Trump administration making the Second Amendment great again in DC



The recent federal takeover of Washington, D.C., appears to have had the intended effect of improving public safety, and the Trump administration is now on a roll, working not only to clean up the streets but to make private gun ownership great again in America's capital.

One major step the administration has taken is to make the process of applying for concealed-carry permits easier. According to a recent report from Fox News Digital, Trump's Making D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force is doing just that.

'President Trump is not only stopping violent crime in Washington, D.C.; he is also streamlining the permitting process for law-abiding residents.'

Trump established the task force — comprising members of the Departments of the Interior, Homeland Security, and Transportation; the FBI; the ATF; area U.S. Attorney’s Offices; and other entities — in March through an executive order, directing it to, among other things, collaborate "with appropriate local government entities to provide assistance to increase the speed and lower the cost of processing concealed carry license requests in the District of Columbia."

Since then, the average permitting process time has been reduced "from several months to just five days," White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers told Fox News.

"President Trump is not only stopping violent crime in Washington, D.C.; he is also streamlining the permitting process for law-abiding residents who want the ability to protect themselves and their families," Rogers added.

RELATED: 'Beautiful, clean, and safe': Trump assembling A-team to crack down on DC crime, beautify city

Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The task force appears to have helped shorten the firearm registration process in the district as well, according to Fox News. Whereas D.C. residents used to wait up to four months for a registration appointment with the Metropolitan Police Department, they may now book an appointment for the following day. Walk-in appointments are even available now too.

The Making D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force is also exploring other ways to expand legal access to gun ownership in D.C., which has some of the strictest gun restrictions in the country despite the Heller and Bruen decisions from the Supreme Court. One idea on the table is CCP reciprocity with other states. Another is allowing women with a CCP to carry in their purses or handbags rather than on their persons, Fox News said.

'Imagine if DC's government adopted crime control measures for a year or three. DC might actually become a safe and vibrant community again.'

U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro is likewise taking gun-related matters into her own hands, declining to issue felony charges against those carrying rifles and shotguns, according to the Washington Post. D.C. bans carrying rifles and shotguns except in rare cases, and first-time violators can face up to five years in prison. However, a new policy created by the DOJ and its solicitor general changes the enforcement of this local law.

While Pirro reiterated that her office will still pursue cases of violent gun offenders and those engaged in firearms trafficking, she told the Post that the general ban against carrying rifles and shotguns "is clearly a violation of the Supreme Court’s holdings."

"Nothing in this memo from the Department of Justice and the Office of Solicitor General precludes the United States Attorney’s Office from charging a felon with the possession of a firearm, which includes a rifle, shotgun, and attendant large-capacity magazine pursuant to D.C. Code 22-4503. What it does preclude is a separate charge of possession of a registered rifle or shotgun," Pirro told the Post.

Pirro's office has not indicated that it will change its policies about prosecuting illegal ownership of handguns, which are used in the majority of gun-related crimes in D.C., the Post reported.

RELATED: Jeanine Pirro rips into reporter over crime in DC: 'You tell these families crime has dropped!'

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call Inc. via Getty Images

John Boch, the executive director of the Second Amendment advocacy group Guns Save Life, is cheering these changes implemented in D.C. by the Trump administration.

"For generations, statist politicians have told us that gun control is the answer to the gang violence in our cities. In reality, crime control was all that was needed. Targeting good guys with guns doesn't reduce violent crime. It makes it worse. Because criminals don't care about what they see as silly laws," Boch told Blaze News.

"President Donald Trump's team has opted to go with crime control instead of failed gun control to address crime across America, and for the last week or so in Washington, D.C., in particular," Boch continued, noting that these federal interventions have made progress in just a week.

"Imagine if D.C.'s government adopted crime control measures for a year or three. D.C. might actually become a safe and vibrant community again."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

This Supreme Court Is Woefully Weak On The Second Amendment

When firearms are involved, originalism is ignored and basic principles of statutory interpretation are overlooked.

2nd Amendment does not protect illegal alien who allegedly lied on gun form, judge rules



An illegal alien who has lived in the U.S. for nearly two decades is not protected under the Second Amendment, a federal judge has ruled.

