Blame Women For High Divorce Rates That Hurt Women More Than Men
Sadly, it’s often women — the people feminism promised were our sisters — who are the most insensitive to divorced women’s struggles.Sadly, it’s often women — the people feminism promised were our sisters — who are the most insensitive to divorced women’s struggles.Democrats’ Double Standard On Judicial Impartiality Is Obvious From Wisconsin To Washington
There's a huge disconnect between D.C. and Wisconsin Democrats: a judicial double standard that exists to give the left more power.THESE two 'knuckleheads' claim the 14th Amendment disqualifies Trump from running
On August 19, the Atlantic published a piece by — in Mark Levin’s words — “two knuckleheads,” titled, “The Constitution Prohibits Trump from Ever Being President Again.”
These “knuckleheads” are J. Michael Luttig and Laurence H. Tribe, who argue that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment provides that Donald Trump literally can be prevented from running for president.
“The former president’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election, and the resulting attack on the U.S. Capitol, place him squarely within the ambit of the disqualification clause, and he is therefore ineligible to serve as president ever again,” the article reads.
“Of course these guys used to hate each other's guts, but this is what they come together on,” Levin laughs.
When grilled on their article in a segment on CNN, Tribe explains the pair's thinking is that “secretaries of state or other officials” will have to “determine whether despite his obvious attempt to overturn the 2020 election and engage in insurrection, whether despite that, somehow Trump gets to run, the secretaries of state around the country are going to go both ways on that.”
“Whichever way they go, they’ll be challenged in court, and that’ll end up in the Supreme Court, and what it will have to decide is what this language means,” he adds.
Levin is not amused.
“Just so you understand folks, there are more scholars who say no to this than say yes, but the ones who say yes obviously are promoted by the Jim Acostas and the media,” he says.
Want more from Mark Levin?
To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Biden-Appointed Judge Rules Religious Parents Can’t Opt Kids Out Of Pro-LGBT School Lessons
Muslim, Catholic, and Orthodox parents argue that the school board’s 'no-opt-out' policy violates their constitutional rights.Parents Sue Pennsylvania School District For Barring Parochial Students From Extracurriculars
Despite the district’s purported lack of resources for extracurricular activities, it still has time to focus on 'equity and inclusion.'The Best Lines From The Supreme Court’s Takedown Of New York’s Unconstitutional Gun Licensing Scheme
The Supreme Court ruled that New York’s policy is wholly unconstitutional because it tramples on the Second Amendment rights of Americans.Breaking: Supreme Court strikes down New York gun control law in major gun rights victory
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York state gun control law that required gun owners seeking a license to carry a concealed handgun to demonstrate a "proper cause" to do so.
In a 6-3 ruling, the Court reversed a lower court decision upholding the law and delivered the most significant victory for gun rights in more than a decade.
New York's state law required people who want to carry concealed handguns outside their homes to show a "proper cause" for having a license to do so. State courts had ruled that gun owners needed to show more than a general desire for protection in order to obtain a concealed carry license; they could not just claim they wanted it for self-defense.
The Supreme Court declared New York's law unconstitutional on 14th Amendment grounds, saying that New York prevented law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the majority opinion for the court, writing, "The constitutional right to bear ams in public for self-defense is not 'a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.'"
"We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need," Thomas wrote. "That is not how the First Amendment works when it comes to unpopular speech or the free exercise of religion. It is not how the Sixth Amendment works when it comes to a defendant's right to confront the witnesses against him. And it is not how the Second Amendment works when t comes to public carry for self-defense."
The three liberal justices dissented.
Tradition And Stare Decisis Are More Reasons The Supreme Court Should Reverse Roe v. Wade
Famous for recognizing the value of long-established traditions, Edmund Burke was no apologist for institutional error.Today's top stories
www.theblaze.com
freebeacon.com
The Senate has ALREADY found Trump NOT guilty
While many on the left are cheering for the downfall of former president Donald Trump, Mark Levin doesn’t believe they stand a fighting chance.
“This indictment, the ruse is obvious,” he tells Sean Hannity on Fox News. “You have to be the dumbest on the face of the Earth to be proposing this.”
Now, a Colorado watchdog group is attempting to block Trump from making it onto the 2024 ballot, citing the 14th Amendment.
Section 3 of the amendment states that “no person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States,” having previously taken an oath to uphold the Constitution, if they have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
“You know what they meant? They meant, Sean, the Civil War. That’s what they meant. Anyone who engaged in, participated in, gave aid and comfort to the Civil War, they were the ones who were banned from holding public office,” Levin explains.
“They didn’t mean for this to apply after the last Confederate died,” he adds.
Levin notes that if Trump were actually in trouble, he’d be being charged for insurrection or sedition.
According to Levin, he’s not being charged because “two days before January 6, when this so-called insurrection took place, he offered ten thousand military personnel to defend the Capitol building and defend the members of Congress on January 6.”
He was then turned down by the Democrat speaker and the Democrat mayor.
“Well, that’s a hell of a way to run an insurrection, don’t you think?” Levin asks.
“They held a rump trial in the Senate, and they didn’t come close to the supermajority votes they needed to convict Donald Trump,so if anything, under our constitutional system, Donald Trump was adjudicated not guilty of an insurrection and a sedition, by the one body that took it up: the United States Senate.”
Want more from Mark Levin?
To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.