WATCH: Tulsi Gabbard brilliantly explains why she left the Democratic Party — 'It is the height of hypocrisy'
A lot of conservative eyes are on Tulsi Gabbard right now, especially since Donald Trump listed her as a potential VP candidate.
Back in 2022, Gabbard formally departed from the left, and while she doesn’t necessarily see every issue through a conservative lens, she’s nonetheless woken up to “the extremism in the Democrat party,” says Dave Rubin.
In a recent interview with Lex Fridman, Gabbard explained the reasoning behind her partisan transition.
“You were a longtime Democrat,” began Fridman. “Now, you’re an independent. ... Why did you choose to leave the Democratic Party?”
Gabbard explained that there were “a number of central reasons why [she] made that choice” but “fundamental to them is that the Democratic party has become a party that is opposed to freedom, that is opposed to the central and foundational principles that exist within our founding documents and that serve as the identity of who we are as Americans and what this country is supposed to be about.”
“It has become a party that is controlled by this elitist cabal of warmongers who are driving forward this quote unquote woke agenda, and we see it through their racializing of everything; we see it through their defund the police mission; we see this through their open border policies; we see this through how their education policy is failing our kids,” she explained, adding that Democrats “are pushing this narrative that ultimately is a rejection of objective truth.”
For example, “They are actively pushing for boys who identify as girls to compete against girls in sports; [they are] changing our language so that the word woman – the identity of being a woman – is essentially being erased from our society.”
“It is the height of hypocrisy and frankly an act of hatred toward women,” Gabbard added.
Above all, “The Democratic party has become a party that is so consumed by their desire for power – this insatiable hunger for power – that they are willing to destroy our republic, our democracy, our freedom just so they can hold onto power and gain more power.”
Dave notes that Gabbard was “the last one in [the 2020 presidential race] against [Joe Biden].”
“That might have been the last moment the Democrats had a choice, and now they don’t have a choice anymore,” he says.
To hear Gabbard’s brilliant exposure of everything wrong with the Democratic party, watch the clip below.
Want more from Dave Rubin?
To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.
'Save the country from these psycho Silicon Valley libs': Reactions to Elon Musk teasing 'new platform' to challenge Twitter, which he says 'fundamentally undermines democracy'
Elon Musk ignited a firestorm of speculation and optimism as he teased a potential "new platform" that could challenge Twitter for the title of "de facto public town square."
It all began on Friday when the Tesla CEO posted a poll on Twitter that asked the question: "Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy. Do you believe Twitter rigorously adheres to this principle?"
Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy.\n\nDo you believe Twitter rigorously adheres to this principle?— Elon Musk (@Elon Musk) 1648193692
Musk – who has over 79 million followers on Twitter – received more than 2 million votes on his survey. At the time of publication, over 70% of respondents declared that Twitter does not provide free speech to its users.
On Saturday, Musk reacted to the Twitter poll results and asked, "Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square, failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy. What should be done?"
The SpaceX founder also pondered, "Is a new platform needed?"
Is a new platform needed?— Elon Musk (@Elon Musk) 1648317242
Within four hours of posting his question, there were more than 26,000 replies on what Musk should or should not do about the issue of free speech on social media. Many commenters urged the billionaire business tycoon to buy Twitter and stop big tech censorship.
BlazeTV host Dave Rubin: "Maybe buying Twitter to clean it up makes sense, but maybe letting it die is best. @rumblevideo has the infrastructure and video capacity, @onlocals has the crowd funding and community building. PT is in on Rumble, I think you started something with him way back when!"
Managing director of Thiel Capital Eric Weinstein: "We need to invent something that fills this space that hasn't existed…yet. There are, unfortunately, several challenges that have prevented every previous attempt from working. This is very much an analytic problem of a particular kind. It’s not just lack of desire. Good luck."
Podcast host and computer scientist Lex Fridman: "Yes. I can build it."
Writer Katherine Brodsky: "The problem with new platforms is a) the alternatives are too political and b) those on Twitter have to start over on building their followings. How can they be moved over?"
Economist Brian Wesbury: "I'm on Twitter and Parler and others, but Twitter is still my go to. It's established…it has both sides…it just needs to stop canceling people. That's the problem with it.
Former MMA fighter Jake Shields: "We need a new platform but one that’s not a right wing echo chamber. I want to hear all perspective not one side."
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis spokesperson Christina Pushaw: "Buy this one!!!"
CEO Ryan Petersen: "Buy twitter Elon!"
