Reckoning in Ramadi

In Unremitting: The Marine "Bastard" Battalion and the Savage Battle that Marked the True Start of America's War in Iraq, author Gregg Zoroya takes readers on an intense, often violent journey with a Marine battalion that fought in some of the toughest fighting in American history—the Battle of Ramadi, Iraq, in the summer of 2004. Incredibly detailed, Unremitting provides a day-to-day—and in many cases a minute-by-minute—narrative about the 2nd Battalion, 4th Marines (2/4) and the punishing warfare it faced over 184 days in the provincial capital of Ramadi. Over that deployment, the 1,000-man battalion suffered 238 Marines and sailors wounded and 34 dead, a whopping casualty rate of roughly 30 percent, the highest of any battalion in Iraq or Afghanistan.

The post Reckoning in Ramadi appeared first on .

Iran Is Not The United States’ War To Fight

If President Trump truly believes in 'no more stupid wars,' now is the time to prove it.

Iran is not the next Iraq War — unless we make the same mistake twice



Is Donald Trump a warmonger? It’s a simple question, and yet an increasingly popular accusation from corners of the political class and commentariat that once saw him as the clearest alternative to globalist foreign adventurism. But such an accusation also defies the record. Whatever else one might say about Trump, he has been — consistently and vocally — against needless foreign entanglements.

To suggest that he has suddenly pivoted toward militarism is to misunderstand either the man himself or the moment we are in. Trump is not easily swayed from his core convictions. Trade protectionism and anti-interventionism have always been part of his political DNA. On tariffs, he is unbending. And when it comes to war, he has long argued that America must stop serving as the world’s policeman.

Is Iran another Iraq, or is it more like Poland in 1980?

So when people today accuse Trump of abandoning his anti-interventionist principles, we must ask: What evidence do we have that he has changed? And if he has, does that mean he was misleading us all along — or is something else happening?

If you’ve lost your trust in him, fine. Fair enough. But then the question becomes: Who do you trust? Who else has stood on stage, risked his life, and remained — at least in conviction — largely unchanged?

I’m not arguing for blind trust. In fact, I strongly advise against it. Reagan had it right when he quoted a Russian proverb during nuclear disarmament talks with the Soviet Union: “Trust, but verify.” Trust must be earned daily — and verified constantly. But trust, or the absence of it, is central to what we’re facing.

Beyond pro- and antiwar

The West is being pulled in two directions: one toward chaos, the other toward renewal. Trust is essential to renewal. Chaos thrives when people lose confidence — in leaders, in systems, in one another.

We are in a moment when clarity is difficult but necessary. And clarity requires asking harder questions than whether someone is “for or against war.”

Too many Americans today fall into four broad categories when it comes to foreign conflict.

First are the trolls — those who aren’t arguing in good faith, but revel in provocation, division, and distrust. Their goal isn’t clarity. It’s chaos.

Second are those who, understandably, want to avoid war but won’t acknowledge the dangers posed by radical Islamist ideology. Out of fear or fatigue, they have chosen willful blindness. This has been a costly mistake in the past.

Third are those who, like me, do not want war but understand that certain ideologies — particularly those of Iran’s theocratic rulers — cannot be ignored or wished away. We study history. We remember 1979. We understand what the “Twelvers” believe.

Twelversare a sect of Shia Islam whose clerics believe the return of the 12th Imam, their messianic figure, can only be ushered in by global conflict and bloodshed. Iran is the only nation in the world to make Twelver Shia its official state religion. The 12th Imam is not a metaphor. It’s doctrine, and it matters.

Finally, there are the hawks. They cheer for conflict. They seek to project American power, often reflexively. And they carry the swagger of certainty, even as history offers them little vindication.

The last few decades have offered sobering lessons. Regime change in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria — none produced flourishing democracies or stable allies. While America is capable of toppling regimes, we’re not so good at manufacturing civil societies. Real liberty requires real leadership on the ground. It requires heroes — people willing to suffer and die not for power, but for principle.

That’s what was missing in Kabul, Baghdad, and Tripoli. We never saw a Washington or a Jefferson emerge. Brave individuals assisted us, but no figures rose to power with whom nations could coalesce.

Is Iran 1980s Poland?

That is why I ask whether Iran is simply the next chapter in a tired and tragic book — or something altogether different.

Is Iran another Iraq? Or is it more like Poland in 1980? It’s not an easy question, but it’s one we must ask.

During the Cold War, we saw what it looked like when people yearned for freedom. In Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia, dissidents risked everything for a chance to escape tyranny. There was a moral clarity. You could hear it in their music, see it in their marches, feel it in the energy that eventually tore down the Berlin Wall.

Is that spirit alive in Iran?

