'The Left is completely out of control': New Mexico GOP headquarters torched in 'horrific attack'



The Republican Party headquarters in Albuquerque was set ablaze and defaced with graffiti early Sunday morning in what the party characterized as a "horrific attack, fueled by hatred and intolerance."

Firefighters with Albuquerque Fire Rescue and Bernalillo County Fire Rescue were dispatched to the scene at 5:56 a.m. following a report of a structure fire. Fire devoured the entryway while smoke filled the building. Firefighters were able to subdue the blaze within five minutes of their arrival.

New Mexico GOP Chairwoman Amy Barela confirmed that no one was harmed in "what could have been a tragic and deadly attack" and indicated that the party is presently working with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, local law enforcement, and federal investigators to help "bring those responsible to justice and ensure they are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law"

"Those who resort to violence to undermine our state and nation must be held accountable, and our state leaders must reinforce through decisive action that these cowardly attacks will not be tolerated," Barela said in a statement. "The Republican Party of New Mexico will not be silenced."

In addition to its apparent firebombing, the headquarters was defaced with spray paint. A message painted on the exterior wall read, "ICE=KKK."

'The Left is completely out of control.'

Weeks before the attack, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced the arrest of 48 illegal aliens in Albuquerque, Santa Fe, and Roswell who "either remained in the country despite being ordered removed by an immigration judge or were charged or convicted of serious crimes while they were illegally present in the United States."

Twenty of the illegal aliens captured had previously been arrested or convicted on serious offenses including murder, rape, domestic abuse, aggravated battery, drug trafficking, burglary, driving under the influence, and shoplifting.

While Republicans' support for ICE and its effective enforcement of the law may have rankled some potential attackers, Republican state Rep. John Block indicated that Democratic rhetoric may have also played a role.

'This is not an isolated incident.'

"Yesterday @TeresaForNM told her radical followers to 'agitate,'" tweeted Block. "This morning, the @NewMexicoGOP HQ was firebombed. Coincidence? No. Her loyal followers also continue to attack Teslas at dealerships on tribal land."

U.S. Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-N.M.) spoke about fighting the Trump administration's deliverance on campaign promises and urged fellow Democrats at a town hall in New Mexico hours before the firebombing to "agitate," reported the New Mexican.

Fernandez denounced the arson attack in a statement Sunday and suggested that she was speaking about "love in action" at her Saturday town hall.

The Democratic Party of New Mexico similarly condemned the firebombing, underscoring that peaceful discourse and organization constitute the only ways to resolve political differences in the United States.

The New Mexico GOP noted in a statement, "This is not an isolated incident. It is part of a disturbing pattern of politically motivated violence that has plagued our country — fueled in part by the silence and implicit encouragement from progressive leaders who refuse to condemn these acts."

While leftists have repeatedly targeted pro-life pregnancy centers, churches, and conservative lawmakers in recent years, radicals have begun attacking Tesla vehicles, charging stations, and dealerships in response to Elon Musk working for the Trump administration — attacks Attorney General Pam Bondi recently deemed "domestic terrorism."

GOP Chairman Michael Whatley stated, "Whether it's vandalizing Tesla dealerships or burning GOP HQs, the Left is completely out of control. Every Democrat who doesn't condemn violence like this is responsible for it."

"Let us not forget: it was the Democrat Party that once supported the formation of the KKK, pushed Jim Crow laws, and defended slavery. Today, we see the same dangerous tendencies play out in new forms — attempts to suppress free speech, silence dissent, and use fear to control the political narrative," said Barela. "Our fight is not just for our party — it's for every New Mexican who wants a safer, freer, and more accountable state. We will never back down."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Trump flushes woke programs at Smithsonian museums, orders return of leftist-targeted statues



The left's long march through the institutions was a resounding success. Numerous businesses, churches, libraries, law enforcement agencies, schools, and other organizations have for decades served as incubators for radical activists and amplifiers for pernicious ideologies.

Leftist marchers are, however, now being routed.

Conservatives and other normalcy advocates have in recent years undertaken a reconquest, enjoying success with certain academic institutions such as the New College of Florida as well as major businesses including Walmart, Harley-Davidson, and John Deere.

President Donald Trump — who has taken an axe to DEI, critical race theory, and gender ideology in the federal government and in federally funded organizations — continued his D.C.-focused purge of radicalism on Thursday, this time taking aim at the nation's premier museums.

Trump intends to rid the Smithsonian Institution, its 21 museums and 14 education and research centers, and the National Zoo of radical leftist programs, policies, and installations.

In an executive order titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," the president noted, "Over the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth."

'Museums in our Nation's capital should be places where individuals go to learn — not to be subjected to ideological indoctrination.'

"This revisionist movement seeks to undermine the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light," continued Trump. "Under this historical revision, our Nation's unparalleled legacy of advancing liberty, individual rights, and human happiness is reconstructed as inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed."

Trump slammed the Biden administration for advancing this "corrosive ideology" and cited the following as examples of the anti-American propaganda at issue.

  • The Smithsonian American Art Museum's exhibit "The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture," which represents that "[s]ocieties including the United States have used race to establish and maintain systems of power, privilege, and disenfranchisement."
  • The National Museum of African American History and Culture's assertions that the nuclear family, rugged individualism, self-reliance, prioritization of work over play, emphasis on rational linear thinking, punctuality, decisiveness, and a future-oriented outlook are "aspects and assumptions of whiteness and white culture in the United States."
  • The "forthcoming Smithsonian American Women's History Museum plans on celebrating the exploits of male athletes participating in women's sports."

