Welcome To America’s Ungovernable Regime Of Sexual Chaos

Joy Pullmann reveals how queer politics has initiated a revolution toward a new sexually perverse regime.

Disney’s New Christmas Movie Sexualizes Kids

A boy gestures at another male and calls him 'hottie' and another boy 'cute' in Disney's TV-PG family movie about Christmas.

Anglican church facing schism over Church of England's capitulations to LGBT activists — conservative archbishops have rejected primacy of Canterbury en masse



The Church of England renounced papal authority in 1534. Now, amid internal strife over whether to hold true to long-standing church teaching about the sacrament of marriage or to capitulate to LGBT activists, a host of conservative Anglican archbishops, including the head of the Anglican Church in North America, have renounced the primacy of the archbishop of Canterbury.

The Monday announcement by the heads of numerous Anglican member churches to cease recognition of the archbishop of Canterbury as the "first among equals" heralds a schism in the Anglican Communion, which the Wall Street Journal indicated could "threaten the very survival" of one of the world's biggest Christian denominations.

Marriage at the center of another schism

The Anglican Communion comprises tens of millions of believers in 42 autonomous provinces, each of which makes its own decisions. However, these decisions are informed by recommendations from the Lambeth Conference, the Anglican Consultative Council, the Primates' Meeting, and the archbishop of Canterbury.

According to the Anglican Communion, the archbishop of Canterbury "is the Focus for Unity for the three other Instruments of Communion" for the coalition "and is therefore a unique focus for Anglican unity. He calls the once-a-decade Lambeth Conference, chairs the meeting of Primates, and is President of the Anglican Consultative Council."

Extra to these responsibilities, Justin Welby, the 105th archbishop of Canterbury — who has been in the role since March 2013 — was long regarded by the Anglican Communion as the "primus inter pares" or "first among equals."

The relatively more orthodox Global South Fellowship of Anglican Churches confirmed in a statement Monday that it has rejected Welby as the first among equals.

"With great sorrow at the recent decision of the Church of England’s General Synod to legitimise and incorporate into the Church’s liturgy the blessing of same sex unions, ten Primates of the Global South Fellowship of Anglican Churches (GSFA) met virtually on 13 Feb 2023 under the chairmanship of Archbishop Justin Badi (Chairman of GSFA & Primate of South Sudan) to discuss our response," said the statement.

The GSFA primates claimed that the "Church of England has departed from the historic faith passed down from the Apostles by this innovation in the liturgies of the Church and her pastoral practice (contravening her own Canon A5), she has disqualified herself from leading the Communion as the historic 'Mother' Church" and added that "the Church of England has chosen to break communion with those provinces who remain faithful to the historic biblical faith expressed in the Anglican formularies ... and applied to the matter of marriage and sexuality in Lambeth Resolution 1.10 of the 1998 Lambeth Conference."

Marriage is evidently a divisive issue near and dear to Anglicans. After all, it was the very issue that first parted the CE from the Roman Catholic Church, which has maintained the orthodox view on marriage that the breakaway Anglicans have recognized on their own to be critical.

The GSFA primates, who indicated they spoke for 75% of the Anglicans around the world, noted they cannot recognize Welby as he "has sadly led his House of Bishops to make the recommendations that undergirded the General Synod Motion on 'Living in Love & Faith,' knowing that they run contrary to the faith & order of the orthodox provinces in the Communion whose people constitute the majority in the global flock recommendations."

The GFSA primates noted that this turn of events "breaks our hearts and we pray for the revisionist provinces to return to 'the faith once delivered' (Jude 3) and to us."

The statement was endorsed by 12 GFSA primates, hailing from various countries including the United States, Chile, Congo, and Brazil.

Following this seismic shift in the Anglican Communion, the GFSA plans to convene "other orthodox Primates in the Anglican Church across nations to re-set the Communion on its biblical foundation."

The Telegraph reported that this announcement came just weeks after the CE voted to allow blessings for gay and lesbian couples who have already been "married" or bound in secular civil partnerships.

