I was a lifelong Madonna fanatic ... until I saw her in concert one last time



Madonna's new album "Confessions II" just debuted at the top of the Billboard chart, giving her her 10th No. 1 album. It also makes her the first artist to score No. 1 albums in four different decades.

Madonna's fans have come through for her once again. Years ago, I would've been right there with them, on the edge of my seat, eager to spend my money the second her new release went on sale.

During a costume change, my friend Clay turned to me and said, 'The more she puts on, the better she looks.'

No longer. In another middle-aged role reversal, I’m looking at the party kids bopping out just like I did in the '80s, except now I’m the disapproving conservative uncle. It's quite a thing to go from being a stereotypical Gen X gay boy Madonna freak to a mid-lifer who thinks the woman is actually the Whore of Babylon.

Childish things

Thank God I finally grew up and got out of the "gay lifestyle" with its promiscuity, addiction, and its "die young and leave a good-looking corpse" motto.

Even if I hadn't, I'm not sure I could've kept up with today's new breed of fan. They have a taste for the raunchy, the narcissistic, and the materialistic that makes Madonna's once-notorious sexual button-pushing seem quaint by comparison. Today, there are no more boundaries to break — not that it has stopped the almost 68-year-old from trying.

When Madonna Ciccone came up in the 1980s, she made a big deal about being more brazenly sexual and aggressive than female stars were supposed to be. Back then, I bought her line about how she was helping women liberate themselves. But that line took us directly to “rap artists” like Cardi B “singing” about anatomical parts in a way that would have made the Material Girl blush in 1984.

Desperate to shock

The only thing Madonna could do to push the shock envelope today would be wearing her internal sexual organs on the outside (and I wouldn't put it past her). The on-the-go senior has been "performing" — we use the term generously — in Times Square dressed in what Baby Jane Hudson would have worn if her parents had started her in burlesque instead of vaudeville.

Butt implants bulging, Madonna squeezes herself into pink satin teddies cut so high a gynecologist could examine her from across a stadium. She spreads her legs (I repeat myself) to reveal a giant boom box speaker while rolling around on her back lip-syncing to her own processed voice.

Then, she brings on a 6-foot drag queen — I'm sorry, a "transgender woman" — so she can put her posterior in the dancer's face to suggest an act too lewd to describe.

This used to be my playground

It's a rehash of the shockingly incompetent, boring, and embarrassing concert I attended in 2024. She went on the road with a greatest hits tour at 65. My friends and I have been to half a dozen of her shows over the years, usually from the front row or close to it. At her best, like her or not, she is a mesmerizing live performer with a charisma that cannot be bought or sold.

Not that night. The arena in Denver was packed with aging "Madonna wannabes," late middle-aged women with their hair tied up in rags and crucifix necklaces. Superannuated gay men prancing about in makeup and the kind of shorts that used to get one arrested for public indecency.

Out came our lady of the pop charts singing along to an entirely prerecorded musical track. There was no band, and the sound was so poor I couldn't understand what she was singing or saying.

That turned out to be a mercy when she decided to break into a speech praising the child abuse that we call "transgender children." And like a modern Joan Crawford, Madonna brought two of her adopted African children onto the stage with her to gyrate while male dancers displayed portions of their physique not usually seen outside textbooks.

At 65, she was still stuffing herself into corsets and teddies that don't wear the same at the AARP stage of life. It was unflattering and embarrassing. During a costume change, my friend Clay turned to me and said, "The more she puts on, the better she looks."

For the first time, I stood at a Madonna concert and looked at my phone for the time to see when it ended. My back and feet were killing me.

Goo goo Gaga

With the release of her new dance album, I've peeked at the online "diva wars" between fans of Miss Ciccone and devotees of the later simulacrum known as Lady Gaga. I've been watching the younger fan reactions to senior citizen Madonna. They're insane.

