Democrat legend attacks Jon Stewart of 'The Daily Show'  for lying to Democrats



If running on a platform that idolizes frivolous abortion, taxpayer-funded transgender surgeries for illegal immigrant inmates, the mutilation of children, DEI, and open borders isn’t considered “woke,” then most Americans don’t know what is.

Regardless, Bill Maher and Jon Stewart have apparently claimed that Kamala Harris did not run a “woke” campaign — and James Carville isn’t having it.

“I saw Bill Maher, I saw Jon Stewart, I saw different people,” Carville began in a video posted to social media, explaining that the discussions these figures had revolved around whether or not Harris’ woke campaign hurt Democrats' chances of beating Donald Trump.

“Of course it hurt us,” he said. “Jon Stewart says, ‘Well it couldn’t hurt because no Democrat ran on it.’ Of course they didn’t run on it, because it was even to the most clueless progressive that you could imagine, by that time, they knew it was a disaster. So in order to escape any responsibility, what happened, they said, ‘Well, that stuff was never used in 2024.’”


“Well, you’re f***ing wrong. It was used,” Carville continued. “In comedy, if you tell a bad joke, who gives a s***. You just tell a bad joke, and you throw the bad joke away. In politics, if you have a bad policy, particularly one as bad and stupid as this was, you may throw it away, but the other side gets to play.”

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” thinks Carville has made an excellent point.

“You’re making the right point there. You can’t run away from everything you just ran on. We’re watching them do it in real time, we’re watching them pretend they had nothing to do with any of this, but the entire Harris campaign was based on equity,” Rubin says.

“These were the people who every time we said, ‘Oh, you know, judging people by the color of their skin and not the color of their character, that’s a problem, that’s racism,’ they would be like, ‘No, no, no, we need quotas,’” he continues.

“So they ran on this, it was soundly rejected, and then to Carville’s point, now we get to use it against them. But they’re going to literally pretend they had nothing to do with it,” he adds.

Want more from Dave Rubin?

To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

‘They’re in a bubble’: How Jaguar TANKED an already-failing brand



Not only did British auto manufacturer Jaguar release a bizarre ad campaign featuring androgynous models — but the ads featured no cars.

“I have no idea what Jaguar is trying to sell us in that ad and who thought this was a good idea,” Jill Savage of “Blaze News Tonight” tells Matthew Peterson and WILL agency founder Isaac Simpson.

Simpson notes that in order to understand the ad, we also have to understand that Jaguar is a “failing brand” and that the brand has “been really struggling for a very long time.”

“So they’ve decided to switch everything over to EV, and they’re going to be 100% electric vehicles, and then not only that, they’re going to charge twice what they’re already charging for their cars,” Simpson explains.


This is where an ad like the one just released comes in as well as its rejection of its iconic logo that features a jaguar to one that just says “Jaguar” in futuristic handwriting.

“Clearly, they asked their marketing team to create a radical new approach to their branding,” Simpson says.

“I don’t think this was an ‘any publicity is good publicity situation,’” he continues. “I think that they’re in a bubble, and I think that the people that create the ads for this particular brand are just living in a bubble as we’ve seen so many times, time and time again with Bud Light and so many other brands.”

According to Simpson, the brand director, who was in charge of this campaign, is “the kind of guy who goes on stage, and he’s wearing a sheer, see-through shirt.”

“You could imagine the type of guy this is,” he says, adding, “They’ve just chased away all the people who would say, ‘Don’t do this.’”

Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Feminists fight back against the transgender agenda — but they’re the ones who started it



Transgenderism has seeped into even the highest levels of government, which has recently made waves as Reps. Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) have taken it upon themselves to fight it.

Mary Rooke, author of the Daily Caller column, believes that these transgender “rights” Johnson and Mace are fighting actually all started with women’s rights.

“I’ve been thinking about this for a really long time,” Rooke tells Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson of “Blaze News Tonight.” “One of the major things that I’ve come up with is the fact that it’s born and bred transgenderism.”

