The DC nobody talks about — and Trump finally did



President Donald Trump’s emergency declaration — placing the D.C. police under federal control — cited a now-famous stat: Washington, D.C., has higher violent crime, murder, and robbery rates than all 50 states.

Yes, even higher than my home city of Los Angeles.

DC is bigger than the Mall, and outside the quaint Capitol Hill and Eastern Market townhouses, the city sings a much different tune.

The order also noted that the city’s homicide rate — 27.54 per 100,000 residents — surpasses that of Havana, Cuba, and Islamabad, Pakistan.

Left-wing media immediately scoffed. They downplayed the numbers, pointing to D.C.’s “declining violent crime” stats — conveniently reported right after city leaders reclassified crimes like felony assault and carjacking as non-violent offenses.

It’s a neat trick to save face at the expense of victims.

In Georgetown, Woodley Park, and Chevy Chase, the chaos hides well. But walk through Columbia Heights or Dupont Circle and men strung out on drugs sprawl across the sidewalks. At Union Station, homeless people bathe in the historic site’s iconic fountains, just a few blocks from the Capitol.

“All cities have a homeless problem,” they say. Sure. But not all cities are the capital of the free world.

D.C. is bigger than the Mall, and outside the quaint Capitol Hill and Eastern Market townhouses, the city sings a much different tune.

A tale of two DCs

Take Anacostia.

This historically black neighborhood in Southeast D.C. has been ravaged by decades of violent crime and neglect in the overwhelmingly Democratic city. Today, it holds an “F” public safety grade and ranks in the seventh percentile for safety nationwide. The neighborhood sees 12.3 violent crimes per 1,000 residents annually, with assault topping the list, followed by robbery, rape, and murder.

As D.C.'s cost of living explodes, many young residents — like my friends — are pushed into cheaper, more dangerous areas. They often choose Anacostia.

I’ve stayed with them several times. It’s the kind of place where you don’t stop at a red light. Homeless men stagger toward your car. Groups of young men tail you from stop sign to stop sign. If you're catching an early flight, you’ll see prostitutes walking home from the night before.

Residents of this once-vibrant neighborhood mourn what it has become. Times were never easy, but now crime has made it unlivable.

One neighborhood, a larger pattern

Anacostia isn’t an outlier. It’s the blueprint.

It’s the story of every community that doesn’t fit the left’s narrative and so gets ignored. As more staffers and young professionals move into these neighborhoods, perhaps they’ll finally draw some media coverage. But reform shouldn’t wait until political aides feel unsafe.

D.C. was meant to be the crown jewel of American cities. In many ways, it still is. But beauty doesn’t excuse such damning crime statistics.

Unchecked crime in forgotten neighborhoods is spilling into tourist hot spots and government grounds. Elites can’t ignore it any more.

RELATED: The capital of the free world cannot be lawless

Photo by ClassicStock/Getty Images

President Trump’s order is delivering what Anacostia residents — and so many others — should have received years ago: law, order, and the simple freedom to walk outside without fear.

That’s not too much to ask. That’s the bare minimum.

It’s a promise every American deserves.

So thank you, President Trump, for doing what should have been done long ago. I hope D.C. is just the beginning. Do L.A. next.

How Qatari Cash Influences Georgetown—and America's Future Diplomats

Georgetown University’s relationship with Qatar has the potential to influence the future diplomats who come out of the School of Foreign Service (SFS), among other institutions, according to a new report detailing ties between the university and radical "Islamist movements and entities associated with the Muslim Brotherhood."

The post How Qatari Cash Influences Georgetown—and America's Future Diplomats appeared first on .

EXCLUSIVE: Medical Schools Press Ahead Answering ‘Clarion Call’ To Wokeness

'A significant departure from the traditional American emphasis on individual responsibility and equal treatment'

As North Carolina Flood Victims Begged For Help, Mayorkas Went Boutique Shopping In Georgetown: Report

Residents across Appalachia are still desperate for basic necessities.

Levin: Foreign regimes have been pumping money into American universities for decades



Authoritarian countries like Qatar, China, and Russia have been pumping billions of dollars into American colleges and universities since 2001 — and the mainstream media has remained silent.

“It’s been going on for decades, right under our noses,” Mark Levin says, adding, “the ruling class in America has failed us, so horrendously.”

According to a December 19 report from OffThePress.com, “Foreign nations have donated $43 billion to American universities since 1990.”

Elite universities have “massively underreported” the funding.

Why fund American universities as a foreign country?

“They’re buying minds, hearts, and souls,” Levin explains, and it shows.

According to a recent study, higher levels of campus anti-Semitism and a decline in free speech norms are associated with the underreported funding. The increase in anti-Semitism across universities has hit an astounding 300%.

This increase has been “linked to $13 billion in undisclosed foreign funds from 2014 to 2019” by “governments in the Middle East, China, and Russia.”

Harvard, Yale, and Georgetown were among the top recipients.

These foreign countries are using this funding “to promote terrorism, to buy the minds of our people in our own schools and to buy politicians in this country,” Levin says.

Despite the clear money trail and influence on American students, the mainstream media seems unbothered.

