Dana White makes CNN anchor regret her attempt to get him to attack Republicans: 'You guys are really bad'



UFC president Dana White refused to play political games on Friday when a CNN anchor tried to bait him into criticizing Republicans.

During an interview, CNN anchor Laura Coates suggested the attempted assassination on Donald Trump has not changed the former president's approach to politics because the campaign "has already gotten pretty nasty." Coates cited the criticism from some Republicans that Vice President Kamala Harris is a "DEI hire."

'All of this stuff is a bunch of nasty BS — all of it.'

"What do you think of this message that attacks the race and gender of an opponent?" Coates asked White.

White, however, was clearly not interested in playing that game.

"I don't judge people by their politics and who they vote for or any of that stuff," he responded. "I don't know Kamala. She seems like she's a nice person. You know, I have nothing against her whatsoever. And like I said, I'm not political, but do I think that she is fit for the job? I do not, personally."

But that response wasn't sufficient for Coates, who pressed White further.

She claimed the attacks coming from Republicans are "not necessarily about the policy," citing JD Vance's quip about "childless cat ladies," a reference to the left's anti-family agenda.

Despite Coates' attempt to bait White into attacking Republicans, he remained above the fray.

"Politics are the most disgusting, nasty— it's atrocious what is said in politics. And the things that are being said on one side are being said on the other side, too, about Trump and about, you know, his choice for vice president. It goes both ways," White responded. "This isn't like, 'Oh my God, look what's being said about Kamala.' It goes both ways. They're both saying it."

That response sent Coates into defense mode.

The CNN anchor disputed that both sides are engaging in the same level of attacks, once again citing only two examples: criticism about Harris being a "DEI hire" and the out-of-context remark from Vance about "childless cat ladies."

"Dana? Come on!" Coates exclaimed.

White, however, had finally had enough. He reaffirmed his belief that both sides are guilty of petty rhetoric, before calling out the media.

"As voters, what we need to do is cut through all the BS, and you have to look at who do you think is best fit to run the country for the next four years? That is our job as voters," he said. "All of this stuff is a bunch of nasty BS — all of it. Who's best fit to run the country? You as a voter, that's what you need to decide."

"You guys, you guys are really bad. Fox is bad. Everybody's bad," he told Coates, referring to the news media.

Finally, Coates got the message despite leaving White visibly annoyed and frustrated. For the remainder of the interview, White and Coates discussed the UFC and the Paris Olympics.

(You can watch a video of their exchange here).

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

CNN host snaps when Kevin O'Leary points out why Trump civil fraud ruling is 'absolutely horrific': 'Hold on a second'



CNN anchor Laura Coates snapped at businessman Kevin O'Leary on Monday for insisting that Donald Trump is being treated unfairly.

On Monday, Trump's attorneys revealed the former president is unable to post the nearly half-billion dollars required of him to appeal the New York civil fraud ruling against him. New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) — who campaigned on targeting Trump — has repeatedly threatened to seize Trump's assets if he does not pay the outrageous fine.

Such a message, O'Leary told Coates, is "horrible" and uniquely anti-American.

"What a great message to send out all around the world. Take a claim where there was no money is lost. There was no fraud here in the context of actually people losing money. Deutsche Bank, who made the loan, was made whole," O'Leary said.

"Great message for New York. Great message for America," he mocked. "I think that was a statement that would be much better made sometime in Venezuela. I'm not kidding. That's a scary, scary message."

He continued, "There are no half a billion-dollar bonds. Never been done before. Never. This law has never been applied. Forget about Trump. Nothing to do with Trump. Everything to do about America and the New York brand. I love this state. My children live here. A horrible message to everybody around the world watching this. Absolutely horrific."

NEW: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary slams AG Letitia James and Judge Arthur Engoron seizing Donald Trump's assets 'like in Venezuela or Cuba' during heated CNN shouting match.

"This may be great for the attorney general, but this is not good for America."