The young have a name for what we might call "super fans," the obsessive types who make a singer, an actor, or a sports team into a religion. They call them "stans," because the word fan, shortened from "fanatic," wasn't fanatical enough.

They defend their divas to the digital death. If you dare to say you're not into their celebrity obsession, the stans will scream that you're old, stupid, a bigot, repressed, or that you just "hate people enjoying things." For them, it's not enough to praise Madonna for her music or her style; she has to be the biggest, best, baddest, b***h ever.

To watch these antics is to look into an unpleasantly clear mirror of the young man I used to be. When I attended the concert two years ago, I thought to myself, "What are you doing here?" I was 49 years old, and the magic was gone.

But it was more than that; it was more than just getting older and reaching maturity. It wasn't that I was no longer interested in Madonna; I was repulsed by her. She stands for everything I think is rotten and destructive in modern society: brazen promiscuity, pathological narcissism, out-of-control greed, and breaking every rule simply for the sake of breaking it.

What did I see in her decades ago when I fell under her spell?

Star struck

It was 1983 in Anaheim. I was over at Dinda's apartment for her eighth birthday party. The wood-grain console stereo was tuned to the top 40 station, and this enchanting melodic synthesizer run tinkled like electric glass out of the speakers. Then a booming bass line came in and some ethereal creature sang, "You must be my lucky star, cuz you make the darkness seem so far."

I was captivated. You couldn't not dance to it.

Less than a year later, I was sitting in front of MTV, and I watched this glamorous vixen in a pink dress (copied from Marilyn Monroe's "Diamonds Are a Girl's Best Friend" number) be pushed up onto a pedestal as handsome men showered her with cash and diamonds.

That was the beginning of my obsession with Madonna Ciccone. I bought every single record (45 singles and the 33 long-playing), every single poster, every single magazine, every fan newsletter. I begged the bus driver to turn up the radio when her songs came on.

For years, I spent money on her merchandise and her concerts, and I defended her singing, her dancing, and her "message" to anyone who would listen (and to those who just wanted me to shut the hell up). To kids like me, she was a liberated, self-made, modern girl who "took on the system."

No man was going to tell her what she could and couldn't do with her body. Stupid, stuffy, old religious conservatives only hated her, because, like, they're afraid of normal sexuality and bodies, OK?

RELATED: Are you a 35-year-old with a nose ring? Forget ‘adulting’ — you need to grow up

NBC/Harold M. Lambert/Getty Images

Missing persons

What was it that so attracted young girls and gays to this siren? Young people are vulnerable to unhealthy obsessions with unhealthy celebrities because they're missing something at home. I was missing a lot. My mother was deranged with a personality disorder. I was 10 years old before she finally put my violent stepfather out of the house the night after he tried to murder her in front of us three children. My teen years were spent in a home for juvenile delinquent boys, and my sister met the same fate when she approached adolescence.

Families like mine provided none of the normal, necessary nurturing that teaches children to value the good things in life and to value the good. No religious instruction, no unconditional love, only mood swings, temper tantrums, and violent punishment.

Like too many young people today, I became convinced that the idea of family was a sick joke. It was just something "fundagelicals" had cooked up and forced down our throats with "propaganda" like "Leave It to Beaver."

Siren song

When I called Madonna a siren above, I meant it literally. She sang a song, and kids like me foundered on her rocks because no one made sure we were tied to the mast. We couldn't resist.

I think she's even more than a siren; I’d call her a sorceress. She cast a "glamour" over youth in the original sense of the term, a spell that binds and blinds. Like all pathological narcissists, Madonna's moral values are inverted. The healthy is recast as sickness. Temperance, chastity, charity, and loyalty are for suckers. Greed is good.

Like my unstable mother, Madonna created herself god in her own image and then demanded that others worship her. We can ask how a woman pushing 70 can stand to do what she does without dying of embarrassment, but the answer is obvious.

We are a society that pays for pathology. Madonna sells the lost exactly what they want to buy. Far from fading into the past, her brand of self-destructive self-worship has been culturally normalized in the 21st century.

