14 Pro-Life Alternatives To IVF For Infertile Couples Who Desire Children

As couples increasingly question IVF ethics, they are seeking better options. Here are 14 to consider.

Surrogacy Left These 21 Children Parentless After Alleged Abuse. Until It’s Banned, They Won’t Be The Last

No amount of regulation can fix a system that is predicated on encroaching on a child’s natural right to his biological mother and father.

Parents Say Massachusetts Plans To Take Away Their Foster Daughter ‘Because They Are Christians’

'Foster parents and adoptive parents, they don't lose their constitutional rights just because they want to be part of the solution and help these children who are hurting,' said ADF Senior Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse.

9th Circuit Rules Oregon Law Forcing Adoptive Parents Into Gender Ideology Violates First Amendment

Beyond the open grooming, the state guidance effectively barred adoptive parents from serious religious adherence by disallowing religious activity that is 'openly hostile or unsupportive' of children who claim to be LGBT.

Blaze News original: Trump gives willing parents hope by taking aim at anti-Christian bigotry in foster system



As has been widely reported, the Biden administration spent years persecuting Christians who live out their faith, even those who volunteered to serve as foster parents for some of the most vulnerable children in their community. Now that Joe Biden has left the Oval Office and President Donald Trump has once again entered it, some of these Christians are hopeful that the persecution they've endured in the foster-care and adoption systems will come to an end.

Blaze News caught up with several of these Christians whose travails in the foster-care and adoption systems made national news. All are hopeful that in Trump's second term, Christians will no longer suffer discrimination on account of their faith or risk compromising their most cherished religious beliefs in order to become foster or adoptive parents.

'Dangerous': Biden, faith, and foster kids

Though a Catholic who purports to attend Mass regularly and who once claimed that his faith "defines" him, Joe Biden spent more than a decade as vice president and then as president targeting fellow Catholics and other Christians who adhere to biblical teaching on issues such as abortion, contraception, marriage, and gender.

Early in his presidency, the Supreme Court seemed to warn against discriminating against faith-based organizations for adoptive and foster placements. In 2021, the justices unanimously ruled that the city of Philadelphia violated the First Amendment in severing ties with a Catholic foster agency because it would not certify same-sex couples.

All LGBTQ children should be 'placed in foster homes where they will be protected from mistreatment related to their sexual orientation or gender identity.'

That case, commonly referred to as Fulton, compelled Philadelphia and other blue municipalities and states to reconsider working with faith-based organizations for foster and adoptive care.

Nevertheless, Biden seemed to take a keen interest in gender- and sexually confused foster children. In 2022, he issued an executive order to address "disparities that LGBTQI+ youth face in the foster care system," pledging to keep them from the practice of conversion therapy, which he described as "dangerous."

He also called on foster parents to "affirm" the gender identities of foster children in their care and for agencies to create a pool of "affirming" families available for LGBTQ-identifying foster placements. All LGBTQ children should be "placed in foster homes where they will be protected from mistreatment related to their sexual orientation or gender identity, where their caregivers have received special training on how to meet their needs, and where they can access the services they need to thrive," Biden said in September 2023.

This fixation on LGBTQ-related issues prompted some states to begin openly discriminating against people of faith who stepped forward to serve as foster parents. And since Christians foster and adopt children at twice the rate of the general American population and fully 65% of foster parents regularly attend church services, this discrimination affected a large number of licensed and prospective foster parents.

'Their faith is not supportive': Kitty and Mike Burke

One of the most egregious cases of anti-Christian discrimination in the foster-care system involves Mike and Kitty Burke of Massachusetts. After discovering they could not have biological children, the couple decided to consider other parenthood options and sought to become licensed foster parents. Though they went through invasive home inspections and hours upon hours of training, the state Department of Children and Families ultimately denied the Burkes a license on account of their Catholic faith.

Kitty Burke told Blaze News that she and her husband were "absolutely devastated" about the denial. They appealed their case and partnered with legal experts at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, who immediately filed a lawsuit on their behalf.

Photo from Becket Fund for Religious Liberty website. Used with permission.