"Forget about Trump. You… pic.twitter.com/yzb6YhPKfc
— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) March 19, 2024

O'Leary wasn't finished making his point, which was that James has not considered the long-term ramifications of targeting Trump. But Coates decided that O'Leary was done, and she began interrupting him.

"Wait, Kevin. Kevin, hold on a second," Coates interrupted. "Hold on a second."

But O'Leary continued speaking and tried to finish his idea, leading Coates to declare, "I have a wonderful voice, and it won’t be talked over!"

"What are you doing?" she then asked him.

"It's not America, but it is the 'Laura Coates Live' show, and I am speaking. So, that will be the rule. Not Venezuela," Coates continued. "It's 'Laura Coates Live.' And hello, my name is Laura Coates."

O'Leary has been a staunch critic of the ruling against Trump, famously declaring that he will never conduct business in New York again because of it.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Kevin O'Leary leaves CNN host astonished after dismantling New York attorney general's civil case against Trump: 'This is a joke'



Businessman Kevin O'Leary told CNN host Laura Coates on Thursday that "every" real estate developer is guilty of the alleged real-estate fraud that Donald Trump is found to have committed.

New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) is suing Trump, alleging the Trump Organization repeatedly overvalued its properties to lenders while reporting different property values to tax officials. A judge has already ruled that Trump committed fraud. The questions that remain in the case are how much the Trump Organization will be fined and what it means for future business.

Many people believe James pursued the case with political motives, an assessment O'Leary appears to agree with. In fact, he told Coates that every real estate developer everywhere is guilty of what Trump did.

O'Leary explained:

So, if you're a developer and you've got a building on a block anywhere in America and it's worth, let's say, $500 million and you want to build a building right beside it, you go to the bank and say, "This building is worth $500 million. I'd like to borrow a construction finance loan against this asset, and I want you to tell me it's worth 500 million, too." The bank negotiates with you and says, "Well, no, we think it's worth $400 million," and you fight it out.

You're always trying to show your assets in the brightest light with the sunshine you can possibly determine for them. You want them to be worth the very most because you're only going to get a 40% or 50% loan-to-value, as it's called. Then you borrow that money. In the case of a $500 million asset, maybe you get $250 million, and you build a new building with a construction finance loan.

"Forget about Trump: Every single real estate developer everywhere on Earth does this," O'Leary said.

The concern, then, should be who lost money? "Nobody," according to O'Leary, because the Trump Organization paid its bank loans. Thus, if James were to be consistent, she would sue "every real estate developer" in her jurisdiction, he said.

"If you're a real estate developer, you're watching this, you're saying, 'What is this? This is ridiculous!'" he said. "This is, for real estate developers, this is a joke."

The explanation, disarming the substance of James' case against Trump, left Coates shocked.

"It's fascinating to me to hear this perspective because you don't often hear it from that particular angle," she said.

"The first question, is everybody doing it in real estate? Yes, everybody is doing it, not only domestically, all around the world. This is how it works," O'Leary responded.

Closing arguments in the civil case took place on Thursday. James is asking a judge to fine Trump $370 million, but a final ruling is not expected for weeks. Even then, Trump will appeal the ruling.

For his part, O'Leary told Coates he believes the case will not survive an appeal.

'Every real estate developer everywhere does this': Kevin O'Leary reacts to Trump civil fraud case www.youtube.com

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

'Very suspicious': CNN panel raises all the right questions about David Weiss' sudden special counsel appointment



CNN anchor Jake Tapper exclaimed Friday that the timing of U.S. Attorney David Weiss' special counsel appointment is "very suspicious."

After Attorney General Merrick Garland shocked Washington with the appointment, Tapper and a CNN panel broke down the significance of the development and how it raises more questions than it answers.

Tapper, for example, questioned why the Hunter Biden case now merits a special counsel when, less than two months ago, Weiss was trying to push it across the finish line with a sweetheart plea deal.