The Smithsonian also enraged conservatives in recent years with the National Museum of American History's Hispanic exhibit portraying religion and history through a Marxist lens and the Smithsonian Institution's 2020 "Girlhood" exhibit featuring the racist founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, and a medical transvestite.

Trump directed Vice President JD Vance to work with senior staffers to "remove improper ideology" from the Smithsonian Institution and its museums, education and research centers, and the National Zoo.

Trump also tasked Vance and Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, to work with congressional lawmakers to ensure that Congress avoids bankrolling exhibits or programs at the Smithsonian Institution that "degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy."

Cognizant and critical of the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum's initiative to feature male cross-dressers in future exhibits, Trump also insisted that the museum does "not recognize men as women in any respect."

"Museums in our Nation's capital should be places where individuals go to learn — not to be subjected to ideological indoctrination or divisive narratives that distort our shared history," said Trump's order.

In addition to flushing leftist radicalism out of the Smithsonian museums, Trump — whose administration has been reverting the names of federal lands and military bases to what they were before Joe Biden took office — set his sights on a restoration of that which the iconoclasts of yesteryear chose to eliminate from the public consciousness.

Radicals both inside and outside government committed to a campaign of destruction and deracination in the wake of George Floyd's death in 2020, digging up graves, toppling statues, renaming animals, melting down busts, and knocking out church windows.

Trump directed Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum to figure out whether public monuments, memorials, statues, or other properties within the Interior Department's jurisdiction were removed or changed during this radical campaign "to perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology."

The president demanded further the reinstatement of pre-existing monuments that were removed.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Colorado Democrats: State can save money by funding abortion, killing 30% more babies



Colorado Democrats are more than willing to blow taxpayer money on programs for illegal aliens; however, when it comes to coverage for American mothers and their unborn babies, they will apparently appeal to lethal ways to reduce spending.

State Democrats are advancing legislation that would enshrine the right to abortion in the state constitution; require the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing to fund abortions for Medicaid and Child Health Plan Plus program participants using taxpayer dollars; and force public employee insurance plans to fund abortions for plan members — something they are not presently required to do.

Senate Bill 183 — a consequence of Colorado voters' overwhelming support last year for Colorado Amendment 79, which set the stage for the use of public funds for abortion — passed the state Senate in a 22-12 party-line vote on March 12.

Prior to the bill passing the committee on health and human services on Tuesday, Colorado House Speaker Julie McCluskie (D), a prime sponsor of the legislation, indicated that the use of taxpayer funds to kill babies could save the state a little bit of money.

"That savings comes from the averted births that will not occur because abortions happened instead," McCluskie said in a video shared to social media. "So a birth is more expensive than an abortion — so the saving comes in Medicaid births that will not occur."

"This bill will actually decrease costs for our health care policy and financing department, our Medicaid expenditures, in both this year and out years as the savings from averted births outweigh the costs of covering reproductive health care for all Coloradans," continued McCluskie, who was endorsed last year by Planned Parenthood.

'Abortion care services represent a one-time expenditure.'

While the Colorado House speaker indicated the state will initially see an "increase to general fund of $1.5 million," over time, the taxpayer-subsidized elimination of human life will ultimately lead to "cost savings."

McCluskie was referencing a state fiscal analysis that made the following assumptions and assertions:

  • 333,330 women ages 15 to 44 will be enrolled in Medicaid or the Child Health Plan Plus program in fiscal year 2025-2026;
  • 1.67% of members from this cohort will seek abortions each year;
  • 50.4% of abortions will be performed "procedurally" and 49.6% will be chemical abortions;
  • "abortion procedures are assumed to be reimbursed at a rate of $1,300, and medication abortions are assumed to be reimbursed at a rate of $800";
  • taxpayer-funded abortions through Medicaid/CHP+ will increase the number of unborn babies killed by 30%; and
  • the average reimbursement cost for child birth is $3,850, which is funded by state and federal programs.

According to Democrats' calculus, abortions will not only save the state on total reimbursement costs for the delivery of children but will likely also spare the state from having to deal with additional costs that might arise in relation to human beings whose lives they failed to "avert."

"Medicaid-covered births typically involve additional social safety net impacts for the child, whereas abortion care services represent a one-time expenditure. These impacts have not been addressed in this fiscal note," said the fiscal note on SB 183.

"On net, the bill will decrease costs for HCPF by about $286,000 in FY 2025-26 and $573,000 in FY 2026-27 and ongoing," continued the fiscal note. "These impacts are the net result of increased costs for abortion services and decreased costs from averted births."

State Rep. Kenneth G. DeGraaf (R) tweeted, "Holy Human-Haters, Batman! 'Killing people is less expensive than caring for them' coming soon from a eugenicist near you."

"Paying for abortions for low income women will save our state millions of dollars on 'averted births,'" wrote Republican state Rep. Brandi Bradley. "Margaret Sanger would be so proud."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

San Francisco rolls out Newsom-approved program fining speeders based on income



San Francisco recently became the first city in California to install speed cameras as part of a broader program aimed at reducing speeding, improving traffic safety, and preventing traffic-related fatalities.