According to documents included in the complaint, officials from the DCF and a private organization called 18 Degrees openly engaged in anti-Christian discrimination in the Burkes' case.

In a message dated October 2022, Linda-Jeanne Mack of 18 Degrees contacted Dawn Sweetman of the DCF to express "concerns" regarding the Burkes and LGBTQ issues.

"They had the 'right answers,'" Mack wrote, "but they are not supportive of LGBTQIA+ youth, we didn't even talk about trans youth."

"Their faith is not supportive and neither are they," Mack continued, even as she described the Burkes as "lovely people" who "have a lot of strengths." Mack then recommended approving the Burkes for a license — with conditions "specifically around religion and LGBTQIA++ related issues."

Screenshot of complaint

Five months later, social worker Tywanna Jones of the DCF apparently documented the decision of her license review team to deny the Burkes' application, despite "their willingness to parent a child w/moderately significant medical, mental health and behavioral needs" and to maintain connections with a child's birth family.

"Issue(s) of concern for which the couple's license study was denied is based on the couple's statements/responses regarding placement of children who identified LGBTQIA," Jones said.

Screenshot of complaint

Kitty Burke told Blaze News an entirely different version of events. She claimed that she and her husband repeatedly insisted that they would love and care for any child in their home, including sibling groups and children with disabilities.

"We more than had the space for it," she explained. "... We had a basically an open-door policy of children that we were ready to welcome into our home."

Burke noted that she, a former paraprofessional for special-needs students, and her husband, a former combat Marine who previously received treatment for PTSD, are in a unique position to care for vulnerable, traumatized children.

"My husband and I both work from home, so we are essentially stay-at-home parents, the both of us," she said.

'A foster parent shall not be discriminated against on the basis of religion, race, color, [or] creed.'

Burke also claimed that during home visits and other communications, the state and 18 Degrees representatives harped on the couple's Catholic faith, often grilling them about the teachings of the Catholic Church.

"Most of the interview questions seemed to focus both on our faith and on the Catholic views on sexuality and marriage," she said.

In court documents, the Burkes said "much of the questioning centered around their views on sexuality and their response if a child were, in the future, to struggle with gender dysphoria or to identify as gay or lesbian."

"It was a lot of hypothetical questions," Kitty Burke told Blaze News.

Such probing questions about their church and denying the Burkes a license based on their religious identity also seem to run afoul of the state foster parents' bill of rights, which expressly prohibits such discrimination. "A foster parent shall not be discriminated against on the basis of religion, race, color, creed, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, age or disability," reads one of the first lines of the bill that is considered part of the Massachusetts General Laws.

District Judge Mark Mastroianni seemed amenable to the Burkes' allegations of discrimination in light of Fulton, ruling in the couple's favor after defendants in their lawsuit filed a partial motion to dismiss. The litigation in this case remains ongoing.

William Haun, senior counsel at the Becket Fund who represents the Burkes, told Blaze News that he is confident that his clients will ultimately prevail in court and that state foster agencies will no longer be able to use the "discretion" granted to them to ensure that kids are placed in well-suited homes as "a weapon against religious families or religious groups."

While Kitty Burke still expressed interest in fostering children, she emphasized that, first and foremost, she wants to prevent other people of faith from suffering the same discrimination.

"Our goal is to make sure that Massachusetts can never do this to a family again," she told Blaze News. "Because at the end of the day, it's the children who are the biggest losers. It's the children who are stuck living in these horrible situations."

Massachusetts DCF and 18 Degrees did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

'Because of your faith': Jay and Nancy Harmon

A similar situation with a much happier ending involves Jay and Nancy Harmon of Minnesota. After more than two decades as foster parents, the Harmons were nearly denied the opportunity to adopt one of their foster daughters because of their Christian faith.

Nancy Harmon shared her rather unique story with Blaze News. Nancy was actually once a Minnesota foster kid herself, after she reported to school officials one day that her abusive and alcoholic mother had threatened her with a knife the previous evening. Unbeknownst to Nancy, her English teacher, Barb, was at that time a foster parent and volunteered to care for Nancy in her time of need.

