Squires: Vote, but remember government should serve our interests, not run our lives



Luther Campbell (aka “Uncle Luke”) recently started an important debate on the importance of voting when he asked the following question on Twitter:

“Give me five reasons why Black people should Vote in the next election. Give me five BLACK promises that has [sic] been fulfilled by politicians in the last election. MAYOR & PRESIDENT”

The former leader of the rap group 2 Live Crew received responses from several prominent public figures. Joy Reid listed access to abortion and voting rights among her reasons. Ana Navarro, a co-host on "The View," listed the names of the ten people shot and killed in the recent Buffalo mass shooting as her reasons. Jemele Hill responded to Luke’s tweet by asking how not voting would help black people.

Voting is one of the most important rights that comes with citizenship. The fight for equal citizenship for African-Americans was the result of over 300 years of political engagement and social agitation. Subsequent generations owe a debt of gratitude to those who risked life and limb to ensure black people could have legal access to every aspect of political and social life in this country.

They used the political process to achieve equal protection under the law. Black politicians, pundits, and intellectuals today talk about voting in life-and-death terms because they think social and economic progress can also be delivered through the ballot box.

Unlike them, I don’t believe the most intractable issues facing black people today can be fixed through electoral politics. At best, politicians can create policies and programs that provide access to opportunity and promote social mobility.

The growth of government in size and scope over the past 60 years has unfortunately been accompanied by a contraction in every other part of our culture. Americans of all backgrounds now look to the government to solve every problem, from drug addiction to obesity. That worldview takes responsibility away from families, religious institutions, nonprofit organizations, and the private sector.

An overemphasis on politics is often a convenient distraction from addressing important changes in culture. Regardless of race and ethnicity, family formation and the ordering of marriage before children has more to do with norms, values, and priorities than the size of child tax credits or the new interest rate. Every policy discussion today can ultimately be traced back to the state of the American family.

School choice is good public policy because it places education decisions in the hands of parents, but having more options is not the same as improving achievement. Successful students need good schools run by competent and caring teachers and administrators, parents who instill a love of learning and set high standards, and a sense of agency over their own education. Voting can have a direct impact on the schoolhouse, but it has little effect on whether I read to the children in my house.

The same goes for young men who turn city streets into shooting ranges. Children learn the boundaries of acceptable behavior in their homes, not the voting booth. Politicians can advocate for policies that punish criminals to protect law-abiding citizens, but they are not responsible for teaching children that carjacking strangers – or shooting innocent people in a grocery store – is wrong.

Politics matter, but so does culture.

The irony is that Luke is one of the most significant figures in turning rap music from a genre that reported on the gritty realities of urban life to one that celebrated the excesses of the high life. What started as a raw form of journalism was transformed into the neatly packaged promotion of hedonism.

The influence of media on culture is only questioned when it comes to hip-hop. The same black people who argue that "The Birth of a Nation," blackface, and minstrel shows from over 100 years ago still have significant effects on the self- and external perception of black people also argue that the images and lyrics Luke, Snoop Dogg, and their peers created have none.

No one would say the same if white artists in any genre constantly talked about killing black men and made videos with scantily clad black women twerking and simulating sex acts. Representation can’t matter only when it comes to children seeing black doctors, lawyers, and vice presidents. It is impossible to dismiss the impact of hip-hop culture on black boys and girls if we actually believe children emulate financially successful and culturally influential people with whom they identify.

I am not blaming hip-hop for the problems in black America. I am saying that rewarding the cultural norms promoted by hip-hop – particularly violence among men and the degradation of women – promotes those same norms to the people who most readily identify with artists. This is the difference between listening to music as art and consuming it as a lifestyle.

Why would a boy ever think of getting married and raising a family if he’s constantly being told women are for sexual conquest, not holy matrimony?

