Buc-ee’s gets rich by doing everything Wall Street hates



Buc-ee’s may be technically categorized as a “convenience store,” but for millions of Americans, it’s more like a roadside pilgrimage. No matter how big its new stores are, they remain packed. The chain has a fanatically loyal customer base, and it has become a destination for those not fortunate enough to have a Buc-ee's nearby.

What’s the draw? Buc-ee's has enormous restrooms that are immaculately clean, cheap gas with often more than 100 pumps, a kitschy-fun shopping experience, and exceptional food — including Texas barbecue and an in-house bakery. In addition, it’s heavily staffed with low-turnover, career employees.

I shudder to think of the destruction that would be brought upon the Buc-ee's business model if private equity decided to “fix” its operations.

Buc-ee's is thriving by rejecting numerous destructive “best practices” currently embraced by corporate America and private equity.

Fortunately for Buc-ee's, it’s still privately owned by its founders, Arch Aplin and Don Wasek, whose business acumen came from running convenience stores and working directly with customers and employees. They weren’t poisoned by an elite business school education, where modern executives learn that customers are prey and employees are a pestilence whose compensation reduces executive bonuses.

The winning formula

The magic formula to Buc-ee's success is built on a very simple foundation: clean restrooms and cheap gas. It first developed its cult following in Texas by being a place you could always count on for a clean restroom while driving the interstates. Good candies, food, and pastries then added to the appeal.

Nowadays, the same foundation is in place: clean restrooms and cheap gas. But once a customer walks inside to use the restroom, a wonderland of food and products awaits. The food and merchandise are not necessarily cheap, but they’re high-quality, and many customers enjoy making those purchases as part of their Buc-ee's experience. But it’s still possible to visit Buc-ee's for gas and a potty stop without paying a premium.

Standing up to Wall Street

By contrast, Las Vegas tourism is down dramatically — in no small part because of the city's outrageous pricing. The old Vegas model of cheap buffets and affordable rooms to get people into the casinos was not unlike Buc-ee's lure of clean restrooms and cheap gas. But the Wall Street wizards now in control of Vegas have ditched the old model in favor of revenue-mining every possible moment of a visitor’s stay.

As Jeffrey Turner explained on his Substack, “The MBAs and data-crunchers at the corporate casino have installed Disneyland pricing into their models.”

Buc-ee's still understands the power of the previous business model that Las Vegas abandoned: Provide a high-quality “loss leader” — or two — to get the customers in the door, and then provide high-margin products that entice them to open their wallets.

For those who work at Buc-ee's, it’s more than a job — it’s a career. Buc-ee's doesn’t consider its staff to be “unskilled” labor who deserve near-minimum wages. Their excellent compensation results in lower turnover and better customer service. The food at Buc-ee's might be a little more expensive than at a nearby fast-food joint, but it’s of much higher quality and served by professional staff — things customers will gladly pay a premium for.

As I discussed in a recent column, revenue mining has become an all-too-common corporate business strategy these days, especially in private equity. Revenue mining exploits customers while slashing costs to the bone, shipping jobs oversees, firing veteran employees who know the business best, wrecking customer service, downgrading quality, and killing innovation. That pernicious strategy may briefly produce record short-term profits, but it also destroys customer loyalty and brand value.

I shudder to think of the destruction that would be brought upon the Buc-ee's business model if private equity decided to “fix” its operations.

RELATED: Fear the beaver: How a gas station became a cult (and why you should consider joining)

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The famous Buc-ee's restrooms by themselves produce no revenue, and they occupy significant square footage. Its full-time staffers make about $40,000 annually simply to keep these restrooms clean. In other words, the restrooms are a loss leader, drawing customers in but producing no revenue. That’s anathema to private equity.

Private equity would slash the restroom maintenance, eliminate or outsource the cleaning crews, and decrease their square footage. Or maybe they’d try to charge admission to the restrooms. But they would undoubtedly kill the golden goose — the restrooms — and thus lose the golden egg that gets customers to the checkout registers.

A job sign outside a Buc-ee's in Alabama recently showed that several manager positions within a Buc-ee's pay in excess of $100,000 per year, and the store’s general manager can earn more than $200,000 per year. Wall Street or private equity would waste no time in slashing Buc-ee's employee head count and compensation, assuming it would increase the bottom line. But it wouldn’t; it would simply destroy the staffing that makes Buc-ee's success possible.