“Because of feminism, and its fight to erode the distinction between the sexes, there’s no longer a protected space for either one,” she continues. “I think that if our society can go back to a time, whenever common sense, and respect, and understanding of the dignity between the sexes can then become the focus of the conversation, then we can bring it back around where women don’t have to fight this hard to keep men in dresses out of our bathrooms.”


What’s so insane about this fight is that these spaces that men are attempting to infiltrate are places where young children and teenagers often frequent.

“This is just the insanity that we’re at right now, because we’ve no longer allowed men to come and protect us,” Rooke says.

While she appreciates representatives like Mace fighting this, Rooke is still skeptical.

“Whenever you dig into her history, she was the one that fought to tear down this space for men. She is the first graduate of the Citadel, which is a military college over there in the South, and she uses this as a point of pride for her,” Rooke explains.

“‘Look at me, I was able to break down this door of sexism, I was able to break down this door of misogyny, and here I am now being able to stand and fight for women,’” she continues. “What she doesn’t understand is that her fight was not against sexism and misogyny. In fact, what her fight actually did was remove spaces where men can be formed.”

Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

God never makes someone LGBTQ+: The 5 biggest victims of the rainbow agenda



I’ve spent the last few days walking the streets and alleys of one of my favorite small rural villages in the Northwest. The coffee, the flowers, the food, the views, everything is made so beautiful by the hearts and hands of these local artists.

Perhaps the only things more ubiquitous than the thoughtful touches of creativity are the LGBTQ+ pride flags and signs proclaiming things like “everyone is loved here” and "this is a safe place."

Really? Is everyone loved? Is everyone made more safe?

Amid all of this beauty, I find these messages strangely dissonant. Why? Because these signs aren’t loving to everyone, and they make some safe and others less safe. But the other side of these well-meaning messages is hidden. So we need to spotlight those being excluded and often injured by the ideology these messages are promoting. Pointing this out is important because the reason for the boldness with which shop owners and churches fly these flags betrays the fact they either don’t know or don’t care about the cruelty their “kindness” perpetrates on other parties.

Here are the five parties you choose to injure by flying your Pride flags.

Children

Celebrating LGBTQ+ pride is the practice of acting compassionate to some children while being cruel to others.

Children are hurt more than any other party by a culture that champions individual identities over family identities.

Flying these flags is a signal that the movement that says your sexuality is the place from which you form your deepest identity is deeply anti-family. The United States has now surpassed Sweden as the country with more single-parent households than any country in the world. The other thing that the U.S. and Sweden have in common (along with all the other top countries where family bonds dissolve most frequently) is these places are where hyper-individualism is being most aggressively embraced.

Stop disrespecting the gift of life given to you by your ancestors and celebrate continuing your family line — not ending it.

Children growing up without both a mother and father are at an enormous disadvantage. But even researchers who have most documented this fact refuse to draw the obvious connection between hyper-individualism and the refusal to create a culture that encourages children to find their identity in their family over their sexuality.

A culture championing hedonistic sexuality and the primacy of sexual identity may seem momentarily safer for someone wishing to explore alternative sexual identities. But it is decidedly neither safer nor more loving for countless millions of children affected by the weakening of the family that is the inevitable result.

Your ancestors

Every person you meet is part of a family line so resilient, so resourceful, so powerful that it stretches back unbroken to the very beginning of the human race.

Did thousands of your ancestors persevere through countless unremembered sacrifices in order for their descendants — at a time when we enjoy more peace and safety than they could ever have dreamed — to choose to end their family lines forever?

This alone is reason not to be proud of LGBTQ+ identities.

Challenges like same-sex attraction make the tragedy of ending a resilient family line more likely, but this is not something to celebrate. Stop disrespecting the gift of life given to you by your ancestors and celebrate continuing your family line — not ending it.

Your descendants

Much of our suffering is caused by our shortsighted forefathers, and we return the favor by ignoring how our decisions impact our descendants. Break this cycle in your generation.

I once read that when a Jewish child dies before having children, the family mourns not only the loss of that child but the 10,000 descendants of that child who now will never be born.

This, of course, is true at the death of any child. But today, instead of mourning the loss of descendants, we celebrate identities that make cutting off a person’s future descendants some kind of accomplishment.

