7 questions the right can’t dodge after the midterm rout



Ever endured a stomach bug so vicious you were certain nothing could possibly be left to vomit — only to feel the nausea return? That is what Republicans face after last week’s electoral gut-punch. They want relief. Instead, they have two more years of Donald Trump.

Conservatives are busy blaming tariffs, the Iran war, bad Senate candidates, feckless congressional leaders, and White House staff for the midterm collapse. Nearly everyone avoids the man who dominates the Republican Party and whose administration owns those decisions.

If we had a movement instead of a craven industry, we would be asking how to get the albatross off our neck.

Replacing the White House chief of staff or replacing Mike Johnson and John Thune will not change the face voters associate with the economy, the war, and corruption. A post-election Economist/YouGov poll found that 62% of registered voters disapproved of Trump’s job performance. My friends in conservative media may prefer to tiptoe around him. Voters will not. They know who signs the orders, makes the promises, starts the wars, and claims the credit. Somehow we have decided he should escape the blame.

Trump has effectively led the American right for 10 years. He controls its message, machinery, and public image. Even if he suddenly changed course, how would voters believe the change?

Since the election, he has bragged about his ballroom, defended the Iran war and tariffs, entertained claims of election fraud, and defended Nvidia’s Jensen Huang amid scrutiny over his adulterous relationship with a suspected Chinese spy. Every appearance reminds voters why they wanted to punish his party.

If this is the performance immediately after a historic defeat, why should anyone expect sobriety when the next crisis comes?

So I have seven questions for those on the right who think replacing a few aides, nominating the next man in line, or changing a policy or two will clear this wreckage.

1. How do we win younger voters while Trump insists that high stock prices and swelling 401(k)s prove the economy is wonderful? Young people struggling with rent and housing costs are not impressed by a Baby Boomer bragging about his portfolio. Nobody on the right can talk over Trump, much less persuade those voters that Republicans have heard them. The party cannot offer an affordability agenda while its leader treats a booming stock market as proof that families have nothing to complain about.

2. How do we loosen Trump's chokehold on candidate recruitment and the party apparatus? He will continue endorsing people based on personal loyalty rather than conservatism or electability. What mechanism allows a genuinely independent Republican movement to develop while he remains its center of gravity?

RELATED: The GOP’s worst defeat may be its best chance to move on

Megan Varner/Getty Images

3. What happens if the economy gets worse? The Iran war continues, and the housing and AI booms may not last. Another economic downturn could reproduce the electoral catastrophes Republicans suffered in 2006 and 2008. Democrats will control Congress, but Trump will still be the president. His party will own the consequences, whether the pundits think that fair or not. The blame will stick.

4. How can Republicans sell a fresh presidential nominee in 2028 when Trump will dominate the campaign until Election Day? Some colleagues want to clear the field for Vice President JD Vance, as if the best response to an unpopular administration is to nominate its second in command. Even the Bush-era GOP did not try to run Dick Cheney in 2008.

5. How do we win back the suburbs? Republicans cannot win 218 House seats without suburban districts, and the party's image there is toxic. It is not enough to say Democrats are worse. What could a Republican candidate offer suburban voters that they would actually hear over Trump's daily pronouncements?

6. What is the plan for recovering the Senate? Democrats have already flipped seven Republican-held seats, with two races still uncalled as of publication. That is an electoral map the GOP may struggle to reverse for years. Even a Republican presidential victory in 2028 could be crippled by a Democratic Senate blocking judicial nominees and Cabinet appointments. Simply waiting for the next red wave is not a strategy. Neither is assuming every blue seat will become competitive merely because Trump finally leaves office.

7. How do we survive the next two years legislatively? Democrats will investigate corruption and put Trump on defense. He is already floating an immigration compromise. What prevents him from trading away immigration enforcement, signing terrible spending bills, or making deals with Democrats while vetoing reforms conservatives actually want — on surveillance, stock trading by executive officials, or the data-center boom? Republicans could get the worst policy outcomes and still absorb the electoral punishment.

RELATED: No amnesty. We’ve seen this movie before.

Al Drago/Bloomberg/Getty Images

We are losing by miles, not inches. The landscape is so bleak that if the 2027 off-year elections were held today — governorships in Kentucky, Louisiana, and Mississippi — Republicans would struggle to win those formerly solid red states.

This cannot be remedied by another reshuffling of Republican personnel or a few cosmetic changes in policy. Yet the same people who failed to anticipate the rout claim to have diagnosed it already. They have their preferred villains, their favored replacements, and their fundraising pitches. What they do not have is a believable path out of the hole.

I do not pretend to have all seven answers. I do know the one answer that will fail: asking voters to embrace the very image they just rejected.

If we had a real movement instead of a craven industry, we would be asking how to get the albatross off our neck. Instead, the people who refuse to confront Trump are preparing the next electoral convulsion — and another chance to govern flushed down the toilet.

Sabotaging Trump Killed GOP Majorities. They Have Two Months To Make It Better

Republicans squandered much of the opportunity Trump gave them, but he still has two years to accomplish a great deal. The least Republican legislators can do now is get out of his way.

Electing John Thune Senate Minority Leader Would Be ‘Rewarding Failure’

Sen. Ron Johnson says it would be 'political malpractice' to rush a conference vote on leadership this week. Several others agree.

New Docs Reinforce The Newest DC District Judge Is A Legal Hack Skilled In Abusing Power

The amazingly named Sparkle Sooknanan was rewarded with judicial robes for helping violate the law and Constitution.

