EXCLUSIVE: Trump Has No Problem Seeing Comey, Brennan Behind Bars For Russiagate Hoax
EXCLUSIVE: Trump Has No Problem Seeing Comey, Brennan Behind Bars For Russiagate Hoax
‘Undercover’ Spy At Center Of WSJ Sob Story Is Actually A Public CIA Russia Hoaxer
James Comey outs himself as a Swiftie in a ‘creepy’ rant
Former FBI Director James Comey has just shared a creepy story about not only feeling deeply connected to Taylor Swift’s music, but attending multiple Taylor Swift concerts when the star was even younger than she is now.
“Taylor Swift has grown up with my family and provided us a soundtrack, really, as we’ve grown ourselves and learned and adapted and dealt with adversity and celebration. She had songs for all of it. I suspect that’s something that millions of Americans have also experienced in their families,” Comey said in the very strange video.
“I think that’s because Taylor Swift produces great art, but also because she models something. At every stage of her career, she’s shown a certain way of being that resonated with my kids and also felt right to me as a parent. And she’s still doing that as a grown-up,” he continued.
Comey went on to claim that he also struggles to “stand up to bullies without letting their meanness infect me and change me.” He then referenced California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom’s new social media strategy, which is mocking “Donald Trump and his all-caps megalomania and his absurdity.”
“I got to be honest, it also leaves me with a strange feeling at times because I don’t want us to become like Trump and his followers. There are far more decent, honest, kind people in America than there are mean jerks,” Comey said, before bringing it back to Taylor Swift.
After attending his second Taylor Swift concert in Hartford, Connecticut, 14 years ago, “she sang a song about this topic, asking, ‘Why you got to be so mean.’” He finished the odd video by quoting the song.
BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler is in shock.
“It would almost be better if you thought, ‘Wow, he is just a loser who’s having verbal diarrhea, and that’s what he’s saying.’ No, no, look at his eyes in that video. He actually pre-wrote this and was reading it,” she says.
“Comey is a 50-year-old man at the time. Like, what a creeper to be a drooling fanboy over a young girl,” she continues, adding, “And yet he seems proud of this? We knew he was a weirdo and a corrupt criminal, but did you also know that he was a disgusting creep? Well, now you do.”
Want more from Liz Wheeler?
To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
Emotional Teenage Girl James Comey Speaks In Taylor Swift Lyrics In Unhinged Anti-Trump Screed
In Wake Of ‘Russiagate’ Revelations, Americans Are Demanding Indictments — Who Could Be First?
'You’re going to see a lot of people get indicted'
Released FBI docs reveal Comey allegedly used media mole to plant info at New York Times for Russian collusion investigation
The case against former FBI Director James Comey got a boost in recently released documents that showed how he allegedly planted narratives to push the Russian collusion story.
Current FBI Director Kash Patel released internal memos from the bureau that revealed interviews with Columbia University law professor Daniel Richman where he admitted to routinely speaking on Comey's behalf to Michael Schmidt.
'They tried to steal the election. They tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever imagined, even in other countries.'
Schmidt is a journalist who worked on Russian collusion stories at the New York Times and was among those who received a Pulitzer Prize for reporting on the story.
Richman told the FBI that the goal of communicating with Schmidt was "to correct stories critical of Comey, the FBI, and to shape future press coverage."
The memos were a part of the FBI's investigation into leaked classified information.
Richman admitted to having access to classified information from Comey but said he did not believe he passed on any classified information to reporters. However, he said he could only make the denial "with a discount."
"Richman was pretty sure he did not confirm the Classified Information," one FBI memo said. "However, Richman told the interviewing agents he was sure 'with a discount' that he did not tell Schmidt about the Classified Information."
Richman was quoted in articles about Russian collusion written by Schmidt, such as the following from an April 2017 Times story: "Jim sees his role as apolitical and independent. The FBI director, even as he reports to the attorney general, often has to stand apart from his boss."
The FBI later decided against criminal charges against Comey, his associates, or Adam Schiff, who has since become a U.S. senator representing California. Schiff is also accused of leaking classified intelligence to smear Trump.
RELATED: Trump hints at ARRESTING Obama — but will he?
The Trump administration has been seeking to uncover the origins of the Russia collusion story, suspecting that the investigation was politically motivated to damage President Donald Trump. Trump even suggested that President Barack Obama was guilty of "treason" for spearheading it.
"It's there; he's guilty. This was treason," Trump said in July.
"They tried to steal the election. They tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever imagined, even in other countries," he continued.
Former President Barack Obama responded to the accusations and denied them in a rare statement.
"Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," a spokesperson for Obama said. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction."