While the initiative had the makings of an inoffensive program purposed around making high-injury thoroughfares and school zones safer, the state Democrats behind it apparently permitted their ideology to corrupt the novel Speed Safety System Pilot Program, transforming it into a three-tier equity-attuned penalty system.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) ratified legislation in 2023 authorizing San Francisco and a handful of other cities in the state to establish a Speed Safety System Pilot Program.

Under the program, clearly identified speed cameras can be positioned on streets approved for enforcement. These cameras, which must be placed at least 500 feet after signs stating both the speed limit and "Photo Enforced," take photos of the rear license plates of vehicles traveling 11 miles per hour or more over the posted speed limit. The vehicle's registered owner subsequently receives a citation.

'A designated jurisdiction shall reduce the applicable fines and penalties by 80 percent for indigent persons.'

SF Gate reported that the cameras, operated by the Arizona-based transportation company Verra Mobility, will not use facial recognition.

According to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, 33 cameras have been installed across the city.

Well over half of the cameras are not currently operational. Those actively snapping pictures are more or less warming the public up to the idea of their presence as the law justifying it requires that participating cities issue warning notices rather than notices of violations for speeding offenses detected within the first 60 days of the program.

Real fines will be issued for violations after this grace period with the exception to individuals subject to criminal penalties for the same act. Violations recorded by the cameras will result only in contestable civil penalties and, according to the legislation, "shall not result in the [Department of Motor Vehicles] suspending or revoking the privilege of a violator to drive a motor vehicle or in a violation point being assessed against the violator."

The Democratic legislation that produced this speed-trap scheme states that "a designated jurisdiction shall reduce the applicable fines and penalties by 80 percent for indigent persons, and by 50 percent for individuals up to 250 percent above the federal poverty level."

Accordingly, a driver caught traveling in a vehicle going 26 miles per hour over the posted speed limit must pay $200, unless of course they qualify for the "low-income fee," in which case they must pay only $100. Those on public assistance traveling at over 100 mph would be hit up for only $40.

For San Franciscans 251% above the federal poverty level or higher, the fines can reach $500.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Jasmine Crockett admits she's not focused on lawmaking; recommends violence against Ted Cruz



The Democratic Party is setting all-time records with its unpopularity. According to a recent NBC News survey, only 27% of voters have a positive view of the party.

Rather than deliver legislative victories to improve upon this embarrassing statistic, some Democrats instead appear committed both to engaging in violent rhetoric and preventing President Donald Trump from delivering on his promises to the American public.

Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett made clear in a recent interview that she is one such Democrat.

Since rolling up to Congress in 2023, Crockett has introduced a few bills and partisan resolutions, including a bill that would direct the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to launch a pro-abortion propaganda campaign; a bill designating the month of August as "National Black Business Month"; and a bill ensuring that convicted criminals can vote nationwide.

KXAS-TV's Phil Prazan asked Crockett in an interview released Sunday whether she was trying to pass any legislation in the 119th Congress.

"'Trying to pass.' Uh, no," said Crockett. "You know, I should probably be a better politician and tell you, 'Yes, we've got all this amazing legislation that I can absolutely imagine Donald Trump signing into law.' I'm just not gonna lie."

'We've gotta get comfortable with letting our hair down a little bit.'

"I think that right now it is about preserving our basics and getting back some of the norms — the norms that make sure that people have food on the table; the norms that make sure that people aren't going through any extra layer of stress when it comes to figuring out education for their kids," continued Crockett. "So right now, I can tell you that, unfortunately, I am not working towards very much that I would consider being the progress train. I am working to make sure that I can minimize the regress train."

If Crockett's recent conduct and commentary serve as any indication, then the minimization of the "regress train" involves publicly rooting for foreign nations engaged in trade disputes with the U.S.; telling radicals that Elon Musk must be "taken down" amid firebombs; characterizing Republican voters as stupid; issuing racist remarks; mocking the handicapped; and dubbing the commander in chief "an enemy to the United States."

During the interview, Gromer Jeffers from the Dallas Morning News asked Crockett how she plans to "resist Trump's policies."

"The reality is that we're dealing with an administration that is lawless and disrespectful," said Crockett. "The idea that we're still going to be nice and friendly and kind and try to look for some sense of normalcy when we are literally living in a time that is anything but normal, I think that we've gotta get comfortable with letting our hair down a little bit."

"We clearly play ourselves by being like these, like, do-gooders, right," said the congresswoman. "It just needs to be clear that we're not weak. And I don't know that anybody believes that we're not weak."

Apparently desperate to make clear that she is neither friendly nor a do-gooder, Crockett appeared to advocate for violence against at least one Republican lawmaker.

When asked about how to win an election in Texas, Crockett said, "You punch. I think you punch. I think you're OK with — you OK with punching."

Crockett then referenced failed Colin Allred's electoral defeat last year by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and suggested the Democrat should have been more combative with his Republican opponent, saying, "I mean, like, this dude [Cruz] has to be knocked over the head, like, hard, right. Like, there is no niceties with him — like, at all. Like, you go clean off on him."

While Crockett's violent rhetoric was likely enough to confirm for critics her commitment to unfriendliness as a hands-off legislator, her mockery of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) in a speech Saturday at a LGBT activist event in Los Angeles — calling him "Governor Hot Wheels" on account of his wheelchair — helped seal the deal.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) stated, "Jasmine Crockett is despicable."

Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R) noted, "FYI to the new spokeswoman for the Democrat party— @GregAbbott_TX became paralyzed after a huge oak tree fell on him, crushing his spine. But sure, go with 'hot wheels.'"

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

How leftists think — and how you can change their minds



Doesn’t it seem like Donald Trump has been president for longer than seven weeks?

The administration has accomplished so much in such a short time that it’s easy to forget “we’ve only just begun.” So far, most of the changes that are de-wokifying American life are coming in the form of executive orders.

I never believed a man in a dress was a woman, and really, no one else does either. ... [But] I was afraid that not believing it would make me a morally bad person.

The most consequential moves — for example, protecting children from chemical and surgical abuse in the form of “sex changes” — need to be codified in laws passed by Congress.

Conservatives are celebrating the death of woke; I’m one of them. But if woke is on the wane, it is not dead. It may be in the process of dying, but actual death has not occurred. And its death may be much farther off than it looks.

Right now, less than two months into the Trump presidency, we’re seeing what I call an unveiling. Some call it an “extinction burst,” the idea that people act out their behaviors even more flagrantly just before the social environment changes enough to make their behaviors “go extinct.”

Whatever you call it, we’re seeing the depth of derangement in the woke minds of Democrats and leftists even more starkly than before.

The media is hyperventilating that free speech leads to Nazi pogroms. Leftists are gnashing their teeth over the deportation of noncitizen Mahmoud Khalil, acting as though he has a fundamental right to agitate against U.S. interests while he’s here as our guest (no concern at all for the effect of his agitation on their own countrymen, of course).

Democrat lawmakers shocked by the new reality that people are not going to call mentally ill men “women” any more just because they say they’re women are melting down in emotional tantrums in House committee hearings.

Inside the leftist mind

Here you are, a conservative, wondering just what these people are thinking. Why do they believe what they believe? Do they, in fact, actually believe what they say they believe?

I have these same questions, but I think I also have some of the answers.

Before a years-long process of changing my mind about politics and culture, I was one of them. The backstory that got me to being a leftist Democrat is a backstory shared by millions of people like me. It won’t describe everyone, but the generalizations I’m going to make are drawn from my own experience, and they do describe a large number of leftists and the woke-minded.

The first and most important generalization? Look into the past of any given leftist, and chances are you'll find some variation of ...

Fatherlessness

This is the single biggest factor that predisposes a child to mental troubles and leftist “people are victims of societal forces” ideology.

Not only is fatherlessness damaging to a kid’s normal ability to relate to the sexes, to regulate his emotions, and more, but it tends to coincide with single mothers with feminist attitudes. I never met my father, and my mother married a violent child molester by whom she had two more children.

She kicked him out after he tried to kill her, and the die was cast. To my mother, and by osmosis to me, all men were lazy deadbeats and scum. All the men in her life had victimized my poor, innocent mother, and nothing could be laid at the feet of her own choices.

Thus, the male feminist version of me was born, nurtured by those two companions of fatherlessness ...

Single motherhood and welfare dependency

One day in 1983, a college student stopped my mother on her way into the grocery store asking for her signature on a petition to end welfare fraud. My mother haughtily raised her nose, pointed at us three children, and said, “Do you see any welfare fraud here?”

At home, she’d scream at the television when Ronald Reagan spoke of “welfare queens,” saying there was no such thing and that Reagan was an abusive scum for trying to reform welfare. We were taught that our poverty was the fault of the government and that the government was cruel to give so little to single mothers like mine.

Thus was born my anti-capitalist sentiment that would flower into protesting against “greedy corporations,” my support for absurdly high minimum wages, and more.

As I discussed in my recent review of Adam Coleman's forthcoming book "The Children We Left Behind," modern America gives single moms the “you go girl/slay kween” treatment. We’ve made them heroines who cannot be criticized.

Of course, spending your whole life feeling like a victim of "the system" lets you justify all sorts of ...

Bad adult choices

Children who grow up in neglect and abuse as I did are far more likely to gravitate toward the left because the left embraces victimhood, hedonistic behavior, and self-centered, narcissistic choices dressed up as “self-care” and “self-love.”

As a young adult, I took up the stereotyped behaviors of abused children, living a promiscuous party life, becoming an alcoholic, and blaming all of this on anything but my own choices. Naturally, I surrounded myself with similarly damaged people. Every single one of them, to a man or a woman, was a leftist, socialist, or proud Marxist.

Once you realize the emotional disorder that leads people to adopt these beliefs, you might ask yourself ...

Do they really believe what they’re saying?

Democrat/leftist beliefs are so extreme and absurd in the 21st century that it baffles non-leftists. It’s been eight years since I started changing my mind to what it is today (conservative, anti-woke).

Even though I can remember when I was one of them, today’s leftists have gone farther than I ever did. For example, take the beliefs surrounding ...

Transgenderism

Do they actually, literally believe that a man claiming to be a woman makes him a woman?

Yes and no.

No, not in a literal sense, even though they claim very loudly that they do. The emotional urgency of their claims is used to cover up the fact that deep down, they know it’s insane.

I know this because it used to be me. I never believed a man in a dress was a woman, and really, no one else does either. So why did I say I believed it? Because I was afraid that not believing it would make me a morally bad person.

