YouTube Throws In Towel, Agrees To Fork Over Millions To Trump After Suspending Account
YouTube agrees to pay Trump $24.5 million
Medical groups, foreign health organizations, and some lawmakers threw a conniption this week after President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dared to take action over the apparent association between autism and prenatal exposure to acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol.
A popular tactic taken by critics was to refute a claim the Trump administration wasn't making, namely that acetaminophen was causally linked to autism.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, for example, stated, "In more than two decades of research on the use of acetaminophen in pregnancy, not a single reputable study has successfully concluded that the use of acetaminophen in any trimester of pregnancy causes neurodevelopmental disorders in children."
Of course, the point the administration was making concerns the apparent correlation, not causation, between Tylenol use during pregnancy and autism in children — a correlation that has been borne out in numerous studies published in reputable peer-reviewed scientific journals such as Environmental Health, JAMA Psychiatry, Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics, and the International Journal of Epidemiology.
While such studies evidently have not swayed organizations cozy with the pharmaceutical industry, they certainly caused alarm behind the scenes at the very company that made Tylenol for six decades.
Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson made the acetaminophen product Tylenol available over the counter in 1960. In 2023, J&J spun off its consumer health care division Kenvue as an independent company, which now makes the drug.
Damning internal documents recently obtained by the Daily Caller indicate that years before J&J parted ways with Tylenol, some of its senior scientists admitted that a possible association existed between Tylenol and autism.
RELATED: Fact-check: Tylenol confirms 2017 pregnancy warning tweet is authentic

For instance, when serving as the U.S. director of epidemiology for J&J's pharmaceutical arm Janssen in 2018, Rachel Weinstein noted in an email, "The weight of evidence is starting to feel heavy to me."
After referencing "studies in prenatal exposure and neurodev outcome," Weinstein wrote, "It looks like there are a bunch of papers from 2016 that we somehow missed. Many of them by Liew et al."
One of the papers Weinstein may have been referring to was a study published in the international journal Autism Research. The study indicated that maternal use of acetaminophen for over 20 weeks of pregnancy "increased the risk of [autism spectrum disorder] or infantile autism with hyperkinetic symptoms almost twofold."
The company documents were provided to the Caller by the law firm Keller Postman, which is leading a class-action lawsuit against Kenvue as well as against retailers that sell their own store-branded acetaminophen.
Ashley Keller, lead attorney for the families whose suit will be heard before the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit beginning on Oct. 9, told Blaze News, "The emails confirm that the company's nothing-to-see-here response to the administration's announcement is pure spin."
"Internally, the company was aware of the growing body of scientific evidence linking prenatal Tylenol use to neurodevelopmental harm in offspring," Keller added.
'There are dozens of studies showing a link between Tylenol and neurodevelopmental harm in offspring.'
Weinstein wrote in a 2014 letter to one of the researchers behind the 2014 study titled "Acetaminophen use during pregnancy, behavioral problems, and hyperkinetic disorders," which was published in JAMA Pediatrics, "We recognize the substantial strengths of the study and the data sources."
That study concluded, "Maternal acetaminophen use during pregnancy is associated with a higher risk for HKDs and ADHD-like behaviors in children."
Referencing her correspondence with the researcher on the 2014 paper, Weinstein and other top J&J scientists considered backing follow-up studies; however, she then noted, "Do we really need to stick our neck out and make this offer?"
Slides for a 2018 internal presentation labeled "privileged and confidential" discussed epidemiological studies concerning potential links between Tylenol and various neurodevelopmental disorders. The slide summarizing the studies under review states, "Individual observational studies show a somewhat consistent association of increased occurrence of neurodevelopmental outcomes with prenatal exposure."
Internal communications further indicate that some J&J employees were reportedly also aware of a 2018 scientific review that indicated nine recent studies had suggested "an increased risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes following prenatal [acetaminophen] exposure."
The Caller indicated that Weinstein could not be reached for comment.
A spokesperson for J&J told the Daily Caller, "Johnson & Johnson divested its consumer health business years ago, and all rights and liabilities associated with the sale of its over-the-counter products, including Tylenol (acetaminophen), are owned by Kenvue."
