'Rents will come down' — but not in sanctuary cities: Loan agent chronicles homes apparently abandoned by illegal aliens



A Texas real estate loan agent says houses are being abandoned by illegal immigrants.

Deportations combined with updated Federal Housing Administration policies mean fewer foreign residents, both legal and illegal, are qualifying for federal loans.

'That's what corporations love — they love the fact there is so many more people, whether they're legal or not.'

An announcement in late March from the Trump administration shifted FHA policy to stop allowing non-permanent residents access to FHA loans, which are loans guaranteed by the federal government and backed by the taxpayer. According to Congress, an FHA loan requires a down payment of only 3.5% for most borrowers.

DACA recipients, H-1B holders, asylum seekers, and refugees without green cards are some of the categories no longer permitted to use FHA loans. The Trump administration said it also prevented illegal immigrants from accessing loans that they acquired under President Biden.

"Today, HUD terminated Biden's taxpayer-backed FHA mortgages for illegal aliens," Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner wrote on X in March. "American taxpayers will no longer subsidize open borders by offering home loans to those who enter our nation illegally."

The policy shift left only U.S. citizens, green card holders, and select others eligible for the federal loans. Months later, a loan agent says the changes have resulted in houses being hastily abandoned.

RELATED: Americans priced out while foreigners pour in: Trump admin report slams Biden for spike in rental costs

— (@)

"This week, I started doing foreclosures on undocumented properties," a content creator named Antts Inc said in a recent viral video.

"Properties that the people had to leave in a hurry. I just left one. Pizza boxes open. Pizza was still there. All the food was still in the pantry. They grabbed whatever valuables they could, left everything else behind. These are foreclosures. So these are homes that were bought using FHA, guaranteed by the government for undocumented people," he explained.

The loan agent said the properties come for inspection tagged as "possible undocumented immigrant" and typically have abandoned furniture or even items like fish tanks with dead fish.

The creator documents many of the houses he visits on his YouTube channel and predicts rents prices will soon start dropping.

"Rents will come down in some states it's already happening! Don't expect them to come down in sanctuary cities or states like California where they all flock to!" he wrote on X.

In Texas, rent costs are already drastically dropping since the same time in 2024.

RELATED: The rate cliff is real — and Washington created it

According to RentHop, studio rent has dropped by more than 11% since last December, while one-bedroom rental costs have decreased by more than 18.5%. For a two-bedroom unit, the price has gone down by about 17%.

Three- and four-bedroom rentals have stagnated or slightly increased, up by 2.6% and 0.7%, respectively.

"They drove rents up," the Texas resident said about illegal immigrants in another video. "States like California where [illegal aliens] rent one house and there's three families living there and they share the rent. But if you're a single family and you're trying to rent that house now, you gotta pay a ridiculous amount because you are one family competing with three that are living in the other house."

He added, "That's what corporations love — they love the fact there is so many more people, whether they're legal or not."

On RentHop, rent prices in Texas showed a sharp increase under the Biden administration starting in March 2021 and began a sharp decline under the Trump administration in October 2025.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Democrat-led city's alleged ‘race-based’ housing strategy prompts federal investigation



One Democratic-led city’s housing plan is facing scrutiny from the Trump administration’s Department of Housing and Urban Development.

On Thursday, HUD announced that it had opened an investigation into Boston’s “race-based” housing program, claiming that the city’s diversity, equity, and inclusion practices may “violate civil rights protections under the Fair Housing Act and Title VI.”

'This warped mentality will be fully exposed, and Boston will come into full compliance with federal anti-discrimination law.'

HUD sent a letter to Boston’s Office of Housing in mid-September, stating that the department had reason to believe the city was using federal grants to support a race-based housing plan. The letter cited the city’s website, which described Boston Housing Strategy 2025 as “provid[ing] tools to … reduce racial disparities through homeownership and development opportunities for BIPOC-led organizations.”

Boston’s housing strategy states that its goal is to ensure at least 65% of home-buying opportunities are awarded to “BIPOC” households.

HUD requested numerous documents from Boston to investigate the matter.

The department informed Democratic Mayor Michelle Wu’s office on Thursday that it had opened an investigation into its housing strategy.