This is an important question that speaks to the current dynamic between Democrats and heterosexual black men. The left is clear about its intentions and priorities. Democrats, including the black elites who appear frequently on CNN and MSNBC, fight hard for abortion and gender ideology in classrooms because their two most important constituency groups are women and the LGBTQIA+ voters.

They see straight white men as the epitome of power and privilege and straight black men are not far behind. They frequently remind the nation that black women "saved democracy” in 2020, even though over 80% of black men also voted for the current president. Black pundits, professors, and activists are the ones saying that the nuclear family is obsolete, fathers are overrated, and the government – not men – is responsible for protecting and providing for women and children.

Black men must decide whether we want to be big or small when it comes to our roles in our homes and communities. Like all Americans, we should remember that we vote because we want politicians to serve our interests, not because we need heroes to save our lives.

Can We Rescue The American Dream From Bullying Corporations?

Can We Rescue The American Dream From Bullying Corporations?

Christopher Bedford explains how groups like BlackRock are barring more people out of buying homes and pushing more people towards renting.

Black Lives Matter co-founder — a 'trained Marxist' who reportedly purchased four homes for $3.2M — says her money is for her 'family members'



Amid scrutiny and controversy over the co-founder of Black Lives Matter reportedly having purchased four homes for $3.2 million — including a $1.4 million property in overwhelmingly white Topanga Canyon, California — "trained Marxist" Patrisse Khan-Cullors said in an interview that she's investing her money in her "family members."

What are the details?

Commentator and activist Marc Lamont Hill interviewed Khan-Cullors for "Black News Tonight" and asked about the problematic optics, specifically from the perspective of "the left."

"If you are a trained Marxist, if we're talking about a certain kind of radical politic, that extravagant homes of any sort, or multiple properties of any sort, is itself contradictory to the ideology that you hold," Hill said. "And so it's not about having money per se ... or about property per se, but it's about being a potential contradiction between your expressed politics and your lived practice."

Khan-Cullors called such a critique "wanting" and asserted that "the way that I live my life is a direct support of black people, including my black family members, first and foremost."

She added that many black people who can "invest" choose to do so with their families, "and that's what I have chosen to do. I have a child, I have a brother that has severe mental illness that I take care of, I support my mother, and I support many other family members of mine. And so I see my money as not my own; I see it as my family's money as well."

Activist Patrisse Cullors Talks Criticisms Surrounding Black Lives Matter Network Foundation: Pt. 1 youtu.be

She also noted in the interview the homes she's purchased are specifically for family members.

Khan-Cullors also dismissed accusations that she's taken money from BLM for such purchases, and the BNC News video description indicated she said "her money comes from other various sources but believes that activists should get paid a living wage for their work." Yet the Marxist also asserted that capitalism is harmful to the black community.

Black Lives Matter — which raked in more than $90 million in 2020 alone — has come to Khan-Cullors' defense, saying earlier this week that recent criticism of her is a "right-wing offensive" that "continues a tradition of terror by white supremacists." BLM added that she's a "volunteer" and does not take a salary, having earned only $120,000 through her work there "for duties such as serving as spokesperson and engaging in political education work."

How did folks react to the interview?

Some Twitter observers responding to the segment during which Khan-Cullors said her money is for her family members weren't terribly sympathetic.

"I gotta hand it to Patrisse Cullors, 'my aim is to help Black people, and I am Black, so I decided the person I'd focus on helping is myself' is an impressive defense of being a Marxist while getting rich off of BLM," Noam Blum of Tablet declared.

Others echoed the sentiment:

  • "It's important to invest in the black community...buys house in majority white neighborhood, OK Patrisse," one user quipped.
  • I have to admire the honesty at least," one commenter noted. "I think it speaks to how much control this organization has over it's pawns that they aren't afraid in the slightest to say things like that."
  • "Marxists are just temporary under the radar elitists," another user said. "Seriously. They're all obsessed with power because they resent not having it all. It's really that simple."
  • "The irony is that self-interest is exactly in-line with Marxist reality," another commenter observed.

Anything else?