You see, children from abusive homes are forced into an adult role when they’re still little, trained to become emotional surrogate spouses to their damaged parent. So we grow up believing we are morally obligated to fuss and coo over any person who presents herself as a victim.

No, I didn’t believe these men were literally women. But I did believe I had a moral duty (it works as a religion because it is one) to say that I believed it and to act as if it were true. Fortunately for me, this cognitive dissonance was so severe that I didn’t keep this stance for long.

“Trans” was the first chink in the armor of my leftism. But rejecting it didn't mean letting of my conviction that ...

America is an exploitative, racist, misogynist hell

I’m afraid I did believe this in the literal sense. Looking back, I laugh at myself. How was it possible to believe that blacks in America were just as bad off after the civil rights era as they were during slavery? Given the reality that women in the U.S. can do anything they want for a career and enjoy absurdly generous legal protections and quotas, how could I believe we lived in a “misogynistic patriarchy”?

I'll tell you how: because the crowd around me believed these things.

Who made up this crowd? A disproportionate number of people with personality disorders. Pathological levels of narcissism, extreme emotional instability, and a victim stance toward the world.

Feminism and leftism preferentially attract the personality-disordered because they give mean, lazy, self-centered people excuses to act the way they do and blame their bad actions on outside boogeymen. Capitalism. Men. Colonialism. Heteronormativity. White people.

The point I’m trying to get across is that the beliefs held by people captured in a leftist frame of mind don’t, and don’t have to, have any relationship to reality.

You can’t break these beliefs by presenting objective facts, because these people don’t believe that objective facts exist. Or they do so only when those facts are convenient for their emotional goals.

This is why they get angry or tearful, or scream at you when you offer an article that questions their belief in vaccines, or in "the patriarchy," or in the idea that black people are systematically killed by police.

A deep part of their mind knows that what you’re saying is true, but that is intolerable. Therefore, they punish you with tantrums and reputational smears that get you kicked out of social groups or cost you your job.

Once you understand it as a social contagion, it's only natural to ask ...

Is there a cure for leftism?

The answer is also yes and no. Frustratingly, there’s no technique you can use on your leftist son, or wife, or best friend that will snap them out of it. Human mentation and emotion do not work that way.

We’re not dealing with ordinary political disagreements that we remember from a more collegial past. These leftists are in an actual cult. The same rules apply as do for any cult. They’re not tethered to facts, their commitment is entirely emotionally driven, and no presentation of facts will make any difference.

No one could have “changed” me from a leftist lunatic into a (I hope) saner conservative. I had to face the wall on my own, so to speak. I had to hit rock bottom, as we say of alcoholics.

For me, that came from a confrontation with the reality of how disturbed and morally depraved my own mother was, a confrontation that happened in 2016. A lifetime of abuse I’d rationalized away could no longer be excused. I saw my mother for what she really was — an unstable, vicious narcissist who exploited her loved ones — and my false but well-constructed view of the world started to crumble.

It kept crumbling. After I saw the truth about my family, I saw the truth about my chosen friends and political circle. Surprise! The same resentments, exploitation of others, false claims of being a victim when one is actually the perpetrator — all of these that I saw in my mother, I now saw in the social and political world I’d lived in all my adult life.

Becoming a small business owner dependent only on myself for my livelihood, and moving to the country, cured the last bits of anti-capitalism I had left.

As someone who made it out, I want the same for every poor brainwashed member of the leftist cult — especially people I care about. But experience has taught me that they have to want to be helped first.

In other words, when it comes to your leftist loved ones, the best practice is to ...

Be available, but don't tolerate abuse

Make it clear that you'll be there when and if they’re ready to talk. Be willing to explain your point of view, and offer them articles or videos that demonstrate why you believe as you do.

This may seem rather passive; unfortunately, it's really all you can do. You can’t make them have that final confrontation with reality. That either happens for them or it doesn’t.

At the same time, I urge you not to tolerate their abusive behavior. Expect the same level of respect and civility from them that you expect of anyone and that they demand from you (while giving you no respect in return).

If they won’t do it, stop talking to them. Tell them, “I will not be spoken to this way. We’re not going to talk until you’re willing to behave like a reasonable adult.” Then stop answering the texts, block their numbers, do not respond to attempts they make to engage you or provoke you.

They may be misguided, and many of them are indeed at least temporarily psychologically disturbed. But that is not an excuse for their bad behavior.

If we are to get society back on track, we conservatives have to be the adults who hold boundaries. Narcissistic, awful behavior needs to be objected to in front of others. We need to chastise those who take advantage of our loving feelings in order to treat us badly. We must dis-incentivize the greedy, grasping, histrionic emotional distortions of leftists if want this bulls**t to stop.

Good luck.

Democrats doing so poorly that Bidens now offer to help: 'Delusional'



The Democratic Party is polling so poorly and in such disarray that the 82-year-old former president it effectively forced out of the 2024 presidential race is now offering to lend a hand.

Given Joe Biden's controversial use of autopen and well-documented decrepitude, it is unclear just how steady that hand would be. Nevertheless, some party officials appear desperate to grab on to whatever they can in order to keep from sinking deeper.

The Democratic Party is more unpopular than ever and continues to plumb new lows. An NBC News survey conducted earlier this month found that 27% of registered voters had a positive view of the party. Only 7% said they had a "very positive" view of the party.

