90-year-old golf legend Gary Player reveals secrets for living to 100



Golf and PGA Tour legend Gary Player is still playing as he turns 90.

The South African was the first international player to win at the Masters in 1961, and a star was born. Even though Player broke the tournament's rules by taking the prized green jacket back home with him in 1962 despite losing to Arnold Palmer — only the reigning champion can take the jacket home, for that year only — a lifetime later, he is still making headlines.

'I really suffered a lot. A lot.'

In April, Player shocked the crowd in Augusta, Georgia, teeing off at 89 years old and finishing his shot with a signature high kick.

"I'm standing here for the 67th time, and I think the word is gratitude, just being here," Player said at the time.

He turned 90 years old on Nov. 1, and now one of the sport's oldest stars is sharing his secrets to living a long life.

"Under eat. Exercise. Read. Prayer/meditate. Love. Ice bath. Gratitude. Sleep. Laugh a lot. Keep busy. Friends. Do things you don't want to do," he said recently.

The secrets were not his, though. While he may have the rules written on a laminated card in his wallet, he once received the advice from a gerontologist as a list of 12 keys to living to 100.

"All the gerontologists varied to a degree, but basically what they all agreed on to live a long time is under eat," Player told Golfweek. "Everybody's eating too much. Obesity, which is killing them."

Publicly declaring that living to 100 is now his goal, Player shared more of his regimen for good health.

RELATED: Justin Bieber confesses Christian faith in candid livestream

Arnold Palmer (L) presents Gary Player (R) with the green jacket at the 1961 Masters Tournament in Augusta, Georgia. Photo by Augusta National/Getty Images

Working out or playing golf as many days as possible is part of Player's plan. Weight training, walking the beach, and swimming are included.

"But not far out," he said. "Because I'm very wary of sharks."

The thought of living to 100 is in Player's head "every day," he explained, saying he thinks he will get there so long as he does not contract a disease. "[It] can happen because the food is all sprayed, you know, and it's the things that prevent you from becoming a hundred."

Player opened up about his younger years in South Africa, saying that when he was a kid he thought of golf as nothing more than a "sissy sport."

Soccer, rugby, and cricket were more revered in his eyes.

"When you experience what I experienced as a young man, which is living like a junkie or a dog ..." he told the outlet. "I went to this great school, which really helped me, but I'd go home at night, nobody there, cook my own food. I'd get up at 5:30 in the morning to travel to school."

When he eventually started playing golf, Player said he made a promise to himself that if he ever became a champion, he would help others in a similar situation.

He continued, "So I really suffered a lot. A lot. I lay in bed for two years on and off wishing I was dead, crying in bed. That was the greatest gift bestowed upon me ever. And that's what made me a world champion."

RELATED: NBA coach, former player arrested in Mafia-tied nationwide gambling bust

Photo by David Cannon/Getty Images

Player has 24 wins on the PGA Tour and 22 wins on the PGA Tour Champions. He has victories in nine majors, winning three Masters: 1961, 1974, and 1978. He also has 118 international wins.

Player was inducted into the World Golf Hall of Fame in 1974.

Through all his success, Player says he knows why people die — it comes from retirement.

"I think people retire too early," he said.

"To me, it's a death warrant," he explained. "They say, 'I've worked hard; I'm going to take it easy.' And yes, literally, they do. They go home and they sit there and they overeat and they watch television and they die within three years."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Study shows massive decline in peanut allergies after previous experts proven wrong



Health experts suggested in years past that mothers with familial predispositions to developing allergies should avoid peanut consumption during pregnancy and breastfeeding and that parents should avoid giving their children peanut products and other common allergens before the age of 3.

According to a National Institutes of Health-backed study published on Monday in the American Academy of Pediatrics' medical journal, Pediatrics, the strategy of avoidance appears to have been the wrong approach.

Background

After observing the prevalence of peanut allergy among children in Western countries double over the course of a decade, an international team of researchers evaluated studies of peanut consumption and avoidance to figure out which was the better approach.

'There are less kids with food allergy today than there would have been if we hadn’t implemented this public health effort.'

The researchers, whose work was partly funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, conducted a randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy and found that "early introduction of peanuts significantly decreased the frequency of the development of peanut allergy among children at high risk for this allergy and modulated immune responses to peanuts."

Following the 2015 publication of the trial results in the New England Journal of Medicine, numerous health organizations issued consensus-based interim guidance recommending early allergen introduction.

Years later, the NIAID, leaning on the trial data in the 2015 study, released guidelines recommending early introduction for all infants facing low risk of developing a peanut allergy and for high-risk infants where appropriate.