Those few months with Barb are some of Nancy's most cherished childhood memories. "The first time Barb gave me a hug, she just smelled amazing. I was just like, I never thought that a mom could be so loving, tender, and smell so good all in one breath," Harmon recalled to Blaze News.

Nancy and Jay married when Nancy was just 17, and they soon started a family. They also had a radical conversion to Christ and Christianity.

Nancy then felt compelled to care for foster children as Barb had once cared for her. The Harmons paired up with a Lutheran organization and began fostering children. Over the course of 24 years or so, they welcomed more than 50 children into their home without a major issue.

'Maybe I was naive.'

That all changed in early 2023, when the state asked the Harmons to consider adopting the three sisters who had already been living with them for approximately 18 months. After praying and talking it over, the Harmons agreed — only to have the state rescind the invitation to adopt the oldest sister.

Nancy learned the news that officials had changed their minds when she accidentally received an email that she wasn't meant to see. The email stated that she and Jay were not the right "fit" for the girl, who had expressed to an adoption worker some type of struggle with her sexual or gender identity, Nancy said.

When Nancy called caseworkers to inquire why her family was not "fit" to adopt the girl, she was told in no uncertain terms that it was because of their Christian faith.

"She's like, 'I'm so sorry. You weren't meant to receive that email.' And I said I need an explanation. Why do you feel like we're not the right 'fit'?" Nancy recalled to Blaze News.

"And she said, 'Just to be honest, it's because of your faith. It's because of your religious beliefs.'"

At a meeting a week later attended by the Harmons, the girl in question, and some adoption workers, Nancy received a similar explanation. "Both the county worker and the adoption agency that they were working through point-blank said, 'It's because of your religious beliefs,'" Harmon claimed.

The Harmons were "shocked," Nancy said, not only because they had never encountered this issue before after decades of fostering but because they had never even been asked about their religious beliefs regarding sexuality and gender.

"They didn't even ask if we would affirm her," Harmon told Blaze News, nor did they consult any of the mental-health professionals working with the girl before determining that the Harmons were the wrong "fit" for her.

Adoption agents then decided that the Harmons could proceed with adopting the two younger girls but that they would have to find an alternative home for the oldest, who was frustrated and furious that a private conversation could tear apart her family. The suggested compromise satisfied no one in the Harmon household.

"You're just going to split them up?" Harmon remembers thinking. "... Is that the best interest of the child? I don't think so."

After some continued wrangling, the girl's therapist eventually wrote a letter urging the court to keep the three girls together and to allow the Harmons to adopt them. The girls officially became part of the Harmon family in December 2023.

Looking back, Nancy still feels blindsided by the recent obsession with sexuality and gender in the foster-care system.

"It seems to me that all of a sudden there was this change about gender ideology that just flipped on a dime, for sure," she said, "and I didn't think it was going to affect us."

"I just thought I can just be the normal family that we are, that loves God and can take care of kids, you know? But that's not the case," she continued.

"Maybe I was naive."

Blaze News made contact with one supervisor involved with child protection and licensing in Nicollet County, where the Harmons live. The supervisor, who included pronouns in his email signature, then recommended contacting Health and Human Services Director Cassandra Sassenberg.

Sassenberg, who also included pronouns in her email signature, declined to comment, citing laws prohibiting release of data without permission from the subject or the court. She added:

Nicollet County Health and Human Services is not involved in all adoptions that occur within Nicollet County. To the extent Nicollet County is involved in adoptions and the selection of adoptive families, Nicollet County follows all guidance provided by the Department of Children and Family Services as well as Minnesota Statute ... when it makes recommendations to the court.

'It's a good sign': Hope for change under Trump

Earlier this month, just a couple of weeks into his second term, President Donald Trump issued an executive order demanding an investigation into anti-Christian discrimination in sectors and industries across America.

"My Administration will not tolerate anti-Christian weaponization of government or unlawful conduct targeting Christians. The law protects the freedom of Americans and groups of Americans to practice their faith in peace, and my Administration will enforce the law and protect these freedoms. My Administration will ensure that any unlawful and improper conduct, policies, or practices that target Christians are identified, terminated, and rectified," it read.

