Federal judge grants the Biden-Harris DOJ's wishes regarding noncitizen voters in Virginia



The Biden-Harris Department of Justice sued the Commonwealth of Virginia earlier this month in an attempt to arrest and reverse its efforts to keep noncitizens off the voter rolls.

A Biden-nominated judge obliged the DOJ Friday, ruling that Virginia must restore the registrations of over 1,600 individuals allegedly identified as noncitizens.

According to Bloomberg News, Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles claimed the removals were a "clear violation" of the National Voter Registration Act's quiet period provision, which requires states to complete programs intended to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from registration lists by no later than 90 days prior to a primary election or general election for federal office.

The Biden judge ordered the state to dispatch notices to everyone whose registration was canceled under Youngkin's individualized voter roll cleanup program.

Giles indicated that these notices must go out even to those who election officials have reason to believe are noncitizens, telling the state's lawyer, "I'm not dealing with beliefs. I'm dealing with evidence."

Charles Cooper, a lawyer for the state, told the court, "Congress couldn't possibly have intended to prevent the removal ... of persons who were never eligible to vote in the first place," reported the Associated Press.

'It should never be illegal to remove an illegal voter.'

Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin indicated that Virginia will appeal the ruling and, if necessary, take the the matter all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court for an emergency stay of the injunction.

"Let's be clear about what just happened: only eleven days before a Presidential election, a federal judge ordered Virginia to reinstate over 1,500 individuals — who self-identified themselves as noncitizens — back onto the voter rolls," Youngkin said in a statement.

The governor noted further that the state was simply following through on a law "passed in 2006, signed by then-Governor Tim Kaine, that mandates certain procedures to remove noncitizens from the voter rolls, with safeguards in place to affirm citizenship before removal — and the ultimate failsafe of same-day registration for U.S. citizens to cast a provisional ballot. This law has been applied in every presidential election by Republicans and Democrats since enacted 18 years ago."

Blaze News previously reported that Youngkin issued an executive order on Aug. 7, exactly 90 days before the general election, requiring both that the commissioner of the Virginia Department of Elections routinely update voter lists to remove individuals identified as noncitizens and that the state Department of Motor Vehicles expedite the interagency data-sharing with the DOE with regard to noncitizen transactions.

"Call me crazy, but I think American elections should be decided by American citizens and Virginia elections should be decided by Virginians," Youngkin said in an interview.

The DOJ swooped in with a lawsuit on Oct. 11, claiming the initiative violated Section 8(c)(2) of the NVRA.

Former Virginia Attorney General Richard Cullen, Youngkin's lawyer, contended that the program was kosher because it is not a systematic program but rather an individualized process that begins with "individuals themselves indicating that they are a noncitizen during a DMV transaction."

Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares said of Giles' ruling, "It should never be illegal to remove an illegal voter. Yet, today a Court — urged by the Biden-Harris Department of Justice — ordered Virginia to put the names of non-citizens back on the voter rolls, mere days before a presidential election.

Miyares suggested that this is a clear case of the Biden-Harris administration weaponizing the legal system "against the enemies of so-called progress."

"That is the definition of lawfare," continued the state attorney general. "To openly choose weaponization over good process and lawfare over integrity isn't democracy: It's bullying, pure and simple, and I always stand up to bullies."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Lawmakers To Issue Subpoenas Over Alleged ActBlue Foreign Election Interference Scheme

Sen. Ron Johnson says the FBI director seems 'clueless' about allegations of campaign finance crimes tied to the Democrat fundraising platform.

UK’s Leftist Labour Party Jumping Into U.S. Election To Help Harris

Nearly 100 current and former Labour Party staff members are heading to critical U.S. battleground states, Labour Party official says.

3 Things Congress Can Do To Protect American Elections From Foreign Interference

While there is much states can do to protect their elections from alien interference, many of those responsibilities reside with Congress.

California Court Greenlights Foreign Interference In San Francisco’s School Board Elections

A California court upheld a San Francisco law on Tuesday allowing certain non-citizens to vote in the city's school board elections.

New Director Of National Intelligence: Congress Illegally Leaks Classified Intel So Much I’m Cutting Them Off

An increasing number of leaks by Congress for 'political purposes' have motivated him to change to only giving limited or written briefings for those 'who are entitled to it.'

Washington Post: Underage drinking is a bigger threat than illegally voting in American elections

In an article published Wednesday deriding President Donald Trump for his statement that “if you go out and you want to buy groceries, you need a picture on a card, you need ID,” then you should be required to have an ID to vote, the Washington Post argued that underage alcohol consumption is a bigger issue than illegals voting in American elections.

“Without wading into the debate over whether voter ID laws have utility on the merits, consider how Trump tried to sell it: with an immediately obvious untrue example. Even if his argument was that you needed an ID to buy alcohol, which is likely where his defenders will soon land on the subject, the analogy breaks down rapidly. Laws stipulate that minors can’t buy alcohol for largely obvious reasons, but minors persist in trying to do so. One person buying alcohol at the age of 18 can have negative repercussions that one person voting illegally almost certainly wouldn’t,” the Post said [emphasis added].

The Post followed the argument with a rather bizarre comment that voter fraud is “not the sort of anti-establishment rule-breaking in which teens are clamoring to engage,” suggesting the president’s concerns of voter fraud were with underage American youths, rather than with illegal immigrants voting.

After all, foreign interference in American elections is not that big of a deal, right?

Keep reading...Show less