Did Trump just stop the Great Reset?



The elite-driven Great Reset has been moving along with little resistance under the Biden administration, but Donald Trump’s election may be throwing a wrench in their plans.

“There’s been this massive movement amongst global elites to seize increasingly more power, to centralize power and ownership and wealth. That’s what the Great Reset is all about,” Justin Haskins, director of the Socialism Research Center at the Heartland Institute, tells Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable.”

“The Biden administration is all for it, they’ve been actively involved in it, they’ve been supportive in a variety of different ways,” Haskins continues, noting the Biden admin’s been working with the World Economic Forum, which he calls “the Great Reset people.”


“The Biden administration is actively working against us, never mind fighting in our favor. So the Trump administration is our only hope of solving that problem. We’re not going to be able to fix it without someone aggressively pushing back against the European Union and the U.N. and the World Economic Forum,” he explains.

This is why it was so essential that Donald Trump win this election, because what would happen to not just American citizens, but the world, had Harris continued Biden’s reign — it would have changed everything.

“A lot of the American elites, John Kerry’s been involved in this, Al Gore’s been involved in this, the Clintons, the Obamas, who have pushed this climate change agenda that they are hoping is part of what you’re calling a reset,” Stuckey responds, noting that the “reset” part is what’s most concerning.

“By a reset, kind of like starting from zero. Rebuilding a society where progressive elites are in charge. But how they’re selling it is an equitable society, an equal society where there’s no difference in income, no one is oppressed, no one is a victim of injustice,” she continues.

“So a lot of this has critical race theory tenets, even gender ideology, abortion plays a role in this. Like their vision of a kind of utopia or heaven on Earth where they have all the power and all of us underlings are just doing what we’re told,” she says.

Trump, who Stuckey calls a “disruptor,” is one of the major obstacles standing in their way.

“It’s not just that he’s not going to go along with it, it’s that his policies have been very proactive in trying to stop that sort of thing from occurring,” Haskins agrees. “There’s no question about it, what Trump wants to do is put individual liberty at the forefront of this.”

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The global NGO destroying Africa — and flooding Europe with refugees



We're often told why immigrants stream into America and Europe by the millions, straining local resources and making a mockery of the law: They're searching for a better life.

But have you ever wondered how the life they're fleeing got so bad in the first place?

By presenting itself as both independent and transparent, the Club and its corrupt collaborators skillfully mask a deeper agenda — specifically, one that centralizes authority and imposes a vision that could punish dissent and enforce compliance.

Meet the powerful non-governmental organization pushing just the kind of draconian "sustainability" policies that help keep third-world countries in dire poverty.

"You'll own nothing and be happy." Thanks to this creepy mantra, most of us are already familiar with the World Economic Forum — if only because of founder Klaus Schwab's Bond movie villain accent and sense of style.

Yet many are not aware of its close partner, an even more powerful player in the shadowy corridors of global governance: the Club of Rome.

Founded in 1968 by a faction of scientists, economists, and business leaders to advance sustainability and systemic change, the Club of Rome presents itself as a benign force for good. But beneath this think tank's flimsy facade of altruism lurks a sinister agenda that makes the WEF look like WWE in comparison

If in doubt, let me point you in the direction of its most recent report, which is full of flawed logic and sadistic suggestions.

Legislated famine

In this document, the authors outline a ridiculous road map for achieving the "Sustainable Development Goals" in Africa. One of the more outlandish and reckless recommendations involves reducing the use of fertilizers. If enacted, this policy would be a death sentence for millions, perhaps tens of millions.

As Africa's population surges, reducing agricultural productivity risks widespread famine and suffering. This is a continent synonymous with starvation. Instead of empowering African nations to harness their natural resources, feed their people, and achieve economic growth, the Club promotes policies that prioritize environmental ideals over human welfare. This social engineering masquerading as progress could have catastrophic consequences.

Maybe that's part of the plan.

The Club of Rome's ideology is not confined to Africa; it resonates throughout Europe and beyond. In a time when many European nations grapple with the influx of immigrants and refugees, these misguided initiatives only serve to exacerbate existing challenges. Since 1990, the number of African immigrants living outside their home countries has more than doubled, with Europe experiencing the most pronounced growth.

An overwhelmed Europe

Over 11 million African-born individuals now call Europe home, many having journeyed through perilous sea routes. They arrive traumatized, often unable to communicate in the language of their new country, thrust into cultures and environments that feel utterly foreign, because they are. This influx brings a way of life that starkly contrasts with local customs, resulting in a clash of civilizations. This is not xenophobic speculation. Countries like France, Italy, and Germany are overwhelmed with African immigrants, and some of the stories of their behavior are nothing short of shocking.