On the heels of the Khan-Cullors controversy, Hawk Newsome — leader of Black Lives Matter Greater New York City — said there should be an "independent investigation" into Black Lives Matter and its finances.

And conservative black journalist Jason Whitlock said he was suspended from Twitter after criticizing Khan-Cullors and her most recent real estate purchase.

"Black Lives Matter founder buys $1.4 million home in Topanga, which has a black population of 1.4 percent," Whitlock tweeted last Friday. "She's with her people!"

Gov. Mike Parson to Missourians: 'Government has no business' regulating gatherings in homes



Like other leaders across the U.S., Missouri Gov. Mike Parson (R) reminded his constituents ahead of the Thanksgiving Day to be cautious about COVID-19. But instead of handing down government dictates ahead of the festivities, Parson did just the opposite: he reminded Missourians of their rights, and vowed not to step on them.

What are the details?

"The holidays are coming, and as the Governor of the State of Missouri, I am not going to mandate who goes in the front door of your home," the former law enforcement officer tweeted. "Government has no business going through the front door of your homes to decide how many members of your family are there, how many are not."

The holidays are coming, and as the Governor of the State of Missouri, I am not going to mandate who goes in the fr… https://t.co/06NiLvfWuP
— Governor Mike Parson (@Governor Mike Parson)1606230969.0

Parson told the citizens of the Show-Me state, "Ultimately, we each must take responsibility for our actions," and issued the longstanding recommendation that folks practice social distancing, wear masks, and wash their hands to stave off the virus. He also suggested that people "host outdoor activities rather than indoor activities as much as possible" and pointed to further guidance from the state's health department.

The Republican's promise not to "mandate who goes in the front door" of citizens' homes is in stark contrast to the messages being sent from jurisdictions across the U.S., where leaders have issued decrees on how many people may gather in private residences, and even how many separate households guests can hail from.

Parson's view on such laws might have to do with his former career as a sheriff, which falls in line with law enforcement officers nationwide who have publicly refused to enforce measures regulating people's party plans.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D), for instance, issued an executive order earlier this month limiting New York residents to only 10 people gathering together in a home. Within days, several upstate sheriffs stated outright that they would not enforce such a mandate, calling it unconstitutional.

Fulton County Sheriff Richard Giardino told CNN of Cuomo, "I don't think the Constitution allows for the infringement on the number of people in your own home. He has authority to do a lot but not to tell law enforcement to get into someone's house and count who is there."

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) also issued new executive orders ahead of the holidays. As columnist John Phillips described them in the Los Angeles Daily News: "The Warden's latest Thanksgiving Day guidelines decreed that parties be held outdoors, with guests from no more than three households, seated six feet apart, taking off their masks only to eat and drink, and no one is allowed indoors except to use the bathroom."

Newsom, of course, was busted breaking his own coronavirus restrictions by attending a lavish birthday dinner for a lobbyist with at least a dozen people inside one of the swankiest restaurants in the country.

California sheriffs pushed back against Newsom's orders, too. The Sacramento County Sheriff's Office issued a statement this week declaring outright that they "will not be determining—including entering any home or business—compliance with, or enforcing compliance of, any health or emergency orders related to curfews, staying at home, Thanksgiving or other social gatherings inside or outside the home, maximum occupancy, or mask mandates."

Masks now required inside Pennsylvania homes when members of different households gather



A new Pennsylvania COVID-19 mandate requires the wearing of masks in homes when members of different households gather, the Associated Press reported.

What are the details?

Dr. Rachel Levine, the state health secretary, said Tuesday the order applies even if people are physically distant, the AP noted. But Levine acknowledged that officials are relying on voluntary compliance rather than on enforcement, the outlet added.

The order applies to every indoor facility, in addition to private homes, the AP said.

More from the outlet:

A separate order mandates that people who are traveling to Pennsylvania from another state, as well as Pennsylvania residents who are returning home from out of state, must test negative for the virus within 72 hours prior to arrival. The order does not apply to people traveling back and forth for work or medical treatment. People who refuse to be tested will be required to quarantine for 14 days, Levine said.