RELATED: Americans priced out while foreigners pour in: Trump admin report slams Biden for spike in rental costs

Scott Turner. Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images

“To further its racialist theory of housing justice, the City’s Fair Housing Assessment promises to ‘target homebuyer outreach’ at ‘Black and Latinx families’ and pressure ‘banks and mortgage lenders to increase their lending in communities of color,’” read HUD’s notification to Boston.

HUD Secretary Scott Turner stated that the department believes the city ”has engaged in a social engineering project that intentionally advances discriminatory housing policies driven by an ideological commitment to DEI rather than merit or need.”

RELATED: Trump proposes drastic cuts to 'dysfunctional' Section 8 housing program

President Donald Trump, Scott Turner. Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

“HUD is committed to protecting every American’s civil rights and will thoroughly investigate the City’s stated goal of ‘integrating racial equity into every layer of city government,’” Turner said. “This warped mentality will be fully exposed, and Boston will come into full compliance with federal anti-discrimination law.”

A city spokesperson told Blaze News, “Boston will never abandon our commitment to fair and affordable housing, and we will defend our progress to keep Bostonians in their homes against these unhinged attacks from Washington.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Americans priced out while foreigners pour in: Trump admin report slams Biden for spike in rental costs



The Trump administration's Department of Housing and Urban Development blames rising housing and rental prices on the surge in immigration under Biden.

HUD published the "Worst Case Housing Needs: 2025 Report to Congress" in November, a biennial report that analyzes problems impacting low-income renting families. It defines renters with worst-case needs as those who do not receive government housing assistance and spend more than half of their income on rent or live in severely inadequate conditions, or both.

'The unchecked illegal immigration and open borders policies allowed by the Biden administration continue to put significant strain on housing, pricing out American families.'

HUD argued that the uptick in immigration caused increases in housing demand and, in turn, prices.

"Between 2021 and 2024, the foreign-born population of the United States increased by more than six million — the largest such increase over such a short period in American history. The foreign-born population now stands at more than 53 million individuals, making up the highest share of the American population in history," HUD reported.

The department stated that the country's foreign-born population has grown by 20 million since 2000, representing a 40% increase.

In some regions of the U.S., such as California and New York, immigrants account for up to 100% of the rental growth and over 50% of all owner-occupied growth, HUD added. Nationwide, immigration accounts for two-thirds of rental demand growth, according to the department.

The median monthly housing cost for renters in 2021 was $1,184, increasing nearly 17.5% to $1,391 in 2023, according to the report.

RELATED: DHS Secretary Kristi Noem partners with HUD to end government-funded housing for illegal aliens: 'The gravy train is over'

Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

"The growth in households attributable to noncitizens was 13% between 2019 and 2023, compared to 7% between 2015 and 2019. This further demonstrates that noncitizen households are playing an increasing role in the household growth that is straining the affordable housing supply," the report read.

HUD's report cited several other contributing factors to the affordable rental crisis, including demand-side housing subsidies and the decline in marriage.

RELATED: Liz Warren hustles Trump with a housing bill from hell

President Donald Trump, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner. Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner told Fox News Digital, "The unchecked illegal immigration and open borders policies allowed by the Biden administration continue to put significant strain on housing, pricing out American families."

"These policies have plagued America's housing market, but in President Trump, Americans finally have a leader fighting to restore sanity to American immigration policy," he added.

Turner stated that in 2025, HUD has supported one million homebuyers, including through first-time buyer and refinancing programs. He has called on the Federal Reserve to cut rates to continue the momentum toward affordability.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The cost-of-living panic sparks a bipartisan rush to bad ideas



Welcome to Sesame Street. The word of the day is “affordability.”

Democrats have treated it as a magic spell ever since their 2024 collapse drove the party’s approval to historic lows. New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani and governors-elect Abigail Spanberger of Virginia and Mikie Sherrill of New Jersey ran very different races, yet all credited their wins to a relentless focus on the cost of living. Mamdani in particular used the term like an incantation to bury a record full of extremist statements and friendly nods toward terrorist movements.

Turning ‘affordability’ into a political idol guarantees policies that cannibalize the future.