TheBlaze previously reported that the blessings were something of a half-measure after CE bishops decided not to recommend that gays partake in the sacrament of marriage, "a solemn, public and life-long covenant between a man and a woman, declared and celebrated in the presence of God and before witnesses."

Despite recommending against performing gay "marriages," the bishops resolved to offer gays "the fullest possible pastoral provision": "prayers of dedication, thanksgiving or for God’s blessing on the couple in church following a civil marriage or partnership."

Additionally, the CE resolved to produce a new pastoral guidance in relation to the discernment of vocation to which all clergy would have to assent, replacing the December 1991 "Issues in Human Sexuality" statement from the CE general synod, which claims, among other things: "There is ... in Scripture an evolving convergence on the ideal of lifelong, monogamous, heterosexual union as the setting intended by God for the proper development of men and women as sexual beings. Sexual activity of any kind outside marriage comes to be seen as sinful, and homosexual practice as especially dishonourable."

The Wall Street Journal reported that conservatives in the Anglican Communion who prioritized tradition over fashion have grown increasingly critical of the infiltration of Western churches by leftist thinking, particularly in Africa, which accounts for nearly half of the world's 100 million or so Anglicans.

It is presently unclear how many of the 42 national Anglican churches will ultimately follow suit in rejecting Canterbury and the "innovation" it has embraced. The greater the number, the more significant this rebuke of the CE's apparent capitulation to LGBT activists.

Rev. Lee Gatiss, director of the pro-tradition Church Society, told the Journal, "It would very difficult for Archbishop Welby to restore his position — and that of the Church of England — after this, unless, perhaps, he were to get the English bishops to row back from their recent proposals to bless same-sex sexual relationships."

Leftists in England may find cause for celebration, however, granted this may enable them to more brazenly pursue heterodox ends in the CE.

Rev. Andrew Foreshew-Cain, a chaplain at the University of Oxford, indicated that CE bishops would do well to conform to the zeitgeist and "move toward full affirmation and welcome for LGBTI people."

A spokesman for Welby stated, "The deep disagreements that exist across the Anglican Communion on sexuality and marriage are not new. ... It is a fundamental principle of the Anglican Communion that no province can bind another province."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Republicans Are Playing Right Into Democrats’ Hand On Gay Marriage

Congressional Republicans are faltering as Democrats attempt to expand legal protections for same-sex unions.

Congressional Republicans submit a bill to define what a woman is



Republicans in Congress have introduced a bill to define what a woman is.

Republican Representative Debbie Lesko from Arizona sponsored a “Women’s Bill of Rights” to provide additional legal protections to women under federal law, RedState reported.

Noting that establishing a standard for identifying people on the basis of their sex is crucial to societal stability, H. Res. 1136 states: “[T]here are important reasons to distinguish between the sexes with respect to athletics, prisons, domestic violence shelters, restrooms, and other areas, particularly where biology, safety, and privacy are implicated.”

The proposed legislation states that “males and females possess unique and immutable biological difference that manifest prior to birth and increase as they age and experience puberty” and that “biological differences between the sexes can expose females to more harm than males from specific forms of violence, including sexual violence.”

It even defies current leftwing orthodoxy by declaring that only women are able to get pregnant. The bill states “biological difference between the sexes mean that only females may get pregnant, give birth, and breastfeed children.”

The bill also indicates that motherhood and fatherhood are reserved for women and men respectively. The bill states “for purposes of Federal law, the word ‘mother’ means a parent of the female sex and ‘father’ is defined as a parent of the male sex.”

Republican Reps. Jim Banks of Indiana, Mary Miller of Illinois, Diana Harshbarger of Tennessee, Claudia Tenney of New York, Vicky Hartzler of Missouri, Doug Lambron of Kansas, Ronny Jackson of Texas, Doug LaMalfa, Victoria Spartz of Indiana, Ralph Norman of South Carolina, and Barry Moore of Alabama submitted the bill along side Lesko.

Banks, who also serves as the chairman of the Republican Study Committee, argued that this legislation is critical in order to protect the rights of women from leftist attacks.