The covenant of marriage

“It’s just a piece of paper …” No, a wedding is an act of covenant-making before God. This is a brilliant idea that gives stability to entire civilizations. We diminish its significance at our own peril.

The reason for the narrow sexual ethic in Scripture is to create a culture that promotes multigenerational families. One man and one woman for life is the only sexual ethic worth celebrating.

The reason we throw a party when a couple has stayed faithfully married for 50 years is that something remarkable has been genuinely accomplished, not just for that couple or for that couple’s family, but for society as a whole. Now that’s a flag worth flying.

The next time you see a business or church proclaiming their compassion, understand the real trade-off of cruelty they are celebrating as well.

Instead, today, we celebrate the bravery of people publicly championing their desires at the expense of others. Our culture refuses to face the fact that every time we loosen the biblical sexual ethic, we weaken the marriage covenant at the core of the family for future generations, and our grandchildren will pay the price.

The marriage covenant has never been weaker, starting with no-fault divorce and culminating in the redefinition of marriage to include alternative arrangements. We don’t see the cultural cruelty being unleashed by our supposed compassion because it launches a slow-moving disease that will be most fully experienced by those not yet born.

God

“As followers of Jesus, our allegiance is to the King, and His kingdom is our priority. Submitting to Christ as King is an act of worship.” —Bailey Gillespie

Last but not least: Any follower of Jesus believes that this world was designed for a purpose by an all-knowing, all-loving God.

These flags have become a growing symbol of conquest. They represent an alternate kingdom. They say, “We have dethroned Jesus and now worship the idol of self.”

God never makes someone LGBTQ+ — this is a false identity category created by a culture determined to free itself from the purpose behind its design. Yes, some struggle more than others to live in the design of the Creator, but we don’t celebrate the decision to give in to the wrong side of that struggle. We should have genuine compassion for these challenges without encouraging a lifestyle of sin along with all of the inevitable consequences that result.

So the next time you see a business or church proclaiming their "compassion," understand the real trade-off of cruelty they are celebrating as well.

We become what we celebrate, and today it takes wisdom and courage to stand up to the collective blindness to injuries and corruption being unleashed by this ideology.

This essay was adapted from an article originally published at Jeremy Pryor's Substack.

Why I choose candidates who defend my values over those who despise them



Kamala Harris has been speaking at churches over the past few weeks, including congregations in Atlanta and Philadelphia. While President Trump is expected to gain strong support from white evangelicals, Harris appears to be aiming for similar backing among black Christians. However, she represents a party whose top policy priorities — such as abortion and Pride Month celebrations — conflict with biblical teachings.

In politics, I believe values should always trump skin color. My faith shapes my views and my vote, even though I understand that no party or candidate can fully align with my beliefs. Ideally, a Christian should seek a candidate who shares, embodies, and legislates biblical values. This is the kind of leader with the character, understanding, and temperament to promote policies that support civil order and human flourishing. While some argue that morality can’t be legislated, few would dispute the need for laws against theft, perjury, or murder.

If using the Bible to dismantle racial discrimination was righteous in 1964, why is it hateful to use it to defend the unborn and uphold the sex binary in 2024?

Every law reflects someone’s belief system. Politicians with strong convictions on family, education, and public safety issues will often champion these values, even when others shy away. The principled politician uses the bully pulpit to promote a positive cultural vision, resisting the fierce political headwinds that protect the status quo.

Sometimes, no candidate running shares your values. When that happens, I turn to the next tier of candidates — those who respect, accept, and defend my values. For example, a politician doesn’t need to be a church deacon to see the hypocrisy of a city prohibiting a congregation from gathering outdoors during COVID-19 while allowing a large political march a month before a presidential election. Similarly, a candidate who sends their child to a private school can still advocate school choice policies that benefit working-class families.

On the other hand, a politician who sends their kids to an expensive private school but opposes programs that would extend this option to poor and working-class families represents the lowest tier of candidates. These politicians despise, condemn, and even criminalize my values. My primary identities are Christian, husband, and father — in that order. I cannot, in good conscience, vote for a politician whose policies are hostile to any of these. Colorado baker Jack Phillips spent over a decade fighting frivolous lawsuits because progressives view Christians who don’t conform to LGBT ideology as bigots.