The order, entitled "Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias," specifically mentioned the plight of Christians in the foster-care system under the previous administration. "The Biden Department of Health and Human Services sought to drive Christians who do not conform to certain beliefs on sexual orientation and gender identity out of the foster-care system," it said.

Between the EO and Trump's recent pardons for Christians arrested in connection with peaceful protests outside abortion facilities, Christians are hopeful that they will no longer be targeted for their views on gender, marriage, and sexuality.

Andrea Picciotti-Bayer — the director of the Conscience Project who also filed amicus briefs on behalf of several beleaguered foster and adoptive parents, including the Harmons — is encouraged by what she has seen and heard from Trump.

"It's a good sign that he's stated publicly and very clearly that gender ideology is really a frontal assault on the well-being of America's youth," she told Blaze News.

Picciotti-Bayer reiterated that "Trump is very aware" of how the Biden administration foisted woke, gender-related ideology onto various federal agencies, including the State Department, the Health and Human Services Department, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

"He's very well aware of the need to extract the ideology out of the federal government," she said.

'It takes time to unwind all of the mess that's happened.'

The Harmons are likewise "thrilled" about the future in Trump's second term. "This gives our kids time and gives us hope that the executive order he signed will prevent many children from making a mistake that will affect them for the rest of their lives," Nancy Harmon said in a statement to Blaze News.

William Haun, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty senior counsel who represents the Burkes, also hopes that soon Christians across America will be able to live their faith openly without fear of reprisal from their government.

"Foster children nationwide are waiting to be welcomed into safe, loving homes. Unfortunately, there’s been a disturbing trend of state and local governments blocking children in need from forever homes like Mike and Kitty’s because of their religious beliefs. We are hopeful that the new administration will take steps to ensure families like the Burkes aren’t punished for their faith any longer," he said in a statement to Blaze News.

Still, everyone is keeping their expectations measured. Picciotti-Bayer warned that due to the nature of the administrative state, the process of removing that ideology won't be easy. "It takes time to unwind all of the mess that's happened," she said.

Haun also wants to see Massachusetts own up to targeting Christians like the Burkes for their faith. "I think the government needs to say, 'Hey, we're actually going to treat you fairly this time. We're not going to treat your religious beliefs like a problem,'" he told Blaze News.

"Until that kind of assurance comes through, I think, really, the ball's in Massachusetts' court."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

10-year-old pleads with neighbor to adopt him minutes before 340-pound foster mom allegedly sits on him until he has no pulse



A 10-year-old foster child in Indiana died days after the morbidly obese woman he temporarily was living with allegedly sat on him until he no longer had a pulse. Officials said the boy pleaded with a neighbor to adopt him just 30 minutes before first responders arrived at the scene.

The heartbreaking tale begins more than five years ago when Dakota Levi Stevens and his sister were placed in the foster-care system because their parents were addicted to drugs. It seems that Dakota bounced around several foster-care placements during his young life. He also suffered from mental health and anxiety issues, according to a foster father who cared for Dakota from 2019 to 2021.

When Wilson saw that his eyelids were pale, she instructed one of her three children — all of whom were adopted out of foster care — to call 911.

In 2022, Dakota landed in the home of Jennifer Lee Wilson but later left. When Dakota began acting up at a foster home earlier this year, he was placed back into Wilson's home for short-term respite care.

On April 25, Dakota, then 10 years old, fled the home that Wilson shared with her husband and three children in Valparaiso in northwestern Indiana. Dakota reportedly ran to a neighbor's house and begged the woman there to adopt him because his foster parents were abusing him.

When Wilson discovered that the boy was missing, she drove around looking for him. She spotted him speaking with the neighbor. Initially, Dakota refused to get into Wilson's car and asked the neighbor to call police, the neighbor claimed, adding that if the boy had injuries, she did not see them.

Wilson eventually coaxed Dakota into the car and suggested that the neighbor mind her own business. As soon as she and Dakota pulled into the driveway at home, though, Dakota's behavior continued, and he insisted he would run away again.

