You won't believe THIS SHOCKING TRUTH buried in the Jan. 6 video archives



House Republicans have announced that members of the media and other qualified individuals will now have access to view footage from January 6.

According to the strict criteria required to view the footage, you have to be a qualifying non-profit organization or a news outlet, among other things.

Sara Gonzales believes that “this obviously is backtracking on the promise that Speaker McCarthy made to the American people when he said we will make all of the footage public.”

Investigative journalist Steve Baker has combed through the 41,000 hours of video, which he says is “a daunting and impossible task” if he wanted to get through all of it.

Baker also says that as he has gone through the footage, he’s found that in footage from certain cameras, there were “three or four hours missing in the middle of the riot itself.”

Some of the cameras have no footage whatsoever, which Baker believes is strange, as the Capitol Police “told us that all of their cameras were functional that day.”

Sara Gonzales finds it all fascinating.

“We are still seeing the FBI and the DOJ put so much concentration on January 6, oftentimes non-violent people who didn’t – they didn’t break anything in the Capitol, they didn’t vandalize anything, they didn’t hit anyone,” Gonzales says.

Baker says that it’s frightening, because the people who are being convicted of some sort of conspiracy to overthrow the government simply used “the words of a founding father,” which he calls “revolutionary-style rhetoric.”

In one of the particular stories that Baker is working on in order to exonerate and find evidence for people who are innocent yet being accused, he believes he saw clear collusion.

“I was sitting in one of the trials back last fall, and in that trial I saw something that did not ring true. It was one of those moments between the judge and the lead prosecuting attorney that I, just by instinct, thought I saw collusion,” he says.

“Body language, the connection didn’t work. I saw the panic of the prosecutor, I saw the panic of the judge in suppressing evidence, and then I started the process of digging myself,” he adds.

In that digging, Baker believes he’s found “evidence tampering, evidence suppression,” and the “creating of evidence that did not exist out of whole cloth.”


Want more from The News & Why It Matters?

To enjoy more roundtable rundowns of the top stories of the day, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Jan 6 cop claims he had a 'near-death experience,' but the actual video footage will make your BLOOD BOIL



Investigations into the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol building are ongoing. The Department of Justice is unwavering in its commitment to investigate and prosecute those who need to be held accountable.

Will the DOJ exercise fairness and impartiality — as it has sworn to do — while it seeks truth?

It’s looking more and more like the answer to that question will be a definitive no.

Glenn Beck plays a clip of a CNN interview with U.S. Capitol police sergeant Aquilino Gonell as he gave a tearful account of his experience on January 6, 2022.

“I got hurt,” he told the interviewer, wiping tears from his eyes. “I thought I was gonna’ lose my life.”

He then went into detail about how he was “covered in pepper spray” and how “[his] hands were bleeding.”

Another clip shows him giving his testimony at a televised hearing, saying, “I, too, was being crushed by the rioters. I could feel myself losing oxygen and recall thinking to myself, ‘This is how I’m going to die.”’

Watching Gonell’s emotional accounts of that day, it’s hard not to immediately sympathize.

However, Glenn then invites journalist Julie Kelly to the show to discuss Gonell’s testimony and others like it.

What she reveals will make your blood boil.

“Officer Aquilino Gonell ... has been one of what I call ‘January 6 celebrity cops,’” she tells Glenn.

“He was one of four police officers/security guards who testified during the very first January 6 select committee televised hearing. The idea of that hearing was to make it sound like Trump supporters tried to kill police officers that day,” Kelly continues.

While Gonell told a horror story involving ghastly injuries to his head, shoulder, hands, and foot, some released footage tells a wildly different story.

“Footage that was obtained by Joe Hanneman at Epoch Times” reveals Gonell “walking around — no indication of any injury, no sign of pain” near the end of the day, after the building had already been evacuated.

In the footage, Gonell’s “hands are visible, there’s no bleeding, there’s no abrasions ... both shoulders are mobile,” and yet Gonell “has been a key figure in promoting the idea that police were almost killed on January 6,” Kelly says.

“He has been a government witness in trials of January 6 defendants,” she continues, “where he’s taken the stand under oath and talked about his injuries ... that were inflicted by Trump supporters — and he specifically says Trump supporters.”