RELATED: Mark Levin sounds alarm: Stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions before it’s too late

  Alex Wong/Getty Images

We know that millions of Iranians have protested. We know many have disappeared for it. The Persian people are among the best educated in the region. They are culturally rich, historically sophisticated, and far more inclined toward Western ideals than the mullahs who rule them.

But we know Iran’s mullahs are not rational actors.

So again, we must ask: If the people of Iran are capable of throwing off their theocratic oppressors, should the United States support them? If so, how — and what would it cost us?

Ask tougher questions

I am not calling for war. I do not support U.S. military intervention in Iran. But I do support asking better questions. Is it in our national interest to act? Is there a moral imperative we cannot ignore? And do we trust the institutions advising us?

I no longer trust the intelligence agencies. I no longer trust the think tanks that sold us the Iraq War. I certainly don’t trust the foreign policy establishment in Washington that has consistently failed upward.

But I do trust the American people to engage these questions honestly — if they’re willing to think.

I believe we may be entering the first chapter of a final, spiritual conflict — what Scripture calls the last battle. It may take decades to unfold, but the ideological lines are being drawn.

And whether you are for Trump or against him, whether you see Iran as a threat or a distraction, whether you want peace or fear it’s no longer possible — ask the tougher questions.

Because what comes next won’t be determined by slogans. It will be determined by what we truly believe.

Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn'sFREE email newsletter with his latest insights, top stories, show prep, and more delivered to your inbox.

Iran Announces Test of Missile With Two-Ton Warhead Amid Threats of Attacks on US Outposts

Iran announced that it successfully test-fired an advanced missile equipped with a two-ton warhead, significantly ratcheting up its war machine amid nuclear negotiations with the United States and threats of attacks on U.S. military installations.

The post Iran Announces Test of Missile With Two-Ton Warhead Amid Threats of Attacks on US Outposts appeared first on .

Rep. John James hammers Michigan GOP over political failures: 'What are we even talking about?'



Republican candidates have not fared well lately in key races in one of the most important swing states in the country: Michigan. Rep. John James (R) of Michigan did not mince words when talking to Blaze News about their lackluster performances, insisting that they demonstrate why he should be the party's nominee for the open governor race in 2026.

James, 43, rose to national prominence in 2018, when he unsuccessfully attempted to unseat incumbent Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow, who has since retired. Two years later, James lost another Senate race, this time to incumbent Democratic Sen. Gary Peters.

In January, Peters unexpectedly announced that he would not seek another term, prompting some to speculate that James, who was elected in 2022 to represent the 10th Congressional District of Michigan and re-elected in 2024, might make another run for the Senate.

However, James made a surprise move of his own, announcing in early April that he would make a bid for Michigan governor instead.

'Michigan's a state that deserves to have a leader who's been knocked down a couple times and refuses to give up.'

Last week, James sat down with Blaze News and explained that his breadth of experience in the business world and in combat has prepared him for executive leadership.

"The time that I've had as a legislator, as a lawmaker, as a representative has actually been the longest period of my life that I haven't been in an executive role," he stated.

"I'm a combat veteran, and I led two Apache platoons," continued James, a Ranger-qualified aviation officer who served in operations in Iraq from 2007 to 2009, according to his congressional website.

"I understand what it takes to keep Americans safe because I've done it before."

James also noted that in the last several years, Republican candidates in Michigan have lost winnable races. To demonstrate, he referred to then-Attorney General Bill Schuette's failed gubernatorial bid against former state Sen. Gretchen Whitmer (D) in 2018, followed by Tudor Dixon's loss to Whitmer in 2022 despite Whitmer's questionable track record regarding COVID lockdowns and nursing home deaths.

James warned that if that "circular firing squad" continues among Michigan Republicans, a leftist could succeed Whitmer next year.

"We can be cute, we can talk, but if you can't win, what are we even talking about?" James asked rhetorically. "If we're not going to put the strongest candidate at the top of the ticket, what are we even talking about?"

Schuette and the Michigan Republican Party did not respond to a request for comment.

RELATED: Mike Rogers launches Senate campaign to replace retiring Democrat

 Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

Tudor Dixon, who has teased another run for governor as well as a possible Senate bid, quickly fired back against James' provocative remarks.

"It's interesting to see a declared candidate lashing out at someone who has not even announced a run for office yet," Dixon said in a statement to Blaze News. "I will not comment on his two statewide failures, but instead recommend he start to share his plans about how to make people's lives here in Michigan better."

When Blaze News pressed James about his failed senatorial bids, he explained that unseating an incumbent is particularly challenging. Since Whitmer is term-limited, he believes he has a good shot of winning the governorship, especially after eight years of her radical policies.

He also admitted to Blaze News that he learned some valuable lessons from those disappointing electoral losses. "Number one, don't run during a global pandemic," he said, referring to the 2020 race against Peters.

