America Is In Shambles Because Of Democrat Policies, Not Just Joe Biden

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Screenshot-2024-06-27-at-10.57.01 PM-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Screenshot-2024-06-27-at-10.57.01%5Cu202fPM-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]Don't buy the spin. Swapping Biden out for a shiny new Democrat won't save America.

Squires: The real ‘American Taliban’ wages a war on children by promoting abortion and death culture



There's a short video showing a British instructor explaining to an Afghan woman why she should appreciate an early 20th-century artist who turned a urinal into conceptual art. The scene epitomizes the failure of Western cultural imperialism.

It also reminded me that the left is engaged in a high-stakes conflict that it is winning: its all-out war on American children.

After Texas lawmakers recently passed a bill prohibiting abortion after a baby's heartbeat is detected, the phrase "American Taliban" trended across Twitter. It's hard to understand how the people who don't want babies dismembered in the womb would be seen as the backward theocrats while the people who would legalize abortion up until birth would be seen as caring and compassionate.

This development shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who understands that abortion — the intentional taking of innocent human life — is one of the left's most deeply held values. The Democratic Party paints itself as a pro-woman and pro-child coalition concerned for the marginalized and oppressed. Its legislative and cultural priorities reveal a very dark alternate reality. The truth is that the left hates women and children.

Like the immoral woman described in Proverbs, the lips of Nancy Pelosi's party drip honey and its speech is smoother than oil. It all sounds tempting until you realize it's a worldview that leads to death.

Abortion is the most obvious front of the left's war on children. There were over 600,000 abortions performed in 2018, according to the CDC. Democrats are quick to point out that most of the women having abortions are low-income and many are ethnic minorities. Both points are true. Apparently the party that decries the twin evils of capitalism and racism has no problem with fewer babies being born if they are poor and black. The party that boldly proclaims "black lives matter" while on a perpetual heat-seeking mission for any institution that honors bigots from the past has no issue with Margaret Sanger's racist views or the legacy of eugenics still seen in our nation's largest abortion provider. Planned Parenthood traces its roots back to Sanger's first birth control clinic in Brooklyn in 1917. To this day, about half of all black babies in New York City are killed in the womb before they draw their first breaths.

The left seethes with apoplectic rage whenever it feels abortion is being threatened, but it also has plans for the children who actually are born. Its first goal is to get the babies out of the arms of their mothers. They see women who stay home with their children as a step back in feminism's long march to turn women — in terms of priorities and temperament — into men who can give birth. Even though the research demonstrates the benefits of mothers staying home to care for their young children — something most Americans support — the left acts as if a woman has more value to her employer than to her own family. Part of the left's motivation is the knowledge that recruiting the next generation into its culture war requires thousands of hours of basic training.

That instruction starts in day care and moves to the school for some children as young as three. Once there, many kids are bombarded by teachers who have swapped a focus on reading, writing, and arithmetic for racial narcissism, activism, and protesting. Los Angeles teachers' union President Cecily Myart-Cruz recently admitted this when she claimed that it was fine if students didn't learn multiplication last year because now they know the words "insurrection" and "coup," as well as the difference between a riot and a protest. She is not alone. The Chicago Teachers Union claimed, "The push to reopen schools is rooted in sexism, racism, and misogyny." The education establishment in this country has been hijacked by partisan advocates who could not care less whether our children are literate and numerate as long as they come out every election to vote for Democrats once they turn 18. They have no problem openly admitting that critical theory is more important to them than critical thinking. What's the result? Our children are not learning. There was a time when American children learned Latin in high school. Now most need remedial English in college.

American children face attacks on all sides, from their personhood in utero to their minds in the classroom. The last ten years have been marked by growing intensity on the gender identity battlefront. Democrats are completely on board with the notion that people — including school-aged children — can pick their gender. They would never encourage an anorexic teenage girl to get gastric bypass surgery, but when it comes to other intense feelings of conflict between mind and body, they promote the radical alteration of the body. What most people probably don't know is that John Money, the man who introduced the term "gender identity," was a psychologist who was involved in the sex reassignment of a child named David Reimer in the 1960s. Money forced Reimer, who was raised as a girl, to perform sex acts with his twin brother while he photographed them. Both brothers committed suicide in their 30s.