Democrats also see the “affordability” push as an opportunity to turn Republicans’ most effective weapon against them. Joe Biden’s low approval ratings on the economy dogged him throughout his entire term, and his constant insistence that things were improving did not cut the (suddenly expensive) mustard.

Republican anxiety grows

On his first day back in office, Donald Trump ordered “all executive departments and agencies to deliver emergency price relief.” But Democrats’ stronger-than-expected showing in the 2025 elections has GOP strategists wondering whether that relief is moving too slowly to blunt the message.

Trump, who dominated the 2024 campaign by hammering prices, sounds irritated that his best issue has turned into a liability. He avoids the word “affordability,” though it has begun sneaking into his teleprompter.

“We’re making incredible strides to Make America Affordable Again,” he told the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum. “Democrats had the worst inflation in history. They had the highest prices in history. The country was going to hell. ... We’re bringing prices down.”

A political arms race

Both parties now talk about the cost of living as their top priority, and struggling families need the attention. But a politics built around “affordability” can easily turn into a race to the bottom — an auction of quick fixes that burn next year’s seed corn for a bump in the polls.

Plenty of shortcuts tempt politicians. Mamdani floated the most obvious one: freezing rents across one million rent-stabilized apartments in New York City. If he pulls it off — a big “if” — tenants will enjoy short-term relief. Yet the move will also choke new construction and allow existing homes to deteriorate as landlords lose the revenue needed to maintain them.

Beware of quick fixes

Even Republicans flirt with shortcuts. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) teamed up on a bill capping credit-card interest rates at 10%. Cheaper interest sounds great until you follow the consequences. A hard cap would force lenders to reject more applications, denying low-income Americans the credit they often need to escape poverty or cover emergencies.

Republicans face their own affordability temptation as well. AI data centers, which consume enormous amounts of power, are driving up electric bills faster than increased energy production can offset. Slowing or freezing data-center construction could save households money for a year or two. It would also cripple America’s position in the AI race with China and cost the country trillions of dollars in long-term economic growth.

RELATED:If conservatives will not defend capitalism, who will?

Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Tariffs under fire

Trump’s tariffs have become a favorite target for Democrats claiming to champion affordability. The administration recently eased tariffs on food imports such as bananas and coffee. But gutting the entire tariff regime — if the Supreme Court allows it to remain in place — would be a profound mistake.

Tariffs have pushed some prices upward, but the Harvard Business School tariff tracker estimates that only 20% of tariff costs reach consumers. Foreign companies and foreign governments absorb the rest.

Meanwhile, tariff revenue strengthens the government’s financial footing, and trillions of dollars in investment continue to flow into new and expanded U.S. manufacturing. Reverting to the failed neoliberal free-trade dogma in the name of “affordability” might give politicians a quick approval boost. It would gut the industrial base, weaken the budget, and destroy the very blue-collar jobs voters were promised.

Our marshmallow test

Blaming the other party for rising prices works because it taps into real pain. But it also encourages the kind of policymaking you would expect from the child in the famous experiment who couldn’t wait 15 minutes for a second marshmallow. He ate the first one instantly and lost the reward.

The cost of living in America (to say nothing of thriving) is far too high. Families need real relief. But turning “affordability” into a political idol guarantees policies that cannibalize the future. Prosperity demands discipline. A country that chases quick fixes will never escape its long-term economic traps.

California’s Housing Woes Spiral Out Of Control Under Gavin Newsom

'Don't look at his rhetoric, look at his record'

Big Government Locks Young People Out of the American Dream

Socialism, regulation, and other government policies are what have caused the affordability crisis that has arisen across the United States.

The rate cliff is real — and Washington created it



It’s never been more unaffordable to buy and finance a home in America. And yet, government officials seem confused about the cause, chasing “solutions” that will only make things worse. They want more building, lower rates, and more subsidies. But none of that fixes the core problem.

We don’t have a shortage of homes. We have an affordability crisis driven by government intervention — one that’s inflated yet another asset bubble. Housing, like education and health care, has been hijacked by easy money, fake pricing signals, and federal subsidies designed to mask structural rot.

You can’t paper over decades of distortion with another round of Fed intervention.

