possible.\u275e\n\n\u2014 Secretary General @jensstoltenberg\u201d
— NATO (@NATO) 1680254362

Finland's defense minister Antti Kaikkonen tweeted, "Finland will be a steadfast security provider as part of the alliance. We look forward to Sweden's membership as soon as possible."

'A huge plus'

Russia presently shares approximately 754 miles of border with NATO members Norway, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, and Lithuania. In light of Finland's 830 miles of shared border with Russia, there will soon stretch nearly 1,600 miles of geographic contact between NATO-protected regions and Russia.

Extra to hemming in Russia to a greater extent in northern Europe, this move signals an end to decades of Finnish neutrality, reported the Guardian.

Reuters reported that after "deposition of the ratification" by all members, Finland will have to deposit its "instrument of accession" at the U.S. Department of State to become an official inductee and party to the proxy war with Russia.

The Times indicated that Finland's inclusion in NATO will bolster the alliance with a better geostrategic position, the support of additional military forces, and access to Finnish airspace, ports and sea lanes.

Finland has 23,000 troops, although in wartime, its fighting strength could reportedly grow to 280,000 soldiers.

According to the Wilson Center, Finland has "1,500 artillery weapons, including 700 Howitzer guns, 700 heavy mortar, and 100 rocket launcher systems, the Finnish artillery has more artillery firepower than the combined militaries of Poland, Germany, Norway, and Sweden can currently muster."

The Wilson Center also claimed that Finland would provide the alliance with additional technological and civilian defense infrastructure.

Retired four-star American admiral and former NATO military commander James Stavridis called the prospective Finnish addition "a huge plus for NATO."

"Geographically, their addition to the alliance adds a huge, difficult-to-defend border that complicates Putin’s calculus," said Stavridis.

Application, American assent, Turkish approval

The president and government of Finland announced in May 2022, following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, that it intended to apply for NATO membership. It formally handed in its application on May 18, 2022.
President Sauli Niinistö said at the time of the announcement of intent, "This is a historic day. A new era begins."
Turkey held up Finland's admission with a veto, but Turkish dictator Recep Tayyip Erdoğan ultimately gave the Nordic nation his blessing after Helsinki agreed to crack down on groups Ankara regarded as terrorists as well as increase in defense exports.
The Turkish parliament voted unanimously in support of Finland's NATO membership application.
Turkey's approval this week comes nearly nine months after the U.S. Senate approved a treaty to include Finland and Sweden in NATO.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) was the lone holdout, claiming in an opinion piece that "NATO expansion would almost certainly mean more U.S. forces in Europe for the long haul," reported the New York Times.
Hawley indicated that notwithstanding the Russian threat, China posed the greater immediate danger to the U.S.. Accordingly, he recommended, "We must do less in Europe (and elsewhere) in order to prioritize China and Asia."
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said, "Some critics say America shouldn’t pledge to protect countries halfway around the world. ... But these critics are seven decades too late. We’re already treaty-bound to defend more than two dozen nations in Europe."

Threatened Russians and Russian threats

In February 2022, Russian president Vladimir Putin condemned further NATO expansion.
"We haven't seen adequate consideration of our three key requirements concerning the prevention of NATO expansion, the refusal to deploy strike weapons systems near the Russian borders as well as the return of the military infrastructure [to NATO's 1997 borders]" said Putin.
In May 2022, the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement, saying, "Finland joining NATO is a radical change in the country's foreign policy. ... Russia will be forced to take retaliatory steps, both of a military-technical and other nature, in order to stop threats to its national security arising."
While denouncing NATO expansion, Moscow has also suggested it does not pose a threat to the Nordic nations.
On March 16, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, "We have many times expressed regret over Finland and Sweden's move toward membership and said many times that Russia does not pose a threat to these countries."
"We do not have any dispute with these countries ... They have never posed any threat to us and, logically, we did not threaten them," reiterated Peskov.
The Russian Embassy in Sweden resumed threatening Finland and Sweden this week over their possible inclusion in NATO, writing, "If anyone still believes that this will somehow improve Europe’s security, you can be sure that the new members of the hostile bloc will become a legitimate target for Russia’s retaliatory measures, including military ones."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Despite Biden’s Explicit Denials, New York Times Confirms POTUS Involvement In Family Business

The New York Times’ 'nothing to see here' approach to the Biden family business is crumbling in the publication’s own pages.