RELATED: The hidden hospital scam driving up drug prices, coming to a state near you

Photo by Amy Brothers/ The Denver Post

Exposure therapy

The new study in Pediatrics indicates that the exposure strategy was worthwhile and has resulted in a 27.2% reduction in the cumulative incidence of peanut allergy among children in the post-guidelines cohort versus the pre-guidelines cohort, and a reduction of over 40% when comparing the pre-guidelines cohort with the cohort situated after the 2017 release of the updated NIAID guidelines.

After analyzing health records from nearly 50 pediatric practices altogether tracking over 120,000 kids, the researchers behind the new study found that overall food allergy rates in kids under 3 dropped from 1.46% between 2012 and 2015 to 0.93% between 2017 and 2020.

The researchers noted further that a Canadian study found that the implementation of early peanut introduction guidelines "was associated with a significant decrease in new-onset anaphylaxis in children aged 2 years or younger."

"I can actually come to you today and say there are less kids with food allergy today than there would have been if we hadn’t implemented this public health effort," Dr. David Hill, an allergist at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and author of the study, told the Associated Press.

While about 60,000 kids have reportedly dodged food allergies since 2015, including 40,000 children who would have otherwise developed peanut allergies, 8% of children remain affected by food allergies. One reason the number remains high may be that only a minority of pediatricians — roughly 29% — indicated they followed the expanded guidance released in 2017.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Gay-spread monkeypox is back. Watchdog asks policymakers to drop the political correctness.



Health officials in California recently confirmed that monkeypox, a virus spread almost entirely in the West by and among homosexual men, has once again reared its ugly head in the United States.

The Oversight Project, a government watchdog group, is calling on policymakers poised to tackle the latest outbreaks to drop the political correctness that tripped up previous approaches to the disease.

Mike Howell, president of the Oversight Project, told Blaze News, "Public officials should be honest about how and where monkeypox is spreading, should not be worried about offending anyone, and should pull the fire alarm if animals and children start catching it."

Monkeypox is a nasty disease caused by a virus in the same genus as the virus that causes smallpox. While endemic in various African regions, monkeypox made a global play in early 2022.

Individuals infected with monkeypox may experience a painful rash that can look like pimples or blisters, respiratory problems, exhaustion, fever, swollen lymph nodes, and chills. The disease can be spread via respiratory droplets, through "direct contact with a rash or sores of someone who has the virus," and through "contact with clothing, bedding, and other items used by a person" with the virus.

A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine noted that of the 528 infections diagnosed between April 27 and June 24, 2022, 98% of those infected were homosexuals and that "transmission was suspected to have occurred through sexual activity in 95% of the persons with infection."

RELATED: 'Trans' fad is dying out among American youth, and straightness is ascendant: Study

Photo by Ronaldo Silva/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Months after then-President Joe Biden stated in May 2022 that "everybody should be concerned" about the virus, former Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra declared that a "public health emergency exists nationwide." Numerous states including Illinois and New York subsequently rushed to declare statewide disaster emergencies.

'They should shut down gay bathhouses.'

While the Biden administration and various state health authorities appeared willing to admit that the spread was predominantly among homosexuals, they nevertheless generalized the threat, glossed over the nature and locations of the spread, and refrained from cracking down on super-spreader venues in the same fashion they had when tackling COVID-19 — while in some cases fretting both privately and publicly about feeding into homosexuals' "sexual shame and stigma."

Such efforts to gloss over critical facts and to pretend the virus presented a danger to the general population evidently caused consternation behind the scenes.

The Oversight Project flagged, for instance, a May 27, 2022, email in which Dr. Stephanie Cohen, then-medical director of the San Francisco City Clinic, noted to other officials at the San Francisco Department of Public of Health that while she supported the "desire to not stigmatize gay men/MSM and agree that other populations can be affected, I worry a bit that we are not being fully transparent about current [epidemic]."

The Oversight Project noted that "officials were primarily concerned with not stigmatizing, the exact opposite of the COVID response."

The watchdog group further revealed that while health officials around the country were well aware that the disease was being spread at LGBT events and homosexual venues such as bathhouses, they refrained from seeking health crackdowns on such locations.

The disease, which the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under Anthony Fauci was reportedly cleared to conduct gain-of-function experiments on, has apparently made a comeback.

Last week, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health and the City of Long Beach's health department both confirmed new cases of monkeypox in their respective jurisdictions.

The announcements by both health authorities appear to have once again been worded to avoid stigmatizing homosexuals. The Long Beach health authority noted, for instance, that "Mpox can spread through specific behaviors, regardless of a person’s race, ethnicity, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation."

The Los Angeles County DPH, echoing the state health authority, did, however, note that the disease primarily impacts "communities of gay and bisexual men" and that risk can be mitigated by reducing the number of sexual partners, limiting attendance at "sex or circuit parties," and refraining from sharing "fetish gear" and sex toys.

"Monkeypox is back. We encourage policymakers to follow the science instead of political correctness this time," stated the Oversight Project.

