'Gaslighting s**t': Joe Rogan questions the official Epstein narrative after latest files dump becomes personal



In a recent episode of "The Joe Rogan Experience," host Joe Rogan and his guest reacted to the new Epstein files release, including a very personal detail for Rogan.

Rogan and guest Cheryl Hines, who is best known for her role in the HBO series "Curb Your Enthusiasm," discussed the bizarre findings of the new Epstein files, which included over 3 million documents, and pointed out the inadequacy of the government's handling of the case.

'I'm in the files for not going because Jeffrey Epstein was trying to meet with me.'

Rogan's producer pulled up an article headline from the Associated Press that read, "FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn't running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men, files show." Asked for the provenance of the article, Rogan's producer said, "It was going around the internet today."

RELATED: 'Smoking Gun': Yale prof nearly blown up by Unabomber defends his Epstein emails

Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

"Oh, today?" said Hines, who is married to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy. "I thought that was from 2005."

"That's the gaslightiest gaslighting s**t I've ever heard in my life," Rogan said. "What do they think is going on? Just a bunch of fun? A bunch of guys hanging out, being fellas? Having cocktails, talking about science?"

Prior to that exchange, Rogan also mentioned to Hines that he was in the files, but not for the reason people think.

"I'm in the files for not going because Jeffrey Epstein was trying to meet with me," Rogan said.

The New York Post suggested that Canadian theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss had attempted to introduce Rogan and Epstein back in 2017, citing an email exchange that was released in the latest files dump.

"I was like, 'B***h, are you high?'" Rogan recalled asking about the man who tried to connect him to Epstein.

Hines asked him if he was glad that he never went to meet Epstein, to which Rogan replied, "I would have never went anyway. It's not even a possibility that I would have went — especially after I Googled him."

Krauss did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Turn off the money; they’ll leave: Elon Musk nails the border truth



Elon Musk’s appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience” last week should be required listening for anyone who still believes “one citizen, one vote” is the bedrock of our republic. For more than three hours, Musk — engineer, entrepreneur, and agent provocateur — peeled back the curtain on what he called Washington’s longest-running con: a taxpayer-funded pipeline that turns illegal immigrants into future Democrat voters.

Musk didn’t hedge. The ongoing government shutdown, he said, isn’t about continuing resolutions or fiscal cliffs. It’s about Democrats refusing to cut the hundreds of billions in welfare spending that draw migrants across the border. Turn off the cash, and the migrants leave. Cut the flow of migrants, and the left’s imported electorate vanishes.

When the rule of law returns to our borders, it returns to our ballot boxes. That’s a future worth shutting down the swamp to secure.

Joe Rogan was gobsmacked, for good reason. The former head of the Department of Government Efficiency described, in clear terms, what many Americans have long suspected but have been told was a conspiracy theory: The government’s own spending has become a political machine.

The welfare magnet

Musk’s argument is simple. Blue-state welfare programs — Medicaid expansions, housing vouchers, EBT cards, in-state tuition — advertise America as “free everything” for those who cross the border. When Rogan asked what would happen if those benefits stopped, Musk replied, “The Democratic Party will lose a lot of voters.”

Not some — a lot. California’s supermajority didn’t appear by chance, he noted; it was built city by city, sanctuary by sanctuary.

That blueprint is now spreading to Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, and other battlegrounds with generous welfare systems. The U.S. Census already rewards high-immigrant states with extra congressional seats and Electoral College votes. Add motor-voter laws, same-day registration, and ballot harvesting, and you don’t need a single illegal ballot to tip the scale. The counting itself does it.

This is arithmetic, not a conspiracy theory. Since 2021, the Department of Homeland Security’s parole programs have admitted more than a million people under “humanitarian” pretexts. Federally funded NGOs meet them at the border, fly or bus them to swing districts, and sign them up for every benefit imaginable.

Musk argued that ending the handouts would prompt a voluntary exodus within weeks — no ICE raids or roundups required. Yet Democrats treat any effort to cut those programs as existential sabotage. Why? Because their own numbers show what happens when the inflow stops: Red states stay red, blue states fade to purple, and the Electoral College map becomes competitive again.

The real shutdown fight

That, Musk said, is why Democrats would rather grind Washington to a halt than surrender their demographic advantage. The “shutdown” isn’t a budget fight — it’s a fight to preserve a political machine.