He said, “The modern Democrat party has put the Left’s woke agenda before the rights of women. These days, Democrats refuse to even admit women exist or recognize them as unique beings, with unique abilities. While radical liberals strip away the progress and protections that generations of women fought to achieve. Republicans must fight back and acknowledge these basic biological truths. AS the father of three daughters, I’m proud to co-lead this resolution reaffirming the legal protections afforded to them under federal law.”

According to a press release from the Republican Study Committee, H. Res. 1136 is also supported by several outside women’s interest organizations such as the Independent Women’s Law Center, Concerned Women for America LAC, Women’s Liberation Front, and the Eagle Forum.

Public school teachers reveal they work with administrators to ignore the pronoun and name preferences of students' parents



Elementary school faculty were caught bragging about ignoring requests from parents to refer to them by their given names and pronouns.

In late April, the virtual “Creating and Sustaining GSAs in Elementary Schools” meeting saw Katy Butler, a second-grade public school teacher at Harvey Milk Civil Rights Academy in San Francisco, California, ask her fellow panelists a question concerning pronoun use when referring to their students.

The Daily Mail reported that Butler asked the panel, “What should we do if a parent requests that we refer to their child by the pronouns associated with their sex assigned at birth instead of their preferred pronouns, and that we use a legal name instead of a student’s chosen name?”

Butler, the creator of Gender Inclusive Classrooms, the group that organized the panel, subsequently opened the floor to the other three panelists, who were all staffers at public schools across the country.

One panelist, Kieran Slattery, a fifth-grade teacher in Massachusetts who co-created Gender Inclusive Classrooms with Butler, proceeded to tell the forum that he ignores instructions given to him by parents.

Slattery, who teaches at Jackson Street Elementary, said, “So, I can respond with something that I’ve done. This came up for me – it’s come up in a couple different ways – but it's come up for me where caregivers asked. I actually refer to their child’s name … using the name they asked to be referred to and their chosen pronouns, and caregivers reacted very strongly.”

Slattery continued by saying that parents “followed up with me and the principal, and said, like, ‘I know you were using a different name than my child’s given name at birth and the pronouns we gave them, and I’m respectfully asking that you use the name and the pronouns that we gave them.’”

Slattery also said, “The laws in every state are different … and I can’t speak to the laws in everyone’s particular state, but I will say – again, the resources that we’ll give you after this have some helpful sites where you can look up what the rules are for your state.”

He indicated that before he proceeded with subverting the wishes of his students’ parents, he checked with school administrators to ensure they would support him in his quest to push gender ideology unto his students.

Slattery said, “Before I responded to the caregiver, I made sure I ran it by my principal and my superintendent just to make sure that they had my back.”

A Pennsylvania middle school reportedly tries to conceal student's gender preferences from their parents



A middle school in Pennsylvania reportedly has been encouraging teachers to conceal a student’s preferred pronouns and gender preference from the student's parents.

The New York Post reported that an email conversation between teachers and a school counselor at the Charles F. Patton Middle School in Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, revealed that the student “prefers the pronouns they/them.”

“She is fine too, but [the student] likes ‘they/them’ the best,” the school counselor said via email.

The educator also suggested that “if you are emailing home, it may be best to use she/her when referring to [the student].”

The teacher’s email reportedly contained “A Guide to Supporting Trans and Gender Diverse Students,” authored by the American Psychological Association.

Reportedly an email exchange also occurred between a school counselor and two teachers about a club at the Unionville High School called the “Gender Sexuality Alliance.”

The school website described the student organization as “a student-run club which provides a safe place for students to meet, support each other, talk about issues related to sexual orientation and gender identity and expression, and work to end homophobia and transphobia.”

A counselor and teacher from the Charles F. Patton Middle School discussed how to start a similar club at their school or how they might be able to give their students the opportunity to attend Gender Sexuality Alliance meetings at Unionville High.

Emails also revealed that when an online assignment prompted a student to describe themselves as being "pansexual," the school counselor encouraged the student’s teacher to “ask [the student] if they would be interested in starting some type of club or group to focus on LGBTQ+ topics/issues.”

Another teacher reportedly wrote, “Middle schoolers are NOT too young to know their sexual orientations and gender identities. LGBTQ-related content is age appropriate for them.”

