6 Unbelievably Scammy Federal Practices DOGE Staff Reveal In Fox Interview

'If a commercial company operated the way the federal government does, then it would immediately go bankrupt ... the officers would be arrested.'

Inside the Country’s Largest COVID Fraud. Plus, Inside Israel’s Revamped War Plan.

Feeding our fraud: It took jurors less than five hours to convict Aimee Bock and Salim Said on 28 counts of wire fraud, federal programs bribery, money laundering, and related conspiracy counts in the Feeding Our Future fraud scandal, dubbed "the shame of Minnesota" by assistant U.S. attorney Joe Thompson. Altogether a cast of almost entirely Somali immigrants stole some $250 million from the state-administered federal child nutrition program—the largest pandemic fraud in the country. How'd they do it? Minneapolis's own Scott Johnson explains:

The post Inside the Country’s Largest COVID Fraud. Plus, Inside Israel’s Revamped War Plan. appeared first on .

From Feeding the Kids to Fleecing the Government: Inside the Country's Largest COVID Fraud

What happens when you cross a Third-World tribal culture with an urban Democratic establishment? You can probably guess the outcome, but in Minnesota we don’t have to guess. We have seen it on display in the sprawling Feeding Our Future case that represents the largest COVID fraud discovered so far in the United States.

The post From Feeding the Kids to Fleecing the Government: Inside the Country's Largest COVID Fraud appeared first on .

Feds probe ASU for racial bias — will other universities be held accountable?



Arizona State University was among a lengthy list of institutions under federal investigation this week for violating Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, a provision designed to prevent discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in federally funded programs. This should be noncontroversial. Yet, universities across the country are engaging in systemic discrimination disguised as social justice under the banner of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Universities justify racial discrimination by applying the Marxist dialectic of “oppressor versus oppressed,” now repackaged in academic jargon as “privileged versus marginalized.” They argue that so-called marginalized groups require extra resources to address past injustices, assigning “oppressor” status based on skin color, sex, and religion.

University administrators who implemented these discriminatory DEI programs should issue a public apology — for starters.

At ASU, for example, DEI employee training explicitly labels “whiteness” and “heteronormativity” as inherent oppressor categories. The training presents as fact — not as one perspective among many — that America has always been a white supremacist nation. Faculty are expected to accept this assertion without question.

I am currently suing ASU to stop this required DEI training. Instead of acknowledging its discriminatory nature, the university defends it in court.

ASU’s inclusive charter has been weaponized into a Marxist dialectic that teaches students to hate the United States and Christianity. The school explains its practices by referring to its charter, which emphasizes “inclusion.” Obviously, a taxpayer-funded university should be inclusive. In practice, however, ASU’s definition of inclusion means privileging some groups — the so-called marginalized — over others — the so-called oppressors.

And how do they determine who belongs to which category? Skin color, sex, and religion.

This is not education; it is indoctrination. Yet, professors often claim, “You cannot discriminate against white people because they are the oppressors.” At one event I attended, a speaker stated it was time to “take white men down a notch.” These people are entrusted with teaching your children — on your dime.

Discrimination in DEI

The Title VI investigation at ASU and 39 other universities targets the Ph.D. Project, a program that provides networking and career opportunities for doctoral students but excludes participants based on race. This is blatant racial discrimination. The program defends its practices using the same Marxist logic — arguing that historic injustices justify present-day racial “preferences.”

ASU reinforced this reasoning in 2023 when it hosted Ibram X. Kendi for the A. Wade Smith and Elsie Moore Memorial Lecture on Race Relations. Kendi’s stance, repeated many times over, is clear: “The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination.”

That argument fails both legally and morally. In contrast, President Donald Trump’s Department of Education made its position explicit: “The Department is working to reorient civil rights enforcement to ensure all students are protected from illegal discrimination.”

For decades, universities positioned themselves as defenders of civil rights. Now, they are being exposed for violating those very principles. The irony would be amusing if it weren’t so destructive.

From racism to anti-Semitism

ASU isn’t just under investigation for racial discrimination — it is also one of 60 universities under federal scrutiny for anti-Semitism. This is particularly rich coming from the same academics who spent the last decade yelling that “Trump is Hitler.” And yet, the Department of Education now says:

The Department is deeply disappointed that Jewish students studying on elite U.S. campuses continue to fear for their safety amid the relentless antisemitic eruptions that have severely disrupted campus life for more than a year. University leaders must do better.

Professors support Hamas, leave their Jewish students open to harassment, and yet take to social media to denounce Elon Musk as a Nazi. They need to look in the mirror. Maybe the Department of Education will help them do so.

University administrators who imposed these discriminatory DEI programs should start by issuing a public apology — not just to Jewish students but to all who have suffered under their race-based policies, as well as to the taxpayers who fund them.

If they refuse, it reveals one simple truth: They have not changed their beliefs. More likely, they will resort to bureaucratic rebranding, repackaging the same DEI policies under a new name while continuing business as usual.

A path forward

The only way to break this cycle is to dismantle the oppressor/oppressed dialectic in all its forms. The Marxist framework behind DEI must be exposed for what it is — a pseudoscientific ideology that justifies discrimination under the guise of justice. It aligns with those who oppose the United States. Parents, students, and faculty must demand transparency and reject participation in discriminatory programs.