Enter Donald Trump’s enforcement agenda: the program many voters thought they were getting after the 1986 amnesty deal that never delivered. Mass deportations. Mandatory E-Verify. The end of catch-and-release. A full audit of every federal dollar funneled to “new arrivals.”

Critics reflexively cry “xenophobia,” the same way they called a border wall “immoral.” But this isn’t about left versus right — it’s citizens versus cartels. A union welder in Pennsylvania, a black business owner in Atlanta, and a Latino pastor in Miami all lose when the voting power of citizens is diluted by noncitizens who bypass the legal system their grandparents followed.

Representative government dies when representation is determined by who sneaks across the border first. Real elections require verifiable citizens, not harvestable bodies. Ethical leaders don’t traffic in future ballots; they protect the franchise like nuclear codes.

The fix

The appeal of Trump’s immigration plan is that it’s universal. America First means American tax dollars for American citizens, not for an imported electorate. Require proof of citizenship to register to vote. End chain migration and the visa lottery. Finish the wall. Empower ICE and Customs and Border Protection to do their jobs. The crisis collapses the moment the incentives do.

RELATED: ‘Operation MRE’: Meals, reform, enforcement in a SNAP!

breakermaximus via iStock/Getty Images

No more midnight ballot drops in swing districts. No more census manipulation. Just the restoration of an old promise: play by the rules, and the rules will protect you.

A choice bigger than party

This fight transcends party and personality. It’s about whether your grandchild’s vote will still count in 2050. Support strong immigration enforcement. Demand audits of federal spending. Tune out media race-baiting and sentimental excuses. End the programs that siphon taxpayer money into the hands of those who broke the law to get here.

When the rule of law returns to our borders, it returns to our ballot boxes. That’s a future worth shutting down the swamp to secure.

Kamala Harris Says She Skipped Rogan Podcast Because One Hour Flight 'Wasn't Feasible'

Former vice president Kamala Harris has a new excuse for why she never appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience: Traveling from a campaign rally in Houston to Rogan's studio in Austin, a trip that takes less than an hour by plane, "wasn't feasible."

The post Kamala Harris Says She Skipped Rogan Podcast Because One Hour Flight 'Wasn't Feasible' appeared first on .

Video: Joe Rogan shaken by Charlie Kirk's murder, warns against celebrating his death; Charlie Sheen says it's a 'dark day'



Joe Rogan and his recent guest, actor Charlie Sheen, had live reactions to the assassination of Charlie Kirk during the latest episode of "The Joe Rogan Experience."

During the podcast interview with Sheen that was recorded on Wednesday afternoon, Rogan was notified in the middle of his broadcast that Kirk had been shot.

'You're allowed to disagree with people without celebrating the fact they got shot.'

A visibly distraught Rogan asked aloud near the end of this podcast, "Should we bring this up? I guess we have to. So this just happened. We just found out that Charlie Kirk got shot."

Sheen replied, "It's f**king awful."

After it was confirmed that Kirk was assassinated, Sheen commented, "Murdered for having a different opinion from somebody else. A different ideology from somebody else. His beliefs didn't align."

"He doesn't deserve that," Sheen added. "Nobody deserves that."

Upon hearing the news that Kirk had been killed, Rogan was visibly shaken over the assassination, exhaling loudly in a video clip.

Rogan then skewered MSNBC for commentary that suggested that the shooting of Kirk was possibly "a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration." Rogan remarked, "Oh God. What a crazy take. Like it might not have been someone assassinating someone for the wrong opinion."

Rogan noted that MSNBC had a narrative of attempting to "try to pin it on a crazy Trump supporter with a gun going wacky." As Blaze News reported, MSNBC analyst Matthew Dowd was fired following "insensitive" comments he made during the live coverage of the shooting of Kirk.

Rogan made a correct prognostication when he uttered, "There's gonna be a lot of people celebrating this." Blaze News brought to light some of the more reprehensible reactions by left-wing supporters celebrating the murder of Kirk.

RELATED: Charlie Kirk assassination timeline: What we know so far

Rogan delivered a warning about the dangers of people celebrating the murder of Kirk.

"It's so scary. It's so dangerous to celebrate or to in any way encourage this kind of behavior from human beings," Rogan explained. "It's not a violent guy. He's talking, he's talking to people on college campuses. He wasn't even particularly rude. He tried to be pretty reasonable with people."