"With these numbers, the Democratic Party is not in need of a rebrand. It needs to be rebooted," said Jeff Horwitt of Hart Research Associates, the Democratic pollster who conducted the survey.

A CNN poll recently conducted by SSRS similarly found that Americans aren't particularly keen on the Democratic Party, with only 29% expressing a favorable opinion.

Quinnipiac University's annual first-quarter congressional polling indicated that a plurality of Democratic voters disapprove of the job congressional Democrats are doing, reported Politico. Whereas 40% of Democratic voters signaled approval, 49% indicated that congressional Democrats were fumbling their duties.

While NBC News might feel comfortable spinning Americans' contempt for the Democratic Party as "a good thing" and New York magazine is holding on to hope that unpopularity won't necessarily translate into a wipeout in the midterm elections, it's clear that the party is presently in major trouble.

Biden, who had a disapproval rating of 58% when leaving office in January, met with Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin last month and offered to help raise money, campaign, and do whatever it takes to arrest Democrats' slide into irrelevancy and ultimately extinction, people close to the former president told NBC News.

'The Bidens are still living in an alternative universe.'

Democrats have yet to meaningfully take Biden up on his offer, partly because of his tether to Kamala Harris and her second failed presidential bid. The potential value added of Biden at a campaign event might also be compromised the moment he opens his mouth, given his tendency to issue streams of incoherent thought, slur words, mix up people and places, and alternate clumsily between whispering and shouting.

Notwithstanding his track record and foibles, some in the party do, however, reckon that Biden has some appeal for voters.

"If you were to call any state party chair and ask them if they wanted Joe Biden to be a keynote speaker for their annual dinner, the answer would be yes," said Jane Kleeb, a vice chair of the DNC. "He is beloved by the party and beloved by the voters."

NBC News indicated that Jill Biden, whose approval rating was 33% in January, is similarly keen on campaigning and raising money for her fellow Democrats.

An unnamed individual close to Jill Biden said, "She recognizes that serving in the capacities that she served is an honor and it comes with responsibilities to the party. And she's prepared to help in any way she can."

Alan Kessler, a Philadelphia-based Democratic fundraiser, told NBC News that while there might be an "appropriate time" for Biden to get involved, this isn't it.

"It's time to move on with new leadership," said Kessler.

In response to NBC News' report, a onetime senior White House adviser told the New York Post, "The Bidens are still living in an alternative universe that revolves only around them."

"Their irresponsibility, family ego, and selfishness put the Democratic Party in this position in the first place," continued the former adviser. "The Biden family — and the disconnected reality that they and their ineffective little circle live in — is responsible for the Trump sequel and the wilderness the Democratic Party finds itself in today."

"Joe Biden should enjoy retirement at the beach in Rehoboth," another former Biden official told the Post. "No voter wants to hear from him. He is delusional and arrogant to think that he can be a value add to the Democratic Party. We need to move on from the era of Joe Biden and embrace new, younger leadership."

President Donald Trump was recently asked about Biden getting back into the political game. Trump, who called Biden "the worst president in American history" in his joint address to Congress, told reporters, "I hope so."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Noem, Patel vow cowardly 'swatting' perpetrators will be hunted down in wake of attacks on conservatives



FBI Director Kash Patel and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem indicated amid a rise in swatting attacks on conservatives that the perpetrators will be hunted down and brought to justice.

Parallel to this effort to smoke out those behind the attacks, Republicans are championing legislation that would increase penalties for these attacks that some, including Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee, have suggested should be prosecuted as attempted murder and domestic terrorism.

Background

Swatting is the practice of calling in false reports to law enforcement — often alleging that self-harm, domestic abuse, or some form of other violent criminality is taking place or is imminent — with the goal of having an armed emergency response team dispatched to a victim's location. Since the victims of these attacks are rarely if ever expecting a sudden incursion of well-intentioned law enforcement agents into their homes, and are in some in cases law-abiding gun owners, there is a good chance of things going sideways.

In 2017, 28-year-old Andrew Finch of Wichita, Kansas, was killed in a swatting incident. Law enforcement, responding to a fake hostage threat, killed Finch when he answered the door. The agitator responsible for getting Finch killed, Tyler Rai Barriss, was also held responsible for several other swattings.

Mark Herring, a man harassed because he would not sell his Twitter handle, was another such swatting victim. When Tennessee police were dispatched to his house in April 20, Herring suffered a fatal heart attack.

Conservatives and other critics of the liberal establishment have long been strategically targeted with swatting calls.

'That's the tactic of those who don't like my politics?'

For instance, the number of times that Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has been targeted is apparently now well into the double digits, including the December attack that proved fatal for a woman who crashed into a bomb squad member responding to the call.

'Attempted murder' campaign

In recent days and weeks, numerous conservative media figures and social media influencers have been swatted.

Shawn Farash, a comedian who specializes in impressions of President Donald Trump, indicated that he and his wife were swatted in Tennessee on March 13. Police apparently received a report that "somebody murdered somebody in the house and was planning a suicide by cop."

Right-wing influencer Phillip Buchanan, who goes by "Catturd" online, revealed that he was swatted on March 14.