Radio host Jason Rantz: "Buy Twitter."
Stock trader Timothy Sykes: "PLEASE BUY TWITTER AND MAKE IT BETTER!!!"
Radio host Buck Sexton: "Yes. Buy Twitter or please build one. Save the country from these psycho Silicon Valley libs."
Computer scientist Paul Graham: "That would be a waste of money. A decent team could reverse engineer a version 1 in a month."
Wall Street Bets chairman: "Just buy Twitter and change the bird logo to a doge," to which Musk responded, "Haha that would sick."
Cultural commentator Mike Cernovich advised Musk to purchase Twitter, and added, "If you’re a leftist making death threats against conservatives. or organizing riots, Twitter respects your freedom of speech. Twitter also respects the freedom of speech for media hoaxes like when every major outlet framed an innocent Covington high school kid."
Musk – who has a net worth of over $270 billion – replied, "Doesn’t sound very balanced."
Doesn\u2019t sound very balanced— Elon Musk (@Elon Musk) 1648318048
Joe Rogan blasts Anthony Fauci for public mistrust in science, says people are expected to believe him when he's '100 percent wrong'
Joe Rogan slammed Dr. Anthony Fauci on a recent episode of his hugely popular podcast, blaming the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for the public's mistrust in science and vaccine skepticism.
Rogan discussed the current conditions surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic with Lex Fridman, an "AI researcher working on autonomous vehicles, human-robot interaction, and machine learning at MIT."
"There's not enough authentic, strong leadership," Fridman stated. "We have somebody like Fauci, who basically nobody really trusts any more, as being the chief communicator of how we proceed forward. That's a huge problem."
Rogan noted, "You don't just have the fact that the people don't trust him, but you have the mainstream media ignoring all the things he's done to lead the people not to trust him."
Rogan stressed Fauci's shifting guidance on face masks, in which he initially said, "There's no reason to be walking around with a mask" in the spring of 2020. In January 2020, Fauci said, "The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person." However, a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in January 2021 suggests that asymptomatic infections account for more than half of all COVID-19 cases. Fauci also walked back the possibility of a lab-leak theory.
Rogan and Fridman claimed that Fauci wasn't transparent about gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute, which helped intensify the lab-leak theory. Rogan highlighted that Fauci's agency provided grants for bat coronavirus research to EcoHealth Alliance.
Fridman told the audience not to let "shady, greedy a**holes at the very top that are communicating science as part of our government be somehow connected to the essence of science."
"There's also a problem with people like him where they make these statements that you're led to believe they have an understanding of the situation ... but then it turns out they're 100% wrong. But then they come up with a new statement and you're supposed to believe that," Rogan said. "When they don't know, they never say 'We don't know.' They don't say, 'This is very confusing and we're trying to figure it out as we go along.'"
Rogan mocked the chutzpah of Fauci, who serves as President Joe Biden's chief medical adviser, by citing a quote that the notable immunologist said in June.
"A lot of what you're seeing as attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science, because all of the things that I have spoken about, consistently from the very beginning, have been fundamentally based on science," Fauci told NBC News host Chuck Todd.
Fridman believes that top health administrators let "power get to them," and "ego is the thing that destroys all awesome things."
Fridman said that he believes in the efficacy of the coronavirus vaccines, which decreases the risk of death from COVID-19.
"I think it's a wise choice to take the vaccine if you're at all concerned about ending up in the hospital," Fridman said.
During "The Joe Rogan Experience" podcast, the comedian acknowledged that his parents got vaccinated.
Rogan explained that he hoped that there would be a "push for health, there'd be a push for people to change their diet, start a rigorous exercise routine."
A study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed that 78% of people hospitalized for COVID-19 were overweight.
Rogan pointed out that "people don't trust pharmaceutical companies and haven't for a long time." Rogan and Fridman noted that the pharmaceutical companies are making enormous profits from the COVID-19 vaccines, which could mean that the "incentives are not well aligned."
Fridman argued that the United States should fully reopen and allow unvaccinated Americans to accept the risks of their decisions. Fridman also said that he is against any kind of vaccine passport.
"I don't trust the government enough to allow any kind of control of your ability to travel and your whereabouts," Rogan said of vaccine passports.
Earlier this month, Rogan railed against vaccine passports, warning they take America "one step closer" to a dictatorship. Rogan's comments drew the ire of the outrage mob, who attempted to cancel the massively successful podcast host.