Pete Buttigieg TOO GAY to be vice president according to Kamala Harris



Former Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris said the quiet part out loud when she wrote in her new book, "107 Days," that her first choice for a vice presidential candidate in the 2024 election was not Tim Walz — but Pete Buttigieg.

And not only did she admit that Walz was not her first choice, but that she didn’t pick Buttigieg as her running mate because he is gay.

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, who is gay, sat down with Harris for an interview and put her in the hot seat over her decision.

“I guess I’d ask you to just elaborate on that a little bit. It’s hard to hear with you running, as you know, you’re the first woman elected vice president, you’re a black woman and a South Asian woman elected to high office, very nearly elected president. To say that he couldn’t be on the ticket effectively because he was gay is hard to hear,” Maddow said, disappointed.


“No, no, no, that’s not what I said, that he couldn’t be on the ticket because he is gay,” Harris responded, before trying to explain herself.

“To be a black woman running for president of the United States and as a vice presidential running mate, a gay man, with the stakes being so high, it made me very sad, but I also realized it would be a real risk, no matter how, you know, I’ve been an advocate and an ally of the LGBT community my entire life,” she said.

BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler is floored.

“Imagine if this were a Republican saying what Kamala Harris just said. Imagine if a Republican went on cable news after having lost the presidential election,” Wheeler says.

“Imagine if a Republican said, ‘Actually, my first choice for vice presidential running mate, I decided against because he was gay.’ The left’s heads would explode. They would be screeching and screaming melting down like the wicked witch of the West, calling that Republican a bigot, a hateful homophobic bigot,” she continues.

And instead of admitting that she didn’t choose Buttigieg because he’s gay, she laid the blame at the feet of Americans who wouldn’t vote for him.

“Kamala Harris, her answer, she said she didn’t disqualify Pete Buttigieg because he’s gay, because she’s personally prejudiced. She disqualified — she decided not to choose him because he’s gay because you’re prejudiced,” Wheeler says.

“She didn’t have time to contend with the homophobic masses. She didn’t have time to re-educate the Christians, the terrible, hateful Christians who hate Pete Buttigieg because he’s gay,” she continues, adding, “She’s dripping with disdain for you, but she’s above board.”

Want more from Liz Wheeler?

To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Kamala Harris is back — and making INSANE claims



If you were starting to miss former Vice President Kamala Harris and her infamous word salads, then you’re in luck — because she’s back and talking just as much as ever.

Harris has been making the interview rounds to promote her new book, “107 Days,” and in one recent interview on “Good Morning America” with Michael Strahan, she explained why former President Joe Biden did a great job during his losing campaign for a second term.

“My concern about him running for re-election was completely separate from my admiration and knowledge about his capacity to serve as president of the United States, which was consistent and never wavered,” Harris told Strahan.

“Well, as we sit here today, do you think he would have been up for running the country for four more years?” Strahan then asked.


“I — here’s the distinction that I make. Having had the experience myself, it is one thing to have the capacity to govern. It is another thing to go through an election for president of the United States,” Harris replied.

“Running for president of the United States is like being in a marathon at a sprinter’s pace, with people throwing tomatoes at you every step you take. It is not for the lighthearted. It takes an incredible amount of endurance and stamina. And can you imagine doing it while you are also carrying literally the weight of the world as being president of the United States?” she continued.

“So the distinction I make is about capacity to be president and what that election would require in that campaign, especially running against Donald Trump,” she added.

BlazeTV host Stu Burguiere can’t believe what he’s hearing.

“So she’s saying it’s harder to run for president than be president. That’s her case. That is a bizarre argument. You’re talking about managing the world’s nuclear weapons. You’re talking about multiple conflicts going on at any given time,” Stu says.

“Running a campaign is like running a marathon at a sprinter’s pace while they’re throwing tomatoes at you,” he mocks. “What’s being president like? A wonderful stroll through the park?”