Comey, Schmidt, and Richman did not respond immediately to a request for comment from Just the News.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Durham annex proves Russiagate was a coordinated smear
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) last week declassified a 29-page document known as the Durham annex. Its publication has received remarkably little attention from major media outlets, despite containing one of the most significant intelligence disclosures since the origins of the Russiagate investigation.
The Durham annex is not conjecture, analysis, or political spin. It is a collection of sensitive intelligence reports, internal memos, and declassified emails compiled by the intelligence community and withheld from public view for years under the pretext of “source protection.”
The Durham annex reveals that the FBI ignored evidence in 2015 and 2016 suggesting that foreign governments were attempting to collude not with Trump, but with Clinton.
The declassified document offers a clearer view of what many Americans have long suspected: that the narrative surrounding Trump-Russia collusion was not only politically motivated but deliberately constructed by the Clinton campaign, facilitated by sympathetic actors within U.S. intelligence agencies, and ultimately endorsed by senior members of the Obama administration.
This trove of documents does not merely reinforce existing criticisms of the FBI’s conduct during the 2016 election. It provides evidence that the Clinton campaign approved a strategy to discredit Donald Trump by promoting a false association with Vladimir Putin. And it does so using intelligence collected from foreign surveillance of American political actors — surveillance that the CIA deemed credible enough to brief President Barack Obama directly.
The cover-up unraveled
Central to the Durham annex is a source codenamed “T1” — a foreign intelligence asset who intercepted Russian cyber-espionage activity targeting American entities, including George Soros’ Open Society Foundation, the Clinton campaign, and U.S. think tanks. The reports T1 relayed to U.S. intelligence included detailed assessments of internal American political strategy. In effect, T1 was watching Russian spies watch us — and reporting back.
T1’s identity remains classified, but strong circumstantial evidence points to a Dutch intelligence source. The Netherlands reportedly gained access to Russian cyber operations as early as 2014. Regardless of who provided it, U.S. agencies treated the intelligence from T1 as credible.
Then-CIA Director John Brennan quickly briefed President Obama, Vice President Biden, FBI Director James Comey, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Those briefings included memos indicating Hillary Clinton had personally approved a plan to tie Donald Trump to Russian election interference.
One memo, dated 2016 and reportedly obtained through Russian surveillance of George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, outlined a Clinton campaign strategy: “Smear Donald Trump by magnifying the scandal” over Russia’s preference for Trump. That memo laid the groundwork for the Trump-Russia collusion hoax now known as Russiagate.
Intelligence running Clinton’s interference
The CIA labeled the intelligence “sensitive” and credible. The FBI rejected it. Agents claimed it relied on hearsay, appeared exaggerated, and might have suffered from translation errors.
That kind of skepticism might seem reasonable — if the FBI had applied the same scrutiny to the Steele dossier. Instead, they accepted that now-debunked document without verification and used it to justify surveillance warrants.
The inconsistency runs deeper than analysis. The Durham annex reveals that the FBI ignored evidence from 2015 and 2016 showing that foreign governments weren’t courting Trump — they were cozying up to Clinton.
One memo, written before Trump even announced his candidacy, described a foreign intelligence operative preparing to meet with a Clinton associate to discuss a “plan.” The operative was acting on direct orders from a foreign head of state.
RELATED: The Russia hoax and COVID lies share the same deep-state fingerprints
Photo by Gilbert Carrasquillo/FilmMagic
The precise content of the plan is redacted, but the FBI’s field office viewed it as serious enough to request a FISA warrant. That request, however, was left to “languish in limbo” by senior FBI officials, who subsequently warned Clinton in a defensive briefing.
Frayed trust, no accountability
The documents suggest a coordinated operation — one in which political, bureaucratic, and media institutions aligned to discredit a political opponent using information they had strong reasons to believe was false. The CIA deemed the intelligence worth a presidential briefing. The FBI discarded it. The media ignored it. And Clinton operatives implemented it.
This is not merely a scandal of partisan excess. Nearly 10 years after the first Hillary Clinton email leaks, and eight years after Trump’s unexpected victory, we are only now beginning to see the scope of institutional complicity in the Russiagate deception. The political cost may never be fully calculated, but the institutional damage — to the FBI, to the intelligence community, and to the trust of the American people — is already done.
Want more from Glenn Beck? Get Glenn's FREE email newsletter with his latest insights, top stories, show prep, and more delivered to your inbox.
Why Raining Justice On The Russia Hoaxers Is So Tricky — And So Important
Get the Conservative Review delivered right to your inbox.
We’ll keep you informed with top stories for conservatives who want to become informed decision makers.
Today's top stories