When asked what prioritizing science over political correctness would look like in practice, Howell told Blaze News, "It means they should shut down gay bathhouses if they're again epicenters for monkeypox."

Editor's note: Mike Howell is a contributor to Blaze News.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The FDA Has A Chemical Abortion Pill Problem

If we want to Make America Healthy Again, we must reevaluate deadly chemical abortion pills, not approve even more of them.

Male ‘Skinny Fatness’ Is A Moral Problem As Well As A Physical One

The frail condition that Millennial young men like Mamdani find themselves in should be a wake-up call to parents, educators, and policymakers to look for ways to encourage young men to lead, build, and — at very least — lift.

Losing our child exposed the depth of my husband’s abuse; it also gave me the strength to leave



I was stunned when it happened. Since the day we married, I had been his verbal punching bag — insults about my faith, my body, my job, and everything in between were constant. But this was the first time my husband put his hands on me.

My crime? After enduring a month of the silent treatment, I finally found the courage to ask, “Do you love me?” He snapped, and all 6’4”, 260 pounds of him charged toward me, pushing me so hard that I stumbled backward and out of our family room. When I regained my footing, I looked up at him — a head taller and a hundred pounds heavier — and said I was done being silent about his abuse.

I said, 'This is the worst day of my life. I need you.' He looked at me and said, 'No, the worst day of your life was marrying me.'

In hindsight, it wasn’t a safe move, because it enraged him. He grabbed my phone, and when I tried to leave, he planted himself in front of the door to the garage, my exit, refusing to let me get by. Terrified, I ran to our bedroom and locked the door. Later that evening, when I heard him walking on the floor above me, I bolted. It felt like I was moving in slow motion as I raced to the car, but I hit the gas just as he reached the doorway yelling, “You’re ruining everything!”

The mask of abuse

In a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study, the researchers found that roughly one in four women and about one in seven men experience physical violence from a partner. Rates of emotional abuse are higher. Like most victims, I never imagined that this would be part of my marriage or my life. Few knowingly say “I do” to abuse. And — perhaps arrogantly — I didn’t think it could happen to me.

At 41, I owned a successful Washington, D.C., public relations firm, was a regular guest on cable news, and coached members of Congress on their on-camera presence. Surely someone who reads body language for a living would recognize the signs.

But abuse is insidious, and it starts with a mask.

Our story began like a pandemic romance. It was the fall of 2020, the first year of COVID. I had just moved from Washington, D.C., and he from Nashville — both of us to South Carolina, where we had family.

After a friend’s suggestion to try the dating apps in a new city, I begrudgingly created a profile. Over the years, I’d ended an engagement, had boyfriends who didn’t work out, and tried online dating, which felt like day trading. But finding a man who shared my faith and values, and who also offered mutual love and respect, had proved nearly impossible.

Before long, I connected with the person who would become my husband. We messaged back and forth, and then he asked, “Would you like to FaceTime?” When we met virtually, we both laughed and said, “You actually look like you!” — a rarity in the world of online dating photos.

That conversation turned into an hours-long first date, followed by a second where I met his family and a third where he met mine. I hadn’t lived near family in two decades, so having both families involved from the start felt safe.

Answered prayers

We seemed aligned in all the big ways: faith, politics, and family, including trying for kids at our ripe old age of 41 — I was exactly four days older. I still remember the night he met my cousin with Down syndrome. He spoke to him like the man he was — not someone with a disability — and knew all his favorite Disney songs. Later, he joined my family in singing hymns, knowing every word.

We shared many of the same passions: the arts, sports, travel, dogs. My English bulldog loved him for many reasons, but especially because he’d get on the ground, rope in hand, to play tug-of-war — the only sport my dog excelled in and one I didn’t. I’d sit back and laugh, heart filled.

As the months went by, we shared our lives — going to church, gathering with family, working on projects around my house, watching sports, and meeting the people closest to us. I believed he was an answer to my prayers, and he told others that I was his. For the first time, I truly felt I had found the person I wanted to build my life with and that waiting so long to marry someone compatible had been worth it.

Ten months after we met, we married under an arbor he built representing the Trinity, surrounded by family and friends. I wore the ring my grandfather gave my grandmother when he returned from WWII, and he wore his father’s wedding band — his dad had tragically died just a month before we met.

Warning signs

Even before the wedding, there were moments that gave me pause. He sometimes grew emotionally distant, held rigid opinions, helped less than he once did, and, at times, was short with me. When I brought it up, he’d apologize and explain that he was still grieving his father’s death and struggling. I believed him. People talk about “red flags.” What I saw felt more like yellow flags — concerning but not alarming enough to call it off.

I shared my concerns with one of his relatives, my dad, and our premarital counselor, and each of them encouraged me to move forward. I thought to myself, We agree on the big things — faith and family — and with those at the center, we’re solid. I also knew I wasn’t perfect, and I loved him, so I walked down the aisle and said, “I do.”