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Maddow TRAPS Kamala Harris with tough questions on live TV



Even MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow couldn’t save former Vice President Kamala Harris from herself during a recent interview where she asked her some questions about her latest book, “107 Days.”

“Madame Vice President, I have to ask you about the, I think the part of your book that has people most upset thus far, which is some of your writing about the decision around the president abandoning his re-election campaign, the timing there, and how it’s handled,” Maddow said to Harris.

“You say in part, page 46, ‘It’s Joe and Jill’s decision. We all said that like a mantra, as if we’d all been hypnotized. Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness. The stakes were simply too high. This wasn’t a choice that should have been left to an individual’s ego, an individual’s ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision,’” Maddow continued.

“Whose decision should that have been? How should that decision have been made?” she then asked.


“So, when I write this," Harris began, as she appeared to struggle to find her words, "it’s because I realize that I have, and had, a certain responsibility that I should have followed through on, which is — and so when I talk about the recklessness, as much as anything I’m talking about myself."

“There was so much, as we know, at stake, and as I write, you know, where my head was at at the time is that it would be completely — it would come off as being completely self-serving,” she added.

“If you said to President Biden that you did not think he should run again?” Maddow asked.

“Yeah. Or even that he should question whether it’s a good idea,” Harris replied.

BlazeTV host Pat Gray is shocked that Harris so willingly gave up that information.

“Is that an admission that she knew he shouldn’t be running?” Gray asks, intrigued. “But she stayed quiet.”

“Kamala Harris,” executive producer Keith Malinak asks, pretending to press the former VP further, “who tweeted for Joe Biden, especially on that day he dropped out? Did they run the tweet by you first?”

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Kamala fact-checked in fiery CBS interview for LYING about Trump again



CBS News may have acted out of loyalty to Vice President Kamala Harris when it edited her “60 Minutes” interview to make her sound more presidential and less chaotic — but it didn’t let her get away with it so easily in a recent interview with anchor Norah O’Donnell.

“So you do support restrictions after viability?” O’Donnell asked the Vice President.

“I support Roe v. Wade being put back into law by Congress and to restore the fundamental right of women to make decisions about their own body. It is that basic,” Kamala responded.


“But you know, with Roe v. Wade, there were restrictions after viability,” O’Donnell shot back.

Kamala went on to pin it on Donald Trump, telling O’Donnell that “women have died because of Trump’s abortion ban” and that “women who have survived rape and incest” are not allowed to make decisions about their body.

“We have seen women who are experiencing a miscarriage around a pregnancy they prayed for and being denied health care because doctors are afraid they’re going to go to prison,” she continued.

“And when you argue that Donald Trump, if elected, would put forward a national abortion ban,” O’Donnell began her response before being cut off by Kamala, who interjected with “just read Project 2025.”

“The former president said that’s not true,” O’Donnell continued, before Kamala started meandering on about how we shouldn’t be taking Trump’s word for it.

Pat Gray of “Pat Gray Unleashed” can’t hear anymore of it.

“Are we really taking your word for anything after you flip-flopped on every single issue from 2020 until now?” Gray says. “You flipped on fracking, you flipped on confiscating guns supposedly, we’re supposed to take your word for that? Eliminating private health insurance, now you don’t want to do that? Decriminalizing border crossings, federal job guarantees.”

“She has flipped on everything, and we’re supposed to take her word that now she feels completely different,” he adds, annoyed.

Want more from Pat Gray?

To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Kamala’s filibuster fails as Bret Baier shreds her cowardly campaign strategy



Although The Hill certainly can’t be accused of being in Donald Trump’s corner and, as far as I can tell, has leaned left throughout this presidential campaign, its reporters lost no time telling us that Kamala Harris messed up her interview with Bret Baier on Fox News. The Hill’s description of the interview used the word “disaster” several times to underscore the truly appalling character of Harris’ clumsy attempts to grapple with Baier’s questioning.

Contrary to the totally dishonest defense that the vice president received in much of the corporate left-wing media, The Hill further explained that American media was responsible for Kamala’s interview catastrophe.