Yes, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are on the ballot, but faithful Christians should see the 2024 election as less about a choice between two candidates and more about a clash of worldviews.

The vice president’s decision to make abortion the centerpiece of her campaign is a reflection of the modern left’s priorities. So was Joe Biden’s decision to appoint a man who “identifies” as a woman — Dr. “Rachel” Levine, born Richard — as the most visible figure in the nation’s public health system. Given the fact Harris bragged about providing surgery for transgender inmates while she was California’s attorney general, voters can expect even more radicalism if she becomes president.

It’s no surprise that the administration labels the social, chemical, and surgical “transition” of minors as “gender-affirming care” and criticizes conservative states attempting to ban such procedures on minors.

Democrats have elevated pride — a traditional deadly sin — to one of their three core virtues, alongside abortion and pagan Earth worship. This may sound simplistic to some, but progressives today are more vocal about promoting social norms tied to sexual orientation and gender identity than about advancing policies on labor or infrastructure.

This is why elected officials in federal, state, and local government all bow before the Pride flag. The mayor of New York City said drag queens are advancing a love of literacy in the nation’s largest school district. Wisconsin’s governor bragged on social media about signing a bill that would keep boys out of girls’ sports. In fact, it is far more difficult to find a congressional Democrat who affirms there are only two sexes than it is to find one who rejects the belief men can have babies.

The evidence is crystal clear: These aren’t your daddy’s Democrats.

On the other side is Donald Trump’s Make America Great Again movement. Like all slogans, people read meaning into those words in ways that sometimes sound absurd, including the assumption that the former president wants to return the country to the political and social norms of the Jim Crow South.

The core of the MAGA movement puts the interests of American citizens above those of foreign nations and international organizations. It advocates strong borders, lower taxes, domestic energy production, conservative judicial appointments, pro-life policies, a strong economy, law and order, school choice, and the natural family.

Nothing in this agenda conflicts with a Christian’s commitment to God. Loving our neighbors doesn’t mean encouraging them to reject their God-given bodies for a “gender identity” that leads to cross-sex hormones and genital mutilation.

Some Christians refuse to vote for Donald Trump due to his speech, demeanor, and conduct, arguing that character is an essential quality in a leader. However, a soft-spoken figure like Dr. Ben Carson can support both pro-manners and pro-MAGA policies, while today’s Democratic candidates at all levels of government align with pro-LGBT and pro-abortion agendas. Rejecting God’s creational work in Genesis isn’t a bug in the left’s political project — it’s a defining feature.

That said, an honest look at both parties should caution believers against equating the Republican Party with biblical values. I understand the concern. The GOP’s 2024 platform softened its language on key social issues like abortion and same-sex marriage. Trump has criticized pro-life laws in Florida and other states as too strict, although he consistently maintains that abortion laws should be decided at the state level.

Many Christians view a vote for the Harris-Walz ticket as a vote for civility, diversity, equity, and inclusion. Campaign surrogates use race and gender to persuade voters, from black men to white Christians, into supporting politicians who oppose their values. Americans — regardless of color — should not fall for this trap. If using the Bible to dismantle racial discrimination was righteous in 1964, why is it hateful to use it to defend the unborn and uphold the sex binary in 2024?

Buck Angel: Did Josh Seiter go TOO FAR with his trans hoax?



When former "Bachelorette" hopeful Josh Seiter first sat down with Alex Stein of “Prime Time with Alex Stein,” Stein made it clear that he thought the 37-year-old was trolling the country by pretending to be transgender.

Months later, he reappeared on Stein’s podcast — only to tell him that he was right all along.

“For the last five months, I’ve been conducting a social experiment online to expose how gullible and how delusional the left is,” Seiter told Stein. “The whole idea of postmodern gender ideology is ridiculous and absurd, and I tried to be the most extreme version of it and take it to its logical end to show how ridiculous it is that people can actually believe that biological men are magically transformed into women because they are having a gender crisis.”


Now, Buck Angel — who is a transexual himself — is telling Stein whether or not he believes Seiter took his experiment too far.

