ProPublica’s Pulitzer For Its Blatantly False Clarence Thomas Smear Should Be Revoked
The misleading story turned out to be fundamentally incorrect, but that didn’t stop ProPublica from continuing its journalistic malpractice.The misleading story turned out to be fundamentally incorrect, but that didn’t stop ProPublica from continuing its journalistic malpractice.ProPublica Plots Another Clarence Thomas Hit Piece Based On Recycled, Settled Claims
ProPublica is determined to stick to false narratives in its efforts to attack Justice Thomas and undermine trust in the Supreme Court.Democrats Illegally Vote To Advance SCOTUS Attack And Subpoena Private Citizens
Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin vowed to authorize the Crow and Leo subpoenas no matter how long it took.ProPublica Editor-In-Chief Who Stirred Up Clarence Thomas Smears Built His Career On False Insinuations
Unlike allegations made against Clarence Thomas, a look into Stephen Engelberg's career finds decades of allegations tied directly to his work.New Financial Disclosures Contradict ProPublica Smear Operation Against Clarence Thomas
The new financial disclosure filed by Justice Thomas Thursday delivers a rebuke to activists' smear campaign.If ProPublica’s Looking For A Corrupt Sellout, It Should Pivot From Clarence Thomas To The Mirror
Democrats and their media allies say Clarence Thomas is corrupt, but ProPublica is the real sellout to power.Today's top stories
thefederalist.com