Trump’s Hot Mic Moment Exposes ‘Blue Slip’ Beef With Senate GOP

Condescension from Republicans will be their downfall

What Has Congress Actually Done During The Shutdown?

The government remaining shut down for over a month has still not stopped the Senate from going about its business. Congress is poised to break the record for the longest shutdown in U.S. history on Tuesday night, after Senate Democrats blocked a bipartisan GOP-backed clean spending bill to reopen the government 13 times in a row. During […]

Trump’s new judge pick: True constitutionalist or hidden Democrat?



President Donald Trump's nomination of Assistant U.S. Attorney Rebecca Taibleson for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has prompted questions about the extent of her alignment with the administration's conservative values, particularly in light of her and her husband's political donations to Democrats.

Trump's first term was undermined by several appointments that did not fully align with the administration's priorities, leading to setbacks in key legal battles and policy implementation. The president admitted that he received "bad advice ... on numerous Judicial Nominations," expressing that he was "very disappointed" with some of those picks.

'She brings an exceptional legal mind and a firm dedication to interpreting the law as written, not bending it to fit a political agenda.'

Mike Davis, a Trump ally and the founder of Article III Project, stated that the president's second administration would not make that same mistake again and instead would focus on selecting judges who are "even more bold and fearless" and have been "battle-tested."

Trump announced Taibleson's nomination in August, writing in a social media post, "It is my Great Honor to nominate Rebecca Taibleson to serve as a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals, for the Seventh Circuit, in the Great State of Wisconsin. Rebecca brings a wealth of EXPERIENCE AND SUCCESS, from her time as Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin and, formerly, as Assistant to the United States Solicitor General."

"Rebecca has learned from some of the BEST and most HIGHLY RESPECTED Legal Minds in the Country, having clerked for United States Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Antonin Scalia. Rebecca will make a fantastic Judge who will fearlessly defend the Constitution, and strongly uphold the Rule of Law. Congratulations Rebecca!" Trump added.

While Taibleson, 42, meets all legal qualifications, having earned her J.D. from Yale Law, her background raises questions about her political leanings. In fact, her conservative critics have been quick to highlight that she and her husband have a history of donating to Democrats.

RELATED: Rogue judges voted to replace Trump-chosen US attorney Alina Habba. DOJ fights fire with fire.

Roman Martinez, Sarah Pitlyk, Rebecca Taibleson, and Porter Wilkinson, former law clerks for Brett Kavanaugh. Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call

Taibleson donated in 2022 to Joe Manchin, a former Democratic senator from West Virginia, through ActBlue, and in 2024 to Bridget Schoenborn, a judge nominated by Democratic Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers. However, she also donated to Mike Gallagher, a former Republican representative, and WINRED in 2016 and 2020, respectively.

Blaze News reached out to Taibleson for comment.

Her husband, Benjamin Taibleson, contributed to Joe Biden's 2020 presidential campaign against Trump, Kamala Harris' Senate campaign in 2015, and Forrest Dunbar, a Democratic member of the Alaska Senate.

Despite these donations to Democrats and other elements of her record that appear to her conservative critics at odds with the administration's priorities, Davis and the Article III Project have expressed their support for Taibleson.

"President Trump continues to deliver on his promise to appoint bold and fearless judges who will defend the Constitution and uphold the rule of law," Davis said. "His latest nomination of Rebecca Taibleson to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is a testament to his unwavering commitment to restoring a judiciary grounded in constitutional principles and judicial restraint. She brings an exceptional legal mind and a firm dedication to interpreting the law as written, not bending it to fit a political agenda."

"As President Trump further reshapes the federal judiciary with judges who understand their role is to interpret the law, not make it, the Article III Project stands ready to support Taibleson through every step of the confirmation process. We are committed to ensuring the American people get the impartial, constitutionally faithful judges they deserve," Davis added.

RELATED: 'Monumental victory': Trump applauds Supreme Court for disabling Democrats' biggest weapon

Justice Antonin Scalia. Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Taibleson's conservative supporters have pointed to her experience working as a clerk for Justice Antonin Scalia and Judge Brett Kavanaugh, even advocating for Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination, as proof of her commitment to uphold similar values. However, critics dispute this claim, noting that Scalia was known for hiring counter-clerks, or politically liberal clerks, and that Kavanaugh has been suspected of employing a similar practice.

For example, Department of Justice lawyer Danielle Sassoon opposed Trump's attempt to dismiss charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. Law professor Rachel Barkow stated that Trump's "use of the pardon power is part of his effort to put the country on an authoritarian path." Former Judge Michael Luttig described Trump as "a clear and present danger to American democracy." Notably, all four individuals were former clerks for Scalia.

Some of Taibleson's conservative supporters also point to her time with the Solicitor General's office beginning in the first Trump administration. However, she remained on with the Biden administration through 2022, including defending Biden's student loan forgiveness policy in a lawsuit brought by the Brown County Taxpayers Association.

As Taibleson's confirmation process unfolds, various aspects of her record will likely spark ongoing debate about whether she fully embodies the bold constitutionalism Trump has pledged for his judicial nominees, or whether potential misalignments could mirror the challenges faced during his first term.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

No. 2 GOP Sen Says Republicans Will Move Quickly To Speed Up Confirmation Of Stalled Trump Nominees

Senate Republicans are moving to draft a proposal that would expedite the confirmation process for the 145 stalled Trump nominees awaiting floor consideration. Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso said Wednesday that Republicans are aiming to vote on changing Senate rules to expeditiously confirm dozens of the president’s picks by the end of next week before […]