A month into our marriage, I knew something was deeply wrong. I was writing a work email when he suddenly burst into the room, yelling, “I’m never going to church with you again!” The tirade, which included a list of other grievances, lasted so long that by the end I was curled into the fetal position on the bed, sobbing, as he stood over me berating me. It was the first of many times that I was scared of him.

He apologized the next day, dismissing it as “anger issues” in a flippant tone. But the outburst came out of nowhere, and his words didn’t match what he had said he believed. That was the moment I started walking on eggshells, gradually realizing, day by day, that the man I married didn’t exist.

A deliberate pattern

As the mask wore off, things that mattered to me were bound to be ruined — even simple joys like the holidays. If it wasn’t picking a fight before my family arrived — declaring, “I didn’t get you a Christmas present, and I’m not going to!” — it was deliberately stalling, making us arrive hours late to family gatherings. One holiday, he started a movie when we were supposed to leave, then burst into our bedroom angrily accusing me of not wanting to go because I had napped while waiting for him.

Then there were the bigger moments, like my grandmother’s funeral. He ruined that significant day — by complaining all morning about attending and how he felt fat in his suit. I spoke at her memorial service, crying not only for the grief of losing her, but also because of my husband’s cold disregard for what her death meant to me. We left early, simply because he was uncomfortable in his pants.

At first, I brushed things off, thinking — he just has poor time management, or he’s just having a rough day. But as his actions began to affect my day-to-day life, I recognized the pattern: Each act was deliberate, meant to create confusion and keep me under his control.

A constant target

My work — our main source of income — became a constant battlefield. Simply waking up at a normal time disrupted his desire to sleep, often until three in the afternoon after staying up all night. He worked mostly from home and admitted to lying to his employer about his hours, insisting it wasn’t his fault that he finished tasks faster than expected. If I made too much noise while juggling clients and household responsibilities, he’d yell at me. Sometimes the punishment came in the middle of the night — I’d jolt awake as he poked and pushed my face, intent only on depriving me of sleep.

My body was also a target. If he wasn’t tickling me so hard it hurt — despite my protests — it was relentless body-shaming. My weight, what I ate, what I wore — nothing was off-limits. Once, he sneered, “How can I be attracted to you when your stomach looks like a man’s?” Eventually, I went to a doctor, humiliated by some of the things he had convinced me were wrong with me. The doctor, both puzzled and concerned, assured me I was perfectly healthy. I broke down as I told my husband the results, confessing that I didn’t know how I could forgive him for pushing me that far. He sat there eating, offering no apology and showing no remorse.

As someone regularly on TV, I tried to mask the pain, but looking back at old clips, I can see the sadness in my eyes growing more visible over time. Once, he made me cry right before I went live, accusing me of putting my job above our family. Another time, after he’d worked on my car, the battery was dead. I begged him for a ride to the airport, but he refused, telling me to call an Uber — a long wait in our small town. I barely made my flight to speak to the largest crowd of my career, having to hold back tears when it should have been a joyful milestone.

Why did I stay?

I was also experiencing physical reactions to his abuse. I started grinding my teeth at night, leaving the insides of my cheeks raw and torn. My breathing grew labored, and at times, it felt impossible to catch my breath. And for the first time in my life, I developed anxiety — constantly fixated on making sure everything was perfect so he wouldn’t find a reason to criticize me.

For those who haven’t experienced abuse, it can be hard to understand why someone stays, but abuse is confusing because it is cyclical. The lows are punctuated by highs, and in between, there were moments when the man I thought I had married seemed to return, complete with apologies for what he had done. In one handwritten letter, he wrote, "I have projected fears and undue criticism upon you. The things which I have done were wrong and inexcusable.” Repeatedly, I heard "I’m sorry," pledges of changing, and plans to fix our problems, typically with lots of spiritual language. I wanted to believe him — I needed to believe him — because I didn’t believe in divorce.

I spent countless hours reading anything I could get my hands on, but the typical marital advice I kept seeing didn’t apply to what I was living. My marriage wasn’t hard because my husband didn’t pick up his socks or because I expected him to read my mind. No — my marriage was hard because it seemed to make him happy to hurt me.

Turning point

The day I read the book "The Emotionally Destructive Marriage" was a turning point for me. It included a questionnaire, and after answering all 31 questions, my result was clear: I was in a destructive marriage. The author wrote, “I don’t want to scare you … but trust me: Ignoring destruction doesn’t ever make it better or even neutral. The damage only grows.” And the danger was increasing.

The car itself became something he used as a weapon. He drove erratically no matter how much I begged him to slow down and stop recklessly passing cars. I’d sit there with eyes closed, praying. Eventually, I refused to get into a car with him unless I was driving. As punishment, I wasn’t allowed to listen to podcasts or music, and we rode in silence. Even reaching to adjust the air or sound system could earn me a very hard slap to my hand, like I was a child touching a hot stove.