Federal investigations are a step in the right direction, but they are not enough. Universities like ASU must face accountability — not just legally but intellectually. Public universities should be required to disclose what professors teach in their classrooms. Taxpayer-funded faculty must be held responsible for their actions like any other government employee.

The woke university system has long relied on an illusion of moral authority, but that illusion is crumbling. Under its leadership, the worst forms of discrimination have flourished, and those who cry loudest about justice have been the worst offenders. The question is: Will we seize this moment to force real change, or will we allow these institutions to rebrand and continue their deception under a new name?

Federal Judge Could Force IRS To Release Internal Records in Alleged Political 'Weaponization' Case

A federal judge could soon rule on whether the Internal Revenue Service falsified records to target companies for tax penalties, according to new court filings on Friday. Three companies filed a motion on Friday asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to determine whether there is sufficient evidence that the IRS fraudulently "backdated" documents while cracking down on "syndicated conservation easement" schemes, which allow individuals and corporations to offset their taxes by donating land to charitable groups.

The post Federal Judge Could Force IRS To Release Internal Records in Alleged Political 'Weaponization' Case appeared first on .

Nonprofit fraudsters convicted for swiping COVID cash from hungry kids to bankroll lavish lifestyle



A federal jury convicted Feeding Our Future founder, Aimee Bock, and her co-defendant, Salim Ahmed Said, for their roles in a $250 million COVID fund fraud scheme.

Feeding Our Future, a nonprofit, joined a federally funded child nutrition program that provided meals for school activities. During the COVID-era, the U.S. Department of Agriculture eased participation rules, including allowing for-profit restaurants to join and permitting food distribution beyond education programs.

'Falsely claimed to have served 91 million meals.'

Workers with Feeding Our Future were tasked with recruiting individuals and entities to open sites in Minnesota to support the nutrition program. The nonprofit opened more than 250 sites throughout the state.

"These sites, created and operated by Bock, Said, and others, fraudulently claimed to be serving meals to thousands of children a day within just days or weeks of being formed. Bock and Said created and submitted false documentation, including fraudulent meal counts consisting of fake attendance rosters purporting to list the names and ages of the children receiving meals at the sites each day," read a press release from the Minnesota U.S. Attorney's Office.

"To accomplish their scheme, Bock and Said created dozens of shell companies to enroll in the program as food program sites, and to receive and launder the proceeds of their fraudulent scheme," it continued.

The jury found that Feeding Our Future fraudulently received and disbursed over $240 million in federal funding.

Instead of using the cash to feed hungry children, the organizations bought "luxury vehicles, residential and commercial real estate in Minnesota as well as property in Ohio and Kentucky, real estate in Kenya and Turkey, and to fund international travel."

Bock, 44, was convicted of four counts of wire fraud, one count each of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, bribery, and conspiracy to commit federal programs bribery.

Said, 36, was convicted on 20 counts, including conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit federal programs bribery, bribery, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and money laundering.

Bock and Said are being held without bail while they await sentencing.

Kenneth Udoibok, Bock's attorney, stated that they plan to appeal, claiming that the jury did not consider all of the evidence fairly.

Seventy defendants, including Bock and Said, have been charged in the case.

Lead prosecutor, Joe Thompson, stated that only $60 million of the $250 million has been recovered.

Acting U.S. Attorney Lisa D. Kirkpatrick said, "Aimee Bock and Salim Said took advantage of the Covid-19 pandemic to carry out a massive fraud scheme that stole money meant to feed children."

"The defendants falsely claimed to have served 91 million meals, for which they fraudulently received nearly $250 million in federal funds. That money did not go to feed kids," Kirkpatrick continued. "Instead, it was used to fund their lavish lifestyles. Today's verdict sends a message to the community that fraud against the government will not be tolerated."

Governor Tim Walz (D), who has received criticism for not catching the egregious fraud sooner, stated, "We just need to make sure that we put up more firewalls, more security, more ability to make sure that these criminals aren't able to prey on this."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cori Bush's Husband Indicted for Wire Fraud, Allegedly Submitted False Applications To Obtain COVID Relief Funds

Former left-wing congresswoman Cori Bush’s husband was charged on Thursday with defrauding the federal government to illegally collect tens of thousands of dollars in loans under COVID-era small business relief programs.

The post Cori Bush's Husband Indicted for Wire Fraud, Allegedly Submitted False Applications To Obtain COVID Relief Funds appeared first on .

Amid Chaos At ActBlue, House Republicans Seek Answers About ‘Potentially Fraudulent And Illicit Financial Activity’

In addition to congressional investigation, ActBlue faces a wave of departures among its top officials.

Congress’ Sex Abuse Enforcement Body Nailed For Fraud, Pattern Of Misconduct

U.S. Center for SafeSport, created after the Larry Nassar scandal, can expect more scrutiny after a court found it guilty of fraud.

Trump Doesn’t Need Maduro’s Cooperation To Deport Venezuelan Migrants

Most of the Venezuelans who illegally crossed the U.S. southern border were living in 20 other peaceful countries for years beforehand.