The solution isn’t more easy money. It’s pulling the plug on government policies that distort markets. Enough with near-zero interest rates. Enough with the Federal Reserve buying mortgage-backed securities. Enough with Fannie, Freddie, and the FHA inflating demand that the market can’t sustain.

Cause and effect

Remember the late ’90s? Mortgage rates sat between 7% and 8%. Nobody panicked or complained much about the cost of living. People bought homes. Prices were reasonable. Inflation was low because deficits were shrinking and money wasn’t being printed into oblivion.

Then came the dot-com crash, George W. Bush’s post-9/11 spending spree, and the Clinton-era “affordable housing” schemes coming due. The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s footprint expanded. The Fed, under Chairman Alan Greenspan, dropped rates to near zero — the same path Trump wants now — and we inflated the first major housing bubble of the 21st century.

From 2001 to 2006, Washington juiced the market at every turn. M2 money supply growth topped 10% and stayed above 8% into 2003. The Fed funds rate plummeted from 6.25% to 1%, where it stayed for a full year. Real rates were negative for two and a half years.

No surprise what followed: Real estate loans at commercial banks surged at a compound annual rate of 12.26%. Cheap money and inflated supply pushed prices through the roof. The result was a bubble built not on demand but distortion.

Then came the collapse.

And what did Washington do? Bailouts for big banks. Bailouts for Fannie and Freddie. Dodd-Frank. Obamacare. Trillions in new debt. The Fed held rates near zero for six more years, planting the seeds for the next wave of asset inflation — especially in housing.

Then came COVID.

The government printed $7 trillion and subsidized nearly everything. Rates dropped back near zero. The Fed bought trillions more in mortgage-backed securities. Freddie, Fannie, and the FHA expanded their subsidies even further. By 2021, we had the biggest housing bubble in American history.

Welcome to the rate cliff

Now, we’ve hit the wall. The Fed had to raise rates to fight inflation. That created a generational rate cliff. Sellers don’t want to give up their 2% and 3% mortgages. Buyers can’t afford homes at today’s prices — prices that are still artificially high thanks to 15 years of easy money and government meddling.

And yet, housing starts have held up decently. The problem isn’t inventory — it’s liquidity and affordability.

In June, existing home sales dropped to their slowest pace since 2009. But it’s not because no one’s selling. Redfin reports 500,000 more sellers than buyers — a 33.7% gap, the widest since 2005. Total inventory rose to 1.53 million units, up nearly 16% from last year. Vacancies have spiked 28% since the second quarter of 2022. New home supply has ballooned to 9.8 months.

RELATED: Government broke the housing market — only this will fix it

rudall30 via iStock/Getty Images

In a real free market, prices would drop sharply. But when government, either directly or indirectly, backs 90% of the U.S. mortgage market, that’s not how it works. Subsidized mortgages and distorted demand keep prices frozen — even as sales crater.

Sellers want prices buyers can’t afford. According to the Atlanta Fed, a household now needs $124,150 in “qualified income” to afford the median home. But the median household income is just $79,223.

Lowering interest rates again won’t fix this. It’ll just stoke inflation and feed the next bubble. And with the Treasury dumping trillions in debt onto the market, 10-year yields — and therefore 30-year mortgage rates — aren’t coming down anytime soon.

Absent a 2008-level crash, housing prices aren’t dropping meaningfully. We’re stuck.

You want lower rates? Cut spending

If you want rates to fall, slash spending and debt. That’s how you bring prices down. You can’t paper over decades of distortion with another round of Fed intervention.

Live by Fed money printing, die by Fed money printing.

Welcome to Rent Nation, where no one owns and no one is free



For generations, homeownership has been a cornerstone of the American dream. It meant stability, responsibility, and the chance to pass wealth to the next generation. It gave people a stake in their communities.

But that dream is slipping away. And it’s not by accident.

If we want Americans to remain free and self-governing, they must be able to own their homes and their futures.

We are drifting into a rental society. Fewer families can afford to buy a home, while massive investment firms and corporate landlords are buying up the housing supply and turning America into a nation of tenants.

This is hardly the natural evolution of the market. Rather, it’s the result of decades of bad policy, turbocharged by emerging technology and justified by global elites who’ve decided that private property is both outdated and unsustainable.