“I think that he made a very strong point that a man can just put on a dress and all of a sudden go urinate in the little girl’s room next to a little girl, and a lot of people accepted him. A lot of people called him out, you were calling him out from the beginning. So was he good, or was he bad, in your opinion?” Stein asks Angel.

“Somebody had to do it,” Angel says. “If we were going to continue on the road we’re going on, we are in a lot of trouble, seriously. Not only the trans space, but your space, the whole world is in a lot of trouble. We’ve got to watch out for these young people, and women’s sports is being destroyed by these people.”

“So, yeah, I actually appreciate what he did do,” he continues. “I think what he did is on some level a service to the trans activism and community so we can see that we need to pull back. We need to pull back on the reins and say that we are going too fast, and we are destroying a good thing for all of us transsexual people.”

Want more from Alex Stein?

To enjoy more of Alex's culture jamming, comedic monologues, skits, and street segments, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Wokeness is 'locked into Democrat DNA'; dooms Kamala’s 2024 campaign



Americans are waking up, and the woke agenda is losing its hold on our great country — which might spell disaster for Kamala Harris’ flailing 2024 campaign.

“You kind of wonder why they go down this road, when we’re having this kind of big conversion in the United States, a United States that kind of took up the mantle of this woke revolution for a while and has now really started to reject it,” Stu Burguiere of “Stu Does America” comments.

The Economist has also recently published an article titled “America is becoming less woke,” which states through statistical analysis that woke opinions and practices are on the decline.


“It’s true,” Stu comments. “I think it’s something that we’ve all sort of felt over the past couple of years. You know, there was that crazy point where everyone seemed to have a DEI person in their company, and everything was woke all the time, and it does seem to have died down a little bit now.”

However, the Democrat Party seems to be delusionally holding on tight to its woke ideology.

“Is the Democratic Party right now just really out of step with what America is doing?” Stu asks. “We have these emotional reactions. The nation had one after George Floyd, but eventually, sober reality comes back, and all of a sudden you’re like wait a minute, what did we change about our society?”

“Here in America, the Democrats took that George Floyd era and locked it into their DNA, and now they are the arbiters of all that is woke and all that is right to say. They embrace stuff like radical racial ideology from CRT and DEI and Ibraham X. Kendi and all the people that you know, all the names that you know, they embraced that. They embraced it hard-core,” he continues, adding, “And America didn’t.”

The Democrat Party has attempted to rectify this with campaign ads like its “man enough” ad, which featured a slew of men saying they are “man enough” to support women who want to make their own decisions about their bodies or run for president.

“I still look at that and I can’t believe it’s real,” Stu comments. “You watch that and you realize exactly what’s happened with our country and what’s happened with the Democratic Party. Why is this failing so bad?”

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'Craziness': IOC spokesperson claims no 'reliable' test to determine a male from a female



Jennifer Sey is a former pro athlete and brand president of Levi’s — who is now a fierce advocate for saving women’s sports from being infiltrated by men.

“I swear I’m going to lose my mind,” Sey tells James Poulos of “Zero Hour.” “The spokesperson for the IOC just said this morning there’s no reliable test to tell the difference between males and females.”

While Poulos and Sey agree that what’s been happening is absolute insanity, Sey believes it’s “deliberately obtuse and politically motivated.”

“The other argument they use is, ‘Any test we might do is just too intrusive,’” Sey continues. “Well, I will tell you, as an internationally competitive athlete that competed before this, before we didn’t think the tests were accurate, we were tested regularly for drug use.”


“We had to pee in a cup in front of a person at every national and international competition,” she says. “I didn’t even think it was intrusive. I wanted it to be fair, I wanted a fair fight in the competition.”

“I can always accept losing if it’s a fair fight,” she adds, explaining that something like 85% of female athletes are in favor of testing for sex eligibility simply because “they too want a fair fight.”

Two major stories from earlier this year surrounded the boxers who failed the sex eligibility tests but were allowed to compete against women in the 2024 Olympics regardless of the results.

“They did not challenge the testing results in the court of arbitration, which might suggest they knew that the testing results were accurate, and since then, the IOC has snatched regulation and oversight of boxing away from that individual sports governing body,” Sey says.

