CIA Review Exposes Corruption In Obama’s Trump-Russia Report
'This was Obama, Comey, Clapper and Brennan deciding 'We’re going to screw Trump''
Headline after headline has slammed President Donald Trump’s recent wave of pardons, claiming they prove America now operates under a two-tiered justice system. But the outrage is manufactured. These critics want you to forget that Trump was a target of the very system they now accuse him of controlling.
With these pardons, Trump isn’t abusing the justice system — he’s beginning to dismantle the weaponized bureaucracy within it. For years, a corrupt faction inside the Department of Justice has twisted its constitutional mandate to serve the personal and political agendas of activist attorneys and the operatives who influence them. Trump’s actions mark the start of holding that faction accountable.
Government lawyers and law enforcement officials have abused their power for personal ambition and gain. They don’t want the truth. They want trophies.
Don’t take Trump’s word for it. Or mine. Critics across the political spectrum have warned for decades about the potential for the weaponization of criminal law by overzealous prosecutors.
President Bill Clinton told the ladies of “The View” that former FBI Director James Comey used his power and “outside influence” to sway the outcome of the 2016 election.
Two-time Attorney General Bill Barr has warned that prosecutors often turn into “headhunters,” obsessed with taking down targets at any cost. That mindset, he said, leads the Justice Department away from its duty to administer justice fairly and according to clear, consistent legal standards.
Joe Biden himself allowed that his Justice Department “selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted” individuals — choosing targets based on improper criteria and engaging in “selective prosecution.” He was referring, of course, to the federal case against his son Hunter.
This problem goes far beyond politics. Law enforcement, once politicized, can be turned against anyone. Prosecutors armed with the full force of the federal government can destroy individuals, families, businesses, and entire communities.
As Barr put it, the mere act of launching an investigation can be devastating: “People facing federal investigations incur ruinous legal costs and often see their lives reduced to rubble before a charge is even filed.”
Once you understand how the game works, turning your political or corporate rivals into criminal targets becomes easy.
RELATED: Civil forfeiture turns lives upside down, ruins families — just like mine
LIgorko via iStock/Getty Images
In my family’s case, Amazon executives hired a former federal prosecutor to pressure his former colleagues at the Justice Department to go after my husband, a former Amazon employee. Their goal: bring federal charges over an obscure “process” crime — violating internal Amazon employment terms.
The Justice Department never filed charges. The investigation eventually closed. But for four excruciating years, prosecutors used civil forfeiture laws to seize every dollar in our bank accounts. FBI agents raided our home while our babies crawled on the floor in diapers. Prosecutors threatened our family members with criminal charges in a scheme to force my husband into pleading guilty to a lie.
We sold our house. We lost our jobs. We spent years in court just to “prove” what was always true: My husband had complied with his employment contract.
The Chrisley family knows this drill, too. After President Trump pardoned Todd Chrisley, his daughter, Savannah, revealed that law enforcement explicitly wrote that they needed a “big fish” — and the Chrisleys were the “biggest fish” in Atlanta. For many prosecutors, a high-profile conviction is just a stepping stone to a cushy law firm job and a seven-figure salary.
My family made it through. So did the Chrisleys. But plenty of Americans are still “in the hunt,” as prosecutors like to say.
Greg Lindberg is one of them. A self-made entrepreneur, Lindberg built a network of insurance companies that employed more than 7,000 people. His mistake? Supporting the wrong candidate for North Carolina insurance commissioner. After the election, the winning candidate got to work, with help from the FBI and Justice Department, setting a trap that would ensnare Lindberg in a manufactured bribery scheme.
Prosecutors took the Lindberg case to court on charges built on lies. As Barr warned, they became obsessed with “getting their guy.” Even after the Fourth Circuit vacated the bogus conviction, the U.S. attorney refused to back down. He threatened Lindberg with new charges and a staggering 540-month sentence, knowing Lindberg was financially drained and couldn’t afford to fight.
This wasn’t just a campaign to destroy one man. The fallout has devastated thousands of families across North Carolina. Lindberg’s insurance companies, once solvent, are now failing. People are out of work. Why? Because the same commissioner who targeted Lindberg handed control to a group of handpicked receivers — politically connected insiders with no accountability.
RELATED: Trump’s blanket pardons offer hope and healing
Photo by DOMINIC GWINN/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images
Those receivers didn’t just take over Lindberg’s insurance businesses. They seized more than 100 companies. They’ve collected tens of millions in fees while leaving policyholders in limbo and small businesses without payouts. The result? Lost jobs, ruined livelihoods, and a crisis that didn’t begin with Greg Lindberg — it began with the government.
Lindberg is still fighting to clear his name. So are others.