For years, I complied with my mother's idolatrous demands, and I gave in to Madonna's as well. Now I'm free, but an even greater percentage of young people today are in moral and spiritual bondage than they were in my youth.

Tie your children to the mast. Give them what they need at home, or they'll pay dearly for a poison substitute.

'It's called a humiliation ritual': Dave Landau ROASTS Grammys red carpet worst dressed



Celebrities are known for their insane political commentary and questionable fashion statements — but this year's Grammys took that to an entirely new level.

One of those celebrities was Lady Gaga, who during a speech stated that she was “sick of transphobia” and that “trans people are not invisible.”

“I actually find them to be the most visible,” Stu Burguiere tells comedian Dave Landau on “Stu Does America.” “Like, every time they walk, there’s bulges to describe. Like, you can see, we all can tell.”

“They’re also the most talked about and the ones that we have to bring up all the time,” Landau agrees, laughing. “There’s doctors that have actually made them so unseen while they’re being seen that guys are afraid to go up to people in bars after a certain number of drinks.”

But believe it or not, it gets worse.



“As someone who’s, I would say, an expert on looking at the culture and determining what the hell is going on, what the hell was going on with Kanye’s wife at the Grammys? Because I don’t know if you noticed, did you notice anything about her?” Stu asks, referring to Bianca Censori’s extremely inappropriate outfit.

Censori’s outfit was essentially not an outfit at all, as whatever clothing she was wearing was so thin and see-through that she appeared to be completely naked.

“I believe it’s called a humiliation ritual, it’s what they do. It’s in certain trafficking circles,” Landau says. “He’s at the Grammys, we’re letting this slide for some reason, but wasn’t he completely a Nazi a year ago?”

“Yes, is he still getting invites to stuff?” Stu asks, laughing.

“Apparently,” Landau says, adding, “‘cause he was a full-blown Nazi.”

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

FACT CHECK: Did Lady Gaga Discuss Encounter With Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs In Interview?

A post shared on social media purports that singer Lady Gaga spoke about an experience she had with Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs. Suddenly, all of Hollywood knew about Diddy’s parties. They are all coming out of the woodwork to make sure everyone knows that they did not participate. 😂 Right….. Sorry but I don’t believe any […]

Kamala's pointless celebrity splurge



It had a billion-dollar budget, lavish sets, and some of the biggest names in entertainment — so why did the Democrats' latest presidential campaign tank at the voting booth?

Yes, there was that desperate, last-minute casting change. But new lead Kamala Harris seemed to get the notoriously troubled production back on track despite a predecessor unwilling to give up his former role and co-star Tim Walz's troublingly erratic public behavior.

Megan Thee Stallion, Lady Gaga, and Charli XCX just weren’t up to the task of rescuing Harris from herself.

The sheer star power on hand seemed to guarantee a runaway hit: Gen Z favorite Alex Cooper ("Call Me Daddy"), as well as proven draws like Will Ferrell, Rihanna, George Clooney, Jennifer Lopez, and even Oprah Winfrey.

Pay to play

Winfrey's glorified cameo was said to cost a cool million. Also rumored to have gotten a seven-figure payday was Beyoncé — who perversely enough appeared in a non-singing role — and any number of other artists ranging from Taylor Swift to Eminem.

Whatever the exact line items were, one thing is certain: A campaign that still had more than $100 million in the bank in October now finds itself $20 million in the hole.

In retrospect, maybe that GloRilla performance wasn't such a good idea after all.

Or maybe the era of the big-budget, mass-marketed, four-quadrant blockbuster is over.

Joy division

Where was the big-name actor or actress who would come along and save Harris from her floundering campaign?

The tear-streaked viral post recorded on the spur of the moment by Lady Gaga that would finally convince regular people in Pennsylvania and North Carolina that Harris really was the answer to their prayers — and not just a Polly POC-et puppet who couldn’t string two sentences together without cackling like a banshee and waxing poetic about the joy of abortion rights?