North African immigrants, particularly from Morocco and Tunisia, are increasingly linked to a surge in violent crime in Germany. Disturbingly, these individuals are responsible for an average of one murder every six days, a statistic that underscores a troubling trend. The rise in serious offenses — assaults, stabbings, and rapes — coincides with the left-liberal German government's hesitance to deport offenders, raising serious concerns about public safety.

Since 2019, the number of murder cases involving Tunisians has skyrocketed by 110% while cases involving Moroccans have risen by 67%. According to data from the Federal Criminal Police Office, a murder was committed by either a Tunisian or a Moroccan every six days last year. These countries are known for their strong Islamic traditions, which often run counter to Western values.

In contrast, Southern African nations, where Christianity is more prevalent, often reflect different social dynamics. The influx of North African immigrants, with cultural and religious differences rooted in Islam, has sparked a clash that further complicates integration and endangers the people of Europe.

Thanks to the reckless recommendations of unelected globalists with the Club of Rome, the WEF, and the European Union, Europe now grapples with the dire consequences of this “human oil spill.” The surge of immigrants has overwhelmed social services, heightened cultural tensions, and fueled fears of escalating crime, unemployment, and the demise of broader society.

Post-COVID carnage

The backdrop for this upheaval is the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lockdowns imposed by governments across the globe became a catalyst for radical change. While you and I were imprisoned in our homes, the elites — those behind organizations like the Club of Rome and the WEF — strategized about the future. They saw an opportunity to implement their vision for a post-COVID world, one where individuals would relinquish their rights and property in exchange for a facade of security and stability.

Again, this is not conjecture. The Club of Rome, through its partnerships with the WEF and the EU, seeks to chart a path for “systemic change” that undermines individual freedoms. Its influence extends into policymaking, shaping agendas that prioritize climate ideology over the welfare of citizens. This collusion raises critical questions about the legitimacy of its authority and the future trajectory of humanity.

The launch of the Systems Transformation Hub earlier this year marks a disturbing shift in Europe’s governance. Amid an escalating series of “crises” — conflict, climate change, and “deepening inequality” — this initiative seeks to overhaul societal structures under the banner of sustainability and unity. With Europe facing a number of pivotal elections, the timing of the Hub's emergence was anything but coincidental.

At its core, the Hub aims to craft policies and create a narrative that fit neatly with the European Green Deal. It emphasizes scientific data — often selectively chosen, as the COVID pandemic has shown — over public opinion, subtly undermining democratic processes and paving the way for directives from an exclusive elite. After all, the elites clearly know best.

Unaccountable authority

While the Hub touts its commitment to creating “a prosperous, resilient, green, and just Europe,” the reality may be a consolidation of power in the hands of a select few. Here, I suggest, “green” translates to cash flow rather than genuine environmental concern — think eco-friendly profits rather than eco-friendly policies. By presenting itself as both independent and transparent, the Club and its corrupt collaborators skillfully mask a deeper agenda — specifically, one that centralizes authority and imposes a vision that could punish dissent and enforce compliance.

The most dangerous aspect of organizations like the Club of Rome and the World Economic Forum is their enduring influence in a world where politicians come and go and nations rise and fall. These entities, composed of unelected, largely unknown officials, wield power that transcends electoral cycles, remaining ever-present as they pull the strings behind the scenes.

This unaccountable authority allows them to shape societal norms and policies without the scrutiny that elected leaders face, fundamentally undermining democratic processes. Operating with a level of permanence that defies political turnover, these organizations pose a grave threat to the Western world.

FACT CHECK: Did Klaus Schwab Say An ‘Era Of Shock Events’ Is Coming Ahead Of The 2024 Election?

A screenshot of a headline shared on Facebook claims World Economic Forum (WEF) founder and non-executive chairman Klaus Schwab said an “era of shock events” is coming before the 2024 presidential election. Verdict: False The claim is false and stems from an Aug. 19 article published on “The People’s Voice,” a website that is known […]

Klaus Schwab stepping DOWN from WEF; which global villain will replace him?



World Economic Forum founder and executive chairman Klaus Schwab has shocked the world by announcing that he's stepping down from his role running the WEF.

Schwab had founded the global gathering in 1971 and was operating as the executive chairman until now — though he won’t be leaving his brainchild. Rather, Schwab will be transitioning to a role as a nonexecutive chairman pending approval by the Swiss government.

While his successor has yet to be named, Glenn Beck and comedian Eric Hollerbach aren’t wasting the opportunity to poke a little fun at the global villain.