Decorated NYPD veteran and 9/11 hero Michael McMahon now faces prison on the bizarre charge that he spied for China — for $5,000. Trail runner Michael Sunseri could spend six months in jail for breaking a speed record in Grand Teton National Park, on a trail thousands have used before — except the government says it was “off-limits” in his case.
How is this justice?
Government lawyers and law enforcement officials have abused their power for personal ambition and gain. They don’t want the truth. They want trophies. And until that changes, President Trump should keep using his pardon power boldly, unapologetically, and often.
Because the real two-tiered justice system isn’t a myth. It’s the scoreboard — and it’s long past time to even it.
Former FBI Director James Comey made a desperate jab at the Republican Party during a chummy interview with a legacy media outlet.
Earlier this month, Comey shared a photo on social media featuring seashells arranged to spell out "8647." Many interpreted this message as a call for violence against Donald Trump, the 47th president of the United States, with "86" a common term for removal — traditionally used when referring to removing an item from a restaurant menu, though linked to assassination threats.
'You know that one of the two political parties is, let me put it nicely, white supremacist adjacent, at a minimum.'
Comey went on a media tour denying the accusations.
He appeared on MSNBC last week to discuss the claims during a friendly interview with network host Jen Psaki, a former press secretary under the Biden administration.
RELATED: Secret Service pays a visit to James Comey about the '8647' seashell threat
Jen Psaki, former White House Press Secretary. Photo by: Shannon Finney/NBC via Getty Images
Psaki framed Comey as the victim in the situation, claiming that his post was "relatively benign" and adding that he has "long been the target of Trump's ire." She claimed that Trump was using "the power of his office to go after his opponents."
Comey told Psaki that he expects the investigation to "go away because there's nothing there."
He claimed that Trump is "obsessed" with him, adding that part of his "roar" is to "freak out his victims."
Psaki shifted the conversation to Trump's White House "testing the system," citing the firing of federal employees and agency restructurings.
"In the law enforcement sense, do you think there are laws that should be put in place that would help better manage this that aren't in place now?" Psaki asked Comey. "Is the law enforcement system and the legal system equipped to deal with what we're seeing now?"
Comey responded by calling the Republican Party "white supremacist adjacent."
"There are cultural impediments to doing this work," he told Psaki. "Let's say you work in the FBI. You know that one of the two political parties is, let me put it nicely, white supremacist adjacent, at a minimum."
"And so why would you want to throw your career on that side of the line and be summoned to Capitol Hill to be asked, 'Why are you pursuing these innocent groups?'" he continued.
RELATED: Trump rips into Comey over seashell message: 'He knew exactly what he was doing!'
Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
Earlier during the interview, Comey called the FBI a "fundamentally honest group of people" and "not a left-wing cabal of deep-staters."
Comey's social media post controversy, which has temporarily thrust the former FBI director into the spotlight, coincided with the release of his latest book. He claimed to Psaki that he had been trying to "withdraw" from the public eye after the November presidential election but felt compelled to speak out against the Trump administration's actions.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
On May 15, former FBI Director James Comey posted the following strange and cryptic message on his Instagram account:
The post was deleted after it sparked a firestorm of criticism, with many decoding it as a call for violence against President Trump. Comey immediately denied the accusation, insisting he’s opposed to all violence and that he assumed the message was merely political.
Not everyone is convinced, though. Investigative reporter Breanna Morello says there’s no doubt it’s a call for violence.
“Man oh man, do these people love to egg on their radical far-left, mentally unwell supporters to go out there and try to kill the president,” she tells Hilary Kennedy and Blaze News editor in chief Matthew Peterson on an episode of “Blaze News: The Mandate.”
“People use [86] metaphorically, but I think what we could say here is when you are who James Comey is … you were in charge of the most powerful enforcement body in the country; this is obviously a kind of different thing to post,” says Peterson, noting that two assassination attempts plus “the weaponization of the deep state” have led to a heightened sensitivity, and rightly so.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has made it clear she interpreted the message as a direct threat as well. On a recent Fox News segment, she told Jesse Watters that Comey was “issuing a hit on President Trump.”
“That is a ridiculous and insane statement to make certainly within this context, but especially coming from a guy who's the former director of the FBI, a guy who spent most of his career prosecuting mobsters and gangsters — people who know and execute other humans and use this exact lingo of 86,” she added. “The rule of law says people like him who issue direct threats against the president of the United States, essentially issuing a call to assassinate him, must be held accountable under the law.”
She concluded by saying that she believes Comey should be in jail for this Instagram post.
“Tulsi Gabbard is 100% correct,” says Morello. “People like [Ryan Wesley Routh] are going to see things like what Comey just posted, and they're going to go all in on this.”
President Trump clearly thought so as well. “That meant assassination,” he told Fox News’ Bret Baier. “He wasn't very competent, but he was competent enough to know what that meant.”
To hear more of the conversation and see the footage of Gabbard and President Trump’s comments on Fox, watch the episode above.
To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.