Carlos Serrano-Restrepo is a foreign national who currently resides in Orient, Ohio, about an hour east of Springfield, having last crossed the border to enter the U.S. in April 2008. Since then, he has bought a home and opened a business that helps remediate fire and flood damage, according to WSYX.

He previously lived in Arizona but moved to Ohio in 2022, under the Biden-Harris administration, and filed an asylum claim, fully 14 years after his arrival in the U.S. That claim remains pending.

In 2023, the Biden-Harris Department of Homeland Security approved Serrano-Restrepo's application to work legally in the U.S., at least until March 2025, and the Social Security Administration approved his application for a Social Security number.

'The swearing of an oath of allegiance occurs through the naturalization process, not through his asylum application or his years of living in the United States.'

Around this time, Serrano-Restrepo also managed to amass a significant assortment of firearms, some of which were reportedly purchased for self-defense. During these purchases, he allegedly stated on ATF Form 4473 "that he had citizenship in the United States and that he was neither unlawfully in the United States, nor admitted under a nonimmigrant visa," court documents said.

After obtaining an Ohio driver's license, Serrano-Restrepo once again filled out the form, allegedly claiming he had dual citizenship in the U.S. and Colombia and that he "was not unlawfully in the United States or admitted under a nonimmigrant visa."

The purchase of at least 22 firearms and the apparent lies about citizenship on the forms caught the attention of the ATF, which began investigating him.

Last January, ATF agents seized approximately 170 weapons, many of which were displayed in gun safes and closets, and thousands of rounds of ammunition from his residence. In July, a grand jury indicted Serrano-Restrepo for possession of a firearm by an alien unlawfully in the U.S.

His attorney then filed a motion to dismiss the charges, arguing that even though Serrano-Restrepo is in the country illegally, he is protected under the Second Amendment since he "has been part of the national community and developed sufficient connections with the United States to be considered part of its community."

On Thursday, Judge Edmund A. Sargus Jr. of the Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio denied that motion to dismiss. Citing the 2022 Bruen decision of the Supreme Court, which severely restricts when the government can regulate gun ownership in America, Sargus claimed that the U.S. has a history of preventing groups of "outsiders" deemed to be national security threats from arming themselves.

"At the time the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791, the Government contends that the Second Amendment did not protect the right to bear arms of 'outsiders,' such as Native Americans, Catholics, and Loyalists who refused to swear oaths of allegiance," Sargus wrote. "These outsiders were disarmed because they were perceived as dangerous to public safety or social stability, and thus not trusted to possess firearms."

In the same way, the U.S. government is within its rights to restrict Serrano-Restrepo, an illegal alien outsider who has never sworn a formal oath of allegiance to America, from bearing arms, Sargus ruled.

"Disarming unlawful immigrants like Mr. Serrano-Restrepo who have not sworn allegiance to the United States comports with the Nation’s history and tradition of firearm regulations," Sargus continued. "Mr. Serrano-Restrepo’s as-applied challenge lacks merit. The swearing of an oath of allegiance occurs through the naturalization process, not through his asylum application or his years of living in the United States."

Serrano-Restrepo's trial is scheduled to begin January 21, 2025.

Steve Nolder, an attorney representing Serrano-Restrepo, told Blaze News that his client "did not pose any danger" with his weapons collection and that he is "very disappointed" with Judge Sargus' decision.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Hawaii Court Gives Middle Finger To SCOTUS, Claims ‘Spirit Of Aloha’ Overrides Constitution

The court used omissions and ahistorical Warren Burger quotes to make sweeping conclusions about the existence of gun rights.

Chris Murphy’s Dangerous Threat Of ‘Popular Revolt’ Threatens The American Public

Murphy recklessly warned of a 'popular revolt' if the U.S. Supreme Court doesn’t rubber-stamp an unconstitutional gun control agenda.

Standing Your Ground Is A Constitutional Right

'Duty to retreat' laws cost precious seconds but also further embolden violent criminals, potentially endangering additional lives.

Don’t Believe Leftist Lies About A Federal Judge’s End To California’s Gun Ban

Judge Roger Benitez’s opinion provides a perfect primer for Americans seeking to understand the law and the gun fallacies leftists push.