The left hates your children. Democrats don't believe pre-born babies have inherent worth. They have no problem undermining parental authority if it means getting the opportunity to shape the minds and morals of the next generation of voters. Decades of research show children have the best outcomes when they are raised by their married biological parents. Yet it is easier to get an elected Democrat to promote pornography and sex work than to publicly affirm the role of marriage and the nuclear family in producing positive social outcomes.

Liberal ideology couldn't make Afghan women accept bathroom art as normal because the people in that country actually believe in something more important than superficial notions of identity. That may come as a surprise to American elites whose views are a mile wide and an inch deep. The quickness with which the Afghan government folded to the Taliban demonstrated that a small group of highly committed people can drive off a well-funded enemy who lacks the courage of its convictions. It's time for parents in this country to use their own weapons — prayer, petition, public pressure — to fight for what they hold most dear.

Verizon pushes leftist, anti-American agenda in social justice training for employees: Report



Multinational telecommunications conglomerate Verizon has internal programs that train employees on anti-American sentiments and "anti-racism" agendas, according to a new report.

Following the death of George Floyd in late May 2020, Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg delivered a speech where he announced that the company would commit $10 million to "aid organizations dedicated to equality and social justice."

Verizon launched a new "Race & Social Justice Action Toolkit" in June 2020, with "employee-generated resources to jumpstart your education" and "support partners who are on the frontlines of battling racial injustice."

Verizon then presented a "Race & Social Justice" initiative last year for employee training, which "has created an extensive race reeducation program based on the core tenets of critical race theory, including 'systemic racism,' 'white fragility,' and 'intersectionality,'" according to City Journal.

Journalist Christopher F. Rufo claims to have received internal Verizon documents from a whistleblower, which show corporate curriculum and speeches that spread a leftist agenda.

In the "Conscious Inclusion & Anti-Racism" training module, Rufo reports that Verizon diversity trainers educate employees about topics such as "institutional racism," "privilege," "microaggressions," "microinequity," "allyship," and "intersectionality." Employees are instructed to list their "race, ethnicity, gender, gender identity, religion, education, profession, and sexual orientation."

Verizon then instructs employees on the firm’s elaborate racial-etiquette system, warning them against committing "… https://t.co/pjIqt18SPZ

— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) 1629922394.0

Verizon's then-Global Chief Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion officer Ramcess Jean-Louis, who now works at Pfizer, allegedly gave a presentation claiming that "weaponized White privilege" is a "danger" to black Americans, who are seen as "inferior." To prove his point, Jean-Louis included video of the Central Park dog walker incident involving Amy Cooper from May 2020.

Verizon Vice President David Hubbard interviewed Khalil Muhammad, who reportedly "argued that America is fundamentally racist and needs a 'new origin story,' replacing the narrative of 'American exceptionalism' with the narrative that America was founded on 'systems of racism' that remain at the root of our society."

As part of the company's "antiracism" education series, Verizon VP David Hubbard interviewed Khalil Muhammad, great… https://t.co/TND0SNH4Ms

— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) 1629922606.0


Next, Muhammad claimed that the police force is designed to maintain America's "two-tier society," "make sure that… https://t.co/wMPYt1eBpD

— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) 1629922810.0

Adrian Burrell, a social justice activist, allegedly told Verizon employees that police budgets are "aimed towards hiring [police officers] with racist biases."

Burrell purportedly said governments "need to be aimed at bringing more resources to the community at a root level, and then you just won't need so many police. If you want to call that 'abolishing the police,' or if you want to call that 'defunding the police,' so be it."

TheBlaze reached out to Verizon for comment, but there was no response at the time of publication.

Seattle elementary school lesson reportedly encourages children to see police officers as racist



A Seattle-area school reportedly encouraged young children to complete a school assignment about a police officer shooting a black male that had what many called an anti-police bent.

When reached for comment, a school official told KTTH-FM's Jason Rantz that the assignment was a "non-story."

What are the details?

According to Rantz, some Seattle-area elementary school students received a head-scratching homework assignment sharing a decidedly anti-police sentiment.

