RUNNING SCARED: Jack Smith steps down before Trump has a chance to FIRE him



Jack Smith’s cases investigating Trump’s attempts to challenge the 2020 election are falling apart — and now he’s stepping down from his position as special counsel before the president-elect takes office.

Mark Levin of “LevinTV” isn’t surprised.

“You know why? It’s simple. He’s an unconstitutional prosecutor. Donald Trump’s going to fire his ass. All the cases collapse, based on Department of Justice memos,” Levin says. “They collapse, these cases should never have been brought, the case in Florida was rightly thrown out.”

“That’s why they were in a rush to get these cases prosecuted. To get him in prison before the election, which also violated numerous Department of Justice rules,” he continues.


Now, Levin believes action against the people who sanctioned this needs to be taken.

“It’s also my position that the new attorney general needs to dig into this and find out who exactly was responsible for it,” he says, adding, “They did everything possible to affect the election and to destroy Donald Trump’s life.”

While the obsession with putting Trump behind bars was obvious from the start, Smith had been hyper-focused on Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election — which is a perfectly normal thing for a candidate to do.

“A candidate has every right to try and challenge an election, which means to overturn it. That’s exactly what’s going on in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania today at the behest of Chuck Schumer with their slip-and-fall lawyer Mark Elias,” Levin explains.

“They did the same thing in Minnesota to give Al Franken a senate seat to take out Norm Coleman. More than a decade ago, Al Gore challenged the election in court after court in Florida until the Supreme Court stopped it,” he continues.

“There’s simply nothing criminal about challenging it, about looking for more votes, about encouraging a state legislature to act, about encouraging a board of elections to act,” he says, adding, “This is the first time it’s been criminalized.”

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mark Levin eviscerates the ICC’s witch hunt against Netanyahu



Mark Levin recently spoke with Jewish journalist Libby Alon to discuss the International Criminal Court’s decision to issue arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s former defense minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif for war crimes and crimes against humanity in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas.


“Let’s start with the most critical question. What do you think about the ICC decision to issue arrest warrants to Prime Minister Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant?” Alon asked.

“The ICC has become an operation of the Marxist Islamists, the Jew-haters,” says Levin. “The idea that the Israeli people, that their representatives in the government, are committing acts of genocide and war crimes against the Palestinians in Gaza is sickening; it's a blood libel.”

“The fact of the matter is Hamas is killing its own people; the fact of the matter is Iran is using Palestinians as fodder, and Israel and the Israelis are just trying to live their lives and not be bothered by all these people who apparently want to eviscerate and destroy them,” he adds.

“And how do you think the U.S. should act?” was Alon’s next question.

“My view is that we ought to pass a law that says, ‘Okay, now we have jurisdiction over the ICC, and we have jurisdiction over all the jurisdictions that the ICC claims.’ If they can do it unilaterally, why can't we?” Levin states.

Further, “when it comes to the U.N. and their funding and so forth, we define their sources of funding and do whatever we can to cut it off. 25% of the United Nations budget comes from the United States, and the American people are sick and tired of the U.N. Most Americans want the U.N. to get the hell out of our country,” he adds.

“Trump imposed sanctions on the ICC in 2020; the Biden administration removed these sanctions in 2021. Do you think there's any connection between the removal of these sanctions and the warrants that Prime Minister Netanyahu and Gallant are getting?” Alon then asked.

“100%,” Levin says. “Biden and Blinken could have put an end to this. They could have said, ‘No, we're going to reinstitute the Trump sanctions against the ICC.'”

“How do you think the signatory country to the treaty should act?” Alon posed.

“They should speak out against what's taking place,” says Levin, noting that due to the corrupt leftist governments of various European countries, this is highly unlikely.

Alon also asked how Netanyahu should react to the ICC’s decision and how the relationship between the U.S. and Israel will look now that Trump is returning to the White House.

To hear Levin’s answers, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Mark Levin ROASTS ‘comedian’ and ‘pretend’ intellectual Jon Stewart: ‘He’s a shrimp’



Comedian and host of “The Daily Show,” Jon Stewart, is still reeling from the mandate Donald Trump received from the American people, who voted to put him back in the White House as the 47th president of the United States.

From Stewart’s unfunny jokes to his pathetic political analysis, Mark Levin knows what he is: a part of “the phony corporate media,” who deserves a good roast.

“This guy pretends to be some kind of intellectual. Based on what? ... He also pretends to be a comedian. Based on what?” Levin asks. “I notice when he debates people, he gets in their face, and he yells at them, like he's a tough guy,” but, “He's a shrimp.”

“He’s very upset his Kamala lost. He can’t understand why,” says Levin. “Because you’re out of touch, you jacka**, that’s why.”

Following Trump’s victory, Stewart said to his audience, “We're all going to have to wake up tomorrow morning and work like hell to move the world to the place that we prefer it to be.”

