Chip Roy RIPS into Speaker Johnson's 'garbage' spending deal



Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson and Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer have finally come to an agreement on the next budget spending bill.

But Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) is furious, despite Johnson touting the agreement as a way to cut back on spending while avoiding a government shutdown.

Roy tells Glenn Beck that the bill will “hammer the American people” and that while Johnson is the new speaker, he’s simply representing “the same garbage.”

The bill is $1.66 trillion, which is nearly $60 billion more than Nancy Pelosi’s last spending bill and $100 billion more than is needed.

Meanwhile, the bill doesn’t address the border crisis at all.

“Republicans are going to go try to sell you and the American people that that’s somehow a win. Don’t believe them,” Roy says.

“I was asked to eat a National Defense Authorization Act which got rid of almost all of our policy changes we put in our version and then extended FISA over 16 months so we can have a government continue to spy on the American people, and now I’m being asked to accept this ridiculous spending deal with no real border security measures,” Roy continues.

While the deal is financially devastating, Roy is slightly more concerned about the lack of attention given to the border crisis.

“In my view, they’re actually both important, but I will take border security first,” he tells Glenn.

“Me too,” Glenn says firmly.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Oklahoma House passes bill that would protect motorists who hit protesters while fleeing a riot



The Oklahoma House of Representatives passed a bill Tuesday that would protect drivers who hit protesters while fleeing a riot and also would update punishment for rioters, KOCO-TV reported.

What are the details?

House Bill 1674 would create a new section of law to protect motor vehicle operators fleeing a riot under a reasonable belief their actions were necessary to protect them from serious injury or death, the station said, citing a news release, adding that it also would update language relating to those convicted of illegal activity during riots.

"Last summer, during the height of violent riots that were sweeping the nation, resulting in loss of life and millions of dollars in property damage, a motorist in Oklahoma traveling with his wife and two school-aged children was surrounded by aggressive protesters in the roadway," GOP state Rep. Kevin West said, KOCO reported. "The protesters beat at his truck and threw things at it, scaring both him and his family. The driver was severely chastised for trying to hurt the protesters, and he even faced the possibility of criminal charges for his actions in attempting to evade the protestors."

Here's a clip of the incident to which West referred:

Truck drives through crowd of protesters in Tulsayoutu.be

West added that "this measure would clarify a motorist's rights in a similar situation going forward. It also would clarify punishments for rioters acting illegally to impede traffic or seeking harm of other individuals during the course of a riot," the station said.

Bill co-author Kevin McDugle, another Republican state representative, said, "I fully agree that peaceful protests are a right of the people, and I condone anyone who wants to protest peacefully. Once anyone impedes on the freedoms of others, however, the protest is no longer peaceful. I simply want to make sure people on both sides of any issue are kept safe and have the right to defend or protect their families when they feel their lives are threatened," KOCO reported.

More from the station:

HB 1674 states that every person who unlawfully obstructs – or makes impassable or hazardous – the normal use of any public street, highway or road within Oklahoma by impeding, hindering or restraining motor vehicle traffic or passengers, by endangering the safe movement of motor vehicles or pedestrians shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for a term not exceeding one year, or by a fine of not less than $100 and not exceeding $5,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment. In addition, the person shall be liable for all damages to person or property, according to the news release.

The measure also addresses organizations found to have conspired with people found guilty of committing crimes under rioting statutes, officials said. Those organizations shall be fined 10 times the amount authorized by the appropriate provision.

The bill passed 79-18, KOCO reported, adding that it now goes to the state Senate where it was authored by Republican Rob Standridge.

Similar legislation was introduced in Missouri by a Republican state senator in January.

What else do we know about the Tulsa incident?

While the media tried to portray the motorist as the bad guy and the Tulsa protesters attacking his vehicle as victims, a state prosecutor actually decided to not charge the motorist and instead was looking at whether to prosecute some of the protesters, the Associated Press reported last July.

The Tulsa County District Attorney's Office asked the Highway Patrol to identify protesters from photos and videos for possible prosecution for doing what District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler described as "using weapons and throwing projectiles and damaging the property of this family" in the vehicle, the AP said.

More from the AP:

Attorney Jonathan Nation, who represents one of three people who were injured during the May 31 protest, told the Tulsa World on Thursday that Kunzweiler's stance is "essentially blaming the protesters and essentially blaming the victims for their own injuries."

The newspaper obtained a memo from Kunzweiler in which he said: "Although the claim may be that this was a peaceful protest, there was nothing peaceful about the targeting and attack upon this family." The driver's name has not been released.

Insulting a police officer could soon become a crime in Kentucky



A bill advancing out of a Kentucky Senate committee would make it a crime for people to insult a police officer to the point where it causes a "violent response," Fox News reported.

The proposed bill came in response to the riots last summer.

What are the details?

The bill advanced out of the committee Thursday on a 7-3 vote. The bill's sponsor, Sen. Danny Carroll (R), is a retired police officer who says that something needs to be done to prevent the escalation of "riotous behavior."

"In these riots, you see people getting up in officers' faces, yelling in their ears, doing everything they can to provoke a violent response," he said. "I'm not saying the officers do that, but there has to be a provision within that statute to allow officers to react to that. Because that does nothing but incite those around that vicinity, and it furthers and escalates the riotous behavior."

He added, "This country was built on lawful protest, and it's something that we must maintain — our citizens' right to do so. What this deals with are those who cross the line and commit criminal acts."

Fox News reported, "The bill kept language making a person guilty of disorderly conduct — a Class B misdemeanor — if they accost, insult, taunt, or challenge a law enforcement officer with offensive or derisive words, or by gestures or other physical contact, that would have a direct tendency to provoke a violent response from the perspective of a reasonable and prudent person."

A Class B misdemeanor carries a penalty of up to 90 days' imprisonment.

The bill is headed for the full Senate and could be passed as early as next week.

What are others saying about this?

State Sen. David Yates (D) seemed to suggest that the bill is overkill.

"I don't believe that any of my good officers are going to be provoked to a violent response because somebody does a 'Yo mama' joke or whatnot," Yates told the Louisville Courier Journal.

Corey Shapiro, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky, added that the "idea that the legislature would be criminalizing speech in such a way is offensive."

"Verbally challenging police action — even if by insult or offensive language — is a cornerstone of our democracy," he told the outlet. "And the First Amendment protects people's ability to express themselves, even if it's using offensive words to the police."