Gonell’s testimony “has helped judges impose very long, harsh sentences against January 6 defendants,” Kelly adds.

What’s perhaps most upsetting, however, is that “the Department of Justice and Capitol police ... have designated all of this footage as highly sensitive government material; all of it has been under strict protective orders in court” and has only been released when it can be used to incriminate defendants.

“That seems like a miscarriage of justice,” says Glenn, clearly blown away at what he’s hearing.

To listen to their full conversation, watch the clip below.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Are you paying attention yet? This is American Marxism staring you in the face



What is the point of having news operations if they all cover the same propaganda and demagogues who've already been leaking information to them?

BlazeTV's Mark Levin addressed many questions surrounding the Jan. 6 committee in this clip from "LevinTV" on BlazeTV. How did the Jan. 6 committee come to be? Is it a committee that represents the broad-body politic? Can you think of another case in the history of our Congress or our criminal system where the other side wasn't able to defend itself? Who wasn't able to present any information?

Can you think of another instance where several members of a prior administration have been held in contempt by Congress, and in two cases, criminal charges were brought?

Remember when Eric Holder's FBI sold guns to Mexican drug cartels? Guns that would eventually be used to murder a border agent? Eric Holder wasn't indicted on criminal charges. Why?

But these questions are not a source of concern for the mainstream media. Instead, the mainstream media chose to attack news sources unwilling to broadcast the live stream of the Jan. 6 committee hearings.

"This is a Democrat show trial," Levin said. And he is right. The New York Times ran an article with a headline celebrating how the trial's ratings rival major televised events, comparing ratings to those of the Thanksgiving Day Parade and Sunday night football.

"It's pretty impressive and shocking," Levin said, adding that the left's constant attack on conservative talk radio and conservative leaders is American Marxism staring you right in the face. Watch the clip to hear from Mark about this tragic stain on American history.


Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Audio: Lindsey Graham calls Biden the 'best person to have' as president following Jan. 6 Capitol riot



In newly released audio, Republican South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham said that President Joe Biden was the "best person to have" leading the nation after the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

On CNN Tuesday, New York Times reporters Alexander Burns and Jonathan Martin shared audio of an interview with Graham from Jan. 6, 2021, after rioters breached the U.S. Capitol building in an attempt to interrupt the certification of the 2020 presidential election results, which declared Biden the winner.

The interview was taken for Burns and Martin's new book, "This Will Not Pass: Trump, Biden, and the Battle for America’s Future.”

“We’ll actually come out of this thing stronger. Moments like this reset. People will calm down. People will say, ‘I don’t want to be associated with that,’” Graham is heard saying in the audio clip. "This is a group within a group. What this does, there will be a rallying effect for a while, the country says, ‘We’re better than this.'”

When Martin asked if the newly elected Biden would help unite the country, Graham instantly agreed, telling him that Biden was perhaps the best person to have in the White House.

"Biden will help that, right?" Martin asked.

"Totally, he'll be maybe the best person to have, right? I mean, how mad can you get at Joe Biden?" Graham replied.

As it turned out, Lindsey Graham himself would appear very mad at Joe Biden one year later.

On the anniversary of the Jan. 6 riot, Graham blasted both Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris for what he called the "brazen politicization of January 6." In a speech that day, Biden accused former President Donald Trump of instigating an "armed insurrection" at the Capitol to "prevent the peaceful transfer of power." The president also used the anniversary of the riot to attack Republican-backed state election security laws and push for federal election reform that would undo those laws.

"President Biden and Vice President Harris’s speeches today were an effort to resurrect a failed presidency more than marking the anniversary of a dark day in American history," Graham said on Jan. 6, 2022.

"Their brazen attempts to use January 6 to support radical election reform and changing the rules of the Senate to accomplish this goal will not succeed," he added.

Though Graham has called Biden a "friend," he has also said their relationship has soured since the bungled U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.

“I’ve known Joe Biden for a long time, I had a good personal relationship with him. He’s a decent man. But what he did in Afghanistan, I will never forgive him for. He has blood on his hands, and he’s made America less safe,” Graham told Fox News last November.

In a statement to The Hill, Graham's office said he "has repeatedly said the Joe Biden we see as president is not the one we saw when he served in the Senate.”

"He's pursued a far-left agenda as president," Graham's office said.