“In other words, to try and destroy the Trump presidency, to double down on this stuff that is tearing this country apart,” Levin corrects.

Stewart then laughed at the idea that Barack Obama’s 2008 victory signaled that we were “moving towards a post-racial America” — “That lasted a day!”

“What would [Democrats] do without racism? What would they do without the allegation of racism?” Levin asks. “There'd be no Project 1619, there'd be no CRT or DEI or ESG.”

“The greatest country on the face of the Earth, the most beneficent country, the most diverse country on the face of the Earth, where specifically people who are minorities — whether skin color, whether other physical aspects and characteristics, whether faith — this is the place to be,” he adds, “but with these clowns on the left, everybody's a victim.”

Stewart also condemned Trump’s comments about illegal immigrants from Mexico and expressed his disbelief that Hispanic voters voted red in record numbers.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime; they’re rapists,” Trump said during one presidential campaign announcement.

Stewart couldn’t fathom how such a racist message could possibly be “the winning message.”

“Maybe Jon Stewart doesn't know anybody who died from fentanyl; maybe Jon Stewart doesn't know any of the women who were sold into slavery; maybe Jon Stewart can help us find one of 325,000 unaccompanied miners who've gone missing,” says Levin.

“Do you realize how irrelevant the phony corporate media are in this country?” he asks.

To hear more of Levin’s roast, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Anti-Semitic attack on Jewish soccer fans in Amsterdam sheds light on Europe's open-border catastrophe



Like the United States under the Biden regime, Europe has opened its borders, allowing floods of anti-Semitic jihadists to infiltrate the cities and terrorize its Jewish civilians.

Mark Levin calls this mass migration “the second Muslim crusades.” However, he clarifies that he’s referring to “the jihadis, not normal migration,” which he wholeheartedly supports.

As a result of the open-border policies, some of the smaller European countries have lost control of the anti-Semitic migrants due to the sheer number of them. Unsurprisingly, this has resulted in an uptick in riots and attacks on Jewish people.

Never has this been more evident than when riled up pro-Palestine protesters attacked Jewish soccer fans in Amsterdam earlier this month. The skirmish ended with five people hospitalized and dozens arrested by Dutch authorities.

Authorities reported that “it’s not clear who started the violence,” but Levin says that that’s rubbish.

“It's not clear who started it? There's an entire report on it, and the entire report says this was organized weeks before that soccer game,” he says, adding that “this is the game” Europe’s Palestinians play.

Their claims that they “were provoked” tend to form the mainstream narrative, but Levin knows the truth: “They’re not provoked — not to stab people, not to brutalize people, beat them while they’re on the ground, not to throw them in rivers.”

This “hunting down Jews who go to a soccer game” was “planned a long time ago,” he reiterates.

One person in Europe, however, is thankfully speaking the truth. His name is Bruno Retailleau, and he’s the minister of the Interior of France.

On November 12 during a session of questions to the government at the National Assembly, Retailleau delivered a speech about Europe’s rampant anti-Semitism — a speech Levin calls “fantastic.”

To hear it, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Two reminders we all need after the election: We are NOT a democracy, and the Electoral College is good



We heard a lot about democracy during the election season. The left circulated the narrative that Trump would be the end of democracy while the right called him the savior who would rescue it from the undemocratic Biden regime.

Mark Levin, however, says we need to be reminded of something: “[Our Founding Fathers] didn't support democracy; they supported republicanism.”

“Democracy means factions can take over or a majority can be tyrannical,” he says, adding that our Founders saw this in other countries and “didn’t want anything to do with it.”

“They wanted republicanism; they wanted checks in power,” he explains.

That’s why they enshrined certain principles in our Constitution.

That way, “you can't have people vote away your rights,” says Levin. If “90% of them don't think you should have the right to bear arms, that's too damn bad.”

The fact that our forefathers foresaw the inevitable issues with a true democracy and created our brilliant system proves that “they were geniuses.”

Their installation of the Electoral College was equally brilliant.

Even though we see people like Tim Walz advocating for the demolition of it, Levin knows the truth: It’s for our nation’s protection.

“You choose a president not through a direct election” but rather via an “Electoral College. Why?” asks Levin. “One person is the head of an entire branch; we can't just leave it up to a popular vote” because then “the cities will choose the president.”

“In order to have a union and in order to make sure every aspect of the society was represented, they came up with this brilliant Electoral College,” he explains.

Because of this brilliant system of balance, “California doesn't get to drown out Montana, Wyoming, [or] Idaho.”

“If you had a national popular vote, that’s what [California] would do,” says Levin.

A system in which “the president [is] chosen by the people through the Electoral College but not chosen by the legislature” was “unheard of” at the time. So was the idea of “staggered terms” and a “bicameral congress.”