James added that even though he didn't win, those two U.S. Senate races did provide some unforeseen benefits: statewide name recognition as well as the opportunity to demonstrate to voters his fortitude and toughness.

"Michigan's a state that deserves to have a leader who's been knocked down a couple times and refuses to give up," he said.

For now, James has much in his favor. Though state Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt (R-Lawton), who has also announced his candidacy for governor, is likewise a well-known name and may give him fits in the Republican primary, at the moment, much of the state media attention has been focused on the campaign missteps of Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson.

RELATED: 16 noncitizens apparently voted in Michigan in 2024 — and liberals are cheering about it

 Photo by Rey Del Rio/Getty Images

James also pointed out that he has long-standing ties to President Donald Trump, who carried Michigan handily in the 2024 presidential election and who endorsed James in his previous runs for Senate and Congress. However, at least one Michigan-based Republican communications operative disputed the strength of James' current relationship with Trump, suggesting to Blaze News that it has been "shaky" recently.

So far, Trump has not weighed in on the upcoming gubernatorial race in Michigan. When Blaze News asked James whether he has discussed the topic of endorsement with Trump lately, James deftly changed the subject to his current focus of helping the president pass the "big, beautiful bill" in the House.

"We as Republicans, we have the best ideas. We have the best policies — and they work," he said.

"But none of it makes a lick of difference if ... we don't elect the candidate who can win."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Stolen valor? Veterans dispute Cory Mills’ record: 'He fooled a lot of us'



Republican Rep. Cory Mills of Florida built his political career with stories of heroism in the U.S. Army and as a private military operative, but several former colleagues say he exaggerated or lied about being “blown up” twice in Iraq, being an Army Ranger, training as an 18 Delta Special Forces Medical Sergeant, being a military-trained sniper, and saving the lives of two soldiers wounded by enemy fire. They also allege he walked away from his post in Iraq when his employer asked him to verify his service record.

As much time and energy as Mills has spent promoting his history, he’s now running from some of the details as the men he served with and the media are increasingly questioning his record, his personal life — and his truthfulness.

RELATED: 5 former colleagues of Rep. Cory Mills say he told them he became a Muslim — as girlfriend claims Blaze News report 'entirely untrue'

 

Mills is under new and intense scrutiny after Blaze News revealed that he was married in 2014 by a radical imam in Falls Church, Va. The imam, Sheikh Mohammed Al-Hanooti, was a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood, a fundraiser for the terror group Hamas, and an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York. The wedding took place at the Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center, where two of the 9/11 hijackers once attended and where notorious terror leader and al-Qaeda propagandist Anwar al-Awlaki was an imam.

'People could have f**king died depending upon him if he failed to perform.'

Mills has consistently presented himself as a Christian since he ran for Congress, but there continues to be controversy over whether Mills converted to Islam in order to marry Rana Al Saadi in 2014. His girlfriend recently told the Daily Mail "that the claims made in the Blaze article are entirely untrue,” while five former associates, including one on the record, told Blaze News that Mills told them he had converted at the time of his wedding.

'It just started to make sense. It was like, "Oh well, he couldn’t f**king run any more. He couldn’t hide any more." Why else would someone do this?'

Many former associates also recently went on the record with Blaze News to dispute his record of accomplishments overseas. “He has a monstrous gift of bulls**t, and it’s impressive,” said Jesse Parks, Mills’ supervisor during the last of his time with DynCorp. “It’s also pathetic. Because [the way] I look at it is people could have f**king died depending upon him if he failed to perform.”

“He’s handsome, he’s charismatic; he has always used that [to] his benefit,” said William Kern, a former U.S. Marine counter-sniper who worked with Mills at DynCorp carrying out security missions in Iraq. “So, you know, he fooled a lot of us.”

Leaving DynCorp

Multiple men who worked with Mills at military contractor DynCorp International told Blaze News that when the company demanded that employees verify their military service, training, and qualifications at the request of the U.S. State Department, Mills delayed until the deadline, then disappeared, leaving his rifle and gear laid out on his bed. They say he never returned and that fellow soldiers searched for him to no avail.

Parks said he warned Mills and other soldiers that they needed to turn in documentation of their military record and achievements to meet a demand made by the U.S. State Department in early 2009. He said that for weeks, Mills did not comply. On the day of the deadline, he said he again warned Mills to turn in his proof of credentials.

'He literally walked off of the US consulate in the middle of the night under darkness.'

“I found Cory and I told him flat out, ‘Cory, if I don’t have your bio and your supporting documentation in my hand by 1900 hours [7 p.m.] today, you have to go get on an airplane tomorrow morning at 10:00 a.m. and leave.”