I started noticing things getting broken. A bed frame I had slept in growing up — over 100 years old, one my sister and I had shared as children — sat in the guest room. He hated it, even though he never used it, purely because it mattered to me. One day, I found all the spindles kicked out. At the end of our relationship, when he moved his things out, an outside camera caught him throwing a personal item and leaving what was left of it beside the lawnmower — the single yard item I had specifically asked to keep. Later, I discovered the wires had been cut.

Conditioned to silence

Looking back, I’ve had to ask myself why I never confronted him when things were broken. If I believed he was responsible, why didn’t I speak up? That’s the nature of abuse — you’re conditioned to stay silent. Speaking out rarely fixes anything and usually makes things worse. Whether yelling, belittlement, silence, or countless other forms of punishment, I couldn’t risk triggering his rage — especially if I was leaving town for work and he was alone with my dog.

He knew I adored my sweet pup, which made him a primary target. Once, in a fit of anger, he aimed a leaf blower at him at full force while I begged him to stop. My dog, terrified, tried to fight back — snapping at the machine until his back legs gave out, leaving him unable to walk afterward. Another time, on a road trip, my dog panicked from my husband’s rage, gasping for air in the car. Instead of helping, he coldly shouted, “IF HE DIES, HE DIES.” I drove as fast as I could, frantically pleading for him to assist, but he refused. By the time we reached the Airbnb, my bulldog’s tongue was blue and he was barely breathing.

Even though my husband had physically abused me, the emotional abuse — including his lack of concern for my well-being or even my dog’s — was far more damaging. I’ve often heard women who have experienced emotional abuse say, “I wish he’d just hit me.” Part of that is because others don’t take abuse seriously unless there’s physical harm, but it’s also because emotional abuse can be more damaging. It often is subtle, creeping in slowly over time, yet studies show emotional abuse can have lasting consequences — including depression and anxiety — that endure long after the relationship ends.

Clinging to hope

What kept me going during this time was community. Even after he moved me out to the country — a move I later realized was meant to isolate me — I wasn’t alone. I had friends, a church family who walked with me (I eventually joined that church while finalizing my divorce), and my family, who supported me in every way imaginable. While I learned that marriage counseling is better suited for marital issues than abuse, three different men worked with my husband and me during this period. Traveling to D.C. for work also helped me reclaim a sense of self; I realized that people liked me and wanted to engage with me — something my husband had stopped doing.

Yet through it all, I clung to the hope that if he truly wanted to change, as he claimed, I would walk that path with him. I had already mourned the man I thought he was and worked to find joy in life despite my home circumstances, and I loved him — and valued our marriage — enough to stay, as long as it remained safe. I kept reading that some people can’t change, yet my faith told me transformation is always possible. I now know that change must begin with a genuine desire — a desire he never had.

Painful clarity

When I got pregnant, everything became clear.

I was stunned when I saw the plus sign. At 42, I wasn’t sure if I’d be able to get pregnant, but after several tests to make sure it wasn’t a false positive, and with the changes to my body, I knew it was real. I was overjoyed but also anxious about how I was going to handle pregnancy at my age and with my difficult husband.

During our first year of marriage, we went to a fertility clinic to undergo testing. We were both fine! Yes, my eggs were old and chances were low, but we were capable of conceiving on paper. But we stopped pursuing that route as marriage became hard. He’d say, “If God gives us children, he gives us children.”

A few days after finding out I was pregnant, I started bleeding, and I knew something was terribly wrong. My husband found me in the kitchen crying. When I told him I thought I was losing the baby, he first hugged me — but then released me, looked me in the eye, and said I wasn’t allowed to be sad. Stunned, I told him that of course I was going to be sad about losing our child. He then yelled, “Now you’re just going to be sad all that time, aren’t you?” and stormed out of the room.

In our relationship, it was common for me not to be allowed to feel sad. Whether life was difficult or I was responding to his abuse, my emotions weren’t permitted. When a fight shifts from the behavior that caused harm to how you react to it, that’s a red flag. Truthfully, I didn’t always handle his treatment well. Sometimes I yelled back — something that wasn’t part of my personality before marriage. And whenever and however I responded, like a dog reacting to abuse, it was held against me.

This time was no different. As I endured physical pain and had to rush to the bathroom repeatedly, he would yell at me. I wasn’t allowed to disrupt his plans for the day. As this continued, a terrifying thought struck me: Would he take me to the hospital if I needed to go? My doctor had instructed me to come in the next morning, but to go to the ER if my bleeding worsened. Realizing I couldn’t rely on him, I made a plan B — I decided I would ask one of the contractors working on our house to take me if necessary. It was sobering to recognize that I trusted someone working at my home with my child’s and my own well-being more than I trusted my husband.