"I was just swatted again for the 4th time," tweeted Buchanan. "As I tweeted earlier, I live in the middle of nowhere and know all the cops here. (because of the past swattings) they knew what it was immediately and just called me and sent one officer who I just had a great conversation with."

Talk radio host Joe Pagliarulo indicated that he too was swatted earlier this month, noting on his show that he momentarily suppressed the desire to grab one of his many firearms upon seeing an individual with a rifle lurking outside his home and called 911. After the dispatcher confirmed that law enforcement was on the premises, the talk radio host informed police over the phone that he suspected a swatting attack might be under way and was able to arrange a peaceful resolution.

"If I would have grabbed my AR-15 and walked out the front door, or my pistol and walked out the front door, I would have been dead in my doorway," said Pagliarulo. "Dead. I mean, think about that. That's a tactic of the left? That's the tactic of those who don't like my politics?"

Infowars host Chase Geiser shared a video of his latest swatting ordeal on March 12, noting, "Swatted for a second time in 12 hours."

The video shows police ordering his surrender over a megaphone and Geiser complying, exiting his residence with his hands over his head. Geiser's coworker Owen Shroyer indicated that he was swatted on Wednesday.

Possible reckoning

Last week, FBI Director Patel stated that the bureau "is aware of this dangerous trend, and my team and I are already taking action to investigate and hold those responsible accountable."

"This isn't about politics — weaponizing law enforcement against ANY American is not only morally reprehensible but also endangers lives, including those of our officers. That will not be tolerated," continued Patel. "We are fully committed to working with local law enforcement to crack down on these crimes."

Newly minted FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino provided a brief update Wednesday, noting, "Our teams are actively working on the Tesla incidents and the swatting incidents."

Noem indicated that the DHS is also now taking the swatting attacks seriously.

''People need to be in prison for this.'

"Under President Trump's leadership, we will not sit idly by as conservative new media and their families are being targeted by false swatting," Noem wrote on X. "@DHSgov has the ability to trace phone numbers and track location information. We will use it to hunt these cowards down."

"This is an attack on our law enforcement and innocent families, and we will prosecute it as such," added Noem.

Lawmakers appear to be taking the matter seriously as well.

Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.), chairman of the Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement, announced an investigation into the recent increase of swatting incidents and requested a staff-level briefing from the Department of Justice and FBI by April 9 to better understand the phenomenon and what is being done about it.

There is now renewed interest in advancing Tennessee Republican Rep. David Kustoff's Preserving Safe Communities by Ending Swatting Act. The proposed law, endorsed by the National Association of Police Organizations and the National Sheriffs' Association, would impose strict penalties for swatting, including 20 years in prison if someone is seriously hurt as a result of an attack.

Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas), a co-sponsor of the bill, called swatting "an extremely dangerous form of political terrorism," stressing, "People need to be in prison for this."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Twisting the truth: Wikipedia’s ongoing misinformation war



For over a decade, I have argued with Wikipedia curators about the biographical sketch covering my life and work. Each time a surrogate or I correct false or slanderous details, the misinformation reappears within weeks — often with even greater distortions. Friends who have helped me in this thankless effort suggest giving up, believing that no matter how many corrections we make, the falsehoods will always reappear.

Christopher Rufo has assured me that anyone paying attention knows Wikipedia leans left and misrepresents those with views deemed unacceptable. However, after decades of acquiring unfriendly critics, I doubt most readers will dismiss Wikipedia’s misrepresentations in my case.

One position I will never conceal is my contempt for peddlers of what George Orwell called 'smelly little orthodoxies.' One can’t despise such people enough.

I have also observed Wikipedia’s double standard in editing biographical sketches. Friends with technical expertise have spent weeks trying to correct inaccurate statements about me. Each time, they must provide excessive documentation and navigate endless disputes before even minor corrections are approved. No matter how often they succeed, new distortions inevitably replace the old ones.

When left-leaning contributors make unsubstantiated claims about figures they associate with the political “dark side,” those assertions often go unchecked. The most recent version of my Wikipedia entry falsely states that I oppose Israel’s existence. I have never expressed any sentiment remotely resembling that.

While I have criticized AIPAC for unfairly attacking Israel’s critics, I have consistently defended Israel’s right to protect itself. Yet my biographer offers flimsy evidence to suggest otherwise. One supposed indicator is my past friendship with the late Murray Rothbard, who was explicitly anti-Zionist. But why assume I shared all his views, including his stance on Israel?

Another so-called proof is that I once wrote a review essay for the American Conservative about Elmer Berger, a Reform rabbi critical of Israel’s founding as a Jewish state. Although I described Berger’s position as unrealistic, I apparently didn’t denounce him strongly enough to satisfy those eager to paint me as anti-Israel.

Guilt by association

Wikipedia contributors also attempt to discredit me by linking me to white nationalism. They note that I spoke at an American Renaissance conference in the 1990s but fail to mention that my remarks focused solely on my research on American conservatism — without endorsing white nationalism in any form.

The entry also highlights my past acquaintance with Richard Spencer, though that relationship largely predated his public embrace of white nationalism. Even more tenuously, it refers to an attack from the ADF against an organization I once led, claiming it was “friendly” to white racists. However, even the Wikipedia entry admits that our group was never identified as inherently racist.

These misrepresentations follow a familiar pattern. When leftist editors shape a narrative, they demand exhaustive proof to correct errors. Meanwhile, baseless smears against those they oppose remain unchallenged.