Parks said after issuing the order, “That was the last I saw Cory, because he piled up all of his DynCorp s**t and his State Department serialized items, weapons, this, that, and the other, on his bed, and he walked out the gate. Nobody ever saw him again.”

Parks said he was the one “who f**king fired him.”

Kern said the next morning, during his run, people began to notice that Mills was no longer around. “What’s going on with Cory? No one can find him. He left his radio, his Glock, his sniper rifle, and his M4 on his bed,” Kern said. “And he literally walked off of the U.S. consulate in the middle of the night under darkness. He walked out the back gate. We have video of that.”

Kern said once they determined Mills left on his own, “It just started to make sense. It was like, ‘Oh well, he couldn’t f**king run any more. He couldn’t hide any more.’ Why else would someone do this? Why would someone walk away from a $200,000-a-year job? I mean, just submit your s**t, dude.”

Mills said the story about how he left DynCorp in Iraq was “bulls**t.”

“No one walks off in the middle of the night unarmed in Iraq,” Mills said. “All right? Let’s just put it first like that. I put my gear on the bed and walk out in the middle of the night? No.”

Mills said he requested early release so that he could return to the United States with his girlfriend, who was leaving around the same time.

“I’m sorry, but I didn’t go walk around and knock on everyone’s door to go, ‘Hey, by the way, guys, I ended up getting a contract release for two days,’” Mills said.

“Like, a week or two weeks earlier than my contract was set to expire, because I wanted to go home with a nice girlfriend,” Mills explained.

“This is the thing that’s so ridiculous about these types of fabricated nonsense, is that, I mean, it’s so outlandish.”

'Blown up' twice?

Mills has often made the claim that he was “blown up” twice while on missions in Iraq for DynCorp.

He points to a certificate of appreciation he received from the U.S. embassy in Baghdad as proof of his brave actions. The certificate reads, “In grateful recognition of your prompt and brave action when your motorcades were hit by an EFP on March 15 and April 19, 2006. You exhibited the highest caliber of professionalism and your actions saved the lives of your comrades.”

Kern said there were blank templates of the certificate floating around. “There were [around] 35 guys that got that same thing,” he said.

The first incident, on March 15, 2006, involved a motorcade that got blown up by a roadside bomb. Blaze News confirmed that Mills was present at this scene. However, photographic evidence and sources have called into question the seriousness of his injuries.

'It would have been impossible for him to be wounded.'

Mills told Blaze News he suffered a concussion when the Suburban SUV in which he was riding was damaged by an IED. “I ended up hitting my head,” he said. “… Was it some severe, maiming wound? No. I’ve got the actual document that shows where I was hit.”

“Why are you saying on your website that you were wounded, and now you're telling me a different story?” Blaze News asked Mills.

“I had a concussion. So a concussion isn't being wounded? Knocking your head off an actual armored vehicle door and having to go get treated and have three days down, that's not being wounded, right? So what is your definition? Do I need to lose an arm? Do I need to be shot in shrapnel? Just tell me. Tell me what your definition of wounded is. Because apparently, [traumatic brain injury] is not an external wound.”

Blaze News pressed him on his claim that he suffered from a traumatic brain injury. Mills responded: “No, I actually just got reviewed by the PA and the doctor there, and they basically told me to monitor myself for the next 24 hours.”

RELATED: STOLEN VALOR: Tim Walz allegedly LIED about his military service; abandoned his unit

 Photo courtesy of Scott Kempkins

On April 19, 2006, in a separate incident, Mills’ motorcade was hit by a roadside bomb as it made its way toward the Ministry of Electricity. According to a summary report obtained by Blaze News, the two lead vehicles in the convoy had turned right toward the Ministry of Electricity when the following Humvee was struck by an array of explosively formed penetrators with five or six linked devices.

Mills’ vehicle was allegedly 50 yards away from the one that sustained bomb damage, and his colleagues said he was never wounded.

A photograph provided to Blaze News by Scott Kempkins, one of Mills' colleagues who was wounded in the attack, shows Mills with a large bloodstain on his right pant leg after the mission. Kempkins and others who were there said that the blood did not belong to Mills.

 Courtesy of Scott Kempkins

“Cory was absolutely not wounded,” said Scott Kempkins, who suffered injuries from the bomb. “While Sergeant Ray was bleeding quite a bit, it definitely was not life-threatening, so that blood on Cory’s pants was from Sergeant Ray. He didn't need to lie about anything.”

Kempkins said he was behind the driver of the Humvee when the bomb blew.

“I got hit in the shoulder, the neck, and the leg,” Kempkins said. “And then the guy in the turret took a little bit of shrapnel to the side of his face. That was it. Cory’s vehicle was already around the corner and about 50 yards down the street. It would have been impossible for him to be wounded.”