What allegedly happened next cost Dakota his life.

Wilson later told police that she did not recall whether the two fell to the ground together or whether she tackled him, but at some point, Wilson reportedly pinned the boy down in full view of the front-door Ring camera.

At first, she reportedly held him down by laying across his neck and head area. She then allegedly held him down by the arm. Finally, Wilson — who stands less than 5 feet tall and tips the scales at 340 pounds — sat on the boy near his buttocks and remained there for six minutes and 48 seconds, Ring footage allegedly showed.

During this time, Wilson called Dakota's caseworker with Children's Protective Services, and at one point, she allegedly stated, "I was laying on him, and he was acting bad."

Eventually, Dakota's screams ceased, and after nearly seven minutes of sitting on the boy, Wilson discovered that Dakota apparently was no longer breathing.

"Are you faking?" she asked, according to court documents.

When Wilson saw that his eyelids were pale, she instructed one of her three children — all of whom were adopted out of foster care — to call 911. She also attempted CPR.

After not finding a pulse, first responders rushed Dakota to South Bend Memorial Hospital, where he died two days later. An autopsy revealed that he had suffered mechanical asphyxia, and the medical examiner ruled his death a homicide.

On Friday, the Porter County Prosecutor’s office announced that Wilson, 48, had been charged with reckless homicide, a level 5 felony that carries a sentence of up to six years behind bars and a fine of up to $10,000.

Wilson was soon arrested and assessed a bond of $20,000. Jail records indicate that she is not currently in custody.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Why Is The ‘Sound Of Hope’ Movie So Hopeless?

It’s hard to overstate how counterproductive it is to depict foster care as a joyless, draining, hell on Earth.

Vermont couples barred from fostering children because of their Christian beliefs on sexuality, says lawsuit



Brian Wuoti of Vermont is a Baptist pastor and a high school math teacher. His wife of 14 years, Kaitlyn Wuoti, leads a bi-weekly women's Bible study and homeschools their five children. They first became foster parents in 2014, adopting a pair of brothers who have become an "integral" part of their family.

Michael Gantt is the lead pastor of another church, and Rebecca Gantt, his wife of 25 years, raises their seven children. They became foster parents in 2016. Extra to their four biological children, they have adopted three children from the Green Mountain State's foster care system.

Both families believe that God created everyone in his image; that sex is binary and fixed by God at conception; and that all people deserve respect and love.

These two families unfortunately share something more in common beside their establishment of loving homes, dedication to protecting the vulnerable, sterling records, and Christian faith.

According to their lawsuit, filed Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont, the Vermont Department for Children and Families has barred them from continuing to foster children on account of their religious beliefs about sexuality.

'Vermont would prefer children have no home than to place them with families of faith with these views.'

"Although the Wuotis and Gantts have adopted five children between them, the Department has determined they are unfit to foster or adopt any child solely due to their religiously inspired and widely held belief that girls cannot become boys or vice versa," said the lawsuit.

"And Vermont applies this policy categorically — whether applicants want to adopt their grandchild, provide respite care for an infant for just a few hours, or foster a child who shares all of their religious views," continued the suit. "Vermont would prefer children have no home than to place them with families of faith with these views."

The Wuotis discovered that their mainstream Christian beliefs rendered them ineligible to give orphans and other vulnerable minors a supportive home in 2022, when the state was reviewing their application to renew their foster care license.

Despite a case worker suggesting that she "probably could not hand pick a more wonderful foster family," and the Wuotis' licensor apparently indicating there was "no doubt" they could welcome another child into their home, everything changed when they indicated they were Christians and would not embrace the ideological fads of the day. Somehow, they instantly ceased to be wonderful. An absence of doubt in their ability to foster another child became an absolute certainty in their inability.

They received a "Notice of Decision" from the VDCF recommending the revocation of their license.

Last year — a year where the state had 985 children in out-of-home protective custody, 467 in conditional custody, and 150 family support cases — the Gantts heard the call of a child in need.