Fox News reported that No Left Turn in Education, a group saying they “believe that K-12 education should be free from indoctrination and politicization,” heavily criticized the school’s actions.

The organization’s president, Dr. Elana Fishbein, said, “It is unconscionable for any teacher to go behind a parent's back to meddle in a child's mental, physical and emotional health. While us concerned parents get called domestic terrorists, it's the radical ideologues who actually threaten, harass, and intimidate parents who object to their woke agenda. No Left Turn in Education is standing up for these families and is holding officials accountable for enforcing the laws that are supposed to protect our kids.”

Exxon Mobil will not allow LGBT or BLM flags to fly outside its office buildings



Exxon Mobil will no longer allow its offices to fly flags expressing adherence to or membership of “outside organizations” on company flagpoles, the New York Times reported.

The new policy, which prevents employees from hanging LGBT+ pride and BLM flags on the flagpoles on company premises, is angering some of Exxon Mobil’s employees who in the past have flown gay pride flags outside of Exxon Mobil offices.

Exxon Mobil will only be allowing governmental, company, and employee resource group (ERG) flags to fly outside of its facilities. The Times said that ERGs are “employee-led affinity organizations that are generally blessed by employers.”

ERG flags that celebrate certain group identities may still be flown on company premises during months that coincide with those group identities.

Tracey Gunnlaugsson, vice president of human resources at Exxon Mobil, said, “It’s a longstanding practice at our facilities around the world that E.R.G. flags can be flown during signature months. The flags are directly related to our business and company support of our E.R.G.s.”

For instance, the company’s ERG logo for LGBT+ employees features bubbles filled with several colors around the word “PRIDE.” This logo has been flown at Exxon Mobil offices and is used on T-shirts that employees wear during gay pride parades.

J. Chris Martin, a former employee of Exxon Mobil, who previously had led the LGBT+ ERG group said that a different flag that featured the Exxon Mobil on a rainbow background “was flown at many company locations last year without question” and that he had been told that his ability to display this flag had been revoked “without explanation.”

Martin said, “I’m also told that the employee resource groups were consulted only in a perfunctory way regarding this matter, based on momentary discomfort with displaying a symbol of open-mindedness and support for long suppressed voices.”

He added, "While they may say nobody has lost anything, the symbolism is unmistakable.”

The Human Rights Campaign, a leftist organization that advocates for the LGBT+ agenda under the guise of civil rights activism, lambasted Exxon Mobil’s policy. The group said, “There’s no such thing as ‘neutrality’ when it comes to our rights. Our flag isn’t just a visual representation of our identities. It is also a staple of allyship.”

We support the LGBTQ+ employees at Exxon and hope Exxon\u2019s leaders understand there\u2019s no such thing as \u201cneutrality\u201d when it comes to our rights. Our flag isn't just a visual representation of our identities. It is also a staple of allyship.https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-22/exxon-triggers-employee-backlash-with-rainbow-pride-flag-ban\u00a0\u2026
— Human Rights Campaign (@Human Rights Campaign) 1650659402

The Human Rights Campaign has also aggressively come out against Florida’s Parental Rights in Education legislation that was recently signed into law by the state’s Republican governor Ron DeSantis.

In early March, the Human Rights Campaign said that it would refuse to accept donations from the Walt Disney Company until it took “meaningful action” against the then Parental Rights in Education Bill.

Left-wing Human Rights Campaign revokes Fox's status as a 'preferred LGBTQ' employer over accurate coverage of Disney's 'not-at all-secret gay agenda'



On Friday, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a scandal-ridden, leftwing advocacy group, revoked Fox Corporation's — the parent company of Fox News — status as a "preferred LGBTQ friendly employer" and condemned the company's recent news coverage of the LGBTQ agenda.

CNN Business reported that the move to revoke Fox's standing came in response as "Fox News relentlessly attacks Disney for the company's belated opposition to the 'Don't Say Gay' law and for the entertainment giant's efforts to incorporate the LGBTQ community into its films and other projects."

In a statement explaining the decision, HRC said, "Fox News has a history of sharing misinformation and disinformation about the LGBTQ+."

