Sen. Ron Johnson Asks DOJ To Investigate Judge Accused Of Misconduct In Trump Lawyers’ Trial

A judge with a 'grudge' against one of the defendants allegedly ghostwrote Wisconsin Judge John Hyland's August order denying a dismissal motion.

Target Of Leftist Lawfare Seeks To Remove Judge For ‘Judicial Misconduct’

Jim Troupis, Wisconsin attorney for the Trump campaign following the rigged 2020 election, is fighting a politically-driven prosecution.

The Supreme Court takes up New Jersey’s baseless assault on pro-life support for moms



New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin’s office was recently forced to make a stunning admission before the U.S. Supreme Court. During oral arguments, Platkin’s team conceded that although the state issued a sweeping subpoena against a pregnancy center — First Choice Women’s Resource Centers — the office had no complaints against the organization.

That admission stripped away any pretense that the attorney general was protecting consumers. It revealed the real motive: a fishing expedition into constitutionally protected internal records and private donor information for no reason other than First Choice’s commitment to life-affirming support for women. Now the court must decide whether New Jersey’s top law enforcement officer can bully pro-life charities out of helping women and families.

When First Choice made its case before the Supreme Court, it stood up for every American who believes mothers deserve compassion without harassment from the state.

What’s at stake is the work of pregnancy centers and charities nationwide that help women sustain their decision for life. These organizations provide the material and emotional resources mothers need to meet their own needs and the needs of their children.

Choosing life for an unborn child is never a one-time decision. It’s a daily commitment made amid financial, professional, emotional, or health-related pressures — and often in the face of serious challenges in securing food, clothing, housing, and other essentials. Women deserve support in every one of those areas so they can pursue their ambitions with their children. Pro-life Americans stand ready to offer that support. Platkin prefers abortion over help for moms.

Research shows that 60% of women who have had abortions would have preferred to choose life if they had more financial security or emotional support. Pregnancy centers and life-affirming organizations across the country confront this reality every day. Last year alone, they provided $452 million in support services, medical care, and material goods — all free of charge.

And the need keeps growing. Over the past two years, pregnancy centers increased their material assistance by 48% to ensure that women have what they need to thrive in pregnancy and early parenting. In 2024 alone, they served 1 million new clients.

When families face challenges beyond diapers and baby supplies, pregnancy centers rise to meet them. At Real Options Pregnancy Center in Texas, staff provided full Thanksgiving meals to local families. In Chicago, a center hosts an annual Christmas celebration so moms can put gifts under the tree. Across the country, community partners working with Her PLAN offer free car maintenance and help women escape trafficking and addiction, secure housing, and receive job training.

Every woman’s story is unique. Pregnancy centers recognize that dignity, which is why they collaborate with trusted community resources to provide comprehensive support tailored to each individual who walks through their doors.

This community network forms the pro-life safety net that Her PLAN strengthens through grassroots engagement and an online directory of vetted service providers across seven categories of care. For women with nowhere else to turn, this wraparound support provides stability, hope, and practical help.

RELATED: Leftist war on pro-life pregnancy centers faces Supreme Court reckoning

Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

Women who receive services from pregnancy centers report a 98% satisfaction rate. The real measure of success, however, is the women who later return to help others.

Courtney, once overwhelmed by two unexpected pregnancies, now works at the very center that supported her.

Jean Marie, who escaped human trafficking with the help of a New Hampshire pregnancy center, now runs a center in Vermont, using her experience to counsel vulnerable women.

In Northern Virginia, a maternity home helped Shawnte when she lost her job and housing. Today she works as a peer-recovery coach and credits the maternity home with giving her the strength not to abort “a child I knew I wanted, just because things got hard.”

These women — and countless others — were empowered by the pro-life safety net and now devote themselves to strengthening it for the next mother in crisis.

This is work that protects lives, stabilizes families, and strengthens communities. It deserves support, not intimidation from pro-abortion politicians. When First Choice made its case before the Supreme Court, it stood up for every American who believes mothers deserve compassion without harassment from the state.

Helping women is not controversial. It is love in action.

Top 5 Moments From SCOTUS Arguments In Key Pro-Life Pregnancy Center Case

'Now I don't know how to read that other than it's pretty self-executing to me, counsel,' said Justice Neil Gorsuch.

All I Want For Christmas Is A Republican Party That Actually Cares About Saving The Country

If Republicans keep focusing on performative politics, they're going to lock themselves out of government.

Justice Thomas Dismantles New Jersey’s Lawfare Against Pro-Life Center With A Single Question

In a stunning admission, Iyer acknowledged that the New Jersey AG's office hasn't 'had complaints about this specific center.'

New Docs Reveal Jack Smith Intentionally Violated Congressional Republicans’ Constitutional Rights

Smith never should have approved the subpoenas since they violated the congressional Republicans’ clearly established rights.

Comey, James Escape Justice For Now Thanks To Judicial Coup Against Presidential Power

'This abuse of judicial power was aided by the legislative branch,' legal analyst Keith Gross told The Federalist.

Judge Says US Attorney Lindsey Halligan Can’t Prosecute Comey Because Trump Appointed Her

An unelected, inferior-court activist judge tossed the grand jury indictment against disgraced former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James on Monday, arguing that federal prosecutor Lindsay Halligan was unlawfully appointed. Judge Cameron Currie, a Clinton appointee, ruled Monday that Halligan was unlawfully appointed and that the indictments against both Comey […]

Judge axes indictments against Trump foes James Comey, Letitia James



A federal judge dismissed the cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James Monday.

Senior U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie dismissed the two indictments, ruling that President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer Lindsey Halligan was invalidly appointed to her position.

'No one is above the law.'

Currie said that "all actions flowing from Ms. Halligan's defective appointment" to serve as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia "were unlawful exercises of executive power and hereby set aside."

Prosecutors who work alongside Halligan said U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has the authority to choose whom to appoint to the position and that the 120-day period interim U.S. attorneys serve operates as a temporary check-in system for appointees.

RELATED: Eric Swalwell offers melodramatic response to Trump DOJ probe: 'I refuse to live in fear'

Photo by Al Drago/Getty Images

“The implications of a contrary conclusion are extraordinary,” Currie said of Halligan's appointment. “It would mean the government could send any private citizen off the street — attorney or not — into the grand jury room to secure an indictment so long as the Attorney General gives her approval after the fact. That cannot be the law."

Currie dismissed the cases without prejudice, keeping the door open for the cases to be refiled, though whether they will be remains unclear. The Department of Justice may also opt to appeal Currie's decision. Blaze News reached out to Bondi's office for comment.

Comey was indicted in September for "serious crimes related to the disclosure of sensitive information," with the Department of Justice alleging that the former director lied to Congress.

“No one is above the law,” Bondi said in a statement following the indictment. “Today’s indictment reflects this Department of Justice’s commitment to holding those who abuse positions of power accountable for misleading the American people. We will follow the facts in this case.”

RELATED: Letitia James gives unhinged rant after court hearing for bank fraud allegations: 'This is not about me!'

Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

James was indicted shortly after Comey in October over allegations of bank fraud and providing false statements to a financial institution. If James had been convicted, she would have faced up to 30 years in prison and up to $1 million in fines on each count.

"The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust," Halligan said in a statement following the indictment. “The facts and the law in this case are clear, and we will continue following them to ensure that justice is served.”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!