“So the accumulation of power, the centralization of government is limited,” Levin explains.

To hear more of his explanation on the brilliant and effective system of government designed by our forefathers, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

WATCH: Mark Levin ROASTS ‘5th-grader’ Kamala Harris



The only reason “60 Minutes” had to “significantly edit” Kamala Harris’ answers in her interview with Bill Whitaker is because “she’s so dumb” and “she’s so incapable of having a clear thought that’s not memorized,” says Mark Levin.

So “they covered for her,” he sighs. “Have you ever heard of a news organization doing such a thing?”

“We’re dealing with a fifth-grader,” he says of Harris. “What is this? A student government election in some elementary school?”

“Everybody is bending over backwards in the media, in Hollywood, in academia, in her party to try and find ways to smooth over the absolute imbecility that is this woman, just like they did with Biden,” Levin lambastes.

Just a few months ago, Kamala Harris was “the worst vice president in American history, which is why “they've been trying as best they can to recreate her.”

“The same people who lied about Biden, who covered up his dementia … then changed our electoral system to give us Kamala Harris. They're the same people now who are active in and out of government, in and out of the Democrat Party, in and out of the campaign, who've created this caricature, this fiction, this woman as something she is not,” says Levin.

“She is not qualified to serve as president of the United States at any level and in any way — not by experience, not by intelligence, not by wisdom.”

“She likes to talk about bipartisanship” and claim that “she'll bring the two parties together,” but the fact of the matter is “she was the most polarizing figure in the United State Senate, and I include Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders and Schumer,” Levin explains, adding that Harris “never participated in any bipartisan legislation.”

In fact, “she broke more tie votes … than any vice president in American history for the most radical kinds of legislation,” he explains, pointing to her support of Bidenomics, the Inflation Reduction Act, national health care, and ceasing fracking.

On top of that, the Biden-Harris regime opened the border, “bringing into the country Venezuelan gang members, killers, [and] rapists.”

“They can't even do what they're supposed to do,” says Levin. “They can't run a balanced budget; they're destroying the currency; interest on the debt is bigger than the defense budget; the defense budget is being slashed in the face of potential war with communist China.”

“Can you imagine the government [under Kamala Harris] running health care? Can you imagine the government determining prices and wages?” he asks.

“She doesn’t believe in the Constitution. She doesn’t believe in three branches of government [or] separation of powers.” She doesn’t believe in “delineated, limited powers for the federal government.”

“She never talks about liberty; she never talks about the Constitution unless she's accusing Trump of trying to destroy it,” says Levin.

To hear more of his epic roast, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The REAL reason Kamala Harris’ plagiarism scandal is already dead and buried



The news cycle may have moved on from Kamala Harris’ plagiarism scandal, but Mark Levin certainly hasn’t.

When the Manhattan Institute’s Christopher Rufo confirmed that there was “significant plagiarism” in “Smart on Crime: A Career Prosecutor's Plan to Make Us Safer” that Harris co-wrote with Joan O'C. Hamilton in 2009, the Harris campaign simply denied the allegations and moved on.

“And so it goes away,” sighs Levin, referring to the media’s total abandonment of a story that should get significant attention, granted it proves that the current vice president and Democratic presidential candidate “[stole] the thoughts, the writings, the intellectual labor of somebody else.”

Levin explains that there’s no possibility that Harris accidentally plagiarized.

“She's a trained lawyer, and I can tell you when you go to law school, over and over again they tell you the importance of getting your citations and getting them accurate,” he says.

While CNN did report on the story, it “trashed Christopher Rufo” and pointed to Kamala being “the first woman” vice president and “a minority,” as if that somehow canceled out her wrongdoing.

Then when CNN went to the Harris campaign, the network was met with a curt “we reject it all.”

“Excuse me? What do you reject? This page? ... This page?” asks Levin, flipping through several pages of plagiarized information from Harris’ book.

“I’ve got 15 pages here — verbatim stealing language,” he says.

Unfortunately, all it took was a baseless denial — and poof! “It just goes away.”

Levin then points out that Joe Biden also was caught plagiarizing during his unsuccessful run for president back in 1988.

But unlike Kamala Harris, who can play the gender and race card and walk away scot-free, Biden actually suffered the consequences.

The scandal led to him “[dropping] out of the race,” says Levin.

To hear more of Levin’s commentary, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The Great Prosecutor’s record EXPOSED: ‘She’s never prosecuted a single case from beginning to end’



In addition to Trump hatred, the other pillar of Kamala Harris’ campaign is her claims that she was this brutal prosecutor in California, where she served as San Francisco’s district attorney from 2004 to 2011 and the state’s attorney general from 2011 to 2017.

Allow Mark Levin to set the record straight.