 Cory Mills (middle) and Scott Kempkins (right).Courtesy of Scott Kempkins

Chase Nash, who rode in the same vehicle as Mills in the motorcade, agreed.

“I just want to be very, very clear that there was one vehicle that was hit that actually took a blast, and it wasn’t the vehicle that I was in and it wasn’t the vehicle Cory was in, that vehicle I was in,” Nash said. “I wasn’t wounded. Cory was not wounded. I know for a fact that is true. Cory was not wounded.”

Kern said it makes no sense for Mills to lie about being blown up, because he did render medical aid to the men in the Humvee and accompanied them to the battalion aid station.

“If Cory had just told the truth, it would have been extremely honorable,” Kern said. “But Cory was never, ever blown up as a private security contractor. … You can look at all the State Department documents on when people were injured, contractors were injured. Cory was never injured. His name will never come up because it never happened.”

Kempkins gave Mills credit for the medic work he did after the explosion, but said the injuries were not life-threatening.

“Credit where credit’s due. He bandaged everybody up, we went to the aid station, and they flew us to the green zone,” Kempkins said. “Now having said that, any basic medic could have done exactly what he did. Nobody was life-threatening. There were no severe amputations where [some]body had an arm blown off or a leg or anything like that.”

Mills further confirmed that he was not in the vehicle that was hit the second time, despite his congressional website claiming that he was struck twice: “That's correct.”

Other claims draw fire

Mills’ colleagues said he lied about other things, claiming to have been with the Army 75th Ranger Regiment based at Fort Benning, Georgia. Max Woodside, who was at one time Mills' team leader, told Blaze News, “I bought all of his bulls**t. He told me he was a Ranger. I didn’t vet him or anything. He told me all the cool-guy s**t. I didn’t know.” Woodside said that, all things considered, Mills “performed well at every mission we were on. He perpetrated the lie, and then he performed well.”

But Woodside echoed many of Mills' other former colleagues when he told Blaze News that “I had to earn my rights, I had to earn my stripes, and I had to earn my abilities to be able to do things I did. And he didn’t.”

Parks said that a veteran who retired from the Rangers and later worked for DynCorp confronted Mills about his tall tales.

“One day, our deputy project manager ... who retired from the 75th Ranger Regiment, flat stopped Cory in the street, and he says, ‘If I hear one more time that you have said you were a Ranger, I’m gonna beat your ass within an inch of your life and send you home on a medical flight,’” Parks recalled.

 Mills (left) poses with members of the Army 75th Ranger Regiment.Courtesy of Scott Kempkins

To be a Ranger medic, Mills would have had to go through an advanced 42-week course to become an 18 Delta: Special Forces Medical Sergeant. According to his official DD-214 form, Mills was a combat medic certified with the “Emergency Medical Technician Course” in 1999. His primary specialty, denoted by the Military Occupational Specialty code “91W2P 00,” corresponds with “Health Care Specialist.” There is no mention of service in the elite Army Rangers, although he has described himself as one in the past.

 Screenshot from a 2015 Vice article.

Kempkins said when the DynCorp operation had to move to Northern Iraq after losing the government contract for Baghdad, he started to notice Mills’ stories.

“We started hearing the stories [that Mills was claiming] he was a Ranger and all this other stuff,” Kempkins said.

'This guy doesn’t know s**t about being a sniper.'

DynCorp sent Mills to its sniper school based on his claims of having prior experience. The truth of these claims has since been called into question. Mills’ talk about being an expert sniper also raised eyebrows among his DynCorp co-workers.

“He was supposed to have been this super-duper military-trained sniper and all this s**t, and they [DynCorp] sent him to their sniper school,” Parks said. “He got through it, but he really struggled. It was like he was learning it for the first time, as one of them told me. If he was some hot-s**t sniper from the Army, it should have been a breeze.”

 

Parks said Mills’ former colleagues “want some f**king answers from Cory.”

“I like guys that go to Ranger school, guys that went to sniper school,” Parks said. “I mean, these are very long, hard courses. And not everybody graduates from this. And for him to basically say that he had done all of those things, there's some really tough [questions].”

Mills was able to enroll in a course to become a Designated Defense Marksman, which is supposed to be limited to those who attended an accredited military sniper school.

“I've never ever heard of us giving up a sniper slot to send a medic,” said Bobby Oller, a former 82nd Airborne paratrooper, squad leader, and master gunner who served in Afghanistan and as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom. He later worked for DynCorp. “What does that serve the unit? And what aspect ever on the battlefield would it have to have your medic as the sniper?

“Is he gonna set his rifle down and run over and help somebody?” Oller said. “You know that would never happen whatsoever. I mean, it’s just, it’s not even fathomable.”

When the State Department snipers working for DynCorp had to go to the range to re-qualify, some noticed peculiarities about Mills and his approach.