“Hello my slave, Glenn Beck-ing-hamming, how are you today,” Hollerbach says, impersonating Schwab’s fictional son, who they joke will now be running the WEF.

“I’m good,” Glenn laughs. “It’s interesting that you would agree to come on this particular program. I’m not sure how your father feels about people like me.”

Hollerbach, aka Klaus Schwab’s heir, tells Glenn that he hopes to make some “conversions” from Glenn’s side and that Schwab’s brain “is analog at this moment, and it will go to digitalization.”

“So, he was just kind of getting the upgrade,” Hollerbach jokes, adding, “It’s more of a lateral movement.”

When Hollerbach explains what the role of the WEF is, Glenn can’t help but laugh.

“We do certain rituals to ensure that we go up the food chain, closer and closer and closer to the great architect of the universe. And we are the embodiment to inherit earth incorporated,” he explains.

“People, like the average people, how are they going to benefit?” Glenn asks.

“Well, their slavery will be more like digital token. They will have equitable access to making labor or jails,” Hollerbach answers, embracing his power hungry character.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

FACT CHECK: X Post Falsely Claims Klaus Schwab Has Been Hospitalized

A WEF spokesperson also labeled the claim as false in an email to Check Your Fact

The WEF's plan to control you



The idea of the “metaverse” is synonymous with Mark Zuckerberg.

In 2021, Zuckerberg — half robot, half man — renamed his corporation from Facebook to Meta. Ever since, his primary goal has been to forge the “metaverse,” a virtual reality environment in three dimensions. However, he’s not the only one exploring this brave new world.

The World Economic Forum is also actively exploring the metaverse.

Make no mistake about it: If the WEF has its way, your metaverse identity will be used to monitor, predict, mold, and mimic your behavior.

The unelected globalists in Davis recently published a rather sobering report emphasizing the significance of digital IDs, biometric data capture, and behavior profiling and how all three will shape our identities in the metaverse.

In a new 48-page report, eerily titled “Metaverse Identity: Defining the Self in a Blended Reality,” the WEF suggests that, as people "spend more time exploring, playing and socializing in digital experiences, a person’s metaverse identity will be central to their day-to-day life as well as to the way they express their personal identity.”

The concept of metaverse identity consists of three key elements:

  • Representation: This involves personal, social, and role identity, which can be expressed through avatars, pseudonyms, or other digital forms.
  • Data: This refers to the vast amount of information about individuals collected by the hardware and software supporting the metaverse.
  • Identification: This includes various forms of identification such as driver's licenses, government-issued IDs, passports, birth certificates, attestations, labels, or usernames and passwords.

The report highlights that metaverse identity expands the traditional notion of "identity" by integrating it with the digital infrastructure of the internet. In short, it's a complex framework that encompasses everything from representation to data and identification.

Identity in the metaverse, we’re told, “connects and anchors a person to the physical and virtual world.”

The concept of representation, meanwhile, involves how individuals present and express themselves, whether through a realistic portrayal or more abstract, creative interpretations. This includes visual representations and verbal expressions, actions, behaviors, and mannerisms. This aspect of representation also ties into behavior profiling, which is evident in biometric profiling, data capture, and various identification processes. If you are imagining communist China, then yes, you are on the right track.

Furthermore — and this is a crucial point — introducing digital entities in the metaverse will redefine the notion of representation. These digital entities can embody humans, objects, systems, or abstract ideas and possess varying levels of interaction, autonomy, and behavior within digital environments. Worryingly, any issues with your digital replicas could impact your real-life existence. Today, the line between the physical and digital you is somewhat blurry. Tomorrow, that line will be nonexistent.

The fact that the WEF, the international organization behind the Great Reset initiative (you will own nothing and be happy with owning nothing), is so interested in shaping the metaverse should worry anyone who values his freedom — or what little remains of it, anyway.

As mentioned in the comprehensive report, the metaverse identity data category focuses on collecting and examining data in order to draw conclusions about individuals — their likes, dislikes, political philosophies, etc. Using AI and machine learning, this data is used to anticipate and predict behavior patterns. Yes, like something out of "Minority Report." According to the WEF, when combined with AI and ML models, this data enables the analysis of a person's interactions, movements, and preferences, ultimately generating the person's identity.

Bloomberg/Getty

Whether these inferred data points capture current activities, predict future actions, or anticipate preferences, they offer insights into an individual's identity. Furthermore, these attributes can influence how the virtual environment responds to an individual and how outsiders perceive the individual. Imagine this technology in the hands of Klaus Schwab and his colleagues, all of whom are vested in manipulating human behavior and exerting control over people's thoughts and actions.

