Why SCOTUS Should Nuke Mexico’s Bogus Lawsuit Against U.S. Gun Manufacturers

The Mexican government is attempting to blame American gun manufacturers and distributors for the damage Mexican criminals cause in Mexico.

Two Foreign Countries Join Forces In $10 Billion Lawsuit Against US Gun Manufacturers

American firearm companies

Joe Biden’s Ghost Gun ‘Ban’ Lasted Less Than A Minute

The ability to manufacture arms today ensures that free Americans will never truly be deprived of the ability to defend themselves.

$27 billion Uvalde class-action lawsuit likely to target law enforcement, gun manufacturer for 'deliberate, conscious disregard' for human life



A class-action lawsuit on behalf of the victims and survivors of the Uvalde school shooting that occurred three months ago will soon be filed, and it is likely to name as defendants several law enforcement agencies and at least two firearms businesses.

Back on May 24, a shooter shut himself inside two adjoining classrooms in Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, and terrorized children and teachers for over an hour before law enforcement breached the door and killed him. In all, 19 students and two teachers were murdered in the attack, and several others were wounded.

Last week, Charles Bonner of the Law Offices of Bonner & Bonner — located in the Bay Area — announced that he would soon file a $27 billion lawsuit on behalf of the Uvalde victims. He has been meeting with survivors and family members at a local church to discuss a possible lawsuit which will hold law enforcement accountable for their actions that day.

"Up to right now, there's been no accountability, there's no justice for those 19 children and the two teachers," said Daniel Myers, the pastor of Tabernacle of Worship church where Bonner and the victims have met.

Defendants in the lawsuit will likely include: Uvalde city police, Uvalde police chief Pedro "Pete" Arredondo, sheriffs, Texas Rangers, Border Patrol, and the Texas Department of Public Safety. The lawsuit will also likely target Daniel Defense, which manufactured the gun used by the shooter, and Oasis Outback, which sold it to him. Members of the Uvalde school board and city council may also be named.

Bonner claims that by their actions — and in many cases, their inactions — these individuals, businesses, and law enforcement agencies violated the victims' constitutional rights.

"People have a right to life under the 14th Amendment, and what we’ve seen here is that the law enforcement agencies have shown a deliberate, conscious disregard of the life," said Bonner, who is also representing victims of the recent mass shooting in Buffalo, New York.

The civil rights lawsuit will be "one-of-a-kind in the whole world," Bonner continued.

The lawsuit is expected to be filed soon.

"Now it's time for all of us to stand up and demand change and protection," a statement on the Bonner & Bonner website says.

Other attorneys from a separate California law firm are preparing to file a federal lawsuit regarding the shooting on behalf of three individual families. Though it will not be a class-action suit, it will likely include many or all of the same defendants as the class-action suit filed by Bonner.

Mexico Sues U.S. Gun Makers For Crime While Fueling Violent Cartels

Mexico’s secretary for foreign affairs wants to destroy Americans' God-given rights -- and use the U.S. legal system to attempt it.

Gun manufacturers sue New York over law that lets the state and citizens sue the industry



The National Shooting Sports Foundation and a group of gun and ammunition manufacturers filed a lawsuit against the state of New York Thursday seeking to challenge the constitutionality of a state law that regulates out-of-state gun sales.

The lawsuit led by the NSSF includes a group of 14 gun and ammo manufacturers such as Smith & Wesson, Ruger, and Hornady Manufacturing Company.

The plaintiffs hope to challenge a public nuisance law signed by former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in July. The law requires firearm manufacturing companies to place "reasonable controls" on their products to prevent criminals from obtaining firearms or ammunition. It further states that whenever a gun is used to create a public nuisance that the state of New York, members of local government, and private citizens may sue the gun manufacturer if their products are used to endanger public health. These actions may be taken regardless of whether the manufacture intended harm by misuse of the product, according to the law.

The gun industry groups argue that the state is trying to use the "threat of liability to force the industry to coerce out-of-state businesses to adopt sales practices and procedures not required by Congress or the law of the state where they operate." They also claim that placing liability on firearm manufacturers for the misuse of the products in criminal behavior violates the rights of due process. The constitutionality of the law is also subject to question, as the groups claim that the law is "constitutionally vague" and an attempt by the state of New York to regulate interstate commerce, which is a responsibility of the federal government under the Constitution, the NSSF said in a statement.

"Today’s lawsuit will end this unconstitutional attack on the businesses, large and small, vital to Americans’ Second Amendment rights,” Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF senior vice president and general counsel, said in a statement Thursday.

The NSSF also hopes to challenge the state of New York for violating the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.

The act protects gun manufacturers from legal action if their products are used in a crime.

“Once again, the gun lobby is trying to exert total control over this country and thwart common-sense efforts to protect lives. Make no mistake: We will aggressively defend this law and won’t back down against their continued attempts to endanger New Yorkers," New York Attorney General Letitia James said Thursday.