"He's a very intelligent guy," Rogan said of Kirk, then added, "Whether you agree with him or don't – and there's a lot of stuff that I didn't agree with him on, and that's fine – you're allowed to disagree with people without celebrating the fact they got shot."

Sheen chimed in, "You can't disrespect his passion."

Rogan encouraged people not to celebrate Kirk's murder but to embrace more "discourse" to resolve differences. Rogan urged people who disagree with people like Kirk to engage in debate to prove who has the best ideology by compelling conversation.

Rogan proclaimed, "No one deserves this, folks. No one that has different opinions, no one deserves that. No, this is horrible, no."

The prolific podcaster pointed out that people will celebrate Kirk's assassination because we live in a "f**ked up time," when "people have really fallen into this trap of us against them." Rogan was concerned about the possible ramifications of the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

Rogan revealed that he met Kirk once at a gun range, and he was a "nice guy" when they met.

"This is a f**ked up time," Rogan stated. "People are so divided in this country, so divided. And there's so many people that love it. They love that we're divided, and they profit off that division, and they stoke the fires, and they do it for their own profit. And it's so f**king gross. It's so gross."

Rogan pleaded that this should be a "wake-up call" for everyone.

"This is a dark day," Sheen said, to which Rogan immediately agreed.

Rogan recommended that Americans need to "have a conversation about being able to have conversations," or "it's going to get a lot worse."

"That's what's scary," the comedian continued. "Scary that this could spark off some kind of real violent conflict."

"That guy had a lot of fans. A lot of people loved that guy," Rogan said of Kirk. "And if they find out that he got killed for something they vehemently oppose in the first place, it could send people over the edge."

Sheen warned that Kirk's assassination could be a "flashpoint moment."

You can watch the entire "Joe Rogan Experience" episode with Charlie Sheen here.

RELATED: New York Times continues SPLC demonization of Charlie Kirk, accuses him of provocation

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Joe Rogan targeted by Liver King in wild videos with gold guns, wolf pelts, and enemas; Netflix raw meat influencer arrested



Fitness influencer Brian "Liver King" Johnson threatened to physically assault Joe Rogan in several bizarre videos posted online, according to police in Texas.

The Austin Police Department received a report around 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday that a popular internet personality was allegedly making threats against Rogan on social media.

The Austin Police Department informed Blaze News: "Brian Johnson, known online as 'Liver King,' had made threats against Joe Rogan on his Instagram profile."

Detectives with the APD determined that Johnson was "traveling to Austin while continuing to make threatening statements." Rogan and his family live in Austin.

Detectives contacted Rogan regarding the online threats, to which the podcast star told authorities that he had "never had any interaction with Johnson." Police said Rogan considered the posts to be "threatening."

Based on Rogan's input and the detectives' investigation, police considered the threats to be legitimate, so they obtained an arrest warrant for Johnson.

Officers located Johnson at the Four Seasons Hotel in downtown Austin at approximately 5:59 p.m. on Tuesday. Police noted that they took the raw meat fitness influencer into custody without incident.

The Austin Police Department said the investigation remains ongoing.

According to jail records from the Travis County Sheriff's Office, Johnson was charged with one count of making a terroristic threat causing fear of imminent serious bodily injury — a Class B misdemeanor.

Johnson was released on Wednesday from the Travis County Jail on a $20,000 bond, according to KSAT-TV.

RELATED: Spotify finally reveals how many listeners Joe Rogan has — his audience is gigantic

Photo by Carmen Mandato/Getty Images)

The Liver King — who has nearly 3 million followers on Instagram — posted a video of him being arrested and taken into a police cruiser in handcuffs outside of the hotel.

Before his arrest, Johnson posted several strange videos on Instagram mentioning Rogan.

In one bizarre and lengthy Instagram video posted on Tuesday, Johnson is talking about Rogan while filing his nails because he doesn't want to "scratch" the face of the UFC commentator if they fight, while new-age meditation music plays in the background.

Johnson is also seen telling his staff to deliver a box with Rogan's face on it to his comedy club — Comedy Mothership. Johnson said the box contains DVDs from the "John Wick" movie franchise.

Johnson tells his two sons that he is about to "lose his man privileges." He calls someone on his staff to "mobilize" everyone and to record his imminent arrest. As he is recording the video, police sirens can be heard from outside.