RELATED: Corporate America is eating its seed corn — and our future

Photo by Tim Grist Photography via Getty Images

Private equity would also be aghast at the “lost revenue” from offering below-market gas prices. Estimates are that Buc-ee's sells about 400,000 gallons of gas per day. Just charging 5 cents more per gallon would bring in an additional $7 million annually, all things being equal.

But all things aren’t equal.

A success story worth copying

Buc-ee's sells such a high volume of gas because its prices are lower. Buc-ee's understands that a lower gross profit per gallon with higher volume produces more gross profit than lower volume at a higher price. But more importantly, those swarms of cars fueling up on inexpensive gas are full of people who stroll inside and purchase high-margin discretionary products. It’s a simple concept that is alien to rapacious financial wizards, but one that’s well understood by retailers on the ground.

Buc-ee's success is a refutation of prevailing business wisdom. May it serve as an example to the next generation of business leaders on the importance of developing a loyal customer base with abundant staff, career wages, great customer service, high-quality products, and an enjoyable customer experience.

Neocons are back — and they’re botching Trump’s Latin America policy



A quiet but dangerous conflict is brewing within President Trump’s foreign policy team — a battle between the true red America First voices who made his first term successful and the same old neoconservative ideologues who have derailed U.S. diplomacy for decades.

Heightened by the bombing of Iran, this clash made headlines again earlier this month. This time, it was over botched negotiations over the return of Americans currently held by the socialist Venezuelan government.

Marco Rubio’s hatred of Latin American socialism is clear, but that shouldn’t come at a strategic cost to our country.

Trump’s special envoy Richard Grenell, a realist to his core, was on the verge of brokering a deal that would have secured the release of imprisoned Americans in exchange for Chevron’s continued operations in Venezuela. It was classic Trump diplomacy: bold, transactional, results-oriented.

But Secretary of State Marco Rubio intervened. The State Department made a much less attractive and watered-down proposal to repatriate 250 Venezuelan aliens in exchange for the American prisoners. The interests of the U.S. oil industry were completely ignored.

Wires were crossed, and the talks collapsed.

Two critical lessons

Two lessons are evident: The first and most obvious is that Grenell is responsible for talks with Venezuela and that he is the only U.S. figure Venezuela trusts — a point that shouldn’t be undermined.

The second is that Trump’s transactional diplomacy, represented by Grenell, works — when it’s allowed to. We’ve seen this with Steve Witkoff’s trips to the Middle East and the president’s own handling of NATO.

The Venezuelan government wants to negotiate with Grenell and Grenell alone — and for good reason. He speaks the language of leverage, not lectures. As special envoy, he has built a diplomatic channel that has delivered in the past. In January, for example, Grenell secured the release of six Americans, a great achievement.

RELATED: Biden did that? No, it’s Marco Rubio making gas prices skyrocket this time

Photo by PEDRO MATTEY/AFP via Getty Images

In contrast, Venezuela all but refuses to communicate with Rubio. They see him as persona non grata. His methods, based on intervention and blunt force, are bound to fail.

This is particularly true now that we live in a world where U.S. dominance is not guaranteed. And as the United States has isolated Venezuela, the Latin American nation has been pushed deeper into Beijing’s orbit.

Oil exports to China, for example, have surged since Chevron’s license to operate was canceled in May. In turn, Venezuelan exports to the U.S. and its capitalist allies have cratered.

The strategic cost

Rubio’s hatred of Latin American socialism is clear, but that shouldn’t come at a strategic cost to our country. This isn’t a diplomatic blunder. It’s a threat to U.S. energy security and a betrayal of Trump’s promise to bring down prices at the pump.

We want Venezuelan oil and gas to head to the U.S. Gulf Coast, not Beijing. We need to protect the Monroe Doctrine, which says that no outside power should have a foothold in the Western Hemisphere.

The importance of energy security cannot be overstated. For an administration elected in large part on its promise to cut gas prices, it is a big mistake to turn our backs on Venezuela’s hydrocarbon reserves, the largest on earth.

