Destruction of male-only spaces needs to stop — if we want masculinity to survive



The fight for women to maintain their spaces without males infiltrating them is important and only just beginning — but they’re not the only ones whose sacred spaces are being threatened.

“We’ve had this debate here over the past few years about women’s-only spaces and how guys who say that they’re women seem to be invading them quite a bit, and I think that’s set off the appropriate amount of outrage,” Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” tells Independent Women’s Forum senior legal analyst Inez Stepman.

“We’ve been having this huge national conversation mostly spurred by people of one sex who claim to be the opposite sex, and of men, biological men, invading women’s spaces. And of course, that’s a big deal in some ways, more sort of direct or obvious or urgent, when we see girls losing sports competitions and in a totally unfair way,” Stepman explains.


“Or even we see women’s safety threatened in prisons because we’re putting male sex offenders who claim that they’re women in women’s prisons,” she continues, noting that when the tables are turned and it’s men losing their spaces, it's a “slower burn.”

“Slowly, one by one, since the 1990s and early 2000s, there have been virtually no organized spaces where men can gather together and know that there won’t be any women around, and I think that’s been a negative,” she adds.

And this has been affecting their social lives gravely, as one in four men under 30 don’t consider themselves to have any close friends.

Stepman believes this to be a consequence of not only having fewer and fewer male only spaces, but also the modern obsession with sexualizing male friendships.

In a piece she wrote for National Review on this topic called “Men Need Single-Sex Spaces Too,” Stepman uses Frodo and Sam from "The Lord of the Rings" as an example.

“There’s all those gay jokes; it seems homoerotic to people because we’re so unfamiliar with the idea of close bonds and close friendships,” she explains, adding that even the military has now been infiltrated by women.

But it doesn’t stop there. Once just for boys learning survival skills and, ultimately, how to be men, the Boy Scouts are now allowing girls to join.

“I just think we have lost a lot by making sure that even the Boy Scouts is not allowed to be just for boys to learn how to be boys and grow up into men,” Stepman says.

“I think it’s really time to reconsider that cultural push,” she adds.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Girl Scouts urges parents to 'regularly' discuss race at home, 'start when your kids are young,' claims color-blindness 'perpetuates racism'



The Girl Scouts is urging its membership to "regularly" discuss the topics of race and racism at home because to be color-blind, or simply non-racist, is actually harmful to the cause. In fact, it "perpetuates racism" and the notion of white supremacy, the youth organization argues.

In an online guide posted on the Girl Scouts of America website, the organization charges parents and their daughters to dispel racial injustice everywhere they see it by "taking on an unfair system while working to build a new one that truly works for all."

As part of that mission, the organization instructs parents to "be having conversations about race and racism regularly" with their daughters. They are told these conversations are "vital."

"To make discussion about race and racism a part of 'normal' conversation in your home, start when your kids are young," the guide advises, adding that "it's never too early to start" because "young children start to reflect the bias prevalent in their society."

"In the U.S. that often means a bias toward whiteness," the guide states, as it shifts from talking generically about racism and injustice to clearly confronting what it believes to be the real issue — white privilege:

Talking about who's left out and who's included, and how they're treated when they are included, is important. When you read a book or watch TV with your girl, are the characters diverse? If there are Black, Latinx, Native American, or Asian American Pacific Islander characters, how are they portrayed? Are they in a lead role? Do they reflect stereotypes or do they have dimension? Beyond characters in books and movies, when she's in school and learning about history, whose history is she learning about?

Earlier in the guide, the organization acknowledged repeatedly that it may be tempting to "avoid the topic of race and racism altogether" — presumably for white families, in particular. But that level of inaction should not be tolerated, the guide later implies. And apparently, neither should teaching color-blindness, or non-racism:

Saying "we're all the same" or "I don't see color" might be well-intentioned, but it perpetuates racism because it disregards part of people's identities. Plus, saying everyone is the same implies that everyone has the same experiences and is treated the same in our society—which statistics and the everyday discrimination faced by Black people and other people of color show isn't the case.

To combat color-blindness, the guide recommends reading books and watching TV shows featuring a diverse set of cast and characters.

Toward the end, the guide encourages parents to inform their daughters about ways to take civic action, such as voting and "writing letters to your elected representatives urging them to support anti-racist policies."

TheBlaze reached out to the Girl Scouts organization for comment about the guide but did not receive a response in time for publication.

(H/T: The Daily Wire)

Girl Scouts delete tweet congratulating Amy Coney Barrett

The Girl Scouts of America congratulated the latest Supreme Court Justice on her appointment to the court, then they deleted it.

Girl Scouts apologize after recognizing Amy Coney Barrett for becoming 5th woman to serve on Supreme Court



Girl Scouts of the USA organization has issued an apology after receiving backlash for publicly congratulating Justice Amy Coney Barrett for becoming the fifth woman appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States.

What are the details?

On Wednesday, the group tweeted portraits of all the women who have been chosen to sit on America's highest court, writing, "Congratulations Amy Coney Barrett on becoming the 5th woman appointed to the Supreme Court since its inception in 1789."

Then, the post was removed.

The Girl Scouts explained in a subsequent message, "Earlier today, we shared a post highlighting the five women who have been appointed to the Supreme Court. It was quickly viewed as a political and partisan statement which was not our intent and we have removed the post."

They added, "Girl Scouts of the USA is a nonpolitical, nonpartisan organization. We are neither red nor blue, but Girl Scout GREEN. We are here to lift up girls and women."

Girl Scouts of the USA is a nonpolitical, nonpartisan organization. We are neither red nor blue, but Girl Scout GRE… https://t.co/DZOeAfn0OJ
— Girl Scouts (@Girl Scouts)1603928244.0

The group also quietly deleted a follow-up tweet that read, "Girl Scouts of the USA is a nonpolitical, nonpartisan organization. We are neither red nor blue, but Girl Scout GREEN. We are here to lift up girls and women. If you would like to debate partisan politics—keep scrolling."

The confirmation of Justice Barrett has been a highly contentious political issue in the U.S., as Democrats protested Republicans' move to press forward and confirm President Donald Trump's pick ahead of the Nov. 3 election.

It appears the Girl Scouts are now taking heat from both sides. However, the Girl Scouts maintain tweets honoring the late liberal icon Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Because the original tweet recognizing Barrett has been deleted, TheBlaze is unable to report on the criticism directly to the post.. But the Girl Scouts were lambasted for giving in to the mob and removing their post honoring the newest female justice.

Former Fox News host Megyn Kelly's response best represented the folks protesting the group for taking down its nod to Barrett.

She tweeted, "This is pathetic @girlscouts. It's not 'partisan' to generically congratulate the 5th woman ever to join the High Court. It's patriotic. Taking your tweet down *is* partisan, however, and a real disappointment."

This is pathetic @girlscouts. It’s not “partisan” to generically congratulate the 5th woman ever to join the High C… https://t.co/geoTH8gPFk
— Megyn Kelly (@Megyn Kelly)1603934736.0