The VDCF apparently asked the couple whether they could take an emergency placement — a baby about to be born to a homeless junkie. Prior to taking another child into their home, the couple received an email "explaining that families must accept the State's orthodoxy about gender fluidity 'even if the foster parents hold divergent personal opinions or beliefs,'" said the lawsuit.

The Gantts met with a caseworker about fostering the baby and made clear they would "love and accept any child" but that they would not compromise on their Christian beliefs. Michael Gantt also made clear to a department employee he would not bend the knee to gender ideology — no Pride parades, no incorrect pronouns.

The couple received a "Notice of Decision" concerning their license revocation in February.

'The division is committed to making ongoing efforts to recruit, train, support and retain foster families who are LGBTQ affirming and supporting.'

While the lawsuit references various indicators that the VDCF is ideologically captive and hostile to traditional views, a number of which are still maintained by the majority of Americans, it highlighted the department's LGBT activist orientation, manifest in Policy 76.

The policy states, "When assessing safety and risk in an environment where an LGBTQ child or youth resides, family services workers will determine whether a parent, caregiver, or other family member's attitude and behavior about the child or youth's sexual or gender identity impact the safety and well-being of the child."

"The division is committed to making ongoing efforts to recruit, train, support and retain foster families who are LGBTQ affirming and supporting," the policy says in a section on placement considerations.

The lawsuit indicated that the VDCF has reinterpreted its existing requirements of foster parents in accordance with Policy 76 and that foster families must demonstrate they can follow the policy's guidance.

Extra to the policy, other departmental communications and rules have indicated that devout Christians need not apply.

A Sept. 8, 2023, email circulated to all foster families by the VDCF reportedly stated, "Eligibility for licensure is dependent on foster parents and applicants being able to support youth who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, or another diverse identity (LGBTQI+) even if the foster parents hold divergent personal opinions or beliefs."

'It bears mentioning that this suit was filed at the start of pride month.'

A VDCF spokesman relayed a statement from Aryka Radke, deputy commissioner of the Family Services Division, to the Christian Post, saying that while the department does not comment on the details of pending lawsuits, "generally speaking, DCF takes the care and support of youth in our custody seriously, and we work to ensure that youth in foster care are placed in homes that support all aspects of what makes them who they are. This includes their sexual orientation and gender identity."

"It bears mentioning that this suit was filed at the start of pride month — a time when we reflect on the achievements and continued struggles of the LGBTQI+ movement," Radke continued, signaling her bias. "The department stands in partnership with the community, and continually works to be a better partner, ally, and support system — rather than a barrier to the children and youth who identify as part of this community."

"Providing safe, affirming, accepting and welcoming homes benefits all youth and it has the power to save lives. This is true year-round, and bears underscoring for these youth especially during pride," added Radke.

'They don't need the state pushing its gender ideology on them.'

Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse, the Alliance Defending Freedom legal counsel representing the families, highlighted to the Christian Post that contrary to Radke's suggestion, it's the state's polices that "are actually harmful."

"I would point people to the Cass review that came out of England showing that pharmacological and surgical intervention likely caused more harm than any good and that the evidence is incredibly weak in this area," said Wildmalm-Delphonse. "Children just need a loving place, someone to care for them while they work out these types of issues. They don't need the state pushing its gender ideology on them."

Blaze News previously detailed the extent to which the Cass Review, a multi-year investigation into the pseudoscience of transgenderism, commissioned by England's National Health Service, undermined the ideology that now reigns supreme at the VDCF.

Dr. Hilary Cass, a British medical doctor who previously served as president of the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, reached a number of damning conclusions in her final report, such as:

  • the "systematic review showed no clear evidence that social transition in childhood has any positive or negative mental health outcomes, and relatively weak evidence for any effect in adolescence";
  • puberty blockers compromise bone density and have no apparent impact on "gender dysphoria or body satisfaction"; and
  • the evidence in support of "gender-affirming care" is "weak" and unreliable.

Alliance Defending Freedom stated, "By denying people the chance to be foster and adoptive parents because of their religious beliefs and compelling them to speak the government’s preferred message about sexual orientation and gender identity, Vermont is violating the First Amendment."

