'Just a waiting game': AG Paxton tells Glenn Beck what fate awaits absentee Texas Democrats



Texas House Democrats fled to Illinois and other blue states on Sunday in an effort to thwart the people's will and to block the passage of a redistricting plan that would help the GOP gain five more congressional pickup opportunities ahead of the midterm elections.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) gave the "derelict Democrat House members" an ultimatum: Return to Texas and show up at work by 3:00 p.m. on Monday or face possible removal.

The absentee legislators, evidently keen to test their luck, refused to show up.

Attorney General Ken Paxton told Blaze Media co-founder Glenn Beck on Tuesday that the Texas Democrats are playing a "waiting game" that they will ultimately lose.

"I honestly would have locked them up when they were in the House. [The] Texas House speaker could have shut the doors and kept everybody in," said Paxton. "We did that back in 2003, and once the doors are locked, you can't get out, and you can spend the night there, and you vote."

Paxton noted that by failing to lock the lawmakers in for the vote on the redistricting plan, "they've let the cat out of the bag. The cat's gone. So now you need to arrest them, which you're not going to get help from jurisdictions like Illinois, Boston, or New York."

RELATED: Abbott orders arrests of 'derelict' Democrats after they flout his deadline

Texas House Democrats abandoning their posts on Sunday. Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images

After Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) announced Monday afternoon that a "quorum is not present," the Texas House passed a motion to issue arrest warrants for the Democrats who abandoned their posts.

Abbott subsequently announced that he had ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to "locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans."

Paxton suggested that while it is unlikely the absentee legislators will be arrested out of state, they'll inevitably "have to come back. They have jobs; they have families. They're not going to live in Illinois. It's cold up there. And New York's cold. Boston's cold. So they come back and we vote."

'Governor Abbott is not going to back down.'

While some Texas Democrats could face felony charges for allegedly soliciting funds to break quorum and evade the associated $500-per-day fine — Abbott ordered the Texas Rangers to investigate the delinquent Democrats for "potential" violations of Texas law, including bribery — the civil arrests awaiting the absentee legislators will not lead to jail time.

"It's not a prison sentence," Paxton told Beck. "I mean, unless you consider being on the Texas House floor, which I often did, a prison sentence. But the doors are shut, and you're stuck with all those people."

Beck pressed Paxton about the governor's threat of removal, whereby a district court could apparently determine that a legislator has forfeited office due to abandonment, then remove the legislator from office, thereby creating a vacancy.

RELATED: Democrat offers bizarre spin on imploding support for his party — and he's getting amazing backlash

Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images

The Texas attorney general, whose 2021 opinion was the cited basis of Abbott's plan, noted that removals would change the threshold of present bodies necessary for a quorum, possibly speeding things along, and that Abbott might be able to appoint replacements for the removed legislators, "at least until there's a special election."

As with the arrests, the removal plan does not appear to be a particularly swift remedy.

"It's definitely not a fast process, although we're trying to figure out a way to fast-track it so that we can get an answer sooner rather than later," said Paxton. "Otherwise, it's just a waiting game."

"In the end, we know how it's going to turn out," added Paxton, "because Governor Abbott is not going to back down, and he'll just keep calling them back until they show up."

— (@)
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Jasmine Crockett tries to kill story portraying her as 'brusque,' self-absorbed, and frustrating to her fellow Dems



A weekend profile piece on Democratic firebrand Jasmine Crockett revealed some unflattering details about the Texas representative.

On Sunday, the Atlantic published an article titled "A Democrat for the Trump Era," a piece about Crockett's "style of politics."

'Does that cause headaches for other members? 100 percent.'

The article, written by Elaine Godfrey, claimed that the representative's "coarser" technique is a matched response to the "insult-comedy-style attacks" that the Republican Party has "embraced under Trump," highlighting that multiple polls revealed Democratic voters are seeking "a fighter."