'The worst day of my life'

The next day, I went to the doctor with my mom. He refused to come, claiming he had to go into the office. With her by my side, I had an ultrasound and learned that the baby wasn’t there. I called him after. He knew what time my appointment was, but he wouldn’t answer his phone. He finally called me on his way home later in the day, claiming his phone had stopped working — something I didn’t believe.

As he walked into the house, he complained of a stomachache. Normally, I would have catered to him, but this time I told him it wasn’t about him: We had lost our child, and my body was dealing with the effects of that. I said, “This is the worst day of my life. I need you.” He looked at me and said, “No, the worst day of your life was marrying me.” He then stood up and yelled, “I don’t want to be a father, and you always knew that!” He went on to accuse me of many things, including trying to make up for everything I didn’t do when I was young by getting pregnant now.

There are no words for the pain his words caused — but they, along with his actions, revealed that he did not care about our child or me. I eventually left the house to stay with my parents. Four days later, my uncle and brother-in-law joined me as I confronted him: “I will no longer be your verbal punching bag. The marriage as we know it is over. You can either get help and stop abusing me, or you can divorce me.” I knew I couldn’t change him, but I could determine what I would and would not accept. That day, he moved out.

Revising history

I agreed to meet him four months later to see if he had worked on himself. He claimed he had changed, but it quickly became clear that his priority was rewriting the story of him pushing me a year earlier. He insisted he “never laid hands on me,” saying he only pushed with his torso, like a chest bump. I refused to go along with this revisionist history, which led to a voicemail begging me to change my story — acknowledging that he had hurt me but complaining that I could put him in jail.

During this time, we saw our final counselor to see if the marriage could be salvaged. I gave it everything I had, even though my family and friends urged me to leave, fearful for my safety. There were some good moments, but before long, his mask slipped. My husband, who was pressuring me to be intimate during this period — using Bible passages to shame me to the point that our counselor had to intervene — finally got his way. When he did, he ghosted me. His own words from the past rang true: “I guess I only want you when I can’t have you.” Intimacy in our marriage had always revolved around control and ultimately revealed what I meant to him — nothing more than someone to be used and discarded.

Knowing my husband hadn’t changed and didn’t want to change, I faced one devastating choice: Live with abuse — exposing any future children to it — or leave. His final blow was giving me no real choice at all, forcing me to end our marriage so he could play the victim.

Deciding to leave

When you love someone, it’s tempting to believe that forgiveness and support are the best way to help him. But real change requires his willingness, sustained effort, and consistent action. The most loving thing I could do for my husband was let him live the life he wanted, not rescuing him from the consequences of his actions. Excusing harm may feel like compassion, but without accountability, abuse only deepens — damaging both the one causing it and the one enduring it.

Staying is hard, but the real journey begins when you decide to leave. Statistically, it takes women an average of seven attempts before leaving becomes permanent, reflecting the many complex factors at play. I was one of the “lucky” ones — I had financial independence, no living children, a strong support system, and a few extra years of life experience. Even so, it was still the hardest thing I’ve ever done.

With divorce imminent, his vilification of me had reached its peak. Looking back, I see that the smear campaign began the moment I separated from him the year before, when he pushed me — to craft his victim narrative. Some chose to believe his lies, but those who truly knew and loved me — and asked questions — recognized them for the farce they were. He labeled me as controlling, manipulative, pious, even an addict — but these accusations were merely reflections of himself. At their core, an abuser’s projections are confessions.

I was also forced to fight to protect what I had built in life. During our last attempt at reconciliation, he shifted in an instant from kind to cold — as he often did — and said, “I can take you for half.” I had to fight. The logistics alone were overwhelming, and I can’t imagine how much harder it must be when children are involved. Thankfully, the divorce was smoother than our marriage, but the relationship still cost me tens of thousands of dollars. Yet it was nothing compared to the personal cost.

Alone in loss

That first summer without him, I grieved deeply, trying to heal — not only from my broken marriage but also from the loss of our child. Just weeks after my ultrasound, I learned I had had an ectopic pregnancy when searing pain sent me rushing to the hospital. The injections that followed took a heavy toll. Nurses in hazmat suits administered them, warning me not to share a bathroom because my urine was toxic and to avoid unprotected sex for four months since it could harm a future pregnancy — not that it mattered, being estranged from my husband. My body became a cocktail of cancer-level drugs and lingering pregnancy hormones. My arms ached for weeks without explanation, and my hair began falling out.

Yet I had to keep working because my husband refused to help with any bills. Each time I met with a client, I silently prayed that the client wouldn’t ask how I was doing, because holding myself together felt nearly impossible. More than once, I broke down — once even in front of a full room I was training. When you are carrying death inside you, your body feels like a grave, and you can’t always control the emotions that come with it.