The current maker of Tylenol, Kenvue, in turn continued downplaying a link between its drug and autism.
"Nothing is more important to us than the health and safety of the people who use our products," said Kenvue spokeswoman Melissa Witt. "We have continuously evaluated the science and continue to believe there is no causal link between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and autism."
When asked about Kenvue's assertion that "there is no credible science that shows taking acetaminophen causes autism," Keller, the attorney representing families in the class-action lawsuit against Kenvue, told Blaze News, "To quote the late, great Justice Scalia: 'Pure applesauce.'"
Alluding to some of the credible science that has been undertaken to date, Keller underscored there is cause for concern.
"There are dozens of studies showing a link between Tylenol and neurodevelopmental harm in offspring. The direct measurement studies that look at biomarkers all show dose response (more Tylenol, more risk)," Keller said. "They also show very elevated odds ratios (double, triple, quadruple, even quintupling of the risk). The animal models, which can control for genetics far better than human observational studies, show that acetaminophen is neurotoxic."
"Does that mean causation has been definitively established? No, it is simply likely," Keller continued. "But even if you only think it is plausible, we shouldn't have to wait for definitive proof of causation before we warn pregnant women of risks."
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
President Donald Trump announced Monday that he has filed a $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the New York Times, saying that the paper has served as a "mouthpiece" for the Democratic Party and illegally aided Kamala Harris's presidential campaign last year.
The post Trump Sues New York Times for Defamation, Saying Paper Has Become 'Mouthpiece' for Democrats appeared first on .
Democratic megadonor David Geffen, known for hosting the Obamas and celebrities like Oprah Winfrey on his $450 million superyacht, is accused of plying his ex-porn star husband—50 years his junior—with drugs and trotting him around the globe as a "paid sex worker" to show off to his famous friends, according to a bombshell lawsuit.
The post 'Sick Game': Democratic Megadonor David Geffen, 82, Faces Sordid Grooming Lawsuit from Porn Star Husband, 32, as Top Cultural Centers Take His Millions and Toast Him on Both Coasts appeared first on .
Donald Trump’s base has reached a clear conclusion: The entire importation of white-collar workers from India was a scam. It replaced American workers, fueled outsourcing to India, and boosted its economy at the expense of our own.
The labor market is so weak that even legal visa programs should be suspended under Trump’s 212(f) authority. Yet the H-1B and L visa pipelines remain open, and worse, the Trump Justice Department is defending one of Obama’s most lawless expansions: the H-4 spousal work program.
Defending Obama’s H-4 visa scheme undermines both the law and the American workforce.
Save Jobs USA, representing American workers, has sued the government for continuing Obama’s program that grants work permits to H-1B spouses on H-4 visas. Congress authorized the H-4 visa, but it never authorized work permits. Obama simply created them in 2015 by executive fiat.
Because the program is untethered from statutory limits, it has no cap. While the U.S. still issues around 120,000 H-1B visas each year — including under Trump — hundreds of thousands of spouses now work illegally in the same industries, displacing Americans. Most are funneled into the tech sector, overwhelmingly from India.
This lawsuit has been winding through the courts for nearly a decade. It began after Southern California Edison fired American workers and replaced them with H-1B visa holders. Both district and appellate courts in D.C. sided with the government. Now, as the case reaches the Supreme Court, Trump’s Justice Department filed a brief — signed off by Pam Bondi — arguing that plaintiffs lack standing to sue.
“Petitioner did not identify a single member who is ‘suffering immediate or threatened injury’ that is fairly traceable to the 2015 rule,” government lawyers wrote last month.
Even if one debates the technicalities of standing, why would Bondi waste resources defending a program that is plainly illegal and harmful to American workers — the opposite of what Trump promised in 2015?
Seven months into the new administration, the broader picture looks grim. The White House has failed to slow worker visa programs outside of narrow national security concerns. Trump has not invoked his 212(f) authority to halt needless foreign labor. Instead, he has floated the idea of importing 600,000 Chinese students — an economic and national security risk rolled into one.
This is the worst possible time to flood the market with foreign workers. The economy has averaged just 35,000 new jobs a month, the weakest pace since the Great Recession. Entry-level job listings are down 15% while applications are up 30%. The class of 2024 is still struggling: 41% underemployed, 58% still searching.