The corporate land grab

The “renters’ revolution” emerged from bad policy. For years, local, state, and federal governments have made it more difficult and expensive to build homes. Zoning restrictions choke supply.

Environmental rules delay development. Add in the unintended consequences of government-backed mortgage schemes in the Bill Clinton era, which played a major role in the 2008 housing market crash, and you’ve got a system that makes homes less attainable, despite the stated intentions of the enacted policies.

Into that broken system stepped Wall Street. After the crash, investment giants like Blackstone began buying up foreclosed homes in bulk, turning millions of single-family homes into rental properties. Much of this trend is made possible by emerging technology.

Today, institutional investors use artificial intelligence and algorithmic tools to scan markets and make instant cash offers, often outbidding families looking to buy their first homes. Companies such as Invitation Homes own tens of thousands of properties, all of which are managed through centralized apps, automated lease terms, and data-driven pricing tools.

We are experiencing a market shift — from millions of individual owners to a few corporate landlords.

Ideological push against ownership

This shift is also being encouraged, explicitly and implicitly, by international organizations pushing a post-ownership future. The World Economic Forum’s “you’ll own nothing and be happy” slogan was presented as a prediction, not a policy.

But look closer, and you’ll see that many World Economic Forum and United Nations initiatives actively promote this shift. The U.N.’s Sustainable Development Goals call for denser high-rise cities, a move away from single-family zoning, and new restrictions on suburban development, all in the name of “sustainability” and “equity.”

It’s a coordinated ideological push to replace ownership with access, property with subscriptions, and permanence with flexibility. And the consequences are already showing.

The price of being a permanent renter

When you don’t own your home, you don’t control it. You follow the rules set by someone else. That might mean no pets, no subleasing, and often no firearms on the premises.

As environmental, social, and governance scores, smart devices, and digital IDs creep into the rental landscape, we are fast approaching a future where landlords, driven by corporate and political incentives, can enforce ideological compliance under the guise of lease terms.

Renting means you’re always paying, never building. Homes have long been the foundation of middle-class wealth in America. When families are locked out of ownership, they’re locked out of that opportunity. The result is a cycle where equity flows upward to institutional investors while working families remain stuck on the hamster wheel.

RELATED: Property taxes are killing middle-class ownership nationwide

Photo by: Jim West/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

The “renters’ revolution” isn’t without psychological and cultural costs too. People who own their homes are more likely to put down roots, raise families, get involved in their communities, and feel a stake in the future of the country. Renters, especially when forced into that role, often feel transient and disempowered. That rootlessness is breeding disconnection and resentment.

The political fallout

These psychological costs have political consequences. Younger Americans, who increasingly see homeownership as unattainable, are also more likely to believe the system is rigged against them.

And who can blame them? They’re being told that capitalism failed them, when in reality, it’s crony capitalism, ESG corporatism, and global central planners who’ve rigged the game. But that distinction is often lost — or intentionally obscured. This increases the potential for them to turn to the siren song of socialism or further government action.

This is not just an economic problem. It’s a civic one. A society where most people don’t own anything is a society that’s easier to control, easier to manipulate, and easier to pacify. If we want Americans to remain free and self-governing, they must be able to own their homes and their futures.

We need lawmakers to investigate the concentration of housing in corporate hands. We need to roll back ESG-driven distortions in markets and rethink zoning rules that throttle supply. We should do more to promote first-time homeownership, rather than punishing it. And we must restore the idea that private property is not just an economic good — it’s a political necessity.

Mamdani’s socialist New York sounds great — if you don’t have kids



I still remember the first time one of my toddlers bolted into the street — every cell in my body shifted from principle to protection in an instant. Fatherhood doesn’t just stir the heart; it rewires the brain. In those early years, my focus stretched from the next news cycle to the day my kids might walk their own children to school. Sacrifice stopped being a slogan and became second nature.

New York Assemblyman and socialist wunderkind Zohran Mamdani, 33, is newly married and — so far — childless. But he’s busy trying to reshape a city where roughly one-third of children already grow up without fathers. That void correlates with higher poverty, lower academic performance, and a 279% spike in gun-carrying and drug-dealing among boys. These aren’t abstract numbers. They’re generational failures — and Mamdani’s agenda would only make them worse.