Indeed, what happened to the days of influential celebrity videos with warnings about “fascism” and “democracy"? Did they stop uploading them, or did everybody just stop watching?

Falling stars

The answer seems to be a bit of both. A recent YouGov poll found that only 10% of Americans say a celebrity’s opinion has caused them to cast a vote or rethink their vote. Another poll by USA Today and Suffolk University found that political endorsements had a much larger effect on swaying the Democratic vote than celebrity endorsements.

The study also found that conservatives were rarely swayed by either, including from within the conservative movement’s leadership. (The influence of Hulk Hogan’s bodice-ripping howl of support for Trump remains a subject for future historians.)

Perhaps this is why the standard-issue Democratic endorsements Harris got from Obama and the Clintons didn’t do much: They weren’t delivered with much conviction. It probably didn't help that the DNC brand was tainted by the still-fresh memory of Joe Biden's public stab in the back.

Megan Thee Stallion, Lady Gaga, and Charli XCX just weren’t up to the task of rescuing Harris from herself. Even those who somehow enjoy their music apparently found it hard to get very excited about their political opinions.

Box office poison?

The celebrities who did endorse Harris did so with smug certitude that didn’t do much to reach independents. Their urgent pleas to “get out and vote” (with the obvious insinuation that meant voting for Harris) also clearly backfired, since Trump won men under 30 by 14 points and Harris won young women under 30 by only 18 points. Gen Z voters just weren't pulling the lever for the Democrats the way their celebrities and pop culture puppets told them to.

As Jimmy Vielkind and Aaron Zitner point out, Harris’ result for young women was “down from the 32-point margin for Biden among that group in 2020.”

Trump’s mastery of social media and popular podcasts like Joe Rogan's show also clearly bolstered his already well-known brand and put him front and center in the mind of many undecideds.

Triple threat

But the fact remains that Trump didn't really need anybody's endorsement — at least not the way Harris did. Our former and future president is a consummate entertainer. He sings, he tells jokes, he does his own stunts. He even dances. Who needs celebrities when you can groove out with the candidate himself?

Expensive disasters tend to end with a lot of finger-pointing, and the Harris campaign is no exception. The Democrats might as well take the opportunity to clean house — starting with those among them who insist on blaming the voters.

If the incredible comeback of Donald Trump can teach us anything, it's that fewer and fewer people are waiting for the media to tell them what's worth their time and attention. After years of having their taste underestimated and dismissed, Americans are finally confident enough to call out real, once-in-a-generation talent when they see it. Anyone who wants to win the people over better start with that.

‘Deleting All My Social Media’: Crybaby Celebrities Melt Down After Trump Win

The gnashing of elitist teeth since the Blue Wall’s fall has been GLORIOUS! Especially for an old conservative boy from flyover country.

‘Folie Á Deux’ Portrays The Joker As Not Just A Villain But A Sinner

Musical choices throughout the film set the stage for an ultimate judgment, not just in the eyes of the ardent fans, but in the eyes of God.

'This kind of hatred is violence': Lady Gaga appalled at backlash for photo with Dylan Mulvaney on Women's Day



Singer and actress Lady Gaga claimed that she was the target of violence after she received negative reactions online to photos with gender activist Dylan Mulvaney.

The singer, whose real name is Stefani Germanotta, was featured in a series of images and a video on the pseudo-holiday International Women's Day alongside Mulvaney, a man.

Mulvaney is of course infamous for his role in the Bud Light marketing fiasco that featured the activist in a bathtub with cans of the beer, which cost the brand billions of dollars in market share.

Of course, not only did the singer not see an issue with celebrating a man on a day meant for women, but she labeled any contentiousness from audiences as "hatred" and "violence."