“We would look over, and Cory would be doing s**t on ballistic calculators, you know, like apps,” Kern said. “Everyone’s sitting there going, ‘Dude, it literally takes you longer to put the information in than it should take you to do this in your head.’”

“So everyone was picking up on stuff like that. ‘Cory, what the f**k do you mean? You’re asking what grain bullet we’re using? Dude, we only use match ammo. It’s 168 grain. It’s the same s**t you’ve been shooting in the military as a sniper. What are you talking about, Cory? Why are you asking a dumb question like that?’”

Kern said Mills didn’t speak the “verbiage” common to snipers.

“I’ve trained with SS snipers. I’ve trained with SEAL snipers. I’ve trained with law enforcement, L.A. County SWAT guys,” Kern said. “I know and I understand that we all have different training, and I understand that the formulas are different.”

“But the stuff that [Mills] was saying … I remember thinking, ‘What are we doing? Is this out of a movie?’ Snipers have a verbiage … sniper observer monologue. … This guy doesn’t know s**t about being a sniper.”

According to Mills’ application for a promotion to shift leader at DynCorp, he served as a medic in the 75th Ranger Regiment and received training at the U.S. Army Sniper School in November 2002. Those alleged facts are not on his DD-214 discharge paperwork, and several of his DynCorp colleagues say they are false.

RELATED: Maryland Gov. Moore calls stolen valor over Bronze Star an ‘honest mistake,’ deflects blame

 Mills' DynCorp application.

He also claimed he was an attachment member of Joint Special Operations Command and “performed numerous joint operations missions in Iraq.” The JSOC information is also not listed on Mills’ DD-214.

Questions on Bronze Star

Questions are also being raised about the information used to justify Mills receiving the Bronze Star.

Mills said the Bronze Star has been on his official military record since 2004. Some of the men who served in the Army with him have questioned the details used to justify the honor, however.

The Army Form 638 that details support for Mills’ Bronze Star says Mills earned the award for acts of heroism in Iraq in 2003, including rendering lifesaving aid to two wounded soldiers and subduing an enemy combatant in a separate engagement.

'He didn’t save my life. I don’t recall him being there, either.'

Five former service members — including two whom Mills allegedly saved — question the details on the Army paperwork as misleading or false.

The form said on March 31, 2003, in Samawah, Iraq, south of Baghdad, Mills saved the lives of Corporal Alan Babin and Private First Class Joe Heit, who were hit by enemy fire.

“At great risk to his own life, he applied emergency lifesaving medical care to both soldiers and assisted in their evacuation back to U.S. forces, saving the lives of both soldiers,” Mills’ Bronze Star form said.

There is no mention of Mills in accounts given by members of the 1st Battalion, 325th Airborne, Alpha Company, or from the company commander. Two men, PFC Jesse Walker and Staff Sergeant Augest Berndt, tended to Babin’s and Heit’s wounds under fire.

“In the middle of that firefight, we started taking crossfire from across the road,” said Sgt. Steven Dukes, a member of Alpha Company, in a 2004 report by the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. “It was pretty intense. [Rocket-propelled grenades] were hitting the trees around us. We were taking it from both sides.”

When Heit was shot in the head, Babin started running toward him when he was shot in the abdomen. Heit’s wounds ended up being minor, but Babin was badly wounded. According to one account, “Staff Sgt. Jesse Walker ran to Alan, started an IV, put dressings on his wound, and administered drugs to stop the bleeding.”

Heit told the news website NOTUS that Mills’ claim about him isn’t true.

“He didn’t save my life,” Heit said. “I don’t recall him being there, either.”

The third achievement cited in Mills’ recommendation for a Bronze Star said his unit came to the aid of another U.S. unit pinned down by enemy fire.

“Bounding forward under murderous enemy fire, Sgt. Mills’ team gained and maintained fire superiority on the enemy. Entering the building, Sgt. Mills’ platoon sergeant, SFC Joseph Ferrand, was grabbed by an enemy insurgent. Jumping into action, Sgt. Mills threw himself at the enemy insurgent and subdued him, saving the life of SFC Ferrand.”

Ferrand disputed the description, writing in a complaint to the Office of Congressional Ethics that Mills’ story was “false and a fabrication.” Ferrand said he “was not involved in any claims that Cory Mills makes about me,” adding that “the act never took place.”

Asked why men he served with at DynCorp and in the 82nd Airborne dispute so many of his claims, Mills said: “They’re entitled to have a different recollection. And some of them, obviously, I didn’t have a great relationship with, and I’m sure some are probably disgruntled.”

'It's not going to impact me in my elections.'

An April 2024 letter issued by the U.S. Army in response to a 2023 Freedom of Information Act request said there could be errors in Mills’ Official Personnel File regarding awards and that officials are “reviewing the records to resolve the issue.”