However, the Atlantic's piece did not fully portray Crockett positively, describing her at one point as "brusque" and effectively depicting her as a self-absorbed politician who continues to frustrate her Democratic colleagues.

According to the article, Crockett cited her social media following as a key reason she should have been selected by her fellow lawmakers to lead the House Oversight Committee.

"It's like, there's one clear person in the race that has the largest social-media following," Crockett told the Atlantic.

Crockett reportedly "complained" that Congressional Black Caucus members were planning on throwing their support behind a representative who was not a member.

RELATED: July shows strong signs of a coming and violent Democratic implosion

Rep. Robert Garcia. Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) ultimately grabbed the top spot, beating out three other opponents by securing 33 votes. Crockett landed in last place with only six votes.

The representative also told the news outlet that a May clip of her speaking out about Immigration and Customs Enforcement during a House Judiciary subcommittee hearing racked up over 797,000 views.

"I know this because she told me," Godfrey wrote.

The Atlantic stated that Crockett "monitors social-media engagement like a day trader checks her portfolio," noting that her phone's lock screen "is a headshot of herself."

During her campaign for the Oversight Committee position, Crockett reportedly joined a virtual meeting to pitch her candidacy, but afterward, she admitted to being unsure which committee she had just gotten off the call with.

"It was a virtual meeting of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, she'd explained to me beforehand. But then, after the call, she wasn't sure. 'CAPAC is the Asian caucus, right?' she asked. 'Yes,' the aide confirmed. 'That would've been bad,' Crockett said with a laugh," the Atlantic reported.

RELATED: Jasmine Crockett somehow makes the Texas flood tragedy all about herself

Rep. Jasmine Crockett. Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Senior staffers told the news outlet that other Democratic lawmakers view Crockett as "undisciplined but are reluctant to criticize her publicly."

One of the staffers told Godfrey that Crockett "likes to talk," adding that she can sometimes be "a loose cannon."

"Does that cause headaches for other members? 100 percent," the staffer remarked.

The Atlantic reported that several days before the article was scheduled to publish, Crockett called to pull the plug on the piece, claiming she was unhappy that the outlet had contacted other lawmakers.

"As for her colleagues, four days before this story was published, Crockett called me to express frustration that I had reached out to so many House members without telling her first. She was, she told me, 'shutting down the profile and revoking all permissions,'" the outlet wrote.

Crockett's office did not respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital or the New York Post.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Why It’s Hard To Make Sense Of The ‘Mishmash’ In Republicans’ ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’

Even if the bill passes and gets signed into law, the policy muddle inside it will prove difficult to explain and defend.

How Republicans’ Spineless Gimmick To Extend Trump Tax Cuts Could Expand Obamacare Too

Rather than paring back spending, Senate Republicans are pushing an accounting gimmick to make it look like a Tax Cuts and Jobs Act extension costs nothing.

Sen. Cruz and GOP colleagues reintroduce constitutional amendment to impose term limits



Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and some of his Republican colleagues recently reintroduced legislation that would amend the U.S. Constitution to limit lawmakers from serving more than two six-year terms in the U.S. Senate or three two-year terms in the House of Representatives.

While the Texas Tribune and other publications have eagerly pointed out that Cruz has exceeded his own proposed limit, the Republican senator has beat the drum for better turnover in Washington for years, first proposing a constitutional amendment to impose term limits in 2017.

After proposing the amendment again with former Rep. Francis Rooney (R-Fla.) in 2019 and with the backing of Republican Sens. Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Mike Lee (Utah) and former Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.), Cruz stated, "Term limits on members of Congress offer a solution to the brokenness we see in Washington, D.C. It is long past time for Congress to hold itself accountable."

Later that year, Cruz said when chairing a Senate Judiciary's subcommittee on the Constitution hearing on term limits,

[In] the 2016 election, the American people made a resounding call to "drain the swamp" that is modern Washington. And sadly this is a bipartisan problem. The American people have lost confidence in Washington, and especially in Congress. It isn't hard to see why. Enmeshed in backroom deals and broken promises, our capital has too often become a political playground for the powerful and the well-connected, for members of the permanent political class looking to accumulate more and more power at the expense of American taxpayers.