This is not unfounded fearmongering. The report clearly states that lawmakers could easily “use aggregated inferred data for surveillance, monitoring dissidents or suppressing certain groups without their active consent.”

Which means they probably will.

But, some will say, “I want no part of the metaverse. I refuse to even entertain the idea of entering it.”

Although I applaud your commitment, you and your loved ones may have little option but to participate, especially if the metaverse becomes the internet’s next chapter. If everything is online, then, I ask, how do you plan to remain offline?

Also, your metaverse identity could be your passport, the golden ticket needed to participate in the online world. Make no mistake about it: If the WEF has its way, your metaverse identity will be used to monitor, predict, mold, and mimic your behavior. It will determine what information you can and cannot access and what information you can and cannot share. You have been warned.

FACT CHECK: No, Klaus Schwab Did Not Say Humans Who ‘Refuse’ Artificial Intelligence Would ‘Become Extinct’

The claim stems from The People's Voice, a website that has repeatedly published false information

New Medicaid 'Playbook' pulls directly from World Economic Forum and WHO 'health equity' guidelines 20 years in the making



Medicaid's new guidelines, which allow states to direct a portion of funding to new health care initiatives such as rent or utilities, mirror the World Economic Forum's guidelines for "health equity;" ideas that have been decades in the making.

The Biden administration's Medicaid guidelines recently expanded to allow states to devote up to 3% of their Medicaid spending to experimental subsidies so long as they add in their own funding and evaluate the outcomes.

Guidance comes out of the Biden administration's U.S. Playbook to Address Social Determinants of Health, which lists housing security, food security, education access, and "healthy environment" as the top causes for inequal outcomes.

The push for "health equity" comes at the same time the World Economic Forum has published guidelines for health care and "urban transformation."

"Improving health and health equity for vulnerable populations requires addressing the social determinants of health," the WEF stated, citing a study from the Kaiser Family Foundation. The KFF refers to itself as a "nonpartisan" and "independent source for health policy research."

The nonprofit out of San Francisco published a study in 2018 titled "Beyond Health Care: The Role of Social Determinants in Promoting Health and Health Equity."

The study lists a series of "social determinants" of health care, all of which are included in the U.S. playbook.

"Socioeconomic status, education, neighborhood and physical environment, employment, and social support networks," as well as "access to health care" are listed as the determining factors for a citizen's health.

In fact, the study directly mentions state programs and "Medicaid-specific initiatives focused on addressing social needs."

The Biden administration's foray into "social determinants" as a basis for health care needs goes back to at least April 2022, when it released graphics that were nearly identical to the KFF's determinants study.

Searching farther back, the WEF has been promoting the social determinants strategy since at least January 2020.

"It’s time for the healthcare sector to take bold action," wrote Kelly Barnes and Dr. Rana Mehta. Both authors penned just that single article for the WEF on behalf of PwC, a global consulting firm.

PwC has been heavily pushing "inclusion" and ESG through its many partnerships. The company dates back approximately 170 years and has alumni that include the CEOs of Delta Airlines and Alaska Airlines, founder of Nike Phil Knight, Richard Kramer, CEO of Goodyear Tire, and the CFO of payment processor Stripe.

The strategies go farther back, however — all the way to 2017 when the National Academy of Medicine cited the World Health Organization. Even then, the document cited that "responding to nonmedical needs of patients such as transportation, housing, and food" was a key strategy for Medicaid.

The U.K. government predates all of these findings however, with its 2014 "health equity briefing" document. In the handout, the government cited the Institute of Health Equity, which appears to be the source of social determinant dogma.

The institute's director, Michael Marmot, is listed as having "led research groups on health inequalities for over 40 years." Marmot was responsible for the U.K.'s review of health inequalities in 2010, followed by Europe's in 2014.

It is Marmot's work with the WHO in 2005 that seems to be the origin of all health equity initiatives still being undertaken 20 years later. His 2005 study titled "Social Determinants of Health Inequalities" mimics much of the language westerners have become all too used to.

"Inequalities highlight systemic and structural issues contributing to differential health experiences among various population groups."

It was from there that the WHO established its framework for such legislation in 2008, in which it sought to "to support countries and global health partners in addressing the social factors leading to ill health and health inequities."

The final report started just as you imagine, and stated "social justice is a matter of life and death."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

FACT CHECK: No, Klaus Schwab Did Not Admit ‘Political Revolution’ Is Destroying His ‘Great Reset’ Agenda

The claim is false and stems from a Jan. 19 article published by "The People's Voice," a website that is known for spreading "fake news"