How NATO’s ‘model intervention’ shattered Libya and Europe



In 2010, Muammar Gaddafi made a dire prediction about Europe’s future. While negotiating a deal with Italy to prevent African migrants from using Libya as a gateway to Europe, he warned: “Tomorrow, Europe might no longer be European … as there are millions who want to come in. … We don't know if Europe will remain an advanced and united continent or if it will be destroyed, as happened with the barbarian invasions.”

A year later, Gaddafi was dead. His removal during an Arab Spring uprising created a power vacuum in Libya, allowing nearly a million migrants from Africa and the Middle East to cross the country unchecked into Europe — just as he had foreseen. Years later, the Migration Policy Institute described Libya’s continued instability, stating: “Post-Gaddafi, the trade and extortion of human beings became a central source of income for communities in Libya, often to the migrants’ detriment.”

No territorial body — whether in Africa, Europe, or anywhere else — can truly function as a nation without securing its borders.

At the peak of the migration surge into Europe in 2015, Libya became a primary transit point, with nearly 200,000 migrants per year making the journey. Smugglers charged between $5,000 and $6,000 per person to cross the Mediterranean on unsafe dinghies. Many landed first on the Italian island of Lampedusa before continuing to welfare-rich destinations like Germany and Sweden.

That same year, a separate wave — the “European migrant crisis” — unfolded, likely influenced by Libya’s collapse. This migration, largely over land, passed through the Middle East, Turkey, and Greece before reaching Germany, where then-Chancellor Angela Merkel welcomed the influx.

The 15th anniversary of Gaddafi’s warning is also a reminder of NATO’s direct role in his downfall. The U.S.-led alliance, facing unprecedented criticism from the current White House, orchestrated the dictator’s removal in 2011. The Arab Spring provided a pretext to eliminate a longtime regional obstacle, setting the stage for the chaos that followed.

Libya remains far from recovery and needless to say has not transitioned into a Western-style democracy. Instead, it resembles a slightly less chaotic version of Iraq, marked by deep tribal and factional divisions. However, a 2017 agreement between Italy and the Libyan coast guard has significantly reduced migrant crossings from Libya to Europe. Meanwhile, rising foreign-led terrorism and organized crime in Germany and Sweden have bolstered the appeal of right-wing populist movements.

NATO’s removal of Gaddafi, once hailed as a “model intervention” by Foreign Affairs, exposed the fundamental flaw of nation-building — failing to account for the vacuum left behind (or, really, just the folly of nation-building itself).

More than a decade later, Libya, like Iraq and Syria, remains fractured not just along political lines but also by tribal and ethnic divisions. Under Gaddafi, Libya had been both a destination and transit hub for migrants, particularly black Africans seeking work in the oil industry. After his fall, many became victims of racial violence and even enslavement by local militias and Islamist groups.

Barack Obama later admitted that failing to plan for Libya’s post-Gaddafi future was his “worst mistake” as president. Reflecting on the crisis, he noted that any stable government must first control its own borders. Given the source, the irony is unmistakable. But the point remains: No territorial body — whether in Africa, Europe, or anywhere else — can truly function as a nation without securing its borders.

Assad’s Downfall Proves Neocons Have Learned Nothing From Disastrous Middle East Meddling

Neocons jumped to celebrate the downfall of Assad, heedless of the power vacuum that will give opportunities to terrorists.

Opponents Of Ukraine War Funding Persuaded U.S. Allies To Finally Increase Defense Spending

The lack of consensus about America’s 'policeman of the world' strategy is persuading our allies to meet the military commitments we have long been demanding of them.

Letters to the Editor: Fat Terrorists, Unruly Interns, and More!

These duties include the periodic disgorgement of Diddle's Mailsack™ in order to read and respond to your questions and concerns. Most of your letters were unfit for publication, but I managed to find a handful deserving of my consideration. Enjoy!

The post Letters to the Editor: Fat Terrorists, Unruly Interns, and More! appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

FACT CHECK: Video Does Not Show Fighting Between Hamas And Israeli Troops

'The video was published in 2020. The video was taken in Libya, not in Israel or Gaza'

1,000 U.S. Soldiers In Niger Need To Come Home Right Now

[rebelmouse-proxy-image https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Screenshot-2023-10-27-at-5.41.59 AM-1200x675.png crop_info="%7B%22image%22%3A%20%22https%3A//thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Screenshot-2023-10-27-at-5.41.59%5Cu202fAM-1200x675.png%22%7D" expand=1]Eighty-six senators chose to stand idly by as the president sends their constituents' sons and daughters into harm’s way with no clear objective.