The Bronze Star recommendation was signed by now-retired Brig. Gen. Arnold Gordon-Bray. “I endorsed his Bronze Star,” Gordon-Bray said in a text acquired by Daytona Beach News-Journal. “As I did for all my NCOs. The specific actions had to come from the battalion.”

Gordon-Bray told the Daytona Beach News-Journal in August 2024 that he awarded the Bronze Star to “all my squad leaders and above.” He said, however, “I am not validating any of the specifics.”

There are questions about when the Form 638 was signed by the brigadier general. Oller said the form Mills used was created in April 2021. The form lists an (R) by Gordon-Bray’s name for “retired.” The general retired in 2012.

Mills defends his record

Since running for office, in media appearances and at campaign events, Mills has presented his military expertise for years as a reason voters should trust him in Congress. He recently traveled to the Middle East and spoke with multiple foreign leaders and lectured generals in a House hearing about “warrior ethos.”

The congressman also disputes Blaze News' reporting.

“You haven't reached out to the people in the vehicle. It's comical. I'm laughing at you right now because of that. That's how great your journalistic quality is,” Mills told Blaze News.

Blaze News has reached out to numerous people who worked at DynCorp with Mills, and so far none of them has supported Mills' version of events. When asked for the contacts of anyone who could back up his claims, Mills gave Blaze News some names but never got back to us with contact information. Chase Nash, who was in the vehicle with Mills, disputes his story.

“It's not going to impact me in my elections. It's not going to impact me in my future. So I know what I've done. The guys who are truly with me know what I've done. Am I a hero? No, I'm not. The guys that served with me are absolutely heroes. So you guys knock yourselves out,” Mills told Blaze News.

Matthew J. Peterson, Cooper Williamson, and Steve Baker contributed to this story.

Iraqi Man Charged For Illegally Voting In U.S. Election Is Another ‘Rare’ Non-Citizen Voter

'Here is yet another reason why New York State should require identification to vote,' U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y. said.

Western inaction fuels Christian persecution in Syria and the Middle East



Reports from Syria this week reveal a horrifying wave of violence against Christians and Alawites. The terror group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, which controls parts of Syria, has reportedly massacred hundreds of these minority groups. This brutal attack serves as a grim reminder of the ongoing persecution Christians face under Islamist regimes — a crisis that the international community largely ignores.

The Trump administration condemned the killings at a crucial moment. While much of the world focuses on the political complexities of the Middle East, the reality on the ground for Christians is dire. As the Syrian government has collapsed, Assad loyalists — flawed as they may be — have been overwhelmed by jihadists intent on eliminating Christians. The choice for many is bleak: convert, flee, or face death.

We can no longer afford to turn a blind eye to the suffering of Christians around the world.

Let’s put the blame where it belongs. The perpetrators of this violence are no friends of freedom or democracy. HTS, originally an Al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria, is no better than ISIS. These groups have a proven track record of targeting minorities — Christians, Yazidis, and anyone who doesn't conform to their radical version of Islam. In their world, there’s no room for dissent. Convert or die — it’s as simple and as terrifying as that.

The situation in Syria isn’t just about two warring factions. It’s about innocent people paying the price for geopolitical blunders that have spanned decades. Bashar al-Assad’s regime, itself a brutal dictatorship, had relied on sectarian divisions to maintain power. But when the West, particularly under the Obama administration, empowered elements of the so-called Arab Spring — only to watch them devolve into radical Islamic regimes — we set the stage for more massacres.

History repeats itself

The same pattern played out in Libya: Western intervention, followed by chaos, and the rise of violent extremists. The tragedy in Syria is no different. The same forces that were once seen as “freedom fighters” are now the ones persecuting Christians with impunity.

The past few years have seen a drastic decline in Christian populations across the Middle East. In Iraq, the number of Christians has fallen from 1.5 million to fewer than 200,000 since the rise of ISIS. In Syria, the Christian population has dropped from over a million to fewer than 300,000 — a number likely to decrease further if current trends continue. Meanwhile, Boko Haram has killed more than 12,000 Christians in Nigeria over the past five years.

The West’s inaction in response to this persecution is maddening. Thousands of Christians are being slaughtered, yet Europe and other Western nations seem more concerned with political correctness than with protecting those who are being killed for their faith. Why aren’t these refugees being granted asylum? Why do those fleeing regimes that commit such atrocities receive less attention than others escaping different conflicts?

Why are Christians forgotten?

The conflict in Syria isn’t a matter of simple political alignment. Neither side can claim to be the “good guys.” Bashar al-Assad is a bad actor, but so is the opposition. Both have blood on their hands. Meanwhile, Syrian Christians are caught in the crossfire of a proxy war, abandoned by the international community.