"We know from our own research, which we put out earlier this week, what their disinformation and misinformation mean for the LGBTQ+ community: perpetuating stigma and marginalization of transgender and non-binary people," HRC continued. "At a time when transgender people – especially transgender children – are under attack in statehouses across the country, rhetoric has real consequences."

Aryn Fields, the HRC press secretary, said, "I can confirm that Fox Corporation no longer has a score of 100 on the Corporate Equality Index."

"We can no longer allow Fox Corporation to maintain its score if Fox News personalities and contributors continue to deny the existence of transgender people, minimize the violence transgender individuals face, refer to parents of LGBTQ+ youth as perverts, or equate leaders of LGBTQ+ diversity and inclusions efforts with sex offenders," Fields said. "Each of these actions happened in the last 72 hours. Enough is enough."

According to CNN, Fox News has "in recent days portrayed Disney as a 'creepy' company aiming to sexualize young children and indoctrinate them with a radical LGBTQ agenda."

However, recently leaked footage from an "all-hands" meeting inside the Walt Disney Company shows that Disney executives and creative leads are very focused on laundering LGBTQ+ narratives into content for children.

Evidently, the misinformation and disinformation that HRC accused Fox of spreading was, in fact, accurate.

During the meeting, Latoya Raveneau, the creative lead for projects like "Rise Up, Sing Out" and "The Proud Family: Louder and Prouder," indicated that she was surprised that Disney was so accommodating of her efforts to include a "gay agenda" into children's content.

Raveneau said, "In my little pocket of Proud Family Disney TVA, the showrunners were super welcoming. [SVP] Meredith Roberts and our leadership over there has been so welcoming to my not-at-all-secret gay agenda."

Similarly, Karey Burke, Disney's corporate president, lamented the fact that Disney isn't doing enough to put the sexuality of gay characters at the forefront of their stories.

She said, "We have many, many, many LGBTQIA characters in our stories, and yet we don't have enough leads and narratives in which gay characters just get to be gay characters."

Ohio substitute teacher fired after handing out 'Pride' bracelets to students



Last week, a homosexual substitute teacher in Chillicothe, Ohio, was fired after handing out “Pride bracelets” to high school students. The incident occurred in the Huntington Local Schools district high school.

Jay Bowman, who has been a teacher for 30 years, was reportedly working as a substitute teacher when several girls in his classroom asked him about a “rainbow-colored First Capital PRIDE bracelet” he was wearing, reported WSYX, a local ABC affiliate in Columbus, Ohio.

Bowman’s employment was reportedly terminated after he gave similar gay pride bracelets to his students and explained to them what the bands symbolized.

To which Bowman said, “If a kid has questions. If a kid wants honesty, I don’t think I should be forbidden from providing that.”

Suggesting that his termination indicates the school’s willingness to violate the human rights of LGBT people, Bowman said, “I think the reaction to my violation when compared to other instances in the school where certain things are tolerated, was unfair, Bowman said. “Huntington Township is by in large a conservative area, and human rights are not a foreign entity at all, but it is outside the comfort level of a lot of people.”

Bowman insisted that him giving the students gay pride paraphernalia and explaining what the items symbolized from his perspective should not be considered recruitment. He also insisted that he was not responsible for the children he was supervising in the classroom.

“I don’t try to recruit anyone,” he said. “The parents are responsible for their kids. The parents are the ones who need to teach their kids right and wrong.”

Peter Ruby, the district’s superintendent, refused to answer questions about the incident on camera but issued a statement through the district saying that Bowman’s termination was because he violated school policy, not because of his sexual orientation.

“It is important for you to know that our Board policies restrict staff from discussing with students certain subjects, including political, religious, and personal beliefs. This past week, we received reports with specific concerns about possible violations of those policies by a substitute teacher in the district. After a brief investigation, we confirmed, by the substitute’s own admission, that he violated board policies by speaking to students about political and religious topics, as well as distributing bracelets.”

Despite Bowman clearly being terminated for his refusal to adhere to school policy, CNN said that his firing was “the latest example of LGBTQ discussion in schools sparking controversy.”