Boxing is now the only sport in the Olympics being governed directly by the International Olympic Committee.

“This male boxer punches a woman repeatedly while she’s up against the ropes, with her throat against the rope, in the back of the head. Not disqualified,” She says, adding, “these female boxers are being told to sit down, shut up, take it. This is what you have to do to be inclusive.”

“Craziness,” Poulos comments in disbelief.

Want more from James Poulos?

To enjoy more of James's visionary commentary on politics, tech, ideas, and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

'Trans' male athlete caused her brain bleed — now she’s speaking out



Payton McNabb is a former volleyball player who suffered devastating injuries at the young age of 17, when her team was faced with a transgender player on the opposite end of the court.

“I’m not tall enough to block, so I never block. I always just do tips, and it works for every other team except for this one,” McNabb tells Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable.” “I was back there and I got hit right in the face, they guess it was about 70 miles per hour."

“It knocked me unconscious, he spiked the ball,” she says, adding, “I love sports, it’s brought so much into my life. But unfortunately, everything was taken away that day, because of a boy. And it was just completely avoidable, which is the thing, so that’s why it’s so frustrating to me.”


While women who play sports are told that injuries are unavoidable no matter who’s on the other team, McNabb completely disagrees.

“You’re going to get hurt, which like obviously, but not to that extreme of an injury, unless you’re playing against a boy,” she says.

McNabb recalls being unconscious for 30 seconds, and when she came to, she heard a scream in the background, while the rest of the gym went silent.

“Once I woke up, the trainer for the other team, he asked me if I knew what just happened to me. And I was like, ‘Yeah, that boy just hit me in the face,’” McNabb explains. “We were not allowed to talk about it, so he didn’t know what to say, so he just kind of rushed me off the court.”

The doctors immediately referred McNabb to a neurologist when it became obvious that she was suffering from a brain bleed.

“I was just completely off, I was repeating things over and over again, I was sleeping all the time, didn’t have any balance really, was falling everywhere, my memory was just not good. It was a really hard time,” she explains, noting that her official diagnosis was a brain bleed, a concussion, and permanent whiplash.

“You’re lucky that your neck didn’t or your spinal cord didn’t actually snap,” Stuckey says, disturbed.

“That’s what the doctor said, and they were so confused on how I got this bad of an injury in a high school volleyball game,” she says, adding, “so then my mom finally had to be like, ‘Well, it was a guy.’”

Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?

To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Josh Seiter FAKED being trans to troll the left



Alex Stein was right.

A few months ago, he called out former "Bachelorette" star Josh Seiter for faking his gender transition in order to troll the world — and Seiter is now confirming Stein’s original suspicions.

“Well, I’ve got to be honest. For the last five months I’ve been conducting a social experiment online to expose how gullible and how delusional the left is,” Seiter tells Stein of “Prime Time with Alex Stein.”

“You were accepted by some, you were demonized by most, and now you’re saying this was all a ruse, this was a social experiment,” Stein says. “So, what you did is arguably one of the greatest social experiments of our modern internet age in my opinion.”


“Any biological man putting on woman-face and putting on makeup is pulling a stunt,” Seiter explains. “They are faking being a woman. And, so what I did was I faked being a faker. I pretended to be a pretender. We are all the same. We’re all men that were putting on makeup and dressing and claiming we were women.”

“And I hope that this could help some people understand that just because you put on dresses and makeup as a man, doesn’t magically make you a woman,” he adds.

Stein, who has put on tuck-friendly bathing suits in Target and pretended to be transgender for a short period of time himself in order to drive that same point home, is impressed by Seiter’s dedication to his experiment.

“You actually stayed in character for months on end, did multiple interviews, went on multiple shows,” Stein says. “Behind closed doors, I’m sure you didn’t pretend to be a woman, but you stayed in character every moment even when you’re just talking to somebody casually. So really, you’re an incredible actor Josh.”

“I think any trans person is an incredible actor. They’re all pretending to be something they’re not,” Seiter responds. “I hope I showed how ridiculous and absurd it is.”

Want more from Alex Stein?

To enjoy more of Alex's culture jamming, comedic monologues, skits, and street segments, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.