Fatherhood teaches trade-offs. Socialism hides them behind someone else’s money.

Take his signature proposal for “free” cradle-to-kindergarten care. He wants universal day care seats, baby-supply “baskets,” mental health counselors in every school, and car-free pickup zones. The cost? Roughly $12 billion per year, funded by higher taxes on employers and top earners.

Parents hear promises like that and think about the paycheck covering piano lessons and groceries. Government doesn’t create money; it redirects it. And new taxes on employers show up as thinner paychecks, higher prices, and fewer jobs.

His rent policy isn’t any better. Nearly 30% of New York renters are families with children. Mamdani wants to pack the city’s Rent Guidelines Board with activist votes to lock rent increases at zero. But freezing rent doesn’t create bedrooms. It discourages builders, shrinks housing supply, and drives growing families out of the city. Ask any parent in a cramped walk-up: When the family grows and the square footage doesn’t, someone ends up sleeping in the hallway.

Mamdani’s approach to crime is just as detached from reality. In 2020, he tweeted: “There is no negotiating with an institution this wicked & corrupt. Defund it. Dismantle it. End the cycle of violence.” Today, he promotes a $1 billion Department of Community Safety — $600 million of it reallocated from existing programs — staffed largely by social workers.

But dads hauling strollers through subway stations at midnight know what real safety looks like. It involves more than pastel-vested mediators. When train platforms feel lawless, families don’t stick around. They drive. Or they leave the city altogether.

And culture matters too — especially for kids. Mamdani defends the slogan “globalize the intifada,” claiming it’s rooted in the same Arabic term used by the Holocaust Museum to describe the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. He co-sponsored the “Not on Our Dime!” Act to cut off donations to charities linked to Israel and once refused to sign a Holocaust remembrance resolution. Jewish leaders call it anti-Semitism. Parents call it reckless — because they know their kids might hear the echo of that rhetoric in homeroom tomorrow.

Data confirm what dads already know: Kids without a father in the home are 47% more likely to live in poverty. Fathers who show up daily help blunt toxic stress and behavioral problems. It’s not just about income. It’s about modeling restraint, responsibility, and the long-term thinking Mamdani’s high-spend, low-accountability vision systematically undermines.

RELATED: Establishment Dems say Mamdani and his allies are in for a ‘painful lesson’

Photo by Barry Williams/New York Daily News/Tribune News Service via Getty Images

Our political compass is broken. Résumés stuffed with Ivy League credentials, activist hashtags, and crowdfunding clout now pass for qualifications. Meanwhile, we discount the experience that actually trains a person to lead — especially the crucible of parenthood.

Raising children demands long-term planning, hard budgeting, and a deep sense of stewardship. It builds moral seriousness — and exposes policies that collapse under the weight of real-world trade-offs.

Even California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom just proved the point. On a recent podcast with retired Navy SEAL Shawn Ryan, Newsom admitted that pushing “gender-affirming care” on 8-year-olds is “tough, man.” He acknowledged that Democrats have a “major problem” with voters on the issue.

And then he said it: “Now that I have a 9-year-old ... I get it.” One of the left’s crown princes backed off the party line the moment fatherhood entered the chat.

Of course, not everyone can have children. Many serve the next generation through adoption, teaching, mentoring, or public service. Their sacrifices matter. The point isn’t that only parents deserve a voice — but that people who have shouldered the daily demands of raising children tend to lead with more foresight, more restraint, and more care than the abstract theorists ever do.

Now picture Zohran Mamdani pacing Gracie Mansion at 2 a.m., rocking a colicky newborn. Would he still blow $12 billion on sprawling social programs instead of cutting waste and letting families keep more of their earnings? Would he still gamble his child’s walk to school on unarmed crisis counselors? Would he still bet her rent on policies that shrink the housing supply?

Fatherhood teaches trade-offs. Socialism hides them behind someone else’s money.

New York needs leadership rooted in faith, family, and lived responsibility — not hashtags or hollow credentials. Until Mamdani graduates from theory to midnight diaper duty, voters who already live in the real world shouldn’t hand him the baby.