It Takes A Lot Of Jet Fuel To Throw A Funeral For A Climate Alarmist Pope

If Francis’ climate beliefs were ever to become policy prescriptions, most of the world would die, starting with the poor, elderly, and sick.

Trump Admin Axes Biden-Era Climate Office John Kerry Used To Assault Fossil Fuels

The State Department is formally removing the Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, the office former president Joe Biden created and appointed John Kerry to lead as part of his aggressive agenda to combat global warming, the Washington Free Beacon has learned.

The post Trump Admin Axes Biden-Era Climate Office John Kerry Used To Assault Fossil Fuels appeared first on .

FACT CHECK: Did John Kerry’s Daughter Call for Billions Of Humans To Die For “New World Order’?

A post shared on social media purports that John Kerry’s daughter Vanessa Kerry claimed that billions of people must die for the ‘New World Order.’ You first bitch pic.twitter.com/AMMG20O6mz — illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) January 9, 2025 Verdict: False The claim is inaccurate. Fact Check: The death toll has risen to 24 in the California wildfires. NBC News reports that evacuation […]

How To Combat The Censorship-Industrial Complex No Matter Who Wins The Election

We must keep talking and throwing wrenches into the machinery of loneliness. We must keep coming together in love for our neighbor.

Global elites fear America’s First Amendment — and here’s why



At a recent World Economic Forum summit, John Kerry, former Democratic presidential candidate and Biden-Harris administration official, criticized the role of the First Amendment in limiting the government’s ability to censor social media. “You know there’s a lot of discussion now about how you curb those entities in order to guarantee that you're going to have some accountability on facts, etc.,” Kerry complained. “But, look, if people go to only one source, and the source they go to is sick, and, you know, has an agenda and they’re putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to just, you know, hammer it out of existence.”

Kerry’s unguarded remarks might seem surprising, but they reflect a sentiment common among the managerial class that dominates much of the Western world. The unrestricted flow of information has become an existential threat for governments worldwide, which now rush to establish sovereignty in digital spaces to maintain control.

Constitutional rights are only as strong as the will of a nation’s people to uphold them.

The era of mass democracy coincided with the rise of mass media, and this alignment was no accident. As nations rapidly industrialized, vast countries with diverse regional cultures, like the United States, suddenly found ways to connect and unify. Innovations such as trains and telegraphs, followed by telephones, radio, interstate highways, and television, allowed information and people to travel vast distances quickly.

For the first time, governments could centralize economic coordination and effectively disseminate propaganda. Every state sought to capitalize on this. While the approach differed between the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt understood the importance of centralization just as much as Hitler or Stalin did. The 20th century became a century of scale, where nations that lagged in the race for mass communication and control lost their sovereignty to those that succeeded.

In a system where popular sovereignty grants political legitimacy, a ruling class that aims to maintain power must control public opinion. Establishing compulsory public education with a unified curriculum is a good start, but gaining control over the limited number of television and radio stations effectively seals the deal. A consistent narrative across news and entertainment can steer public opinion in a desired direction. While this method doesn’t reach the level of top-down totalitarianism seen in the Soviet Union, it proves to be a more resilient form of control.

The growth in the number of media outlets did little to change this dynamic. The high cost of operation kept the ability to shape public opinion in the hands of a select group of wealthy oligarchs. The political orientation and selection criteria of journalism schools ensured that those who gathered, wrote, and distributed news held similar views. The public could choose from a variety of news sources and formats, but these options often led back to the same approved narrative.

In a media landscape that seemed to offer endless choices, people essentially received only one perspective. The ruling class maintained control by retaining authority over the flow of information.

The internet disrupted the traditional soft-power model. The digital world's decentralized nature made it difficult for any single oligarchic class to control information distribution. Initially, this posed no major issue because the internet was unfamiliar and complex, making it hard for the average person to access. While tech-savvy enthusiasts might have engaged with unapproved ideas on obscure message boards, most voters struggled just to access email through America Online.

But as digital natives matured and became adept with technology, social media emerged as a platform where anyone could go viral. This shift unleashed uncontrolled narratives into the political landscape, disrupting established powers.

The United States government quickly recognized the internet's disruptive potential. Thanks to its technological advancements and sophisticated intelligence operations, the United States was among the first to use the internet and social media to incite revolutions against rival regimes. Media shapes the behavior of the masses, and any government that relies on public opinion must control the information people consume.

Today, every modern government understands this reality. In the United States, however, the enduring protections around free speech make it especially challenging for the ruling elite to maintain that control.

Governments worldwide are racing against the forces of decentralization, aiming to establish digital sovereignty. Like the Roman roads, which sped up travel within the ancient empire but also facilitated barbarian invasions, the digital age presents both opportunities and threats. Modern governments face this challenge, but those not dependent on public approval have an edge. For example, China can more easily assert control over its digital landscape, often channeling all economic activity and communication through a single, state-mandated platform.