The day I passed the baby lodged in my tube was the hardest — exactly three weeks after the injections. No doctor told me what to expect; I had assumed it would dissolve slowly. Instead, the cramping hit suddenly, and when I stood up from the toilet and looked down, I knew. Shocked and horrified, I fell to the ground sobbing while my faithful dog stayed by my side. At the time, it felt as if I had killed my baby. Logically, I knew the baby could not have survived in my body, and I could have died without medical intervention — but being forced to choose how he or she would die, through injection or surgery, and then witnessing the outcome felt like an added nail in the coffin. No mother should have to flush, especially alone.

A season of grief

At first, I couldn’t face celebrations. I skipped the baby shower for my first great-niece, afraid I’d cry the whole way through. But after a few months, I pushed myself to show up for the people I loved, determined not to let my husband steal any more from me. Over the next year, I hosted bridal showers and holidays and walked beside my niece, who had moved in with me. She was planning her wedding while I was finalizing my divorce — mine official just one month before hers.

I’m thankful for the beauty of life that surrounded me, even as mine was falling apart. It gave me hope. At times, putting on a brave face was exhausting, and I’d cry behind closed doors. But with the support of people who cared about me, I found the strength to keep walking through the pain. There are no shortcuts to healing — the only way through is straight into it.

I can’t pinpoint when it started to get easier. Grief comes in waves, with stops and starts, until it all blurs together. What I do know is that it took time to let go of every loss — the man I loved who never existed, my marriage, our child, the possibility of future children, the family I married into and loved, and the future I thought I had. All of it … gone. And beyond that, I had to heal from the abuse. Climbing out was messy and sometimes still is.

But day by day, I built a new normal. In the beginning, I cried whenever I spoke about what happened. Sometimes tears still creep in, but now I mostly share my story in a matter-of-fact way, as if it happened to someone else. With time, the pain softens, the fog lifts, and you begin to find yourself again — changed, but still you.

The grace of forgiveness

It took time, but I’ve forgiven him for what he has done. I’ve been forgiven for much, and I am called to extend that same grace. Still, I am saddened by the life he’s trapped in — a prison of his own making — and I pray he finds healing. However, the hardest part has been forgiving myself. I’ve carried the weight of marrying an abuser and the tremendous pain he caused those closest to me.

My parents, especially, but plenty of family and friends have spent countless hours helping me and praying for me, their hearts breaking alongside mine. When I told my cousin with Down syndrome about the divorce, he groaned in confusion and pain. My aunt pointed him to 1 Corinthians 13, the scripture passage he read at our wedding, and showed him how my husband, his friend, had failed to live out those words of love and did the opposite. My cousin had to come to terms with the truth, as I did, that my husband wasn’t who he said he was.

A protector's goodbye

I’ve blamed myself for what my beloved dog endured — some days my husband treated him kindly, but too often he didn’t. Through it all, my furry sidekick was a constant, showing me unconditional love as everything around us crumbled. One morning, not many days after he was diagnosed with heart failure and a year after I left my husband, I cupped his wrinkly, slobbery face and told him I was finally strong enough to let him go if he was ready. I hugged him tight, kissing his soft head, and left for work. Understanding that his job of protecting me was complete, he took his last nap, his face facing the sun.

I’ve blamed myself for my child not being wanted by his father — for choosing a man who didn’t want his own. But I’m thankful for the mama-bear instinct that came, forcing me to face a hard truth: If my home wasn’t safe for my child, it wasn’t safe for me. I’ve wondered if God sent that baby so I could see clearly that marriage doesn’t matter more than the safety of the people in it. I have peace knowing that my little one is now with the greatest Father of all — in heaven, safe, loved, and waiting for me.

Finally, I’ve blamed myself for falling in love with a man who harmed me. He took something sacred — marriage — and turned it into a weapon. I’ve had to grieve both the man I thought I was marrying — the one I loved who never truly existed — and the man he really was. Had he chosen to change, I would have walked beside him through it all. Facing the truth saved me, but it also forced me to confront the layers of betrayal that nearly crushed me.

On the days I struggle, I remind myself that my ex-husband wants me to carry the blame for his abuse and the divorce that followed. It’s part of his control that lingers. So instead, I focus on what I know to be true: I meant my vows — he didn’t. I loved him — he didn’t love me. I sought healing — he sought harm. And ultimately, after chance after chance, he chose himself.

Into the light

A strange blessing has come from all of this: I’ve discovered an underground community of women — and men — who have walked the same road. Many remain silent for good reasons: to protect their children, because of legal constraints, or out of fear of retaliation. I’m in the rare position of facing only the latter. But I refuse to live in fear of the man I married any longer.

I’m bringing the brokenness into the light, no matter what he may do, because I want others to know it’s not their fault. Just as I didn’t choose abuse, neither did they. We were deceived, believing the person we loved and who claimed to love us. There is no shame in that.