If Baier seemed to be interrupting Harris repeatedly, he had every reason to do so. She was filibustering.

The legacy media, according to The Hill, never bothered to give our vice president any serious questions. The media avoided asking her those obvious things that Baier brought up in the narrow 20-minute interview that Kamala’s handlers granted him. For example, when exactly did she learn that the president under whom she was serving was afflicted with senile dementia? For years, Harris never let on that she grasped that glaringly obvious reality. She went on praising Joe Biden’s mental acumen, up until the moment Democratic kingmakers installed her as their presidential nominee. The friendly media should have been asking Kamala about why she hid Biden’s frailty. If the media had done its job, she might have had a reasonable response to Baier’s query.

The interview for me raised another question: Why would Kamala’s handlers have permitted her to undergo the ordeal of an unscripted interview?

Their candidate had been running neck-and-neck with and possibly slightly ahead of Trump for about two months, and it might have been possible to run out the clock without exposing Harris to a systematic grilling courtesy of a relentlessly thorough interviewer. By now it’s clear that she doesn’t think fast on her feet; and she’s already “unburdened herself” of multiple, embarrassing word salads when responding to effusively friendly talk show hosts. It might have been best, her advisers should have reasoned, not to put her into a demanding situation that was above her pay grade. (I think we can all agree with Trump that this lady is not very smart.)

The one time Harris apparently ventured out beyond tightly controlled situations was during her debate with Trump in September. But even then, she had been allowed to rattle off memorized lines, mostly depicting her opponent as a fascist ogre. And this debate took place under the aegis of biased moderators, who acted as if they were Kamala’s loving babysitters.

I suspect her handlers agreed to that short interview with Baier because they thought it would be a win-win situation. Her appearance on Fox News would create the impression that she was reaching out to Republicans, just as Trump went into strongly blue areas to appeal to possible voters there. Presumably at least some Fox viewers — anti-Trump Republicans — could be won over to vote blue. Since the time permitted for that interview kept getting whittled down, from half an hour to about 20 minutes, Kamala would not be exposing herself to the unknown for very long.

Her handlers further assumed that Kamala could get by during the abbreviated interview by rehashing the anti-Trump rhetoric that she had dutifully recited for the debate. Please note that the most animated responses that she gave to Baier’s questions were restatements of what she had unleashed against Trump. She, therefore, went back to the same invectives even if they didn’t relate to the questions Baier asked during the interview. If Baier seemed to be interrupting her repeatedly, he had every reason to do so. Harris was filibustering. Instead, she launched into anti-Trump rants as the questioning proceeded, and that made the interview difficult to conduct.

Perhaps the major factor that got Harris and her team to accept the interview was the choice of the interviewer. Although a celebrity on a Republican-leaning channel, Baier is not known to bear any affection for Donald Trump. He has never held back from going after Trump’s claim to have won the 2020 presidential race. He also plays up “bigly” his mediating role in seeking “common ground” with Democrats.

If I were a Democrat deciding to be interviewed on a Republican channel, I would have been truly delighted if Baier were the one asking the questions. What happened, however, was not at all what Harris expected. Baier came out, entirely to his credit, asking tough, well-phrased questions and tried to keep his interviewee from segueing into her anti-Trump invective. That and being for nationwide unrestricted abortion rights for women continue to be Kamala’s only talking points, when she’s not belaboring her listener with unintelligible word salads.

Quite predictably, the leftist media went after Baier for not doing what was expected of him, which was helping to get Harris elected. But Baier wouldn’t release his quarry, a decision for which he should be commended.

Harris' Achilles' heel: The one question Kamala can't seem to answer



Vice President Kamala Harris has repeatedly insisted that American voters "turn the page" but has struggled to explain how she plans to do so.

Most recently, Fox News anchor Bret Baier held Harris' feet to the fire during an interview Wednesday night when he pressed the presidential hopeful on her administration's unpopularity. Baier pointed out that the majority of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track under the Biden-Harris administration.