Doing so increases American dependence on Canadian oil — not a smart move as we fight a trade war with Prime Minister Mark Carney — and on suppliers in a volatile Middle East, where Iran still looms large.

This is not to mention that the policy of isolation is damaging to Chevron, a champion of the American oil industry.

Under its former special license, Chevron was pumping out nearly a quarter of a million barrels of oil per day. This went straight to thirsty refiners on the U.S. Gulf Coast, which depend on Venezuela’s unique heavy crude oil. That lifeline has been cut, and it’s American consumers who will pay the price.

Grenell understood this and so wrapped Chevron’s status into his negotiations, a deal that put American interests first. Rubio, on the other hand, prioritized an ideological pursuit of regime change over American energy security.

President Trump should intervene.

He praised Grenell’s successful negotiations in January and should make clear that Venezuela policy is not for Rubio to decide. The goal is clear: Bring our citizens home, restart Chevron’s work, and reassert U.S. influence in our own hemisphere.

Renew Grenell’s leverage

Grenell, with renewed powers, should return the United States to a policy of strategic engagement. That’s what America First really looks like. That’s the approach to foreign policy promised to us in 2024. That’s the MAGA way.

It’s time to put the neocons back in the box and go back to the bold, pragmatic diplomacy that made Trump’s first term — and will make his second — a victory for everyday Americans and a triumphant return to common sense.

Imagine A World Where The Internal Combustion Engine Didn’t Exist

In 2084, humanity had finally turned its back on burning the ancient remains of a bygone era, only to find itself shackled to the caprices of the sun and wind.

Critics flame Kamala Harris over her Thanksgiving photograph with gas stove



Vice President Kamala Harris shared a seemingly innocuous photograph of herself and second gentleman Doug Emhoff to social media Thursday along with the message, "From our family to yours, happy Thanksgiving."

Astute observers noticed that the climate-conscious Democrat was standing next to an appliance the Biden administration has contemplated banning — a contraption Harris' fellow climate alarmists figure no family should have in their kitchen on Thanksgiving or on any other day.

"Wait...that's a gas stove! The same kind Dems want to BAN you from owning," wrote Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

Former Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) tweeted, "Are they? A) Hypocritical [or] B) That stupid that they didn't realize it."

Florida state Rep. Berny Jacques provided Walker with another possibility, writing, "C) Hierarchy ...gas stoves for the elites, but not for we the people."

Jacques added, "Meanwhile they want you to give up your gas stoves, while they live it up with theirs. Friendly Reminder: not only will gas stoves remain legal in Florida, we also made them tax free!"

— (@)

Earlier this year, the Biden administration raised the possibility of banning gas stoves over concerns about air pollutants. An estimated 40 million American households use gas stoves.

Richard Trumka Jr., a Biden-nominated commissioner of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, told Bloomberg News in a January interview that his agency was contemplating taking action, stressing, "Any option is on the table. Products that can't be made safe can be banned."

Trumka later said in an interview with the Washington Post that gas stoves were risky, stating, "If I didn't have an electric stove, I might be thinking about a switch right now."

Facing significant backlash — including from moderate Democrats like Sen. Joe Manchin (W.Va.) — the chair of the commission announced neither he nor his agency had plans to ban gas stoves. The White House similarly downplayed the possibility of a ban; however Biden's Department of Energy released a proposal for new environmental standards for gas stoves the following month aimed ultimately at gradually discouraging their use.

While leftist ambitions appear to have been put on the back burner at the federal level, New York Democrats saw the scheme through, making their state the first to ban natural gas and other fossil fuels in new buildings in May.

Seizing upon the perceived disconnect between the administration's climate alarmism and Harris' gas-fueled Thanksgiving, Libs of TikTok wrote on X, "Gas stoves for me but not for thee."

Rep. Pat Fallon (R-Texas), among the many who similarly criticized the vice president, noted, "Everyone loves gas stoves! Stop trying to ban them and just let Americans cook how they please."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

I Rented A Tesla For A Week And Am Totally Sold On Gas-Powered Cars

After test-driving one for an entire week, we learned we will never buy a Tesla or any electric vehicle as long as we have the option of gas-powered cars or even hybrids.