Western democracies, however, must tread more carefully when imposing controls. Yet, as we’ve seen in the United Kingdom, democratic governments can still wield significant power. After riots erupted following a mass stabbing incident involving British children, Labor Prime Minister Keir Starmer swiftly enacted draconian censorship measures, even imprisoning citizens for retweeting anti-immigration posts. In the United States, leaders have tried to sidestep First Amendment protections by forming “public-private partnerships,” pressuring social media companies to carry out censorship on their behalf. Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter disrupted this system, creating at least one platform where information flows with relative freedom.

It’s crucial to recognize that the regime’s influence extends beyond formal government entities. The American ruling class has leveraged state power, media, and the nonprofit sector to build an industry around combating “misinformation and disinformation.” This censorship apparatus pushes the boundaries of what a democratic government can achieve through soft power, yet it has not fully succeeded in silencing dissent.

Constitutional rights are only as strong as the will of a nation’s people to uphold them. Although Americans remain deeply divided on most issues, the right to free speech stands as one of the country’s few shared values. This right faces increasing threats, with the state conditioning many citizens to view the First Amendment as “flexible.” Yet, the belief in free speech remains a powerful barrier to government overreach. Figures like John Kerry see the First Amendment as a significant obstacle to their globalist ambitions for control, making it a right that is undeniably worth defending.

CEO wins legal battle to place giant Trump sign on New York office headquarters — and the community is ... happy?



Sticker Mule CEO Anthony Constantino is one of many who the left has tried to silence for vocalizing support for Donald Trump. Despite being a registered Democrat, Constantino was horrified by the assassination attempts on Trump. In response, he posted a message supporting Trump and calling for an end to political violence.

“Well, he started getting death threats and people telling him to kill himself,” says Glenn Beck. “It got ugly.”

However, the hate spewed at him only served to fuel Constantino’s fire even more.

Instead of cowering under pressure, he decided to install a giant 100-foot wide “Vote for Trump” sign atop the Sticker Mule office in Amsterdam, New York.

Initially, the city told him that he couldn’t have the sign for various bogus reasons, but recently a N.Y. judge ruled that he indeed can display the sign.

Constantino, who just unveiled the gargantuan Trump sign at a large rally a couple of days ago, now joins Glenn on “The Glenn Beck Program” to share how New Yorkers are reacting.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

“I think everybody's in love with the sign,” he says, adding that there’s only “two or three people that are upset about it.”

From what he’s heard from local journalists, the sign has been a means of uniting the community.

According to Constantino, one journalist told him, “Everybody is on your side — Democrat, Republican, Independent — in the local community.”

“They all want the sign because they all know I'm sticking up for free speech and free expression, and I’m trying to end this epidemic of anti-Trump hate,” he tells Glenn and condemns the Democrat politicians speaking out against free speech, including Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and Tim Walz.

To hear more of the story, why Trump was the first Republican Constantino ever voted for, and who he believes is the biggest villain in the tech industry, watch the clip above.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

3 pieces of evidence that PROVE you will be censored under a Kamala Harris regime — ‘Our First Amendment stands as a major block’



Many are calling the 2024 election the most important election of our lifetime — and it’s because much is at stake.

One of the most pressing issues right now is our First Amendment, which has protected free speech since it was ratified in 1791.

Although Democrats deny it, a Kamala Harris regime would likely see the end of free speech as we’ve known it.

Glenn Beck points to three examples of people in Harris’ elitist circle who have boldly, unapologetically questioned our First Amendment and called for censorship.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

In the first example, Hillary Clinton in a CNN interview says, “If the platforms — whether it's Facebook or Twitter/X or Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are — if they don't moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control, and it's not social and psychological effects; it's real harm.”

The second example comes from none other than Kamala Harris’ running mate, Gov. Tim Walz. In a clip from 2022 that’s since gone viral, Walz said, “I think we need to push back on this. There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, especially around our democracy.”

Stu Burguiere reminds that Walz even reiterated this idea in his recent debate against JD Vance.

And finally, at a World Economic Forum meeting last month, John Kerry stated the following: “If people go to only one source and the source they go to is sick and has an agenda and they're putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to just hammer it out of existence.”

Of course, these are just three of countless examples of Democrats demonizing the First Amendment and calling for censorship.

What none of the elitists are willing to say, however, is that they intend to be the “final arbiter” on what is considered misinformation and hate speech.

“The arbiter that they are asking for is them — that they will alert social media and everyone else ‘this is not true, this is true,’ just like they did with the Hunter Biden laptop,” says Glenn.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

John Kerry Jumps Aboard Billionaire-Backed Green Energy Firm To Guide 'Energy Transition'

John Kerry is teaming up with billionaire left-wing environmentalist Tom Steyer, announcing plans to join Steyer's investment firm Galvanize Climate Solutions, which has poured millions into climate-related technologies.

The post John Kerry Jumps Aboard Billionaire-Backed Green Energy Firm To Guide 'Energy Transition' appeared first on .

‘National Security’ Officials Who Endorsed Harris Tied To Intel Agencies, Defense Contractors

Deep State Officials Who Endorsed Harris Tied To Intel Agencies, Defense Contractors