Focusing On Russia Instead Of China Would Be The United States’s Biggest Foreign Policy Mistake Ever

Recent conservative restraint and realist gains risk being reversed if realists continue to play defense on the rhetorical field of ‘values.’

Hunter Biden Requested More Than $2 Million To Unfreeze Libyan Assets When Dad Was VP

Hunter Biden requested a $2 million annual retainer and "success fees" to help unfreeze Libyan assets when his father, Joe Biden, was vice president, according to emails reviewed by Business Insider.

The post Hunter Biden Requested More Than $2 Million To Unfreeze Libyan Assets When Dad Was VP appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

New emails show Hunter Biden wanted $2 million for his help to unfreeze Libyan assets



Newly released emails sent by Democratic donors and business contacts of Hunter Biden's reveal that the president's son wanted a $2 million retainer for his help freeing up billions of dollars in Libyan assets that were frozen by the Obama administration, Business Insider reported.

The emails are not directly connected to other controversial emails from Hunter Biden's laptop regarding business dealings with Ukrainians, but they do show how Biden's status as the then-vice president's son and his connections within the Obama administration were seen as valuable by those who wanted to buy influence.

The first email reported by Insider is from Jan. 28, 2015, and was sent by Sam Jauhari, a Democratic donor with businesses in the Persian Gulf. He sent the email to Sheikh Mohammed al-Rahbani, an Obama campaign donor involved in the project to unfreeze the Libyan assets. The email assesses Hunter Biden's strengths as a potential partner but also his weaknesses, namely drug addiction and other vices, and what he wanted in return for his help:

Per phone conversation I met with #2 son. He wants $2 per year retainer +++ success fees. He wants to hire his own people - it can be close circle of people for confidentiality. His dad is deciding to run or not.

His positives are he is Chairman of UN World Food Program, son of #2 who has Libya file, access to State, Treasury, business partner SofS [Secretary of State] J. [John] Forbes K [Kerry] son and since he travels with dad he is connected everywhere in Europe and Asia where M. Q. [Muammar Qaddafi] and LIA [Libya Investment Authority] had money frozen. He said he has access to highest level in PRC [China], he can help there.

His negatives are that he is alcoholic, drug addict - kicked [out] of U.S. Army for cocaine, chasing low class hookers, constantly needs money-liquidity problems and many more headaches.

We should meet in Gstraad or London to decide next steps.

Some details of the email are erroneous. Biden was discharged from the Navy Reserve, not the Army. And he was the chairman of World Food Program USA, a nonprofit charity based in Washington, D.C., that supports the U.N. World Food Programme, not a member of the actual U.N. body.

The fact remains, however, that Jauhari and al-Rahbani were interested in buying Biden's influence. While Muammar Qaddafi was in power, the Obama administration froze $15 billion in Libyan assets. Jauhari and his partners believed they could earn as much as 5% of whatever funds they could free for Libya, profits in the range of hundreds of millions of dollars. According to Insider, the $2 figure is shorthand for $2 million. Beyond his $2 million retainer, Hunter Biden stood to gain a portion of "success fees" if the deal went through.

As the email shows, Hunter Biden's relationship with his father, President Joe Biden, was valued because of the doors knowing the vice president would open. These interested parties sought to pay Hunter Biden to convince government officials like his father to change U.S. policy toward the Libyan assets so that everyone involved could make money.

The second email is from Feb. 26, 2016, and shows the plans for the Libya project were carried into 2016. According to Insider, in this email "Jauhari and al-Rahbani receive a report by John Sandweg, a Washington lawyer who had served as acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement under Obama."

Sandweg had contacted Biden's team about the deal and reported their conditions:

I spoke with HB's team yesterday. They are interested in the project, but emphasized that for them to get involved, the team (lobbyists, lawyers and PR) would need to be a small group of folks they have a tight relationship with. They do not want a large group involved and they only want people with whom they have a close relationship with due to the sensitivities surrounding their involvement.

Though the deal never went through, the fact remains that Hunter Biden was willing to be involved, as he gave his partners a quote. He also wanted to keep the deal secret, as evidenced by his desire to "hire his own people" for "confidentiality." Why? "His dad is deciding to run or not." Buying and selling influence with the vice president might not look good for a possible presidential bid.

Indeed, Joe Biden's connections to his son's business deals became an issue in the 2020 presidential campaign after the New York Post reported emails from Hunter Biden's laptop indicating that the younger Biden introduced his father to potential foreign business partners.

Taken together, all these emails show a clear pattern of the Biden family being willing to sell influence gained from public office to profit personally.