California Passes Bill To Control Gas Prices

Grants the governor greater oversight
MoreISO/Getty Images

By forcing Americans into electric vehicles, leftists ensure the death of road trips

You're definitely not choosing an electric vehicle for your cross-country road trip from Boston to Los Angeles.

Horowitz: It’s worth a government shutdown to fight the climate energy shutdown



Americans are watching the energy blackouts and rationing across the great Atlantic pond with apprehension but also with relief that we are supposedly on the freedom side of that divide. But that is no longer true. Thanks to Brandon’s America, the diesel crisis alone could plunge the United States, particularly the Northeast, into a European-style dystopia of rolling blackouts and rationing. Welcome to phase two of the Great Reset: energy lockdowns.

While many are focused on prices for regular gasoline for cars, which the Biden administration has arbitrarily kept “relatively” less high than before, the diesel shortage will destroy our economy immediately after the election if nothing is done to immediately reverse this administration’s policies.

Of all the economic charts of the Brandon economy, this one of national diesel stockpiles, from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, is perhaps the most dire of all.

Diesel stockpiles have been down over 30% since Biden took office, even as the country’s population grows. Not only is diesel needed for some home fuel, but it also powers all of the trucks that bring every vital good, including food, imaginable to your door or to your local store. Given that trucks are force multipliers for the supply chain, a diesel crisis is much more impactful than even a spike in gasoline prices. As a result of this crisis, the U.S. is down to just 25 days of diesel supply, the lowest level since 2008, headed into the winter.

While the price of gasoline has been temporarily kept off the appalling peak of the spring, the price of diesel is still coasting near all-time highs, literally double the price since Biden took office!

The situation is even more dire in the Northeast, where people rely more on oil for heating, thanks to their governors declaring war on coal, fracking, and gas pipelines over the past decade. However, Biden understood that people focus on gasoline prices much more than diesel, even though the latter probably affects their bottom line more severely. In New England, where inventory is down to just one-third of normal levels, they are being forced to ration fuel and even fill home tanks to just partial levels before the winter.

Meanwhile, our reserves are all tapped out, as Biden has released or plans to release a total of 260 million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, leaving the reserve down to just 401 million barrels of oil, the lowest level since June 1984. Thus, there is nowhere to run or hide from the shortage. Thanks to years of regulations on oil refiners, as well as ethanol mandates, we only have 129 refineries left in the country, just a handful in the Northeast, and most are operating near full capacity after having permanently shut down some operations during the lockdowns. The entire oil refinery output capacity surge of the Trump administration was wiped out, as we have lost over 1 million barrels per day of output since 2020.

Therefore, the day the elections are over, there is no deterrent against the Biden administration even pretending to do something about the energy crisis. The government will barrel head-first into European-style lockdowns and rationing, which have always been the goal. So, what should a victorious Republican Party do?

This is yet another reason, along with the fight for medical freedom and combatting FBI tyranny, why it is suicidal for Republicans to sign an omnibus bill this December rather than holding the budget as leverage over the White House into early next year so they can force the administration’s hand on energy regulations. Republicans must ensure the budget CR is extended into early next year so that a GOP Congress can write the new budget and reverse all the regulations on gas pipelines, oil refineries, terminals and storage, and coal production and reverse ethanol mandates. They must also fight for provisions to give the states more leeway in using their lands to promote energy growth.

Republicans must also prevent the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from blocking the construction of new pipelines. There is record volume of natural gas flowing out of Texas’ black gold from the Permian Basin, but it is now bottlenecked because of a lack of pipelines. All regulations factoring in global warming need to be eliminated, because they are shutting down pipeline projects both at the production sources, such as Texas, and at the endpoints in the Northeast.

It is absurd for Republicans to fear that such brinkmanship would lead to a government shutdown after the American people have languished through a real shutdown of the private sector, and if they fail to confront Biden in this budget, we will suffer an energy shutdown.

Every American will remember the lockdowns of March-May 2020 for the rest of their lives. How many Americans remember the longest federal government shutdown, which occurred from December 22, 2018, until January 25, 2019 (35 days)? “What shutdown?” would likely be the response of anyone who didn’t work for the government. And even those workers all got paid promptly and enjoyed a month of paid vacation. Boo-hoo. Some things are worth fighting for.