“She talks about her prosecutorial record, [but] she's never prosecuted a single case from beginning to end in what we call the first chair. That is, she's overseen an office. Now that's important, but when she says, 'I know these transnational gangs, I prosecuted them' — no, she didn’t,” says Levin. “I've looked everywhere ... nothing, zero.”

When it came to prosecuting members of the clergy accused of sexual abuse in San Francisco during her reign as district attorney, “Kamala Harris didn’t do a damned thing; she didn’t bend a finger,” says Levin.

As California’s AG, “she would prosecute people for marijuana use or the sale of minimal amounts of marijuana,” but “when she ran for attorney general,” she lied and said “she did not” prosecute people for marijuana, he adds.

However, Levin points to another source — an unlikely one — that’s also exposing Harris’ prosecutorial record: CNN.

In a recent piece, the network exposed two additional scandals related to Harris’ time as a prosecutor — the first being the murder of San Francisco police officer Isaac Espinoza by David Hill, an admitted gang member in 2004, right after Harris had been elected as the new DA.

Following Espinoza’s tragic death, she publicly announced that she would not seek the death penalty for Hill.

“Life without possibility of parole is a serious consequence,” she argued at the time.

However, 10 years later, when Harris became California’s attorney general, she defended capital punishment when a judge tried to rid the state of the death penalty.

The second scandal CNN unearthed related to California’s Truancy Law, which Harris vehemently championed as AG. Under this law, prosecutors could seek jail time for parents of truant children. And they did. Ayman and Alice Haddadin, whom CNN interviewed, had no criminal history whatsoever but were nonetheless arrested when their middle school son missed 12 nonconsecutive days of school due to severe allergy issues.

However, in 2019, when Harris first ran for president, she criticized California’s Truancy Law and said that it was “never the intention” to jail parents.

Harris is “a nasty person,” says Levin. “She’s coldblooded.”

To hear more of his commentary on Kamala Harris’ prosecutorial record, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Tim Walz says the Electoral College ‘needs to go.’ Mark Levin explains what that would look like



The Democrat Party claims to be the party of the people. Why then is one of Tim Walz’s goals to eliminate the Electoral College?

Earlier this month at a fundraiser hosted by the equally degenerate Gavin Newsom, Walz made the claim that “the Electoral College needs to go.”

If Democrats succeed in this evil endeavor, “11 blue states will decide the president,” and “all the rest of the country – the 39 other states, tens of millions of people – will literally have no say in the election of the president,” Mark Levin explains.

Campaigning will take place “mostly in the cities,” meaning the people who live in more rural areas or work in industries such as agriculture, natural resources, and the like “will have no representation whatsoever.”

“The big metropolitan cities will decide who's president, which would be an utter and complete disaster, but the Democrat Party wants monopoly,” says Levin, adding that in addition to eliminating the Electoral College, the party also wants to “eliminate the filibuster” so that the party can rapidly pass laws “that will be impossible to undo.”

Then “they'll say, ‘We don't need to amend the Constitution; we're going to pass two statutes – the District of Columbia gets two senators and Puerto Rico gets two senators.”'

That’s “four more Democrats,” says Levin. “The Senate will never overcome that; Republicans will never be in the majority again.”

A Harris-Walz regime “will change the voting system forever.”

To hear more of what this disastrous duo wants to change, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

‘Peace through strength’: SDI and the genius of Ronald Reagan



Mark Levin had the privilege of serving in Ronald Reagan’s administration as a chief of staff, so he knows what he’s talking about when he says that Reagan, who he calls “a genius,” was the brain behind the idea of peace through strength.

“He wanted to bring the most brilliant scientists in the United States together to figure out how to build a missile shield system,” which he called “the Strategic Defense Initiative — SDI,” says Levin, adding that Reagan was “mocked” and “attacked” for these ideas.

The Democrats accused him of “wasting money.” They said “it was an excuse not to reduce nuclear arms.” They called him “a dunce” and “a cowboy” and joked that the program was playing a game of “Star Wars.” They even “made every budgetary movement they possibly could to try and block it.”

One person took Reagan’s SDI program seriously — Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, the last leader of the Soviet Union before it was dismantled.

Even Gorbachev himself admitted that “SDI was a game changer because the Soviets could never keep up with our technological knowhow, our scientific capabilities, and they certainly wouldn't have the money to build this system,” Levin recounts.

Israel also saw the program’s merit.

It “took the idea” and “refined it” to suit its unique needs — an adoption that has been hugely beneficial for the country.

“Like no other country on the face of the Earth, the Israelis have a strategic defense missile defense system, and thank God they do,” says Levin.

America, on the other hand, is “laying naked,” he warns.

To hear more of Levin’s analysis, watch the clip above.

Want more from Mark Levin?

To enjoy more of "the Great One" — Mark Levin as you've never seen him before — subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.