"Why are they saying that if you're turning the page?" Baier asked Harris. "You've been in office three and a half years."

"And Donald Trump has been running for office," Harris replied.

Baier reminded Harris that she has been holding the office this term, not former President Donald Trump.

This line of questioning has repeatedly been a snag for Harris and her campaign as she attempts to distance herself from her administration's failures without going scorched-earth on her own party. The trouble is that there is no good answer.

During her Oct. 8 appearance on "The View," Harris was again asked whether she would have done anything differently from President Joe Biden's term.

"There's not a thing that comes to mind ... and I've been a part of most of the decisions that have had impact," Harris responded.

The next day, Harris had a similar blunder during her appearance on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," where she was questioned about any major changes that would take place under a hypothetical Harris administration.

"I'm obviously not Joe Biden, um, and so that would be one change," Harris said. "But also, I think it's important to say, with 28 days to go, I'm not Donald Trump. And so when we think about the significance of what this next generation of leadership looks like, were I to be elected president, it is about, frankly, um, I love the American people, and I believe in our country. I love that it is our character and nature to be an ambitious people."

Her response avoided the actual question, which she failed to answer.

One of Harris' frequently used caveats has to do with her "middle-class" background, which serves as her first line of defense in many of these policy-related questions. During the Sept. 10 presidential debate, Harris was asked whether Americans are better off now under the Biden-Harris economy compared to four years ago.

"So, I was raised as a middle-class kid," Harris said. "And I am actually the only person on this stage who has a plan that is about lifting up the middle class and working people of America. I believe in the ambition, the aspirations, the dreams of the American people."

Harris went on to describe her "opportunity economy," which would include a $6,000 child tax credit.

During another interview with a local ABC outlet on Sept. 13, Harris was asked what she would do specifically to bring down prices and make life more affordable.

"Well, I'll start with this, um, I grew up a middle-class kid," Harris said. "My mother raised my sister and me. She worked very hard. ... I grew up in a community of hardworking people. Construction workers and nurses and teachers, and I try to explain to some people who may not have had the same experience, and a lot of people will relate to this, you know, I grew up in a neighborhood of folks who were very proud of their lawn. You know?"

While this "turn the page" philosophy has become a hallmark of Harris' campaign, she is still tethered to her track record, and voters are taking notice.

As Baier pointed out, many Americans are dissatisfied with the current state of affairs. Nearly two-thirds of voters said the country is on the wrong track, and the deficit has only widened since the Democratic Party swapped the top of its ticket in July, according to RealClearPolling averages.

The truth is that skyrocketing costs, inflationary spending, and a porous border have become hallmarks of Harris' vice presidential term, eclipsing any and all talking points and friendly media appearances her campaign has booked.

The economy has remained the most important issue, with 90% of voters saying it is "extremely" or "very" important in influencing their vote in the upcoming election, according to a Gallup Poll from Oct. 9. Immigration also ranks high, with 72% of voters saying the issue is "extremely" or "very" important to them going into November.

At the same time, Trump outperforms Harris by nine points on both the economy and immigration, with 54% of voters saying they trust the former president to handle the respective issues, while 45% of voters said the same of the Democratic nominee.

The reality is that Harris is a hard sell for Americans who have lived through her leadership. No matter how many times Harris reminds us about her "middle-class" roots and no matter how many times she insists on "turning the page," she can't manage to become "unburdened by what has been," and that's a problem.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Highlights from Kamala’s ‘angry’ Fox News interview with Bret Baier



One of the biggest criticisms of the Kamala Harris campaign is that she hasn’t done many interviews, leaving voters none the wiser regarding her murky, ever-changing positions and policies.

It seems her campaign management has noticed the complaint and is making an effort to reverse course in the final weeks leading up to the election. In a bold attempt to reach moderates, Harris sat down with Fox News’ Bret Baier for an interview on Wednesday.