Johnson tells his family that he changed the Wi-Fi password to "F**k you Joe Rogan."

Johnson is heard seemingly breaking down in tears as he leads his family in a prayer circle.

In a video shared on Monday, a shirtless Johnson armed with two gold firearms while dancing and wearing a wolf pelt and head said, "Joe Rogan, I’m calling you out. I’m picking a fight with you. I have zero training in jiujitsu. You are a black belt. You should dismantle me."

Johnson said in a different video, "Joe Rogan, we don’t have to make videos to pretend anymore. All of this is happening. We’re coming to you. I’ve challenged you, man to man, to a fight. Honorable. ... You can hold the hand of somebody that you love because you’re going to need to remember that feeling. You’re going to need something to fight for, because I have my family to fight for, and that I’ll die for. And you’re a black belt, [but] you’ve never come across something like this. [I’m] willing to die, hoping that you’ll choke me out.”

In another bizarre video recorded in a shower while administering a coffee enema to himself, the Liver King tells his viewers that he didn't threaten to kill anyone.

RELATED: Spotify CEO explains why streaming giant doesn't edit Joe Rogan's podcast, but stresses even the 'No. 1 podcast' has to abide by new misinformation policies

In December 2022, the Liver King confessed to his millions of followers on social media that he uses steroids to help him get his enormously muscular physique. Previously, the Liver King credited an "ancestral lifestyle" and a diet of raw animal organs as his secret to building massive muscles naturally. Johnson regularly refuted accusations that he used steroids to gain his hulking mass.

Leaked emails from a doctor revealed that Johnson had been a heavy steroid user and had been injecting approximately $11,000 worth of steroids and human growth hormone every month.

In the same month, Rogan called out Johnson on an episode of "The Joe Rogan Experience" with guest Derek Munro — host of the "More Plates More Dates" podcast.

"There’s no way you can look like that in your 40s,” Rogan said of Johnson's physique. "I mean, he’s preposterously jacked."

"This is dumb, man. You ran a con game, and you got busted," Rogan said to the Liver King. "It's unfortunate that you feel terrible. I'm sorry you feel bad. But that's just what happens when you get caught lying."

Rogan also claimed that Johnson was "front row" at one of his comedy shows in Las Vegas and at a UFC fight.

"He was trying really hard to get on the podcast," Rogan added. "And he's been trying really hard now. He contacted a few friends of mine."

In May 2025, Netflix released a documentary about Johnson titled "Untold: The Liver King."

"With his signature bushy beard, hardcore workouts, and a diet that raised more than a few eyebrows (hello, testicles), Brian Johnson rose to internet stardom preaching the virtues of 'ancestral living' — a lifestyle built on core tenets that include eating whole foods, getting outside, and rejecting modern comforts," according to Netflix. "Millions of people followed — but eventually, accusations of hypocrisy led to a public reckoning."

RELATED: Joe Rogan said hippies, musicians thanked him for endorsing Trump because they were afraid of being attacked

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

No Amount Of Democrat Donor Cash Can Create A ‘Liberal Joe Rogan’

After decades, the leftist grip on culture is finally over.

Douglas Murray’s Unbearable Smugness Undermines His Own Argument On Israel And Ukraine

After a three-hour episode, he only manages to convince listeners that he's a self-absorbed clown.

Can we really trust Mark Zuckerberg?



Mark Zuckerberg is a name synonymous with that self-righteousness that defines Silicon Valley. However, in recent times, he has undergone a rather unexpected metamorphosis. The 40-year-old now rocks a chain, a full head of curly hair replacing his signature Caesar cut, and a deep tan. To top it off, he’s even wearing a smile. Finally, it seems like someone toggled his humanity settings.

Maybe all those hours in the dojo have served as a metaphorical punch.

Once the poster boy for woke paternalism, dictating our digital morality with the precision of a helicopter parent tracking a rebellious teen, Zuckerberg now positions himself as a champion of free speech and common sense. His recent shifts leave us with an important question: Is this transformation genuine or just a calculated act of self-preservation?

Eyebrow-raising antics

Take, for example, his budding bromance with Dana White. Adding White — a no-nonsense symbol of rugged masculinity and bare-knuckle capitalism — to Meta’s board feels like either a masterstroke of authenticity or a painfully transparent PR stunt. Around the same time he shook hands with White, Zuckerberg dismantled Meta’s fact-checking services in favor of a community-driven model similar to X and scaled back several DEI initiatives. These shifts have left critics across the political spectrum baffled, though for vastly different reasons. The left is asking whether he’s lost his mind, while the right is wondering if he’s finally found it.