Abuse doesn’t define me. It is a chapter in my life, not the whole story. I’ve found healing, I have joy, and I now carry a deep empathy for the abused that I didn’t have before. What a strange, awful, beautiful gift to be able to look someone in the eyes and sincerely say, “You’re not alone, and there is hope.” I know with certainty that life after abuse can be meaningful — because I’m living proof that what man meant for evil, God can use for good.

This essay originally appeared in the Beverly Hallberg Substack.

Pakistani cousin marriage has no place in UK



Inbreeding is bad, actually.

You’d think that would go without saying. Not in the United Kingdom, where the Genomics Education Programme of NHS England recently published guidance touting the supposed “social advantages” of cousin marriages.

In Redbridge, East London, one in five child deaths was linked to consanguineous parents.

This is what happens when a subject becomes so controversial that no one dares to speak plainly. For years, journalists avoided discussing rampant cousin marriage for fear of alienating the Pakistani population. Even right-leaning newspapers mostly looked the other way.

Imported dysfunction

Last year, however, the Daily Express broke ranks, running a story headlined: “Pressure mounts for marriage ban for first cousins over birth defect fears.” The paper urged Britain to follow Scandinavia’s lead and outlaw the practice. Conservative MP Richard Holden even proposed legislation to that effect.

But both efforts skirted the central truth: The overwhelming majority of cousin marriages in Britain occur within the Pakistani community. Pakistan itself has one of the world’s highest rates — up to 65% — and immigrants have carried the custom with them.

Scandinavia, by contrast, is moving decisively in the opposite direction. Sweden’s nearly 150-year-old law permitting cousin marriage is about to be repealed. Denmark has announced similar plans. Norway went first, declaring its own ban earlier this year. These changes were spurred by rising rates of cousin marriage among Pakistani immigrants and the health risks — and forced marriages — that accompany the practice.

RELATED: UK health service says inbreeding has 'potential benefits,' ban would stigmatize Pakistani community

HANNAH MCKAY/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Honor violence

The situation in Britain is no less alarming.

Academic Patrick Nash estimates that about half of British Pakistanis are married to their first cousins. In Bradford, the figure is closer to 75% — compared to just 1% among white Britons in the same town.

The costs are not only medical but social. Consanguineous marriages often entrench cultural isolation, fuel inter-family conflicts, and spark honor violence when women refuse to comply.

Consider the case of Somaiya Begum, a 20-year-old biomedical science student at Leeds Beckett University. At age 16, her father threatened her with violence if she refused to wed her cousin in Pakistan. She resisted and obtained a court order blocking the marriage.

Years later, her defiance led to atrocity. On June 25, 2022, Somaiya vanished from her Bradford home. Her body was found weeks later, wrapped in a rug, a four-inch metal spike driven into her back. Her uncle, Mohammed Taroos Khan, was convicted of her murder and sentenced to 25 years in prison.

Somaiya’s story is not an isolated horror. In 2022 alone, police recorded 2,594 cases of honor-based abuse — including rape, forced marriage, and assault — a 60% rise since 2020 and nearly triple the number reported in 2016.

Tribal ties

Cultural relativists insist that we must not judge other traditions by Western moral standards. Yet the evidence shows otherwise: Not all practices are equal, and some import measurable harm.

History proves this point. Afghanistan, with one of the world’s highest rates of cousin marriage, remains a rigid tribal society. When kinship ties dominate, democracy fails. By contrast, in early medieval Europe, the Catholic Church’s ban on incest and cousin marriage broke down tribal barriers, fostered cooperation, and laid the groundwork for national identity and democracy itself. That prohibition was abandoned in England with the Marriage Act of 1540 — nearly five centuries ago.

It is time to revisit it.

Preventable harm

A modern ban would protect women from coercion, reduce genetic disease, and strengthen social cohesion. The medical evidence is stark: Children of first cousins face double the risk of congenital defects, rising from 3% to 6%. In Redbridge, East London, one in five child deaths was linked to consanguineous parents.

The Guardian itself reported that one-third of birth defects among Bradford’s Pakistani population stemmed from cousin marriages. Children born into such unions are ten times more likely to suffer from conditions such as heart disease, cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis, and missing limbs.

Cousin marriage is not just antiquated — it is indefensible. Britain should follow Scandinavia’s example and end the practice. How many more preventable tragedies will it take before the law catches up with reality?

Leftists Feign Sympathy For Autistic Babies They’d Happily Abort

True compassion is equipping women to build strong, healthy pregnancies so fewer problems ever arise — not telling them to end the life of their child when challenges appear.

Trump’s Tylenol Cautions Are Just Common Sense

If Tylenol kills significantly more people yearly than black forest ham, is it responsible for doctors to encourage pregnant moms to take it?