Stu Burguiere breaks down their conversation, outlining everything you need to know.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

“That was a legitimately difficult interview. [Harris] was not put in easy places,” says Stu, noting that Baier “asked tough questions,” “followed up,” and even “cut her off” when she attempted to “go down nonsensical talking point roads.”

As for Harris, Stu says she took a “filibuster” approach — “Let me get through this so I can say I did it” — which resulted in “very long answers that didn't really get to anything.”

The interview kicked off with the subject of immigration. According to Stu, Baier was “aggressive” on the subject and cut Harris off when she attempted to repeat her “nine-minute word salad” that included blaming Trump for opposing the border security bill.

While they were on the subject of illegal immigration, Baier mentioned the “[illegal immigrants] who got released [from jail], which led to murders” and even asked Harris if she would “like to apologize” to three specific female victims, including Laken Riley.

Harris responded in sympathy but with no apology. When Baier then played a video of Alexis Nungaray, whose young daughter, Jocelyn Nungaray, was murdered by illegal Venezuelan immigrants, Harris eventually said she was sorry for Nungaray’s loss but ultimately reverted back to blaming Trump.

Harris’ “apology,” according to Stu, was equivalent to “how you'd apologize if your neighbor's cat ran out into the street and got hit by a car.”

“She took no responsibility,” he says.

The next subject they discussed was the controversies surrounding the transgender movement. Baier’s exact question was: “Are you still in support of using taxpayer dollars to help prison inmates or detained illegal aliens to transition to another gender?”

He even played a clip of Harris stating that she is indeed in favor of that.

Harris, clearly thrown off by Baier’s trap, responded with, “I will follow the law,” and then claimed that during Trump’s administration, a law providing for such surgeries if deemed medically necessary was in place and that Trump himself followed that law.

“She’s now a prisoner of the law,” who “can't question money for transgender surgeries,” even though “she's running for president of the United States with dozens of law changes,” chides Stu, exposing the glaring contradiction. “Really evasive, really bad.”

However, one of Kamala’s worst moments in the interview was perhaps when the subject of “turning the page” came up, which has been a major talking point for Harris this election season.

Baier played clips of Harris asserting that she would not change anything about Joe Biden’s presidency, contradicting her instance that we need to turn the page and begin a new chapter.

Thrown off, Harris responded by saying that we need to turn the page on the last decade to distance our country from Trump — who she claimed was unfit to serve, unstable, and dangerous.

“Democrats have been president for 60% of the last decade. Donald Trump had four years in office,” corrects Stu, adding that Baier’s traps really made her “angry.”

However, Stu says that her answers continued to get worse. To hear more analysis on the interview, watch the clip above.

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

‘I’m taking crazy pills’: Dave Portnoy loses his mind over Democrats' latest gaslighting



While most celebrities are championing Kamala Harris, Dave Portnoy of Barstool Sports sees right through all the theater — and he can’t take it anymore.

“Every once in a while, I get so fed up with politics I’ve got to do a rant and just let steam off. I try not to, but I’ve hit the boiling point, and it’s the gaslighting that the left is doing with Kamala Harris making it sound like she’s some great groundbreaking candidate,” Portnoy began.

“She is the worst candidate ever to run for president, ever. There’s two people voting in this election. Either you’re voting for Donald Trump, you like Donald Trump, or you hate Donald Trump, and you’re voting against him,” he continued. “But Kamala Harris, let’s stop it.”



Portnoy explained that what put him “over the edge” was hearing Kamala preach “change” and a “new way forward” at one of her recent rallies.

“I see her at a rally today, and it’s the same message again. ‘Time to turn the page.’ She is the sitting vice president of the United States currently saying she’s the ‘candidate for change,’” Portnoy said in disbelief, before calling out "Call Her Daddy," "The View," and Stephen Colbert for asking her the “most simplest questions, softballs, that she probably knew were coming.”

“Hey, Kamala, how are you different from Joe Biden? What will be different since you are the sitting vice president of the United States and now you’re out saying you’re the ‘candidate for change'? She cannot answer it. She can’t answer it. She is literally saying, ‘Well, I’ve pretty much been in every big decision, I’m the same as Joe Biden.’”