The lawsuit alleges the VDCF has specifically violated the couples' rights to free speech, free association, and free exercise of religion, as well as the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause. The couple seeks a declaration on the part of the department that its LGBT activist mandate encompassing Policy 76 and a handful of rules violated and continues to violated their constitutionally protected rights. Additionally, they seek an injunction against similar and future denials of foster licenses on the bases of protected beliefs.

"Every child deserves a loving home, and children suffer when the government excludes people of faith from adoption and foster care," added the Alliance Defending Freedom.

The Gantts and Wuotis are hardly the first to be precluded from adopting or fostering on the basis of their Christian faith. The Massachusetts DCF rejected Catholics Mike and Kitty Burke last year. Washington State dashed Shane and Jenn DeGross' dreams in 2022.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Nearly all states take foster kids' federal benefits and use them to offset cost of foster care: Report



A disturbing report from the Children’s Advocacy Institute at the University of San Diego School of Law indicates that nearly all states routinely take federal benefits from children in the foster system and use those benefits to offset the cost of foster care.

Like their counterparts who are not in the foster care system, some foster kids are entitled to receive federal money, including disability benefits associated with Social Security as well as survivor benefits associated with the Veterans' Administration and the Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance program, which are issued upon the death of a parent, the Children's Advocacy Institute study noted.

However, of all 50 states and the District of Columbia, only seven received a passing grade in the study: Arizona, D.C., New Mexico, Oregon, Maryland, Illinois, and Washington state. The rest received an F because they otherwise abscond with the foster kids' federal money in the name of "revenue maximization," oftentimes without even bothering to tell the children first.

"For this subset of foster youth, who face tremendous obstacles when they transition out of care, these assets can serve as a lifeline, contributing to economic stability, self-sufficiency, and successful outcomes," the study said. "Most foster youth eligible for these federal benefits will never see a dollar of their money, or even know that someone has applied for and received benefits on their behalf."

The Detroit Free Press investigated the issue in Michigan, one of the 44 states to receive a failing grade in the study. According to the outlet, in fiscal year 2022-23, Michigan collected $3.2 million in federal benefits designated for foster children, all of which went toward reimbursing "the state for the cost of caring for kids in the child welfare system."

The only way a Michigan foster child may begin receiving some of his or her federal benefits or have those benefits saved on the child's behalf is when "the child’s total income exceeds the cost of care," the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services indicated.

Yet, the state has apparently failed to deliver in some of those cases as well. The Free Press noted that one former foster youth whose father died did not receive federal benefits for the first six months after he was returned to the care of his birth mother, meaning the state collected nearly $5,400 to which the young man was entitled.

"I don’t understand how they can do that to kids when they’re trying to move forward with their life," said the boy's mother, Jenny Bowden.

"It makes you feel like they really don’t care about it, or they’re trying to have a good image without having to do the work," Bowden's son added.

When asked for comment, the Michigan DHHS made no attempt to deny denying foster kids their federal benefits. "This is common practice among many states," the agency said.

"When a child is placed in an out-of-home situation with MDHHS, income or funds available to the child are secured and used to reimburse the public taxpayer dollars that provide payment for the child's care. If the child's total income exceeds the cost of care, the excess is saved for the child," the agency helpfully explained.

Jill Bauer, a staff attorney at Legal Services in Washtenaw County in Michigan, took a decidedly different view. "Why should kids with Social Security have to pay for their own foster care?" she asked rhetorically.

Elisa Weichel, administrative director of the Child Advocacy Institute, even suggested that the state practice of taking federal money that belongs to foster children just reinforces to such children that they are viewed as possible revenue sources rather than as human beings.

"We believe that the state is choosing to put its own financial interests above the best interests of the children in its care," Weichel told the Free Press, "which unfortunately is a message these children probably also get in other ways."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Heartbreaking Memoir Troubled Indicts The Elites Tearing Apart Two-Parent Homes

Troubled exposes the 'luxury belief' that stable families are unimportant and that education and upward mobility can repair volatile upbringings.