In 2024 alone, nearly 5,000 Christians were killed worldwide for their faith. This isn’t just a tragic statistic — it reflects a long-standing pattern of violence. The slaughter of Christians in Syria is merely the latest chapter in this ongoing tragedy.

Time to step up

The question now is: What are we going to do about it? We can no longer afford to turn a blind eye to the suffering of Christians around the world.

The Trump administration has made it clear that these atrocities cannot go unnoticed. It’s time for the rest of the world to step up and take a stand, not just for the people of Syria but for all those facing persecution under the hands of radical Islamist groups.

If history has taught us anything, it’s that when we ignore the suffering of minorities, it only sets the stage for more violence. We must act before it’s too late.

Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn's FREE email newsletter with his latest insights, top stories, show prep, and more delivered to your inbox.

Liberal media wails after foreigner flights to US arranged under Biden now canceled under Trump



Leftist media outlets are throwing a fit now that the Trump administration has canceled flights of refugees hoping to make their way to the United States.

On the day of President Donald Trump's inauguration, the White House released an executive order which suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program "until such time as the further entry into the United States of refugees aligns with the interests of the United States."

According to the EO, American cities large and small have been overrun by "significant influxes of migrants" that require the redirection of precious resources and that threaten the security and stability of local residents.

"It is the policy of the United States to ensure that public safety and national security are paramount considerations in the administration of the USRAP," the EO continued.

The EO called for involving local and state leaders in decisions about refugee settlements and promised to review possible exceptions to the suspension "on a case-by-case basis." The suspension goes into effect just after midnight on January 27.

'Thousands of refugees who fled war and persecution ... are now stranded at various locations worldwide.'

In addition to suspending USRAP, the Trump administration has also canceled the flights of prospective refugees still waiting to come to the U.S.

"All previously scheduled travel of refugees to the United States is being cancelled, and no new travel bookings will be made. [Resettlement support centers] should not request travel for any additional refugee cases at this time," said a memo from the State Department obtained by CNN.

The canceled flights will affect an estimated 10,000 foreigners, some of "whose medical exams or security checks, for example, are on the cusp of expiring," CNN repined.

Not to be outdone, the Associated Press bewailed that "thousands of refugees who fled war and persecution and had gone through a sometimes yearslong process to start new lives in America are now stranded at various locations worldwide."

While a breakdown of the countries of origin of these prospective refugees is not available, CNN claimed that refugees to America typically come from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Venezuela, Syria, Burma, and Afghanistan.

Because of the deadly, disastrous withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan under the Biden administration, several media outlets have focused mainly on the canceled traveled plans of approximately 1,660 Afghanis.

"The U.S. decision also leaves in limbo thousands of other Afghans who have been approved for resettlement as refugees in the U.S. but have not yet been assigned flights from Afghanistan or from neighboring Pakistan," Reuters said in an exclusive report, citing Shawn VanDiver, head of #AfghanEvac, and a U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The president will reconsider the suspension on refugee resettlements in the future if doing so 'is in the interests of the United States.'

Reuters then tugged at readers' heartstrings by lamenting the unaccompanied minors, family members of active U.S. military servicemen and women, and the "unknown number of Afghans who fought for the former U.S.-backed Kabul government" who may not be able to move to the U.S. as planned.

However, CNN mentioned that those in possession of a Special Immigrant Visa would likely still be able to travel to the U.S. despite the suspension of refugees. SIVs are available to "persons who worked with the U.S. Armed Forces or under Chief of Mission authority as a translator or interpreter in Iraq or Afghanistan," so those without one presumably do not qualify for an SIV or failed to acquire one in the years since those conflicts began or in the nearly three and a half years since the Afghanistan withdrawal.

CNN also noted that at least some of these refugees have already flown to third-party countries and may not be able to return to their country of origin. "It is not clear what is going to happen to those individuals," one government official told the outlet. "They could be stuck there, we don’t know for how long."

Though the liberal media attempts to spin the story as evidence of Trump's heartlessness, Trump's EO makes plain that his heart remains first and always with the American people. The EO claims the president will reconsider the suspension on refugee resettlements in the future if doing so "is in the interests of the United States."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

How the Biden Admin Allowed Iran To Rake in Illicit Oil Cash Amid Tehran's Terror Spree

Earlier this year, officials from across the Biden-Harris administration reviewed intelligence detailing Iraq's central role in a billion-dollar Iranian oil smuggling scheme. But they largely ignored that intelligence, according to those briefed on the matter, giving Tehran what one former U.S. official described as a "free pass" to evade American sanctions and rake in illicit cash.

The post How the Biden Admin Allowed Iran To Rake in Illicit Oil Cash Amid Tehran's Terror Spree appeared first on .