“I can’t think of one thing different, it’s like I’m taking crazy pills,” he added.

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” couldn’t agree more.

“Dave Portnoy, who wants to talk about sports, is like, ‘Jesus, look what they’re doing with this woman.’ They’re giving her the lowest-hanging fruit, it could not hang any lower. She is literally supposed to just pick the fruit up from the floor and eat it. That’s all she’s supposed to do,” Rubin says.

Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Flailing aides prove unable to save Kamala Harris from absolute 'TRAIN WRECK' Bret Baier interview



Kamala Harris has historically kept her unscripted engagements with the fourth estate to a bare minimum. In the handful of instances in which Harris has actually sat down for interviews as a presidential candidate, they have nearly all been with friendly talking heads from sympathetic networks — such as CBS News, which apparently radically edited footage to make her seem more coherent.

Harris sat down Wednesday with Fox News' Bret Baier for a nearly 30-minute interview in an attempt to broaden her reach and offset the loss of voters Democrats have long alienated.

It did not go well.

It went so poorly, in fact, that Harris' staffers apparently pulled the plug and the Trump team later posted the interview in its entirety as a campaign ad.

Speaking to a panel of his peers after the sit-down, Baier revealed that Harris arrived nearly 20 minutes late and that her team frantically tried to cut the interview short, sparing the Democratic candidate from having to dodge additional questions.

"I'm talking, like, four people waving their hands like, 'It's gotta stop!'" said Baier. "I had to dismount there at the end."

Baier can be seen roughly 26 minutes into the interview referring to Harris' flailing aides, telling Harris, "Madam Vice President, they're wrapping me very hard here. I hope you got to say what you wanted to say about Donald Trump. ... There are a lot of things that people want to know about you and your policies. That's why we invited you here."

While Harris appeared frazzled throughout the interview, there were several moments in particular that may have prompted her aides to seek a quick exit.

'What are you talking about?'

"More than 70% of people tell [pollsters] the country is on the wrong track," Baier managed to say during one of Harris' filibusters, referring to a new Marquette Law School national survey. "If it's on the wrong track, that track follows three and a half years of you being vice president and President Biden being president. That is what they're saying — 79% of them. Why are they saying that if you're turning the page? You've been in office for three and a half years."

"And Donald Trump has been running for office," said Harris.

"But you've been the person holding the office, Madam Vice President," responded Baier.

"Come on," said Harris, smiling. "Come on. You and I both know what I am talking about. You and I both know what I am talking about."

Baier, genuinely confused as to Harris' meaning, responded, "I actually don't. What are you talking about?"

Harris, ostensibly unsure herself, pivoted into another attack on President Donald Trump, saying, "Over the last decade, people have become — but listen, over the last decade, it is clear to me and certainly the Republicans who are on stage with me, the former chief of staff to the president, Donald Trump, the former defense secretaries, national security adviser, and his vice president, one, that he is unfit to serve, that he is unstable, that he is dangerous, and that people are exhausted with someone who professes to be a leader who spends full time demeaning and engaging in personal grievances."

When asked to estimate how many illegal aliens have stolen into the country during her time as America's border czar, Harris proved unable or at the very least unwilling to answer. Instead she tossed another word salad.

"I'm glad you raised the issue of immigration, because I agree with you, it is a topic of discussion that people want to rightly have," said Harris. "And you know what I'm going to talk about."

"Do you think it's 1 million, 3 million?" said Baier.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection data indicates that over 2 million illegal aliens have so far entered the country in fiscal year 2024.

"Bret, let's just get to the point, okay? The point is that we have a broken immigration system that needs to be repaired," said Harris.

Baier noted between interruptions that the Biden-Harris administration dismantled Trump-era policies that helped secure the border and prevent the release of illegal aliens into the U.S.