Students at Grove Elementary were reportedly asked to watch a video that was said to teach kids "that racist police routinely target innocent black Americans."

Rantz writes, "Among the lessons being promoted, either in the virtual classroom or via third-party resources to parents, students as young as 7-years-old are taught that racist police routinely target innocent Black Americans but don't suffer consequences because police cover for each other."

The schools pushed a video titled, "Animation Series: Something Happened in Our Town," which apparently tells the story of a police officer who shot a black male, told from the perspective of a young white child and a young black child.

"When the white girl asks why police shot the man, she's told by her sister, 'The cops shot him because he was black.' The girl's mom says it was a mistake to shoot the man, noting that, 'It was a mistake that is part of a pattern' where white people are treated well, but not black people," Rantz added.

Students were required to watch the video with their parents, and a week later, the students were set to discuss the video in a virtual classroom setting.

When the black boy, however, discusses the shooting with his parents, the story is a little different.

"The boy's father notes that the officer 'won't go to jail,'" Rantz writes. "The boy's brother says, 'Cops stick up for each other. And they don't like black men.'"

Animation Series: Something Happened In Our Town (#AtlantisBuild) www.youtube.com

A 'non-story'

Jodi Runyon, Grove Elementary's director of Communications, Engagement, and Outreach, told Rantz that the video "was successfully addressed at the school level" and refused to provide further comment on the matter.

Rantz persisted, and pushed Runyon for more information. Runyon reportedly responded by calling the issue a "non-story."

Runyon added that the video was set as "an optional resource to build understanding in challenging times."

She also added that the school yanked the video and the assignment after two parents complained.

There was no further discussion, she insisted, because "the teacher addressed the parent's concerns appropriately."

You can read more about what's reportedly happening in other Seattle-area schools here.

This week in nothing makes sense: students are taught police are racist and now, apparently, classical music is ste… https://t.co/kn1PmnZpmK
— (((Jason Rantz))) on KTTH Radio (@(((Jason Rantz))) on KTTH Radio)1600315853.0

College students say rioting, looting 'justified' because 'people in power have stolen so much more'



Rioters and looters — like many on the left — have parroted the same lines this summer to somehow make their immoral actions morally upright.

To wit: Last month Black Lives Matter members in Chicago held a rally supporting and defending more than 100 people who were arrested for looting in the city the previous night. BLM organizer Ariel Atkins justified the estimated $60 million in damages as "reparations."

"I don't care if someone decides to loot a Gucci or a Macy's or a Nike store, because that makes sure that person eats," Atkins said, WMAQ-TV reported. "That makes sure that person has clothes." Atkins added, "That is reparations. Anything they wanted to take, they can take it because these businesses have insurance."

What did college students have to say?

With that in mind, Campus Reformheaded to George Washington University in Washington, D.C., to ask college students what they thought about the looting and rioting. Their answers were less than surprising, unfortunately.

"In my opinion ... it definitely can be justified given that's pretty much the only way we can get our message out there," one student said.

Another added, "I'm in support of the riots personally, whatever you need to do to be heard is the cost of it." She added that those upset over untold financial hardships due to rioting and looting should "reevaluate" perspectives on people versus objects.

When pressed that someone paid for those destroyed or stolen physical objects, the student was unmoved: "Everything can be replaced ... Target is, like, a multimillion dollar, like, company, and at the end of the day they can flip that and get it back."

She added that detractors should "understand that there's a larger cause that people are fighting for versus the cost that it's gonna take to repair your small business."

Another student called rioting and looting "inevitable" and declared that "if change is gonna come, there will be some violence that comes with that."

'All part of the healing process'

"I guess it's all part of the healing process," another student philosophized about the looting and rioting, adding that "some people get caught in the way, and it's unfortunate, but for meaningful progress to happen unfortunate things happen."

Another student added that such lawlessness is "justified. People in power have stolen so much more. Anything that any of them loot will never match up to how much that's been stolen from them."

And yet another student referred to the "many white nationalist protests that have gotten violent" and complained that "the conversation has never been about ... their looting and the violence that they bring. I mean, it's easier to characterize people of color as violent than white people, I guess."

College Students Defend Looting, Say Riots 'Justified'youtu.be