Top Sociological Journal Says Young Kids Should Be Sexualized And It’s Colonizers’ Fault They Aren’t
This academic article, and any like it, must go down, as its clear objective is to violate children.Every parent braces for certain awkward but necessary conversations. The “birds and the bees” talk has long been the gold standard — a dreaded rite of passage. You put it off, swallow hard, and finally sit down to answer your kid’s questions without squirming too much. It’s uncomfortable, but it’s also sacred. That talk belongs to parents — not to culture, not to corporations, and certainly not to a marketing executive at Ulta Beauty.
But thanks to Ulta, I had a different conversation recently — one I never saw coming, and definitely not before we’d covered the birds and the bees.
It’s time to remind corporations: You may sell products, but you don’t get to sell souls — especially not our children’s.
I was watching news coverage of Ulta’s latest ad campaign when my preteen daughter walked into the room. She’s just developing an interest in makeup and skin care, so she stopped to watch. Excited interest turned to confusion.
“Daddy,” she asked, “why is that man in a dress?”
That moment was not in my parenting playbook. It didn’t come from a question at church, a talk with her mom, or an overheard comment from an older sibling. It came from a cosmetics company that used to focus on blush and lip gloss but now pushes gender ideology.
What made it worse was her age. My daughter is 10 — right on the edge of girlhood and young womanhood. As I look forward to teaching my sons to shave one day, my wife cherishes the bond of teaching our daughter to apply a little makeup like Mommy: a touch of lip gloss, a dab of blush. It’s about dignity, not performance. Self-care, not spectacle. Those moments have been quiet lessons in self-respect.
Then Ulta barged in with a campaign that turned that rite of passage into a political statement. The timing, the tone, and the topic were no longer mine to decide. That’s the heart of the issue.
The left mocks parents who warn they’re “coming for our kids.” But they’ve already arrived — and they’re bypassing us entirely.
Ulta is just the latest brand to treat womanhood as a marketing gimmick. The company has joined Bud Light, Target, and far too many others in pushing gender ideology not just as an option but as a virtue to be celebrated. Now it’s stunning and brave for a man to dress as a woman to sell eyeliner to our daughters.
For generations, makeup helped women embrace femininity, express beauty, and boost confidence. Ulta didn’t just hijack that tradition — it erased it. The company replaced women with men in costumes, turning the beauty aisle into a battleground for ideological performance art.
Worse, Ulta disrupted the slow, intentional process parents follow to teach their daughters about dignity, modesty, and authentic femininity. Being a woman is not a costume or an act — it’s inherent, worthy, and profoundly meaningful.
In our home, makeup is a subtle tool, not a mask. It’s meant to refine, not transform. I want my daughter to understand that true beauty starts within and that femininity is strong, graceful, and rooted in truth.
This isn’t about hating anyone or debating gender theory. It’s about parental autonomy — our God-given, biologically affirmed, and constitutionally protected right to decide when and how our children learn about adult topics. We expect to teach them about sex, life, and morality — not to have those lessons ambushed by a YouTube ad or a store display.
A decade ago, the hardest talk I expected was the birds and the bees — rooted in reality, biology, and responsibility. Now parents are forced to explain gender identity, cross-dressing, and surgery on minors before we’ve explained where babies come from. We’re no longer the gatekeepers of our children’s innocence — we’re cast as obstacles to their “authenticity.”
This isn’t progress. It’s cultural colonization.
RELATED: ‘Queer Eye’ star celebrates Ulta Beauty collab by making a mockery of women

And it’s everywhere — school curricula, library displays, streaming specials, toy aisles. Ten years ago, parents couldn’t imagine explaining “preferred pronouns” to a third-grader. Now, if we don’t, someone else will.
The woke mob cleverly rebranded indoctrination as inclusion. They tell us our kids need “exposure,” but they really mean submission. Refuse, and you risk social isolation, bullying, or being labeled a bigot — for believing men are men, women are women, and parents should shape their children’s moral formation.
I didn’t sign up for a cultural hostage situation. I signed up to be a dad — to shield my daughter’s innocence until she’s ready for the truth. These conversations are too important to be rushed by a marketing department chasing diversity quotas.
Ulta didn’t just sell mascara that day. Ulta sold out parents — and sold out women.
But here’s the unexpected part. After the awkwardness passed and the questions came, we talked about how some people struggle with who they are. We talked about a broken world and how people search for answers in the wrong places. We talked about compassion — not compromise. About loving people without lying to them. About truth delivered with grace.
Yes, Ulta forced a conversation I wasn’t ready to have. But it reminded me my daughter is watching — not just what I say, but how I say it. She’s watching me model manhood. She’s watching how I treat people, even those I disagree with. She’s watching how I protect her — and how I pray for the lost.
She deserves better than marketing masquerading as moral authority.
So does your daughter.
It’s time to remind corporations: You may sell products, but you don’t get to sell souls — especially not our children’s.
An Oklahoma man who served nearly half a century for a murder he didn't commit has finally had his name cleared.
Glynn Simmons was just 22 years old on December 30, 1974, the night two robbers entered a liquor store in Edmond, Oklahoma, located just outside Oklahoma City, and shot and killed the clerk on duty, Carolyn Sue Rogers. An eyewitness — described by KFOR as "a traumatized teenager who had been shot in the back of the head" — picked out two suspects from police lineups: Simmons and Don Roberts.
Simmons pled not guilty, insisting that he was in Louisiana on the day of the murder. But the eyewitness' testimony carried the day, and the jury voted to convict both defendants.
Roberts and Simmons were then sentenced to death row. However, a SCOTUS ruling in 1977 changed their sentences to life in prison. They both spent decades behind bars. Roberts was released in 2008 after receiving parole, but Simmons continued to languish in prison for another 15 years, all the while maintaining his innocence.
Simmons caught a break last year when his attorney, Joe Norwood, convinced a court to take another look at his client's case. In July, Oklahoma County District Judge Amy Palumbo ordered a new trial, and as a result, District Attorney Vicki Behenna had to admit that prosecutors in the original trial may have withheld evidence from the defense. Part of that evidence included police reports indicating that the eyewitness identified several other black men from the police lineups in addition to Roberts and Simmons.
Simmons was then released, having served 48 years, one month, and 18 days in prison. Of all former inmates who were eventually exonerated of the crimes for which they were convicted, Simmons served the longest sentence in U.S. history by nearly a full year.
Not content with just his freedom, Simmons then pressed for a declaration of innocence from the court. In September, DA Behenna announced that her office would not retry the case but stopped short of calling for a full exoneration.
Simmons and his attorney persevered, however, and on Tuesday, Judge Palumbo made it official. "This court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the offense for which Mr. Simmons was convicted, sentenced and imprisoned … was not committed by Mr. Simmons," she said. In the eyes of the law, Simmons is an innocent man.
Simmons walked outside the court with a smile on his face and his hands raised in victory. "It’s a lesson in resilience and tenacity," he said in a brief statement. "Don’t let nobody tell you that [exoneration] can’t happen because it really can."
"He had 50 years stolen from him," Norwood, Simmons' attorney, added. "The prime earning years of his life, when he could have been getting experiences and developing skills. That was taken from him by no fault of his own."
Norwood added that his team would now look to secure some compensation for Simmons at the state and federal levels, but such processes can take years and likely won't yield much money. Norwood estimated that the state will, at most, pay $175,000.
"Getting him compensation, and getting compensation is not for sure, is in the future, and he has to sustain himself now," Norwood said.
Simmons, now 71 and recently diagnosed with cancer, is living on a GoFundMe account established by friends.
A spokesperson for DA Behenna declined NPR's request for comment.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!