The confusion is understandable. For nearly two decades, Zuckerberg positioned himself as the self-styled arbiter of truth and master of centralized control. Now, he’s rebranding as a proponent of decentralization, shifting from policing the people to letting the people police themselves.

Zuck 2.0?

Zuckerberg’s recent 2.5-hour discussion with Joe Rogan showcased a new persona — one that lamented the dearth of “masculine energy” in American workplaces. But what does this even mean?

Again, important questions need to be asked.

Is it a rallying cry for a return to hard-nosed, stoic pragmatism or merely a desperate attempt to curry favor with Rogan’s sprawling libertarian audience?

While it may seem otherwise, Zuckerberg’s transformation isn’t without context. His pivot toward jiu-jitsu — and the martial arts culture that prizes perseverance, meritocracy, and humility over virtue-signaling — marks a symbolic departure from his earlier ethos. Zuck has waxed lyrical about his newfound passion, and it seems genuine; he even clinched a win in a legitimate competition. In 2023, he took home the gold in the Nogi Master 1 White Belt Featherweight Division and claimed silver in the Gi Master 2 White Belt Featherweight Division.

Rogan’s post-interview commentary on Theo Von’s podcast was particularly telling. In short, Rogan argued that nothing transforms a soft, sniveling snowflake into a rational libertarian quite like jiu-jitsu. He has a point. In the unforgiving world of combat sports, there’s no space for curated narratives or performative outrage — only the raw reality of outworking your opponent or getting choked out. It’s Darwinism distilled: predator or prey, eat or be eaten.

Having spent years in boxing and Muay Thai gyms, I can vouch for the brutal clarity that comes with physical confrontation. A punch to the face has a funny way of shattering illusions, forcing you to confront reality head-on. Maybe, just maybe, all those hours in the dojo have served as a metaphorical punch — a wake-up call for Zuckerberg. If so, it’s a long-overdue reckoning with the fallout of his policies and the ideological echo chambers his company helped create.

From Meta to MAGA?

But let’s not hand Zuckerberg a black belt in authenticity just yet. Skepticism is warranted. In fact, it’s essential.

His recent statements — from defending free speech to decrying ideological conformity — might signal a genuine shift. Or they might just be the calculated moves of a CEO seeing which way the political winds are blowing (right, so very right). With figures like Elon Musk charming both Wall Street and Main Street, Zuckerberg’s pivot seems like a calculated attempt to curry favor with the new administration. The tech bro is many things, but he’s certainly not stupid.

There are, however, reasons for cautious optimism. If Zuckerberg’s jiu-jitsu journey has truly instilled a respect for merit and hard work, this could herald a long-overdue recalibration of Meta’s priorities. Imagine a future in which the company genuinely champions free expression and fosters a marketplace of ideas instead of reflexively bowing to the demands of vocal activist groups. It’s a tantalizing prospect, but one that requires more than a few podcast sound bites to actualize.

Moreover, Zuckerberg’s recent shift aligns with broader societal currents. People are fed up. There’s a growing backlash against the overreach of woke ideologies, particularly in corporate environments where diversity initiatives often devolve into box-ticking exercises. By championing skill and competency, Zuck could frame himself as a leader ready to challenge the status quo. It’s pathetic, I know. But that’s how low the bar has fallen.

Another factor to consider is Zuckerberg’s relationship with public perception. For years, he’s been seen as a robotic overlord, an archetype of the out-of-touch tech elite. Remember the infamous clip of Zuckerberg awkwardly declaring, "I like to smoke meats"? It cemented his title as tech’s king of cringe. Meant to humanize him, his alien-like delivery only fueled memes and highlighted his inability to connect with real people. Now, with his dojo sessions and sudden embrace of masculinity, Zuck seems to be crafting a more relatable image — and surprisingly, it’s working.

But can we really trust him?

That depends on the consistency of his actions. If Zuckerberg’s transformation is genuine, we should see real changes in how Meta operates — perhaps a platform less eager to censor dissent and more open to fostering true dialogue. If it’s merely performative, a fleeting nod to the cultural zeitgeist, it won’t be long before his carefully crafted image begins to crack.