Harris responded by listing several unrelated initiatives she and Biden pushed upon taking office, then suggested she had also advanced "a bill to fix our immigration system."

Baier, who wasn't buying what Harris was selling, noted that the vice president was referring to the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021. The bill, which failed despite a federal Democratic trifecta, would have both provided a path to citizenship for tens of millions of illegal aliens and weakened various immigration policies.

When the interviewer began to highlight the nature of the bill, Harris cut him off and resumed talking around the question.

'She couldn't give a straight answer to a single question because she has no answers.'

In another instance that might have worried Harris' aides, the vice president demonstrated difficulty reconciling her newfound ability to diagnose Trump's supposed instability from afar with her years-long failure to recognize Biden's decrepitude up close.

After noting that Harris previously called Trump "misguided," "unstable," "not well," and "mentally not stable," Baier said, "You told many interviewers that 'Joe Biden was on his game,' that [he] 'ran around circles on his staff.' When did you first notice that President Biden's mental faculties appeared diminished?"

Even though Harris replaced Biden as the Democratic candidate because of the widespread recognition of the president's decrepitude, Harris suggested to Baier that there actually was no problem, stating, "Joe Biden I have watched in from the Oval Office to the Situation Room, and he has the judgment and the experiment — and experience — to do exactly what he has done in making very important decisions on behalf of the American people."

"You met with him at least once a week for three and a half years. You didn't have any concerns?" asked Baier.

Harris refused to answer and instead attacked Trump.

Trump responded to the interview on Truth Social, writing, "She has a massive and irredeemable case of TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME - So bad, in fact, that she is barely able to talk about any subject other than the man who had the best economy ever, the strongest border in history, and who just got the UNANIMOUS ENDORSEMENT OF THE U.S. Border Patrol, ME!"

Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) tweeted, "To my Democratic friends: maybe you should consider swapping Kamala Harris for Joe Biden."

"Kamala Harris' interview with Bret Baier was a TRAIN WRECK," wrote Karoline Leavitt, press secretary for the Trump campaign. "Kamala was angry, defensive, and once again abdicated any responsibility for the problems Americans are facing. She couldn't give a straight answer to a single question because she has no answers."

Brian Fallon, a top Harris campaign aide, told NPR, "We feel like we definitely achieved what we set out to achieve in the sense that she was able to reach an audience that's probably been not exposed to the arguments she's been making on the trail."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

We asked '60 Minutes' why it CHANGED Kamala’s answer on Israel



Kamala Harris’ interview on “60 Minutes” recently aired — and it was nothing short of disastrous.

However, despite the legitimate questions the interviewer asked the vice president, keen-eyed social media users noticed that “60 Minutes” edited down her answer about Israel to cut out her incessant rambling and make her sound more coherent.

Not only that, but it appears that producers may have copied and pasted an answer from a different question.

“Her word salad about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was cut from Monday’s broadcast, and it looks as though it was a cut and paste job,” Glenn Beck of “The Glenn Beck Program” says.


Glenn’s team even reached out to CBS News for clarification but has not received a response.

The question interviewer Bill Whitaker had asked Kamala was whether or not the U.S. has sway over Prime Minister Netanyahu.

“The aid that we have given Israel allowed Israel to defend itself against 200 ballistic missiles that were just meant to attack the Israelis and the people of Israel, and when we think about the threat that Hamas, Hezbollah, presents, Iran, I think that it is without any question our imperative to do what we can to allow Israel to defend itself against those kinds of attacks,” Kamala said in her originally aired answer.

But she wasn’t done, as she continued to ramble about ceasefires and “the need for a deal to be done” after Whitaker interrupted to say, “But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening.”

The edited answer is minutes shorter, in which all she says is “the work that we do diplomatically with the leadership of Israel is an ongoing pursuit around making clear our principles,” before answering Whitaker’s interjection with a presidential sounding answer cut from another part of the interview.

“Sound more coherent? Sound more certain? Sound more presidential?” Glenn asks, adding, “Yes.”

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.