"It’s appalling to me that a post about National Women’s Day by Dylan Mulvaney and me would be met with such vitriol and hatred," Germanotta wrote on her Instagram. "When I see a newspaper reporting on hatred but calling it 'backlash' I feel it is important to clarify that hatred is hatred, and this kind of hatred is violence. 'Backlash' would imply that people who love or respect Dylan and me didn’t like something we did. This is not backlash. This is hatred."

The singer then claimed that society had more work to do to support transgender people, claiming that they lead the way despite facing different types of "violence," such as "mental violence."

"It is not surprising given the immense work that it’s obvious we still have to do as a society to make room for transgender lives to be cherished and upheld by all of us. I feel very protective in this moment, not only of Dylan, but of the trans community who continues to lead the way with their endless grace and inspiration in the face of constant degradation, intolerance, and physical, verbal, and mental violence."

Lady Gaga then seemed to imply that men who believe they are women are indeed women and should be celebrated as such.

"I certainly do not speak for this community, but I have something to say. I hope all women will come together to honor us ALL for International Women’s Day, and may we do that always until THE DAY that all women are celebrated equally. That all people are celebrated equally. A day where people of all gender identities are celebrated on whichever holiday speaks to them. Because people of all gender identities and races deserve peace and dignity," she continued.

"May we all come together and be loving, accepting, warm, welcoming. May we all stand and honor the complexity and challenge of trans life — that we do not know, but can seek to understand and have compassion for. I love people too much to allow hatred to be referred to as 'backlash.' People deserve better," the artist concluded.

Of course, many women in the media were not happy about this.

"They always find a way to label truth as hatred. Lady Gaga chose to highlight a man on a day meant for women. That’s a fact. It’s not 'hatred,'" commentator Amala Ekpunobi remarked on X.

They always find a way to label truth as hatred. Lady Gaga chose to highlight a man on a day meant for women. That\u2019s a fact. It\u2019s not \u201chatred.\u201d
— (@)

"Stating a biological fact is not hatred ma’am," said writer Natasha Biase.

Stating a biological fact is not hatred ma\u2019am
— (@)

Lady Gaga is set to appear in the upcoming film "Joker: Folie à Deux" and was recently revealed to have her own character set in the extremely popular video game Fortnite.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'I'm proud to partner with Nurtec ODT': Lady Gaga catches flak for promoting Pfizer migraine drug



Superstar singer Lady Gaga is facing criticism for advertising Pfizer's Nurtec ODT migraine medication.

She advertised the drug in an Instagram post that is labled as a "Paid partnership with nurtecodt" and includes the hashtags "pfizersponsored" and "nurtecodtpartner."

In the post, Lady Gaga notes that she has suffered from migraines since her youth.

"Ever since childhood, I've dealt with migraine pain. When I tried Nurtec® ODT (rimegepant) 75 mg for the first time, I'll never forget wishing I had found it sooner. That's why I'm proud to partner with Nurtec ODT," the singer declared in the post. "We're in this together. If you're ready to speak to a doctor, ask about Nurtec ODT today."

Many people left comments disapproving of the star's move to peddle the medication.

"Stop pushing pharmaceuticals on the public and your fans! Many who are impressionable and trust you as an icon. This is wrong," someone declared.

"Is taking that Pfizer money really worth it?" someone else asked.

"Needs to fire her entire PR team for this," another commenter said.

"I can't believe that this hasn’t been deleted yet," another comment declared.

"Y'all who approved this - this is very cringy," another comment read.

"This is complete sell out behaviour. peddling a drug for a big pharma company. How much are they paying you?" someone wrote.

Lady Gaga's partnership apparently also includes an advertisement because a video features footage of the singer while she pushes the product in a voiceover.

"I know what it's like to perform through pain. If you're like me, one of the millions suffering from pain caused by migraine, Nurtec ODT may help. It's the only medication that can treat a migraine when it strikes and prevent migraine attacks," she says. "We're in this together. Talk to a doctor about Nurtec ODT."

From me to you 30sec youtube PP-NNT-USA-0558 www.youtube.com

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!