Again, the state has no plans to enforce that measure, but is asking for voluntary compliance.

The AP said health officials blamed the spread of the virus in part to small indoor gatherings, and Levine noted that how Pennsylvania does in the coming weeks and months will depend largely on the public's willingness to wear masks and practice social distancing.

"In the end, people will have the consequences of their actions as well as their families and their communities, and if they do not wear masks, if they do not social distance, then those communities are going to see even more spread of COVID-19," Levine added, according to the outlet.

The numbers

The state is reporting more than 5,000 new infections per day, up more than 115% in just two weeks, the AP said, adding that more than 2,700 people are now hospitalized in Pennsylvania with COVID-19 — not far from the state record of about 3,000 in early May.

The AP said Pennsylvania will run out of Intensive Care Unit beds next month at the present admission rate, according to models from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington.

And the rate of positive COVID-19 test results, as well as deaths, have been rising, the outlet added.

While Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf imposed a state-at-home order and closed "non-life-sustaining" businesses early in the pandemic, the AP reported that Wolf and Levine have consistently said they don't intend to implement another broad-based shutdown.

But Levine on Tuesday did not rule out more mitigation measures, the outlet said.

"Whether we have to do anything else really depends upon you. It depends upon the public, each one of us taking our responsibility for the common good of everyone in Pennsylvania," Levine said, according to the AP. "And if we all do our part, and we stand united, then we might not need any further mitigation measures."

Penn. bolsters mask, COVID test rules amid surgeyoutu.be

New data reveals dementia and Alzheimers are prevalent in COVID fatalities

Statistics Canada has released new data indicating that dementia and Alzheimers are the most prevalent secondary conditions.

Thousands of Oregonians flee as windblown fires consume hundreds of homes



Thousands of Oregonians have been forced to evacuate their homes as high winds hastened the spread of raging wildfires in several Western U.S. states on Wednesday, and hundreds of residences have been lost in the flames.

What are the details?

The Washington Post reported that "tens of thousands" of Oregon residents have fled their homes in recent days, some through personal necessity and others triggered by government orders to leave immediately as blazes ravaged not only vast forestland but residential areas where hundreds of homes have already been consumed.

Jackson County, Ore. resident Beth Zerkel and her family had to abandon their home. Zerkel told The Post, "I don't have anything with me. I wasn't able to pack. Now I understand when people say they left with just the shirt off their back."

She added, "There are people going into parking lots and sleeping in their cars with their cats and dogs because there's no place to go."

The Associated Press reported "fires trapped firefighters and civilians behind fire lines in Oregon and leveled an entire small town in eastern Washington" on Wednesday.

Oregon Gov. Kate Brown (D) warned, "This could be the greatest loss of human life and property due to wildfire in our state's history," noting that no fatalities from the fires had yet been confirmed.

In neighboring Washington, a 1-year-old boy was killed in a wildfire in the northern part of the state, The New York Times reported.

Early Wednesday, officials counted more than 85 wildfires burning in California, Oregon, and Washington. The New York Post reported in the afternoon that " 96 large fires are burning in 12 states and scorched more than 3.4 million acres (5,300 square miles — about the size of Connecticut)."

Two million acres have been consumed in California alone, according to UPI. The outlet reported that "record heatwave temperatures fueled numerous wildfires over the Labor Day weekend." The fires in recent days have pushed California to 2.3 million acres burned in 2020, which is a new record for the state.

Anything else?

The fires caused the sky to turn hues of red and orange in several parts of West Coast states, leading people to share photos and videos on social media showing the eerie scenes.

One person posted a photo of red skies on Reddit, writing, "Oregon wildfires making it look straight apocalyptic."

CBS News reported that "according to NASA, the color-changing skies are a result of smoke particles, which block certain wavelength colors from the sun."