Tech companies, meanwhile, continue layoffs by the tens of thousands this year even as they lobby for more H-1Bs:
Why would they seek more visas in the middle of layoffs? Because nearly half of H-1Bs go to outsourcing and staffing firms, which feed India’s tech industry while hollowing out our own. Each expansion of the visa pipeline means more outsourcing, not more prosperity for Americans.
RELATED: American universities should be for Americans

The deeper problem is the growing partnership between this administration and multinational tech giants. The government even owns a 10% equity stake in Intel. Palantir, which holds sensitive defense and health databases, has been allowed to staff up with foreign workers who now handle American taxpayers’ critical data.
Against this backdrop, Bondi’s defense of Obama’s illegal spousal work program looks less like a legal technicality and more like a political signal: This administration is drifting from Trump’s 2015 America First promises and closer to the “America Last” priorities of multinational corporations.
The case against foreign workers is even stronger now than when Trump rode down that golden escalator a decade ago. The economy is weaker, the job market tighter, and the outsourcing racket more blatant. Defending Obama’s H-4 visa scheme undermines both the law and the American workforce.
The administration needs to remember what brought Trump to power in the first place. Stop importing foreign labor. Shut down lawless programs. Put American workers first.
A New York appeals court on Thursday threw out a $500 million civil fraud fine against President Donald Trump, ruling that the "excessive" penalty imposed last year in Democratic state attorney general Letitia James's case is unconstitutional.
The post Appeals Court Vacates 'Excessive' Fine Against Trump in Case That President Called a 'Witch Hunt' appeared first on .
A Democrat New York judge ordered President Donald Trump and his sons in February to pay hundreds of millions of dollars over a lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The civil lawsuit claimed that the president defrauded banks and other organizations by overestimating the value of his properties in order to secure favorable bank loans and other benefits. The bank denied any wrongdoing, and critics attacked the case for comically devaluing the president's iconic and profitable properties.
A New York state appeals court delivered to Trump a major boon on Thursday, noting that while the injunctive relief ordered by New York Judge Arthur Engoron "is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution."
Appellate Division Judge Peter Moulton called out Letitia James in his concurring opinion, writing that the "Attorney General did not carry her initial burden" of establishing an approximate total of the profits directly linked to Trumps' supposed violations.
Moulton added, "Indeed, the calculation of the disgorgement in this case was far from a reasonable approximation."
The president celebrated the ruling, writing on Truth Social:
TOTAL VICTORY in the FAKE New York State Attorney General Letitia James Case! I greatly respect the fact that the Court had the Courage to throw out this unlawful and disgraceful Decision that was hurting Business all throughout New York State. Others were afraid to do business there. The amount, including Interest and Penalties, was over $550 Million Dollars. It was a Political Witch Hunt, in a business sense, the likes of which no one has ever seen before.
Trump further characterized this instance of lawfare as a case of election interference and emphasized that Engoron was a "Political Hack" and that James is a "Corrupt and Incompetent Attorney General who only brought this Case in order to hurt me politically."
'NO MORE LAWFARE!'
The president thanked the court, especially David Friedman, associate justice of the New York Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Department.
Eric Trump, who operates the Trump Organization with his brother Donald Trump Jr., said of the ruling, "Total victory in the sham NY Attorney General case!!! After 5 years of hell, justice prevailed!"
Donald Trump Jr. wrote, "It was always a witch hunt, election interference, and a total miscarriage of justice[,] and even a left leaning NY appeals court agrees! NO MORE LAWFARE!"
Trump ally and Turning Point USA CEO Charlie Kirk noted, "They tried to impeach him, bankrupt him, imprison him, and assassinate him. They failed."
This is a developing story.
Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Former Paramount chairwoman Shari Redstone pushed to settle President Donald Trump's lawsuit against CBS News in part because she feared that Trump's lawyers might seize on the network's editing of an interview with a "drowsy" Joe Biden and inflict further reputational damage, according to a report from the New York Times.
The post Ex-Paramount Chair Shari Redstone Privately Worried That Trump Could Sue Over CBS Interview With 'Drowsy' Joe Biden and Bring Embarrassing Internal Documents to Light appeared first on .