“Isn’t this breaking news? That academia has been bought and paid for by communist, fascistic, Islamist regimes by monarchies? Isn’t that important to know?” Levin asks, adding, “these colleges and universities have become Stalinist-like rat nests.”


Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

At Georgetown Med, the Doctors of Tomorrow Aren't Hiding Their Support for Terrorism

At Georgetown University Medical School's annual white coat ceremony, new students gather to recite the Hippocratic Oath and pledge to be "inclusive" in their treatment of patients. A flurry of pro-Hamas rhetoric from those students, however, calls into question whether that pledge applies to Jews.

The post At Georgetown Med, the Doctors of Tomorrow Aren't Hiding Their Support for Terrorism appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

National Media Finally Notice DC Crime Wave After Biden Granddaughter Marginally Involved in 863rd Carjacking Incident of 2023

Naomi Biden, the legitimate daughter of Hunter Biden and granddaughter of President Joe Biden, was (sort of) involved in a thwarted carjacking attempt on Sunday in Washington, D.C.

The post National Media Finally Notice DC Crime Wave After Biden Granddaughter Marginally Involved in 863rd Carjacking Incident of 2023 appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

10 Even More Awesome Places To Send Illegal Immigrants (Besides Deporting Them)

Here are 10 other destinations Abbott and DeSantis might consider for the next round of free transit offered to illegal immigrants.

Federal judge scraps planned speech in order to deliver powerful defense of conservative scholar targeted by cancel culture



Federal Judge James Ho, who sits on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, was scheduled to speak at Georgetown Law School on Tuesday about originalism, a topic in constitutional legal theory.

Instead, he dedicated his speech to Ilya Shapiro, a conservative legal scholar who became a target of cancel culture last month.

What is the background?

Ilya Shapiro was slated to join the faculty of Georgetown Law School as a senior lecturer and as executive director of the law school's Center for the Constitution on Feb. 1. But that all changed after he condemned President Joe Biden's promise to seemingly nominate only a black woman to replace Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court.

"Objectively best pick for Biden is Sri Srinivasan, who is solid prog & v smart," Shapiro tweeted, referring to the Chief United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. "Even has identity politics benefit of being first Asian (Indian) American. But alas doesn't fit into latest intersectionality hierarchy so we'll get lesser black woman. Thank heaven for small favors."

"Because Biden said he's only consider black women for SCOTUS, his nominee will always have an asterisk attached. Fitting that the Court takes up affirmative action next term," he said in a follow-up tweet.

The remarks triggered intense backlash that was led by Slate writer Mark Joseph Stern. Students at Georgetown Law School even demanded "reparations" and a place to "cry" because of Shapiro's tweets.

Despite apologizing for his "poor choice of words, which undermined my message that nobody should be discriminated against for his or her skin color," Georgetown placed Shapiro on administrative leave. Afterward, Shapiro expressed hope that, pending the school's investigation, he would be "vindicated."

What did Ho say?

Speaking to the Georgetown Federalist Society Chapter, Ho acknowledged that he was scheduled to speak about originalism, but decided to use his time for another important issue.

"I’m going to spend my time today talking about Ilya Shapiro," Ho told students.

According to National Review, Ho discussed three important issues related to the Shapiro controversy: ancel culture, freedom of speech, and the substance of Shapiro's criticism.

  • Cancel culture: Ho said that "cancel culture is not just antithetical to our constitutional culture and our American culture," but it is "completely antithetical to the very legal system that each of you seeks to join."
  • Freedom of speech: According to Reason, Ho said, "If you disagree with Ilya Shapiro — if you think his understanding of the law is absurd — if you think his vision for our country is awful — here's what I say: Bring him onto campus — and beat him!" He also described freedom of speech as "the foundation of our entire adversarial system of justice." Ho told students, "You must understand your opponent’s views in order to fully understand, and thus powerfully defend, your own views."
  • Discrimination: Describing equal opportunity as a tenet behind "why America truly is the greatest nation on earth," Ho said, "So make no mistake: If there is any racial discrimination in statements like [Shapiro's], it's not coming from the speaker—it's coming from the policy that the speaker is criticizing. That's the unfortunate irony in this whole discussion. If you asked Ilya, I am sure he would say that he's the one standing up for racial equality, and that his opponents are the ones who are supporting racial discrimination. You don't have to agree with him — but it's obvious that's where he's coming from. And yet I don't hear Ilya trying to punish others for taking a different view on racial equality."

Remarkably, Ho ended his speech by saying that if Shapiro should be canceled, then he should be, too.

"Ilya has said that he should have chosen different words. That ought to be enough," Ho said, Reason reported. "I stand with Ilya on the paramount importance of color-blindness. And that same principle should apply whether we're talking about getting into college, getting your first job, or receiving an appointment to the highest court in the land. Racism is a scourge that America has not yet fully extinguished—and the first step in fighting racial discrimination is to stop practicing it."

"That's all Ilya is trying to say. That's all he has ever tried to say," Ho added. "And so, if Ilya Shapiro is deserving of cancellation, then you should go ahead and cancel me too."