"Every year, Congress spends billions of dollars on giveaways for the well-connected. Washington insiders get taxpayer money; members of Congress get re-elected and the system works for everyone except the American people," continued Cruz, who reintroduced his amendment in 2021 and 2023. "This kind of self-interest builds on itself as members spend more time in office. In an age in which partisan divide seem intractable, it is remarkable that public support for congressional term limits remains strong across party lines."

The Center Square reported that Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) introduced the companion resolution of the term limit legislation in the House, stating, "Those of us in Congress ought to serve for a reasonable period of time and then return home to live under the laws we enacted."

There is overwhelming bipartisan support for term limits.

A Pew Research Center survey conducted in July 2023 found that 90% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents and 86% of Democrats and Democratic leaners support limiting the number of terms that members of Congress can serve.

The survey also found that 79% of all respondents signaled support for a maximum age limit for elected officials in the nation's capital.

'Power is an elixir that is hard to put down.'

A January 2023 Congressional Research Service report indicated that whereas during most of the 19th century, the average tenure of members of Congress remained steady, there was a dramatic increase in how long lawmakers spent in both the Senate and House of Representatives.

Whereas the prior House service of incoming Representatives was, on average, 2.5 years in the 19th century, the CRS indicated that has shot up to an average of 9.4 years in the 21st century. Meanwhile, incoming senators averaged 4.8 years of prior chamber service in the 19th century, whereas in the 21st century, that figure has risen to 11.2 years.

While term limits could potentially serve to prevent the solidification of a permanent ruling class in Washington, D.C., they could also spare the country from transforming further into a gerontocracy and spare the American people from rule by potentially medically compromised lawmakers.

Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley (Iowa), the longest-serving senator in the previous Congress and the oldest lawmaker in the Senate chamber who is set to finish his current term at the age of 95, was briefly hospitalized in 2024.

Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell (Ky.), another geriatric lawmaker and the longest-serving Senate party leader in American history, has similarly had health issues in recent months and years, freezing up when fielding questions, repeatedly tripping, and receiving treatment for a concussion.

The late Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein first took office in a 1992 special election and was re-elected five times. Despite clear signs of mental deterioration — signaling at times she didn't know where she was going or where she had been — her aides and allies kept wheeling her into the Senate and allegedly telling her how to cast votes.

A Pentagon-funded study highlighted in 2023 how elderly government officials' mental degradation could pose significant risks to national and global security.

The RAND Corporation's National Security Research Division indicated that as a consequence of people living longer and working later in life, "The workforce might experience a higher prevalence of dementia than in past generations."

"Taken together, we believe that an increasing number of cleared personnel — that is, personnel who hold or have held security clearances — have or will have dementia," concluded the RAND researchers.

Return managing editor Peter Gietl previously noted in a piece on America's "octogenarian oligarchy" that "our present-day leadership seem to have no interest in enjoying their golden years with their families, spending the hundreds of millions they've accumulated. Power is an elixir that is hard to put down."

Cruz's proposed constitutional amendment will require a two-thirds majority vote both in the U.S. House and Senate.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Why Senators Would Rather Stick To The Status Quo Than Move On From The McConnell Era

Will a change in personnel actually lead to a change in how the Senate operates?

How GOP Lawmakers Should Handle 2025’s ‘Fiscal Cliff’ No Matter Who’s In The White House

Should divided government remain a reality next year, Republicans have a major leverage point to use in fiscal negotiations.

Apathy Is The Biggest Threat To Medicare And The Federal Budget

Politicians now have a continued excuse to duck tough choices and extend Medicare's insolvency until 2036.

Earmarks Are Never A Winning Political Strategy

At some point, the restrictions and limitations should cause Congress to ask an obvious question: Is all this worth the hassle?