"Does he know of stuff that should be in a special counsel investigation that wasn't in that plea deal? I mean, maybe he does, but then why do that plea deal?" Tapper questioned. "It's all very suspicious."

Among the other issues Tapper raised:

  • First, why choose Weiss when special counsels are normally non-U.S. government employees?
  • Second, why stick with Weiss when his plea deal was recently decimated by a federal judge?
  • Third, doesn't the appointment of Weiss as a special counsel confirm what IRS whistleblowers alleged?

"This move makes it seem as though, well, maybe the whistleblowers were right," Tapper explained. "Maybe what they were alleging is true, and he didn't have the ability to charge wherever he wanted to charge, and now he does. So I do have a lot of questions about that. And I do think some of the political questions being raised by Republicans have merit."

In a later panel segment with Tapper, CNN senior legal analyst Laura Coates, and reporter Paula Reid, more questions were raised.

Coates, noting that Garland claimed Weiss asked for special counsel powers just last week, asked: "Why now?"

Reid, moreover, questioned whether the motive for the appointment was "to insulate" the Justice Department if the case goes to trial and from House Republicans, who are investigating allegations of corruption involving Hunter Biden and President Joe Biden.

Finally, Tapper asked why Weiss is suddenly interested in prosecuting Hunter Biden for more potential crimes than those he had agreed to just weeks ago.

"Here's another one for you: OK, so I'm David Weiss, once again, play this game with me. I'm special counsel. Just a few weeks ago, I was ready to say, 'Eh, a diversion, a slap on the wrist, a misdemeanor.' Really, it was not a big punishment. And now I want special counsel authority to investigate something that just a few weeks ago I was basically saying this is the most I can prove in a court of law? That doesn't make sense to me either," Tapper said.

"By the way, I'm fully willing to believe there's a lot more to investigate and a lot more to charge him with, but that wasn't his position a few weeks ago," he noted.

Coates agreed the development "lends credence" to the IRS whistleblowers before asking a final question: Why did Weiss say two times that he had full authority to carry out the investigation in any direction that it led, yet now he feels that he needs special counsel authority?

"The whole thing is a disaster for everyone," Reid said to conclude the segment.

'Why now?': Move to appoint special counsel in Hunter Biden case raises questions www.youtube.com

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Jan. 6 police officer shocks CNN host when he compares Trump to Osama bin Laden: 'Donald Trump is a terrorist'



Former police officer Michael Fanone celebrated the newest indictment against former President Donald Trump by comparing the event to the U.S. military killing Osama bin Laden.

Fanone — a former Washington, D.C., police officer who was injured in the Jan. 6 riots at the U.S. Capitol and who now works as a CNN analyst — expressed joy that Trump was indicted for alleged conspiracies related to the 2020 presidential election.

"When I first learned about the indictment, I had a long conversation with a friend of mine, Ryan Reilly, and I told him how proud I felt to be an American at that moment, much in the way that I did when I learned that our military had killed Osama bin Laden," Fanone said on CNN late Tuesday. "I just felt incredibly proud."

The comment appeared to catch CNN host Laura Coates off guard.

"These two seem comparable to you?" she pushed back.

When Fanone tried to dodge the question, Coates interrupted him and forced him to respond.

"I believe they're comparable," he said. "Osama bin Laden was a terrorist who committed a horrific act against American people and against our republic. And I believe that Donald Trump is a terrorist who committed horrific acts against the American people."

— (@)

The statement clearly made Coates uncomfortable.

Unfortunately, she did not ask Fanone to clarify the "horrific acts" that he alleged Trump has committed, but the content of her follow up question — asking Fanone whether he believes his rhetoric may help "cloud people's view of this indictment as a fair process" — suggested she thought the statement was extreme.

"You can imagine that is a very eyebrow-raising statement, to say the least, the notion of Osama bin Laden in comparison to Donald Trump," she said.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!