The Wikipedia entry omits that I spent years writing for leftist magazines and that members of the conservative establishment once attacked me as a “right-wing Marxist.” Over decades, I have engaged with a wide range of political groups — both right and left — but rarely with establishments. My work does not focus on race, as it is not my field of study. Instead, my scholarship examines European and American political movements.

Despite this, Wikipedia and Tablet's Jacob Siegel claim that I have written extensively on Latin fascism and seek to create a “post-fascist” imitation of it for the present age. Nothing in my research on changing concepts of fascism supports that bizarre conclusion. I have consistently argued that fascism belonged to a past historical era and should be viewed as an archaic, failed political model.

Opposite of reality

One of the weirdest, most glaring errors about my work appears not in Wikipedia’s biography but in its discussion of “cultural Marxism” as a supposed Jewish conspiracy. There, I am falsely listed as a major source of this ugly, pervasive, anti-Semitic accusation — an assertion that conveniently aligns with the misleading portrayal of me in my biographical sketch.

This charge is entirely baseless. Not only have I never held the views Wikipedia attributes to me, but my books explicitly reject them. The reality is the opposite of what my critics claim.

I have argued that critical theory’s success in the United States stems from its compatibility with the country’s evolution into a managerial state engaged in social engineering. I have also repeatedly noted that today’s woke ideology — promoted by the media, educators, and public administrators — is far more radical and far less insightful than anything the Frankfurt School theorists proposed. Compared to modern woke activists and even some so-called conservatives, early Frankfurt School thinkers could be considered homophobic and sexist.

Wikipedia also claims that Telos, originally a defender of critical theory, was a legitimate leftist magazine until I supposedly took control and transformed it into a “far-right” publication. The entry falsely states, “Under Gottfried’s tenure, Telos became far-right in its outlook.” In reality, I never served as the magazine’s editor in chief; Paul Piccone held that role. I was one of many contributors on the editorial board and played only a minor role in the publication’s engagement with European right-wing thought.

During the 1980s and 1990s, Telos began exploring critiques of centralized managerial regimes, including perspectives from “decentralist” thinkers on the right. This shift was not the result of my supposed influence but rather part of a broader intellectual evolution within the publication.

Of course, I have no expectation that Wikipedia will ever portray me fairly, but I hope others won’t judge me based on its fabrications. One position I will never conceal is my contempt for those who defame me and others like them — peddlers of what George Orwell aptly called “smelly little orthodoxies.” One can’t despise such people enough.

Seattle BLM treasurer arrested on drug, weapons charges following commutation from Democratic governor



Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) has a habit of making bad or questionable decisions.

In 2023, he ratified legislation letting strangers shelter children who want sex-change mutilations or abortions without notifying parents. The previous year, his administration secured federal approval to provide illegal aliens with health and dental insurance through the Affordable Care Act. After prohibiting indoor dining and closing gyms, choir performances, and receptions at weddings and funerals, Inslee announced in 2021 that large events would have to confirm attendees' receipt of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines or have them demonstrate negative tests.

Inslee is apparently no better a judge of people than of policy. One of the individuals he sprung from prison is now facing nearly a dozen drug and gun charges.

The Democratic governor commuted the sentence of felon Percy Levy, 54, in 2019. Levy had spent the previous 17 years in prison for a drug house robbery.

Since receiving executive clemency from Inslee, Levy — who the Lynnwod Times indicated sits on the Black Lives Matter Seattle-King County chapter's board of directors as treasurer — has masqueraded as a changed man, working as a community outreach specialist for the Washington Defender Association and running the car dealership Redemption Auto.

Levy's bio on the car vendor's website states, "In 2019, Percy received executive clemency from Governor Inslee, propelling his mission to reform the criminal legal system, with a focus on sentencing reform and advocacy for those affected by the 'war on crime.'"

It appears he rejoined the losing side in that war.

Levy was arrested on March 13 after a traffic stop in Everett, Washington, and slapped with 11 Class B felony charges, including two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, possession of a stolen firearm, and eight counts of possession of controlled substances with attempt to sell. Each charge carries with it a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.

'I would not change it for the world.'

The Snohomish County Sheriff's Office indicated that Levy's arrest followed a 16-month investigation by the Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force, a multi-agency partnership consisting of local, state, and federal detective and special agents.

Detectives with the SRDTF reportedly secured a warrant for Levy's residence, not far from where he was ultimately pulled over. At the scene, they apparently found 2,818 grams of powder cocaine, 14.7 grams of crack cocaine, and 556 grams of fentanyl — enough to kill well over 250,000 people, according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. Detectives also found ample evidence signaling intent to distribute the drugs as well as a handgun.

Hours before his arrest, Levy testified remotely to the Washington State House Public Safety Committee. He provided insights regarding proposed legislation that would remove the requirement that Department of Corrections must provide convicts being released from prison with the least expensive method of public transportation.

Democratic Washington state Rep. Roger Goodman congratulated Levy on his "successful transition" from prison life.

KIRO-TV indicated that Levy is being held on a $1.5 million bond.

In his autobiographic statement on the Redemption Project of Washington website, Levy noted, "What more could I ask than having the privilege of actively working to smooth the road for the release of those back inside? It is fulfilling on a level that is surreal to me. I would not change it for the world."

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!